₦airaland Forum

Maynman:
And you trying to determine for others what is moral or not is the highest form of immorality, because you read a book and think you know the “absolute standard of wrong or right”, only extremists think like this.

If it’s so wrong then tell your god to do something, don’t be like some muslims suicide bombers, why are you fighting for your god?

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

LegalWolf:
Future thief oooo 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

LegalWolf:
Hey FxMasterz

It’s your penchant for stupidity for me. Like we just did, so you would expect me to be arguing blindly with you when your evidence is shaky and spooky at best. Your evidence will contradict you and you’ll expect me to still go and bring evidence to disprove what is non-existent. Really?

Lol!

Cc: future thief TenQ

LegalWolf:
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL - its even the audacity of a future thief to think they do not have answers. Please answer AbuTwins questions and stop dribbling around, ehn future thief Tenq

cc: sirtee15 fxmasterz future thief TenQ

LegalWolf:
Hahahaha future thief oooooo. When I’m looking for opinion of prospective thieves, I’ll come back to this. But for now, sit this one out 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂

LegalWolf:
It appears the truth is antithetical to your nature, like I have always known. Simple explanation, you are writing volumes



Quite irrelevant to the question I asked.



Unnecessary divergent tactics. You are not even sure of which source to rely on. The independent source you provided which I agree with says the origin of the name is uncertain and probably derives from Samaria. Explain what you understand by that. Shikena!



You went to school now - we are dealing with an independent source not some useless book forged over the years by some deluded cretins. Tell us, in clear and unambiguous terms, your interpretation of your independent source. All these nonsense won't help you.



Please wonder later. But answer the two questions. Your independent source said the origin of the word is uncertain. What do you think that means. It went further to say it probably derives from Samaria. What again do you think that means. Keep It Short and Simple as someone who TenQ knows always say.

cc my nairaland nemesis future thief TenQ and his other folks sirtee15 and fxmasterz

Maynman:
Customs is never the same in different societies, there may be similarities.

Maynman:
Your definition of “truth” and what it should be or not, is also subjective to yourself, it’s just like a story of blind men and a elephant.
How do you know your truth is the truth?
Where is truth and false located?

Putin and Russain army are doing their work which is to defend their country.
Justice is doing your own work.

Maynman:
Quote the law of biology.

The surgery bob risky did, does not require the knowledge of biology?

Maynman:
Morality has always been subjective, people come together for a common custom and manner.

Do you think if you go back in time and wore a clothe, these people will consider you any more moral?
And if they see a modern woman dressing almost naked, do you think they will chide her?

Maynman:
Still your subjective opinion.

Another person will also claim “There is the highest Source to which I cannot negotiate with that said that!
I have to comply even if it doesn't agree with what favours me”.

That’s why we have suicide bombers killing for the “highest source” and they can’t negotiate it even if they don’t want to die.
What they have forgotten is that the books they read about the “highest source” and the characters in it are from a Specific CUSTOM.

Laughing in jewish

Maynman:
If anyone is going to answer it, it’s going to be based on his subjective opinion.

And is it objective or subjective to dictate to an adult what they should do with their OWN body?

Your answer will still be subjective.

Maynman:
Does challenging a law that doesn’t favor you, make you moral or not?

Maynman:
Note:
Your opinion is SUBJECTIVE.


The subjective and the objective, go together, you can’t have one without the other, and that’s because they are ONE, just like a magnet has positive and negative poles, they seem different, they act different but they still come from ONE MAGNET.
Nothing is either good or bad, our thinking makes it so.

Manner: a characteristic or customary
mode of acting.

Custom: a usage or practice common to many or to a particular place or class or habitual with an individual

Maynman:
You should run through history from the shamanism age to the agrarian age to the technology age you have now, then you will get better understanding of “morals/customs”.

Maynman:
What you are advocating for is Theocracy and it will do more harm than good. Anyone can claim “higher source”.
Seun kuti once made a remark “if there are no gods, there are no kings”.

Maynman:
You asserting your opinion is SUBJECTIVE.
Who is “I”?

Which objective law says I should take your “assertions” serious?

Maynman:
Which objective law made it so that the earth is carved into “countries”?
Is it moral for earth to be separated by borders called “countries” ?
What is wrong in travelling all over the earth, why do i need a “visa”?
Who made the rules of “Visa”?

Maynman:
If you think one is right or wrong, it depends on the custom of where you are and what they do.

That’s exactly the origin of the word “moral”.

excanny:
When did honesty, trustworthiness become my personal morality?

Maynman:
Who is the “me” that it is favoring?
Your ego?

One of the greatest laws in your New Testament is to do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
That’s the basis of morality.

Maynman:
“I said” is that not subjective?

You are already proving the point.

Maynman:
It means EVERYTHING, and it keeps changing through Subjective discussions, we have lawmakers making laws everyday In nigeria.
How were the israelites able to gather in harmony before the 10 commandments if they didn’t have mutual agreement?

The greatest law is the golden law, “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”.

The inside and the outside, the subjective and the objective, the self and other go together.
There is an harmony and unbreakable harmony, concordant relationship,
The 2 processes, the 2 behaviors are one.
You can’t have objective without subjective.

excanny:
I never mentioned anything about my morality neither did i give any personal judgment on morality. Please read well.

excanny:
A
..
My utmost desire is to raise my children as straight up Atheists, no need wasting thing on fake concepts like religions, but at same time with good morals (logical, truthful, kind, trustworthy, and a couple of good societal values).
..

Maynman:
We should start from the origin of the word “morality”.
And nothing is either good or bad, our thinking makes it so, morals are always changing.
Good and bad exist for each other.

excanny:
A
..
My utmost desire is to raise my children as straight up Atheists, no need wasting thing on fake concepts like religions, but at same time with good morals (logical, truthful, kind, trustworthy, and a couple of good societal values).
..

AbuTwins:
But this your question makes no sense! Just as the ones below may make no sense to you!

It's just like asking why did only Jesus have to die for everyone's sin when there are others before him!
Why would God forbid murder but send his son to be murdered, putting salvation on what he has forbidden?
Why would God personally give David many wives but allegedly promote one wife for man?
Same God that made laws protecting the second wife is the same one Christians believe instituted one wife per husband!
Why would God gave Old testament for some and New Testament for others?
Why are many laws from the Old testament (like a widow sleeping with her husband's brother to produce offspring for him) shunned today?
Why didn't Jesus get married and have kids since he was God 100% and man 100%? Was he barren? Does he have functional sex organ with potent sex cells?
Why was Enoch and Elijah not killed but vanished but John the Baptist and Jesus were?
Why would Elisha cursed 42 kids in the name of the LORD to be mauled by bears but Jesus on the other embraced kids?

SIRTee15:
The guy is a joker!!!
Maybe he's googling his new response. Let's give him time.

excanny:
A little about my background. I was raised as a religious Christian and made to read the Bible from start to end continuously on a yearly basis. This deep studying exposed me to seeing the many inconsistencies in the Bible and question my beliefs.

I also spent some time studying some other religious texts from Islam(English versions of Quran and haddiths), Buddhism and some Hinduism, before accepting Atheism as what works for me.

My utmost desire is to raise my children as straight up Atheists, no need wasting thing on fake concepts like religions, but at same time with good morals(logical, truthful, kind, trustworthy, and a couple of good societal values).

But I've been wondering whether it's ideal to expose them to religious texts, so they can easily see the fallacies of religions or to completely ignore religious texts and focus on scientific reasoning and logic?

Anyone in same boat?

SIRTee15:
Stop calling my name if u not ready to answer my question.
Teach us Arabic...what's the etymology of the word al- samiri found in your Koran.

tonye33:
I have been married for 14 YEARS and 'we' have 3kids(all boys) but none of them belongs to me.

5years before I met my wife, I was involved in a car accident together with two of my friends. We were traveling from Lagos to Abuja and our car skidded off the road.
I was the only survivor of that accident, my friends died. I spent about 11months at the hospital and that left me with a condition that says I can't have children.

I gave my life to Jesus Christ and became a committed Christian after the incident.

In summary I became a pastor in a local church in my community 5years later and met my wife in the process.

I did not tell her about my condition because I was hopeful that God will heal me.

6 years into our marriage, my wife got pregnant and had 'our' first child.

To be sure, I secretly went for a DNA and it was clear I wasn't the father. I repeated the test for all 3 children and they are all not mine.

I have been living with this situation for the past 8 years and I am beginning to get irritated by both the children and my wife.
My wife pretends to be a good wife. She goes around preaching to women in the church about the need to remain faithful to their partners but she has had 3 children by another man or men I don't know.

I want to confront her, but I am confused as to how to go about the situation.
I am just angry and irritated by everyone in my house lately. I feel like a total stranger in my own home.

What should I do!?

--Please advise him.

honesttalk21:
Credibility of the Hebrew Bible as a source for ancient Israel’s history has been disputed since at least the mid-1970s, when the historicity of the patriarchs of Genesis suffered a serious blow in the works of Thomas L. Thompson and John Van Seters

honesttalk21:
I never say Moses is a Samarian.

Canaan is the ancient name of a vast and prosperous country, roughly located in the same place as modern-day Palestine and Israel.

Samaria is a historic and biblical name used for the central region of Palestine.

Going by the book of Genesis, variations about the time for the domestication of the Camel is an indication of an anachronism in the Bible.This forerunner book of the bible reports that camels were mainstay beasts of burden and transportation at the time of Abraham, in the 18th century BCE though it was originally thought that camels were first domesticated in the Middle East no earlier than the 12th century BCE.