₦airaland Forum

1025: on the topic of this thread, UEFA has this to say;

toluxa1: If you were present at the event, you will know they did. How does that put food on your table by the way

Ihedinobi: Prior to and/or larger than this particular thread?

Ihedinobi: And you and I are right here on this thread, but you didn't take advantage of that to explain more clearly to me what I may have been failing to misunderstand. Why exactly is that?

About the long posts, I do that when I'm addressing serious issues and to differentiate loud-mouthed people whose brains are meant to be carried not used from people who really have something of value to say.

Ihedinobi: Now why should I not? I think you pretty much implied that I didn't address what they said. Is that true? Did I indeed fail to address what they said?

Idowuogbo: Preach bro! Preach!

Idowuogbo: u wan shyte?

biolabee: dont get u... if u read the post and had been following this thread, u would not have said what u said

Ihedinobi: Oh I did, did I? So you actually didn't read anything I wrote, did you?

Ihedinobi: @kulyie

Your chosen path is a courageous one. It is full of challenges and troubles and pressures and the threat of regret. But I'm rejoicing in the fact that you claim the Lord Christ. He is able to lead you aright.

However, never let yourself feel the need to defend yourself and validate your decisions to undeserving people. It will get your eyes off the mark and engender bitterness. You need neither. Keep your spirit sweet. And keep your garden ready for the one who deserves it. Those are the things worthy of your energies.

God bless you, sister.

biolabee: unfortunately u are the crappist
His post though long reflects the fact

they left the issue and focussed on kulyie... unnecessary

She is not anti marriage just that she would not be a Mrs for the fun of it
Some court short and have good marriages -- good for them
Some court long and have good marriages -- good for them
Some court short and have bad marriages -- good for them
Some court long and have bad marriages -- good for them

the koko is DO WHAT WORKS FOR YOU AND BE READY FOR THE CONSEQUENCES... chikena

Ihedinobi: Lol. You're not brain-dead too, are you? I think not.

Ihedinobi: [s]Gaggi, barcanista and nony30 are no longer following this thread, are they? I have a culture of seeing the full development of an issue before I contribute to it, that's why I browsed through the whole thread to make sure I got the full story before commenting.

To start with, nony30 spoke like a real jerk. Of course, everyone's got a right to be whatever they want, but every right comes with a responsibility to accept the consequences or outcomes of exercising them. So, nony30 was a major jerk whom I would have enjoyed going to war with on this thread. How disappointing and rather refreshing that he took his jerkiness elsewhere.

Barcanista, one small shade more courteous than his apparent disciple nony30, was not that smart either. A thread has a specific point of discussion that participants may agree with and reinforce with their own perspectives or disagree with and criticize with their own perspectives. Which did this broda-man do? Agree? He seemed to. Disagree? He seemed to. I think his summary of his arguments or rant or whatever was: there's nothing wrong with putting a timeline on your marriage plans as long as you do it for the right reasons. Which promptly causes me to wonder: did he read the op at all or he just read the title and his mind blanked from the rush of antagonism that had him rushing to type nothing?

His subsequent comments smacked of an annoying arrogance that he felt he'd said something smart for whatever reason.

Gaggi...Gaggi Gaggi Gaggi...whoever this person is, I'm both glad and quite upset that I didn't meet this thread as soon as they first commented. From his/her first comment, I was so put off that I could almost not wait to read the rest to get whatever they really meant to say. I still intend to go back and reread all he/she said so that I'm really sure that I get it. Suffice it to say that my first impression of this person is rather unpleasant. But, I gladly accept that I mightbe wrong. And the reason for being that open to correction was how kulyie responded to him/her. She accorded him/her a respect that I would have reserved for people I thought better of.

Ok. About Gaggi'sresponse to the issue, at first, it did seem like s/he was answering the op then it seemed that s/he was answering kulyie in his/her first post. Now, granted that each marriage and each relationship is unique, are all marriages and all relationships not based on the same principles? That is, are they not all fundamentally the same?

Now, if they are (and they actually are), should someone who gets the fundamentals better not offer what wisdom that they have come to possess to others who may not yet possess it? What is their crime in sharing what they have learned with their friends and people that they care about?

Again, does the fact that human beings are basically very good actors not show that a couple's attitude outside the walls of their own home in the sight of everyone is not necessarily the same as their attitude away from everyone's gaze? That fact along with the principles of marriage give the lie to the example of the couple who club and do whatever and still are such great friends.

Finally, I missed where the op insinuated that marriages made on short notice were always going to fail while those made after considerable time taken to court or whatever would always succeed. It seems pretty clear to me that Gaggi simply did not engage intellectually with the op. S/he just skipped the whole "thinking" part and jumped straight into the refuting part and ended up saying almost nothing.

Perhaps I'll pick particular posts and respond to them in subsequent posts that I make to address more directly what each poster of interest said.[/s]

barcanista: did i tell you i'm searching either? besides why is so difficult to respond to simple direct question? Can we be friends? its yes or no. You should not implore unnecessary tactics to respond to direct questions. haba! i fear fear o

Funjay: Kai, av sed it times without no dt most Chelsea fans knows next to nothin about football. Most of dem started supportin Chelsea wen Mou tuk over. Ask dem who Andre Flo is and dey may tell u an ex coach.

Why do u think Juventus is rated as d most successful club in Italy even when AC Milan has won more CL?
2. Why is Man U now d most successful team in England recently takin over frm Lpool after winnin deir 19th League even though the Anfiel side has more European trophy.
3. Why do u think most Chelsea players are now sayin dt dey are now in a better shape to compete for d EPL title nxt season?

If u do ur research well bro, u will know dt winnin d Europa, F.A cup and carlin cup all 2geda is still not comparable to winnin d league title dt spanned a whole season.

Fajzay: As a matter of fact, Man U won the trophy competing with top 3/4 teams and a whole lots of average to mediocre teams(check the EPL log), while Chelsea won the Europa league competing with teams that's played in the champions league and other decent teams (u can bet many of the other teams are 3rd/4th - 5th in their respective leagues ... so dopeJemi's point here is of no basis

dopeJemi: yes! Lemme ask u my own question, if we had won d europa League titLe and u guys won d EPL titLe, wud u say d europa League is bigger dan d epL? And D joy u had wen u guys won d cup yesterday and d joy u wilL av if u guys win d EPL, which wilL be more and why?, Be sincere

dopeJemi: cuz dey r 4rm europe doesn't mean dey r very good, don't 4get, dey r aLso 4rm deir respective Leagues, u guys had a bumby ride compared 2 us dat pLayed d Likes of man city,ur own team, LiverpooL, arsenal, tottenham, everton, swansea and d rest, Twice.. If it was dat easy, u guys wudnt be fighting 4 a top 4 finish.. CheLsea just went straight 2 d knock out phase and pLayed d Likes of bucharest, braga, and kazan.. U guys had 1 helL of a bumby ride compared 2 us

dopeJemi: d europa league title will always be a consoLation 2 any big team dat wins it, if my team (united) wins it next season I will call it a consoLation cuz we shudnt be in d competiton atall cuz we r a top cLub, d europa League wasn't in cheLsea's agenda at d begining of Last season,stop consoLing urseLf dude, cuz u guys found urseLves in d europa League its nau a big deaL 2 u , if u guys had quaLified 4 d knouckout stage wud u be saying alL dese? TelL Me, hau many europa League matches did u watch Last season? Wen we dropped 2 d europa league last season, u cheLsea fans mocked us and we were ashamed, if d europa League was such a big deaL RDM wudnt av been sacked, if cheLsea had Lost d match yesterday wilL u be saying its a big deaL nau? Imagine! CL winners pLaying ind europa League d folLowing year and u say its a big deaL? Dude! It has never happened b4, u guys were DEMOTED, u guys made history 4 d wrong reason

dopeJemi: weren't u sad when u guys dropped 2 d europa League? Wudnt u have been happier if u guys had won d EPL? 2 me, d europa League is just a consoLation 4 cheLsea and deir Fans, dey realLy don't see it as a big deaL, c'mon! U guys pLayed d Likes of Kazan, braga, bucharest, der aint no competition der bro

dopeJemi: United of course.. Ask benitez or abramovic, a top team like cheLsea shudnt be in d europa League in first pLace, u guys were ashamed 2 be in it at first, imagine barca or madrid pLaying in d europa League, if u think d europa League cup is more prestigious dan the premier League Trophy, why don't u guys let arsenal and tottenham quaLify 4 d Champions League and u guys shud keep on pLaying in d europa League, I mean, who watches soccer on thursdays and fridays . D cheLsea pLayers wud av Loved 2 win d premier League trophy rather dan d europa League cup, trust Me

SniperInADiaper: MANU

Rolly83: WTF,who da hell are you?I can see u're looking for trouble.Hw dare u!