₦airaland Forum

LegalWolf:
Hehehehe potential thief writing nothing else than gibberish… Lol!

Haakeem:
Jazāk Allāhu Khayran.
Any religion apart from Islam is a counterfeit.
Quote me any where.

blackyooo:
so basically jesus is human and God to you right? so if jesus decided to have intimacy with woman that means God have intimacy with human woman?

MightySparrow:
[53]Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
[54]Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
[55]For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
[56]He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
[57]As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
[58]This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

John 6:53-58


These are the very words of Jesus.

The question is: why would Father need a Son for the redemption of mankind?

LegalWolf:
Tell me: in truth, calling you a potential thief, future thief, destined armed robber, Oyenusi mentee, Lawrence TenQnih etc. gets to you right? It pains you a lot, huh ?🤔

If doesn’t, good for you. But it does, fa fa fa…. Foul! Omo, you’ll cry eternity o

LegalWolf:
Lol, almost everywhere in the world, Truth is a defence to Slander my potential thief. Again, when next are you pushing a thread out there?

Since you may even fabricate a response, I await your next topic. I’ll be here to remind you. Lol 😂

LegalWolf:
Lol, almost everywhere in the world, Truth is a defence to Slander my potential thief. Again, when next are you pushing a thread out there?

Since you may even fabricate a response, I await your next topic. I’ll be here to remind you. Lol 😂

LegalWolf:
Hehehehe potential thief writing nothing else than gibberish… Lol!

LegalWolf:
Hey Potential Thief TenQ

Enough back and forth. Write a topic and mention me and all Muslims and let me enjoy myself cAlling you a destined thief. Ce fini!

When next should we be expecting your new topic, ehn future thief TenQ 😜

LegalWolf:
Like I once said, you’re too used to stray humans and it’s not my duty to teach you

Just to clarify so it doesn’t go under the rug, you never forced me to adopt anyones position. You asked me a question and I told you someone else has answered it and I don’t see the need to repeat the response.

Now, this is where it gets interesting. Simple answer to your question is NO. But I don’t know the word or spirit of God has blood which is needed by God to forgive. Please point it to me

LegalWolf:
Even if a gun is pointed to my head, I’ll call you a potential thief!

LegalWolf:
I should bring evidence to prove what you asserted . You made a statement without proof and you expect me to look for proof for you?

You are really “smart”!

LegalWolf:
Despite the fact that I consider my debate with you as cruise and waste of time, I think I’ve thought you something valuable. That were a source never mentions something, you don’t go on hallucinating like mad men with your version of the story.

To answer your question:
1. We have evidence that Jesus was the son of Mary , a female specie of human race.
2. We have evidence that Mary was a human being and not a spirit;
3. We know that the only natural way things of substance (outside liquid) comes out from a female is through mouth, anus or vagina
4. Evidence abounds, and which you admitted that humans reproduce by coming ouT of their mother’s vagina
5. Since Mary is a human (female), her birth of Jesus could only possibly be through the vagina.

That’s a combo of inductive and deductive logic. The stray advocatejare may expand further on it or FxMasterz may write an epistle to explain if he knows it.

(underlined mine, apparently)

LegalWolf:
Who told you judges compel accused/respondent to answer questions. 🙆‍♀️ Was it the stray advocatejare 😝😝😝😝 or your rapist defending lawyer-friend?


If you think your question embarrasses me, would that make you sleep better at night? Ehn! Lol

FxMasterz:
Haba! I didn't see any form of forgery on that thread. You simply paraphrased his entire position about the topic in few words. That isn't forgery since you never attribute the statement to him. What you attributed to his was the claim which was truly his position. If he says that wasn't his position, then, it means he's saying your assertion was correct. And that's when you could have been guilty of falsely alleging legalwolf; you wouldn't even still be guilty of forgery in that case.
I've pointed his own case to him, which was clear forgery. He quoted advocatejare, edited what advocatejare said in that quote to make it look as if it was advocatejare's direct statement. That's forgery for which no one has called him a potential thief.
See, I don't know how one can be serving the true God and be comfortable insulting people endlessly everyday. What type of God is producing such volumes of insults and slander from one person endlessly. I think only Allah can do that.
I find it difficult to even reply his insults because the Spirit of God in me wouldn't allow me to behave like a child of the devil. Most times when legalwolf insults, he's the one who deserves the insults for misreading or misinterpreting what was said to him, yet, he would insult you on the basis of what you never said or did.

LegalWolf:
LOL!
Saying I did not answer that question is dishonest as I clearly adopted the answer adopted by someone else. Anyways, we agree that Jesus was human (whether in part or in full, right), Right? That lends support to my argument that Salvation = Human Sacrifice

LegalWolf:
Lol, I have more important things to do than to start digging for your old posts. As far as I’m concerned, mention any Muslim and I’ll call by your nature o!

LegalWolf:
If it is not fabrication, please quote a single strand of evidence to support it? Just one!

If your underlined is what you call fabrications, too bad!

LegalWolf:
I think you’ve forgotten I proceeded with my assumption (which YOU AGREED TO). Let me remind you: I said that you and I know that Yehoshua wasn’t excreted neither was he vomited. He came out from the vagina. This was my point which YOU TENQ agreed to.

It would have been a question of debate if you said Yehoshua was vomited or excreted. But you did not as YOU agreed to the only possible manner in which he was birthed. So what’s the basis of your questions

LegalWolf:
Now who is the judge in this context? And who told you that you cannot refuse to respond to irrelevant points or issues in law? Was it your rapist-defending lawyer friend? Or stray advocatejare?

Anyways, I have the unfettered right to cherry-pick which questions that are relevant and which that are not and I wouldn’t spend my time arguing. On some occasions, I’ll ask you to tell me why you think the question is relevant and you’ll be mute.

So if we are debating and you think a question is relevant and I think otherwise, please convince me of its relevancy. Otherwise fa fa fa…. Foul!

Lastly, would you sleep better at night if you think your questions ‘exposes the weakness of my belief’? Because, if that’ll make you sleep better or increase your account balance, please let me know o

LegalWolf:
LOL! I will be very brief in my response to your posts/allegations.
When I posed a question to you that Yehoshua proceeded from his mother's vagina, do you remeber your response?

It goes like this 'Of course, ALL humans come of from their mother's Farjah'
Impliedly, you have told us that Jesus was human. Now its surprising that your changing your view on the same subject. Anyways, the Gospel of Matthew and Luke provided us with two irreconcialable geneologies of Jesus.

Pray, I beseech thee, that it is Spirit that have geneologies?

LegalWolf:
That you see some men forcefully have their way with women is no reason for you to do same. What is wrong is wrong. I have read your posts a lot (before deciding it's worth my serious attention) and I could see where some people clearly expressed displeasure in you mentioning them (either through questions or what not). TenQ please don't play dumb. And you still go ahead to mention them again in YOUR next posts! It doesn't make sense.

Off the top of my head, I remember you wrote a thread on Jehovah Witnesses? Why don't you mention every christian you've engaged or even JW's you know?

Anyways, it is impossible for me to stop my usual jabs. In fact, I find it difficult seeing you in another perspective from what I know you. So don't be surprised in my response when I call you a potential thief or TenQnih or any of those names.

PS: I reckon I saw your other comment on SC Judgment. You are not just someone I can have such conversations with, my sincere apologies!

LegalWolf:
I have gone through the posts and I can clearly see my rebuttal. So there is no reason for me to repeat myself. Mind you, I can go ahead and least at least 10 instances you invented stories or fabricated non-existent things (without evidence) in order to push your narrative. Is it here:

(underlined mine)

Just the first two paragraphs of a post ooo, and I can point to at least three fabrications. Outright lies that you know within you to be false. I have not run through other similar posts. And you tell me I slander you? Really?

When I posed a question to you that Yehoshua proceeded from his mother's vagina, do you remember your response?

LegalWolf:
Let me answer your question, I only answer questions that are relevant and logical. And I bet you do the same. I asked you that in place of salvation, would yhwh take cassava, garri, or agbado and you never responded till now. And I have asked you so many questions that are off-topic that you clearly deviated from (including your rapist-defending lawyer friend). That is the way I see your question.

What claim exactly cannot stand inquisition? I'm curious! And hope you know that because you answer questions does not necessarily mean your answers are valid in reason or logic. I can go ahead and list countless instances of where you provided answers that are just plain stupid (my apologies as I do not mean to be rude). We've seen people attempting ALL the questions in an exam and still failing, or haven't we?

PS: I did not intend to write this long, but pardon my overly long write-up

shuttox:
https://punchng.com/lawans-supreme-court-victory-daylight-robbery-machina-camp/

LegalWolf:
Wawu! 🙆‍♀️🙆‍♀️🙆‍♀️🙆‍♀️

Never in a million years would I assume remotely that TenQ would come to this point. Nah. This is interesting!

💯 Endorsed!

LegalWolf:
But just to clarify - it’s more fun for me than actually fighting you. Like what’s there to gain?

I’m still curious on why you had a change of mind. Nevertheless, and in addition to what you wrote, I think Salvation in Christianity is nothing other than human sacrifice - a proposition that annoys the very fibre of my being!

LegalWolf:
With respect to my purpose, I think I must have told you countless times. I’m not on Nairaland to convert Christians. In fact, you are the ONLY HUMAN I majorly discuss matters of faith with. My posts are mostly political, academic or cultural.

What I do seek to achieve on religious section is:
- to fault YOUR logic [and in extension Christianity) to those discerning AND
- make you have a feel of your harassment.

I have no issues with you writing any post on Islam based on your hallucinations BUT mentioning ANY Muslim to that post is where I draw the line.

LegalWolf:
That does not mean if you mention me, I won’t heed your call. I promise I will ALWAYS answer till I die, to the extent I have time.

LegalWolf:
Of course! In addition, we can be debate on opposing sides without the need to tell DELIBERATE FALSEHOOD, INVENT STORIES, FABRICATE STATEMENTS AND ATTRIBUTE IT TO OTHERS, OR CLEARLY MISREPRESENTING UNAMBIGUOUS TEXTS OF SCRIPTURES!

LegalWolf:
Hissplendor and I once ended on this note. It’s been fun for me actually and one part of me is sad that this chapter of mine is drawing to an end.

Anyways, I sincerely pray you know Islam - the beauty of the religion, magnificence of the Almighty and simplicity of the Prophet’s message. Your life would take a radical turn for good if you’re fortunate to encounter that in your life.

Salaam alaikum!

FxMasterz:
What you claimed TenQ did to you, you did same to advocatejare, did he call you a thief because of that? You're simply bearing a fruit that tells us so much about your roots.

LegalWolf:
Lol, I should “ Describe how YOU would have blown INTO it without touching it.”?

Insanity!

LegalWolf:
Lol! Your logic is dumb and that’s one reason why I call you a potential thief.

You cannot blow into something WITHOUT putting your mouth on it?

Really, Potential Thief TenQ?

LegalWolf:
So what your “intelligent” brain tells u is blowing = putting mouth on? If I blow air into your eye,
I’m putting my mouth on your eye ehn, potential thief Lawrence Aninih, Oh TenQnih 😝

LegalWolf:
Concede? 'putting his mouth on...' . Where was that said potential thief . [size=8pt][/size]D
....m
Modified: Potential Thief TenQ for y
b...mmour attention

LegalWolf:
Certainly Allah had Orgasm first

Does that answer your question

LegalWolf:
LOL! a potential thief too is talking?



Irrelevant



Still irrelevant....



Probably yhwh. Since he rests and wrestles like man... what stops him from copulating and having orgasm?

PS: All your emotional blackmail and attempt to stop me from calling you a potential is doomed to fail. I have engaged several christians on Nairaland and offline, none of them is a pathetic and senile liar like you. As long as you live, I will call you a future thief. And is it mudslinging calling you by your essence - a potential thief destined to rob?

LegalWolf:
But FxMasterz brought it up and you did try to deflect the question didn't you? Your cry is music to my hears! LOL

Here is what I said:

the same way the Bible is imperfect so also every human being (including the translators of the Quran).

LOL! It is insanity at this point. So Quran = Human being (including its translators from Arabic to other languages)? Ehn Potential Thief?



What exactly are you trying to say here? Where are you coming from, where are you goint to?



Again, your sanity has taken the front drive....What is the issue? Did your Yehoshua come out from the vagina of a woman?

LegalWolf:
LOL! At least we agree on two things:

a. The Bible is imperfect. Just to take it a nudge further from what we both agree on, the Bible is manifestly, inherently and grossly imperfect.

b. Point to any statement of mine that logically supports this 'You are saying in other words that that you believe the Qur'an is ALSO imperfect!? . Pray, I beseech thee, just one!

LOL!




?



Your question is irrelevant. That has no basis to this conversation. [Even if it does, there is no evidence of Allah changing his form or shape. But what I do know is that yhwh changed his shape in order to wrestle with a human. Guess what: his own creation probably beat him blue black. Boxed his mouth with tough punches that he had to flee. yhwh ran like a thief at night. Walahi, I am not making this up. See Genesis 32: 24 - 26]

The point has been made, which you agree that:

1. Yehoshua that you worship came from a woman's vagina. . Again, let me put it in capital letter and highlight so you can see it very clearly, YEHOSHUA WHO YOU WORSHIP PROCEEDED FROM MARY'S VAGINA . So, what is wrong if the spirit through which he was formed pass through the same route that YOU ACKNOWLEDGE that he came from?

2. That the text of our Quran never made any reference to Jubril (whether in human or angelic form) blowing any spirit to Mary. Assuming he does, on a personal note, I see no problem (but that is irrelevant because we are discussing the text not what I did not see)

So that ends the conversation on your question and we should not be caught straying like the stray advocatejare. That's beneath me. And thank you again for you post re-affirming that the message of the gospel is nothing but human sacrifice.

Cheers and have a beautiful day hahahaha Lol

LegalWolf:
Lol
Of course, the same way the Bible is imperfect so also every human being (including the translators of the Quran). Go check preface to some of their editions, some acknowledge their imperfection. So that’s fine.

TenQ:
You are saying in other words that that you believe the Qur'an is ALSO imperfect!?

MaxInDHouse:
According to the inspiration God gave the prophets and Jesus' actions it's not right to pray for or with anyone who refuses to agree on doctrines with the worshipers of the Bible God! Proverbs 28:9; Jeremiah 11:14; John 17:8-9

If you're praying for everyone i know you're just doing it ignorantly but it irritates the worshipers of the Bible God when you do such in the name of God's son who never taught his disciples like that, well let's just say you don't know so go now and stop doing that because from this very moment the heavens will count it against you as sin against God's Holy Spirit after seeing it with your own eyes that even Jesus won't do what God forbids regarding prayers! Matthew 5:17

As long as we disagree on doctrinal matters praying with you or for you is detestable to my own God! Proverbs 28:9

So keep your prayers for your brethren like oteneaaron and others that you always disagree on doctrines! Luke 11:23

MaxInDHouse:
Of course i'm your neighbour no doubt about that but your brother?
No way!
It's faithless miscreants like oteneaaron that's your brother!

Ọmọ you don't have to go far oteneaaron is here and ready to chat with you as his BROTHER, oya preach your gospel to him nah!

Janosky:
Shame on you illiterate

When Jesus raised the widow's only son and raised Lazarus from the dead, were the tears wiped away from the widow's eyes as well as Martha's eyes?

Resurrection of the dead wipes away pain, mourning and tears arising from pain.
Ignoramus get out of here jare.

Janosky:
Will God wipe away tears where none exists?

Revelation 7:17 knocked out your GIBBERISH.

StagethemTVee:
DJ Khaled, Mary J Blige and Rick Ross are seen in this video looking to have a moment with Nigerian Grammy award winner Tems.


Tems Having A Moment With Mary J Blige, DJ Khaled And Rick Ross After Grammy Win


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8rJuhshRtc

MaxInDHouse:
Continue deceiving yourself!



After arguing blindly for weeks on letters that you don't know it's interpretation you ended up calling an atheist your brother then pray for your faithless brother in Jesus name!



Even Jesus refused to pray for those who don't believe in him:

"For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me. I pray for them: I pray not for the world" John 17:8-9 compare to Proverbs 28:9; Jeremiah 11:14

You miscreants won't cease to amuse me!

Lukuluku69:
No, the "answer" to your question will lead to more confusion. And I will tell you why. Ask Scientists that has there been a day that the Sun never give it's Light for 24 hours? They will tell you No. But admit that it is possible that Clouds in a particular place or area can blot out the Sun Light.

So, as you can see, your suppositions, conjectures, and stupid posers will confuse you the more.

Lukuluku69:
When Allah say Kun fa ya translated Be! The Quran says they come (Creations) will do so willingly or unwillingly. That is my stand. And if your stand is to manufacture posers, meaningless ones from your confused soul, go right ahead.

LegalWolf:
Lol
Of course, the same way the Bible is imperfect so also every human being (including the translators of the Quran). Go check preface to some of their editions, some acknowledge their imperfection. So that’s fine.

LegalWolf:
Lol, you were not quoting directly any of the translators potential thief. Pray tell me EXACTLY which of them you quoted that translated the verse the way you did?

I said:
But do you think these translators are Liars?
(Because you accused me of stating exactly their conclusion)

LegalWolf:
Lol, you and I know Yehoshua was not excreted, or was he? Neither was he vomited, am I wrong?

your God came out of the vagina of Mary Again, to repeat, Yehoshua came out of Mary’s vagina. If he could come out from there, what stops the spirit through which he was formed going through there?

Ehn potential thief

Lukuluku69:
Bros, go and rest with all these suppositions of yours. It is not my business and will never be. If God decide tomorrow to ask the Moon to take over the work of the Sun, dat one nah God business. He does as He wills. Not my business. And if you think bringing up suppositions to explain your confusion is your thing, open threads you will find your types on Nairaland and you can discuss.

As for me, I am not in the business of conjectures, wild goose chase and all that.

If you need to ask a question, do so from the Books and not from your confused soul.

MaxInDHouse:

To your brother who strongly believe Jesus never existed!


Why do you people love deceiving yourselves like this?