TenQ's Posts
Nairaland Forum › TenQ's Profile › TenQ's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 (of 515 pages)
chokekachy:With all the experience, the result is that Nigeria has fared worse! SMH!! |
drlateef:It was reported that Once Al-Abbas entered the room, he put his hands at once at his nose, and said to the gathered men outside: "bury your stinking corpse o"! LOL Tareekh-al-Kabeer:1/31 ''Al-Abbas, the paternal uncle of Prophet Muhammad, entered Muhammad's room three days after his death, before his burial, as his body remained there for three days as the people were too busy to bury him, as all of them were engaged in debates of Al-Thaqeefa Council of choosing a ruler/caliph of Yathreb to succeed him. Once Al-Abbas entered the room, he put his hands at once at his nose, and said to the gathered men outside: "Bury your friend Muhammad fast, for his body began decomposition just like the rest of human beings" https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateReligion/comments/zflrhn/ultimate_proof_that_mohammad_was_a_false_prophet/ Now that you have chosen to make me answer your question. Please can you now answer mine? There are Just TWO QUESTION for Muslims: QUESTION: 1. If from Islamic sources as shown, Muhammad's corpse was found to have bloated up and stank badly, is this not a necessary and sufficient proof that he is NOT a Prophet of Allah? 2. Is there any evidence that the Body of Mohammed in his grave in Mecca is still fresh? (When last did any Muslim verify this?) |
Pvin:She is NOT leaving her marriage BUT she has stopped being "the good wife" to Yul. The are merely cohabiting together! She is a STRONG and INTELLIGENT woman. She would NOT be numbered as "ONE OF THE WIVES of YUL"! Yul will be forced to make a CHOICE 1. Divorce MAY and hold on to his second wife 2. Divorce second wife and stay with May Either way, the only way for Yul is to end up with one WIFE. Unfortunately, it seems in terms of valuation, Yul considers May far better than Judy as a WIFE! |
Masterviolence:Ukraine gave a condition for negotiations. Putin should REMOVE his forces, then, TALKs can begin. |
LegalWolf:Now that you have chosen to make me answer your question. Please can you now answer mine? One of the cardinal proof of prophethood according to Islam is that the Corpse of a true Prophet of Allah does NOT decompose. There are several hadiths according to prophet Mohammed that proved this. We find proof from several the authentic Sunnah that the bodies of the Prophets do not decompose. Unfortunately, due to incessant bans by the Nairaland anti-spam bots, I have no option than to post a screenshot of the writeup There are Just TWO QUESTION for Muslims: QUESTION: 1. If from Islamic sources as shown, Muhammad's corpse was found to have bloated up and stank badly, is this not a necessary and sufficient proof that he is NOT a Prophet of Allah? 2. Is there any evidence that the Body of Mohammed in his grave in Mecca is still fresh? (When last did any Muslim verify this?) Cc: All my Friends on Nairaland: LegalWolf Vanessa7 AntiChristian Empiree, Rash4ductluv, BabaHeekmat, Haekymbahd, motayoayinde, drlateef, Thatfairguy1, MrCodeSolo , Hisbah21, thatsleepboy1 , Lordmoh , OBALOLA55, x123xlolls , Lukuluku69 , mhmsadyq, Ibsaq , Herkeym001 , Sulasa07 , hakeemhakeem , abduljabbar4 ,olaalekan ,Friend22 , uthlaw , Exc2000 , AbuTwins ,Akhirastriver ,Akinbahm , Sino , KayB , youngdroly , jaggabban , ukeleh , Realismailakabir , Bami8064 Greatgr , Gaskiyamagana Compton11 , Alfarouq , MrCodeSolo saintHot |
I have responded to you. However, since you brought it here again, I will oblige you. Mr LegalWolf, I will Advise that you Read this post slowly and repeatedly for comprehension. I wouldn't even have time for Nairaland throughout tomorrow for I am on a Journey: so, no hurries. My Dear Mr LegalWolf, I knew perfectly well that you will display your GROSS IGNORANCE to the whole world with this post of yours. You thought because I kept quiet, it was an "indication of weakness' and you rode on it like a MULE you truly are. Did you ask a mercenary to write your English language Exams for you or what? LegalWolf, you fall my hands seriously especially as you are a lawyer: is this how you will be misinterpreting the cases brought to you as an attorney or prosecutor? I’ve always said that anyone who gives you his case to handle has already lost because of your rash uncultured and unlettered manner with simple English language texts. You are exactly the kind of lawyer who instead of looking at the facts of a case would be looking for technicalities and the strategy of slander and name-calling to win a case instead of the use of good old common sense, logic and tact all based on facts. It was good I thought: “Why not allow a PIG to wallow in the mud until the day its cup is full!” And tonight, your cup is truly full and I will not spare you one bit. Your “bumbum” will be red with my spanking. You are lucky I received a ban from the nairaland antispam bots, you’ll have gotten it real hot with immediate effect. You finally came out to say: LegalWolf:I laughed in Mandarin Swahili! LegalWolf, it is a DISGRACE that you don’t know how to use the “QUOTATION MARKS” at his age of yours and you call yourself a lawyer! Shame on you. I won’t be surprise you had a pass/third class from the law school (that is even if you didn’t employ someone to write your exams for you). Hear this LOUDLY, TenQ is NOT your mate either Spiritually, Intellectually or Character wise. I hope after this lecture from me, you will learn to behave yourself and speak like a mature cultured individual rather than like a slanderous thug or hooligan. Let me say this again: I say this without batting an eye “I NEVER EVER FORGED” your statement. The fact that I didn’t play PIG with you does not mean that I am guilty of FORGERY as you have presumed. Some times, they say “silence is the BEST answer for a FOOL”! In your immeasurable stupidity, you had convinced yourself that there is a "Technical ERROR" in my post to capitalize on which wouldn’t have happened if you had truly passed through the four walls of the University (especially for someone who claimed to read Law). LETS GET INTO IT: I will break this up into just three parts 1. It is a pity that you know of ONLY ONE use of the Quotation mark. I am sure you have NEVER in your life come across what is called “SCARE QUOTES” aka “AIR QUOTES” aka “SNEER QUOTES” aka “SHUDDER QUOTES”. If you knew any thing about this kind of Quote Usage, you would have saved yourself this serious EMARASSMENT. Please find someone to Lecture you properly about SNEER QUOTES used in expressing IRONY or SARCASM in a speech I said: Abi, you don't know an answer to a historical event yet without evidence to the contrary you CLAIMED "IT'S NOT CORRECT!" 2. Secondly, to HELP YOU not to fall into this ERROR above, I was even careful not to use the sentence: Abi, you don't know an answer to a historical event yet without evidence to the contrary you SAID "IT'S NOT CORRECT!" Knowing you very well, you would have still thrown your tantrums refusing to acknowledge any form of reason. Instead of using “SAID” I used the word “CLAIMED” , how clear can it be LegalWolf? 3. Finally, a question that you may need to answer is : LegalWolf, Are you saying to the contrary that “IT IS CORRECT”? Let me remind you of the reason for the statement: I said TenQ:I said (speaking about you): “Since he has no EVIDENCE (from Islamic Literatures), he MANUFACTURES his OWN conclusion.” LegalWolf, IS IT CORRECT THAT, Mary his mother, the eleven core disciples, the followers of Jesus and his brothers and sisters know that Jesus wasn't crucified not died? If this statement above is CORRECT, then there exists no further basis of argument. However, there is a basis of argument because you took a position that IT IS NOT CORRECT THAT, Mary his mother, the eleven core disciples, the followers of Jesus and his brothers and sisters know that Jesus wasn't crucified not died? WHICH OF THESE TWO QUESTIONS ABOVE AGREES WITH YOU MR LEGALWOLF? So, Mr LegalWolf, Go revise your lesson in Grammar (even me that don’t speak that good English Language and Grammar seem to be light years ahead of you: don’t forget that you are a Lawyer and language is the most important tool of your legal trade) Just four questions for you (either you keep Quiet, I’ll let it slide or answer these questions directly) 1. Is a Quotation mark round a phrase ALWAYS definitely an indication of a direct Quotation of a second person? 2. Have you ever in your life heard of the phrase SNEER QUOTE before? 3. Are you thankful that TenQ has taught you something of value today? 4. Will you be of good behaviour henceforth after this? Like I said: I am willing to let it slide if you reasonably learn the lesson and move on. FINALLY, LegalWolf, there is definitely NO iota of HONOUR in SLANDERING Others! I hope after this, we can discuss in a civil manner not resorting to blackmail of slander and attack of calumny WHILE logically, scientifically and historically presenting facts for our different positions. Thank you. Cc: AntiChristian Vanessa7 advocatejare HisSplendor |
PJtech:Merry Christmas ahead to you too. However, can you answer the two questions please? |
One of the cardinal proof of prophethood according to Islam is that the Corpse of a true Prophet of Allah does NOT decompose. There are several hadiths according to prophet Mohammed that proved this. We find proof from several the authentic Sunnah that the bodies of the Prophets do not decompose. Unfortunately, due to incessant bans by the Nairaland anti-spam bots, I have no option than to post a screenshot of the writeup There are Just TWO QUESTION for Muslims: QUESTION: 1. If from Islamic sources as shown, Muhammad's corpse was found to have bloated up and stank badly, is this not a necessary and sufficient proof that he is NOT a Prophet of Allah? 2. Is there any evidence that the Body of Mohammed in his grave in Mecca is still fresh? (When last did any Muslim verify this?) Cc: All my Friends on Nairaland: LegalWolf Vanessa7 AntiChristian Empiree, Rash4ductluv, BabaHeekmat, Haekymbahd, motayoayinde, drlateef, Thatfairguy1, MrCodeSolo , Hisbah21, thatsleepboy1 , Lordmoh , OBALOLA55, x123xlolls , Lukuluku69 , mhmsadyq, Ibsaq , Herkeym001 , Sulasa07 , hakeemhakeem , abduljabbar4 ,olaalekan ,Friend22 , uthlaw , Exc2000 , AbuTwins ,Akhirastriver ,Akinbahm , Sino , KayB , youngdroly , jaggabban , ukeleh , Realismailakabir , Bami8064 Greatgr , Gaskiyamagana Compton11 , Alfarouq , MrCodeSolo saintHot
|
Mr LegalWolf, I will Advise that you Read this post slowly and repeatedly for comprehension. I wouldn't even have time for Nairaland throughout tomorrow for I am on a Journey: so, no hurries. My Dear Mr LegalWolf, I knew perfectly well that you will display your GROSS IGNORANCE to the whole world with this post of yours. You thought because I kept quiet, it was an "indication of weakness' and you rode on it like a MULE you truly are. Did you ask a mercenary to write your English language Exams for you or what? LegalWolf, you fall my hands seriously especially as you are a lawyer: is this how you will be misinterpreting the cases brought to you as an attorney or prosecutor? I’ve always said that anyone who gives you his case to handle has already lost because of your rash uncultured and unlettered manner with simple English language texts. You are exactly the kind of lawyer who instead of looking at the facts of a case would be looking for technicalities and the strategy of slander and name-calling to win a case instead of the use of good old common sense, logic and tact all based on facts. It was good I thought: “Why not allow a PIG to wallow in the mud until the day its cup is full!” And tonight, your cup is truly full and I will not spare you one bit. Your “bumbum” will be red with my spanking. You are lucky I received a ban from the nairaland antispam bots, you’ll have gotten it real hot with immediate effect. You finally came out to say: LegalWolf:I laughed in Mandarin Swahili! LegalWolf, it is a DISGRACE that you don’t know how to use the “QUOTATION MARKS” at his age of yours and you call yourself a lawyer! Shame on you. I won’t be surprise you had a pass/third class from the law school (that is even if you didn’t employ someone to write your exams for you). Hear this LOUDLY, TenQ is NOT your mate either Spiritually, Intellectually or Character wise. I hope after this lecture from me, you will learn to behave yourself and speak like a mature cultured individual rather than like a slanderous thug or hooligan. Let me say this again: I say this without batting an eye “I NEVER EVER FORGED” your statement. The fact that I didn’t play PIG with you does not mean that I am guilty of FORGERY as you have presumed. Some times, they say “silence is the BEST answer for a FOOL”! In your immeasurable stupidity, you had convinced yourself that there is a "Technical ERROR" in my post to capitalize on which wouldn’t have happened if you had truly passed through the four walls of the University (especially for someone who claimed to read Law). LETS GET INTO IT: I will break this up into just three parts 1. It is a pity that you know of ONLY ONE use of the Quotation mark. I am sure you have NEVER in your life come across what is called “SCARE QUOTES” aka “AIR QUOTES” aka “SNEER QUOTES” aka “SHUDDER QUOTES”. If you knew any thing about this kind of Quote Usage, you would have saved yourself this serious EMARASSMENT. Please find someone to Lecture you properly about SNEER QUOTES used in expressing IRONY or SARCASM in a speech I said: Abi, you don't know an answer to a historical event yet without evidence to the contrary you CLAIMED "IT'S NOT CORRECT!" 2. Secondly, to HELP YOU not to fall into this ERROR above, I was even careful not to use the sentence: Abi, you don't know an answer to a historical event yet without evidence to the contrary you SAID "IT'S NOT CORRECT!" Knowing you very well, you would have still thrown your tantrums refusing to acknowledge any form of reason. Instead of using “SAID” I used the word “CLAIMED” , how clear can it be LegalWolf? 3. Finally, a question that you may need to answer is : LegalWolf, Are you saying to the contrary that “IT IS CORRECT”? Let me remind you of the reason for the statement: I said TenQ:I said (speaking about you): “Since he has no EVIDENCE (from Islamic Literatures), he MANUFACTURES his OWN conclusion.” LegalWolf, IS IT CORRECT THAT, Mary his mother, the eleven core disciples, the followers of Jesus and his brothers and sisters know that Jesus wasn't crucified not died? If this statement above is CORRECT, then there exists no further basis of argument. However, there is a basis of argument because you took a position that IT IS NOT CORRECT THAT, Mary his mother, the eleven core disciples, the followers of Jesus and his brothers and sisters know that Jesus wasn't crucified not died? WHICH OF THESE TWO QUESTIONS ABOVE AGREES WITH YOU MR LEGALWOLF? So, Mr LegalWolf, Go revise your lesson in Grammar (even me that don’t speak that good English Language and Grammar seem to be light years ahead of you: don’t forget that you are a Lawyer and language is the most important tool of your legal trade) Just four questions for you (either you keep Quiet, I’ll let it slide or answer these questions directly) 1. Is a Quotation mark round a phrase ALWAYS definitely an indication of a direct Quotation of a second person? 2. Have you ever in your life heard of the phrase SNEER QUOTE before? 3. Are you thankful that TenQ has taught you something of value today? 4. Will you be of good behaviour henceforth after this? Like I said: I am willing to let it slide if you reasonably learn the lesson and move on. FINALLY, LegalWolf, there is definitely NO iota of HONOUR in SLANDERING Others! I hope after this, we can discuss in a civil manner not resorting to blackmail of slander and attack of calumny WHILE logically, scientifically and historically presenting facts for our different positions. Thank you. Cc: AntiChristian Vanessa7 advocatejare HisSplendor |
advocatejare:Excellent sir! |
LegalWolf:No problem! |
advocatejare:A way out is to screenshoot every page before exiting , so that you can repost later. |
advocatejare:I didn't break any rule o. I composed a post about Mohammed not fulfilling the Islamic condition of Prophethood and bam, they put me under 24hours ban. I screenshot it and I will post it immediately I come out of the ban. |
Dear LegalWolf , I received a ban yesterday night. Hang on please for your response. Peace |
LegalWolf:To LegalWolf who cowardly lost his voice, Have you found the answer to these questions: Allah needs your help o! Therefore, since the STORY is TRUE (because it is by Allah himself), can you explain About the narration of Allah about prophet Suleiman (SAW) in the Qur'an, can you explain how 1. Suleiman died for almost one year and none of his wives knew!? 2. Suleiman died for almost one year and he was not served any food!? 3. Suleiman was dead for almost one year and he didn't decompose or rot!? 4. Suleiman was dead for almost one year and[b] he didn't receive ANY visitors!? How come islam has so much problematic rhymes? |
AntiChristian:The story sounds fantastic isnt it? This is you Allah aka Mohammed Qutham speaking! No wonder Allah doesn't remember the sequence in which he created the universe. No wonder Allah thinks the sun sets in murky waters. Does Allah TELL Lies when telling stories? |
The TRUTH OF ISLAM YOU DONT WANT TO HEAR Mr LegalWolf, The attention is of a certain so-called Prophet (Qutham aka Mohammed) who was accused of stealing a particular piece of cloth by no other persons than his close followers and partners. We would appreciate if you can use your kind office to defend this prophet as the evidence presented are by his friends, partners and followers. Even though Allah was present while the crime was committed, he could not say who really did the stealing but he defended this prophet by writing a testimony that “a prophet is above the act of stealing”. What made the case more interesting is that Allah himself did not personally give the testimony: the accused did on behalf of Allah. The Prosecution was of the opinion that this prophet is the THIEF and he is LYING that a certain Allah (who was present at the time of the stealing) “sent him to absolve himself” of the crime. You were highly recommended to take up this case as a Defence for the Accused Prophet only because they say you are one of his followers. Thank you, TenQ Case File Introduction: 1. Mohammed the Prophet of Allah was accused of Stealing a Piece of very beautiful RED sheet/garment/cloth that was admired by many of the followers of Mohammed. Everyone who last saw the cloth saw it with Mohammed and by his antecedent, knew that Mohammed stole the cloth. Mohammed denied stealing the cloth but he had not a single evidence to back himself with. Those who saw him amongst his followers kept insisting that their Prophet STOLE the garment. 2. The story was getting out of hand with everyone insisting that their prophet STOLE the Red garment that Mohammed had to call on his (fictitious) Allah to rescue him. 3. Unfortunately, not one of the followers of Mohammed had EVER seen Allah nor Jubril nor did Allah give his prophet ANY KIND of Evidence such as a MIRACLE to authenticate his prophet “Mohammed”. As of this time, ANYTHING Mohammed said Allah said was considered as being from Allah. 4. Mohammed in defending himself gave forth a revelation he said Allah gave him. The verse was recited to Mohammed’s followers in Quran 3:161 Supposed Allah’s Testimony: Quran 3:161 وَمَا كَانَ لِنَبِیٍّ أَن یَغُلَّۚ وَمَن یَغۡلُلۡ یَأۡتِ بِمَا غَلَّ یَوۡمَ ٱلۡقِیَـٰمَةِۚ ثُمَّ تُوَفَّىٰ كُلُّ نَفۡسࣲ مَّا كَسَبَتۡ وَهُمۡ لَا یُظۡلَمُونَ ١ THE WORD Ghulul is PROPERLY TRANSLATED AS STEALING (Taking something that is not yours illegally and deceitfully) Quran 3:161 It is inconceivable that a Prophet would ever misappropriate (steal) anything from the war booty. Anyone who does so will carry it with him on the Day of Resurrection. Then every soul will be paid in full what it has earned and no one will be wronged. 5. Even though the testimony should have been rejected outrightly because there was no signature of the testimony by Allah. Mohammed himself wrote the testimony on behalf of the so-called Allah and he signed the document as “Allah’s Prophet” we present you with it as the fact on ground. 6. Muslim scholars in their Hadiths and Tafsirs tried to EXPLAIN the genesis of the verse acclaimed to have been received from Allah by Mohmmed Sunan Abu Dawud (English) 30, Hadith 3960 Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The verse "And no Prophet could (ever) be false to his trust" was revealed about a red velvet. When it was found missing on the day of Badr, some people said; Perhaps the Messenger of Allah has taken it. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down (Quran 3:161) "And no prophet could (ever) be false to his trust" to the end of the verse 7. UP TILL TODAY, THE RED CLOTH HAS NOT BEEN FOUND! The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf: 1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah? 2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)? 3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything? 4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed) 5. Where is this Red cloth in question? Dear Mr LegalWolf, You are required to respond to these Question rather than your usual resort to character assassination and slander ALL in an attempt of dodging answering the Questions. |
LegalWolf, This is ISLAM, Deal with it! A certain Blackstone that is shaped like women's private part which pre-islamic women smear their menstrual blood on for fertility reasons has become a SIN forgiving stone next only to Allah EVEN THOUGH I KNOW THAT YOU WONT READ TO UNDERSTAND, HERE IS YOUR GOD BESIDE ALLAH 1. Sayyiduna ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (r.a) reports that Messenger of Allah (s.a.w) said: ‘The black stone is a white ruby from the rubies of Jannah, Paradise, it was only blackened due to the sins of the those who join partners with Allah. It will be brought forth on the day of judgment as huge as mount Uhud, to testify on behalf of those who touched or kissed it in the world.’ (Appears in Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah, Hadith: 2734) 2. Sayyiduna ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (r.a) reports that Messenger of Allah (s.a.w) said: ‘Indeed on the day of judgement, this (black) stone shall have a tongue and two lips to testify for those who touched it.’ (Appears in Sunan Tirmidhi, Hadith: 961, Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith: 2944, Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah, Hadith: 2736 & Sahih Ibn Hibban, Hadith: 3711) 3. Ibn ‘Abbaas said: The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w) said: “When the Black Stone came down from Paradise, it was whiter than milk, but the sins of the sons of Adam made it black.” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 877; Ahmad, 2792. Classed as saheeh by Ibn Khuzaymah, 4/219. Al-Haafiz ibn Hajar classed it as qawiy (strong) in Fath al-Baari, 3/462). 4. Ibn ‘Umar said: I heard the Messenger of Allaah (s.a.w) say: “Touching them both [the Black Stone and al-Rukn al-Yamani] is an expiation for sins.” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 959. This hadeeth was classed as hasan by al-Tirmidhi and as saheeh by al-Haakim (1/664). Al-Dhahabi agreed with him). 5. When the second Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab (r.a) came to kiss the Stone, he said in front of all assembled: “No doubt, I know that you are a stone and can neither harm anyone nor benefit anyone. Had I not seen Allah’s Messenger [Muhammad] kissing you, I would not have kissed you.” Ali, brother of prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) responded to Umar (r.a), saying, “This stone (Hajar Aswad) can indeed benefit and harm. Allah says in Quran that he created human beings from the progeny of Adam (as) and made them witness over themselves and asked them, ‘Am I not your creator?’ Upon this, all of them confirmed it. Thus Allah wrote this confirmation. And this stone has a pair of eyes, ears and a tongue and it opened its mouth upon the order of Allah, who put that confirmation in it and ordered to witness it to all those worshippers who come for Hajj.” [Appears in Sahih of Bukhari and Kanz al-Ummal] https://seekingthedivinecountenance./2015/04/13/the-benefits-of-kissing-the-black-stone-al-hajar-al-aswad/ You are certainly on the part of Hell Fire LegalWolf! Again; Enough of flogging you on this! |
LegalWolf:LegalWolf, you are a SHAMELESS COWARDLY LIAR who can only slander a person's character rather than face the UGLINESS of the Religion of ISLAM. I have challenged you several times now, state your facts against me and let me deal with you. But your cowardly self is shivering like a rat that fell into a semi-frozen sewage pipe and is afraid of his lies. A pig is a pig it doesn't matter if he wears a white wig with a block gown: their slanderous character speaks for them like the king's trumpeter. When you know you don't have facts against me, why did you choose the path of attacks of slandrous nature thinking it would bail you out of your misery. LegalWolf, is say it again, YOU are a SHAMELESS COWARDLY LIAR For the last time, I repeat TenQ:I honestly feel like calling you names but I won't: a mad pig is better sometimes ignored! |
LegalWolf:LegalWolf , you are a confirmed Cowardly, Slanderous and vain human being. When you know that you can't stand the heat, why play with an inferno. I put it to you that you lack character like your sex addicted prophet. If he could stoop so low to flirt with the wife of his son and even shamelessly married her, it's not a surprise you take after him. LegalWolf, you are an unredeemable Slanderous Coward |
LegalWolf:Are you ashamed!? Prove your claims against me if you dare! |
LegalWolf:LegalWolf, Your character is eminently displayed as fraudulent if you don't prove your accusation now! What is scaring you LegalWolf? Stop throwing tantrums around. I TenQ is giving you the challenge, which one do you want to PROVE first? 2. Can you please quote where I forged "a statement": it may be that you are the COW or is it a MULE! LOL!! 3. Yes or No, Did I give you sufficient evidence on the Injeel but like a mule, you insist that it is a lie. I guess your definition of what is a lie is your personal invention to hide your inferiority complex and stupidity. I am waiting! Which one do you want to prove first? At least try to show evidence if it's not just a slanderous "forgery of words"! I am waiting! Aside kissing a stone that looks like a woman's private part, the other thing you know how to do is a campaign of calumny against those who show you the FILTH of Islam. This I repeat is a reflection of exactly who you are: that was exactly why I chose to ignore your mudslinging tactics . Again LegalWolf, I challenge you to prove your claims! |
duro4chang:Excellent post. I've been so educated with your writeup. Keep it up please |
Iamfrank:People don't change in marriage! You get exactly what is most important to you: unfortunately after marriage, other needs come up that you never reconned as important. These are the ones that break the marriage because they should have been your most important selection criteria. |
LegalWolf:I am challenging you to bring out your proof COWARD! You can only slander but you have no bite! I said: TenQ:I am waiting! |
LegalWolf: LegalWolf: LegalWolf:Stop throwing tantrums around. I TenQ is giving you the challenge, which one do you want to PROVE first? 2. Can you please quote where I forged "a statement": it may be that you are the COW or is it a MULE! LOL!! 3. Yes or No, Did I give you sufficient evidence on the Injeel but like a mule, you insist that it is a lie. I guess your definition of what is a lie is your personal invention to hide your inferiority complex and stupidity. I am waiting! Which one do you want to prove first? At least try to show evidence if it's not just a slanderous "forgery of words"! |
MrCodeSolo:1. As a rule, Language Translators ALWAYS use the CLOSEST in MEANING to any linguistic phrase and Arabic to English translators are NOT objections to this rule 2. Allah himself said that "the Quran is given in a CLEAR language in Arabic". I am sure Allah knew and that further in time, the Quran would be translated into other languages for people who Arabic is NOT their first language. Almost ALL of your major translators of the Quran agree with me in rendition of the two Quranic verses. 3. I asked you to translate three phases each from Arabic into English from the two verses Qur'an 46:31 and Qur'an 4:64. Both reignforced the interpretations I presented. The Hadith I presented was a CONFIRMATION: Sahih Bukhari 7410 Narrated Anas: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Allah will gather the believers on the Day of Resurrection in the same way (as they are gathered in this life), and they will say, 'Let us ask someone to intercede for us with our Lord that He may relieve us from this place of ours.' .. ... They will go to Jesus who will say, 'I am not fit for this undertaking, but you'd better go to Muhammad whose sins of the past and the future had been forgiven (by Allah).' So they will come to me and I will ask the permission of my Lord, and I will be permitted (to present myself) before Him. ..... O Muhammad! Raise your head and speak, for you will be listened to; and ask, for you will be granted (your request); and intercede, for your intercession will be accepted.' I will then raise my head and praise my Lord with certain praises which He has taught me, and then I will intercede. Allah will allow me to intercede (for a certain kind of people) and will fix a limit whom I will admit into Paradise. Who will admit people in to Paradise? Is it Allah or Mohammed? Except you agree that Arabic is the WORST language Allah could have used to reveal the Quran It is a lame excuse to blame the LANGUAGE of transmission! Hebrew and Arabic are from the same Semitic Language group: have you ever heard Christians complaining that the language cannot be translated ? |
LegalWolf:1. Your campaign of calumny is a reflection of exactly who you are: that is exactly why I chose to ignore your mudslinging tactics (of course when your logic fail because you cannot answer simple questions, the best you can do is to exhibit the Thug and Ruffian you are: thinking that throwing tantrums will help your case). 2. Can you please quote where I forged "a statement": it may be that you are the COW or is it a MULE! LOL!! 3. Yes or No, Did I give you sufficient evidence on the Injeel but like a mule, you insist that it is a lie. I guess your definition of what is a lie is your personal invention to hide your inferiority complex and stupidity. I am waiting! Islam is a religion of Lies and Deception! |
saintHot:Unfortunately, he is NOT smart. |
BJanta:I agree perfectly with you: its like a case of the voluntarily blind leading the blind on the journey through a maze of death. We shall continue to pray for Muslims and also educate them |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 (of 515 pages)
