Richirich713:


Here's what king asked:



Nearly every atheist response ignore the "just for pleasure and not for procreation" part, most atheists responses focused on inbreeding and the bible, that I think is bad answers.

Thank god you didnt say "all atheists"......because some like me, did answer the consensual part

It is funny that the christian and muslim god did allow incest once upon a time.

Now they are asking atheists to justify their moral stance against inbreeding.

What is the religious argument against incest when we have many incestous men of god in the bible?

Your argument against incest is in the old testament.....the same old testament that is laden with murderous punishment for little things like not respecting the sabbath day or stoning for being gay.

ireneony:
if this is how atheist behaves or thinks...

You are a grown lady. You should learn to reason beyond labels. Not all Christians share the same values with you, I'm sure.

Richirich713:

Here's what king asked:
Nearly every atheist response ignore the "just for pleasure and not for procreation" part, most atheists responses focused on inbreeding and the bible, that I think is bad answers.

The first person to answer that's JackBizzle made a reference to the bible first because he knew what the person asking the question subscribes to.
Then he answered the question outrightly by saying "No sensible person will support Inbreeding [In.cest] (Nl spam bot changed it to inbreeding).. Then went on to say what an in.cest could lead to -- not minding whether the in.cest is done for purpose (breeding) or not.

Johnydon22 gave a very lucid answer. First on a comment and later on the matter at hand. You can refer back to his post..also keep in mind the change of words by spam bot.

ValentineMary also answered by saying: "We can't really say if it is bad or good." Then further buttressed his point.

And so on and so forth.
Hope I have helped you guys. Even if dropping a belief in a God is hard, comprehension is not that hard.

If it makes you happy, it can't be bad.

Satan accepts you as you are.

KingEbukasBlog:
When I mean sexual activity , I mean consensual sexual activity just for the pleasure and not for procreation .

Good question. Though I have my suspicions why you chose to narrow the purpose to pleasure.Pleasure is the purpose of all sexual activity. It doesn't matter if it's homosexual, hetero, paedo, etc. Our sexual organs were made for pleasure afterall. Procreation is just an unfortunate byproduct, in my opinion.

I think incest is bad, but it will be difficult to argue against pleasure. Afterall, one man's meat is another's poison.

dblackninja:


The first person to answer that's JackBizzle made a reference to the bible first because he knew what the person asking the question subscribes to.
Then he answered the question outrightly by saying "No sensible person will support Inbreeding [In.cest] (Nl spam bot changed it to inbreeding).. Then went on to say what an in.cest could lead to -- not minding whether the in.cest is done for purpose (breeding) or not.

Johnydon22 gave a very lucid answer. First on a comment and later on the matter at hand. You can refer back to his post..also keep in mind the change of words by spam bot.

ValentineMary also answered by saying: "We can't really say if it is bad or good." Then further buttressed his point.

And so on and so forth.
Hope I have helped you guys. Even if dropping a belief in a God is hard, comprehension is not that hard.

Incest , lol just checking

Atheists should just answer the question not bring the bible in, nor should they keep saying "it might lead to this or that".

Ps do me a favor stop with ur " lacking comprehension" comments, so far I have remain civil but might change my mind soon.

KingEbukasBlog:
cc : plaetton , johnydon22 , hahn , muskeeto , valentinemary , thehomer ,

I think it's silly to ask atheists whether incest is right or wrong.

Atheists are not from a different planet other than the one you call your own.

An atheist is subject to the moral and legal laws of whichever country is a part.

An atheist , let me repeat it to the daft brain for the millionth and one time, is simply someone who doesn't believe in the existence of imaginary creator and puppet fairy in the sky.

Gosh!!

Richirich713:


Incest , lol just checking

So what did you find out about your checks??

Atheists should just answer the question not bring the bible in, nor should they keep saying "it might lead to this or that".

You forgot the question explicitly mentioned "Nairaland atheists " and not Nairalanders or any other thing, so what do you think?? Also know that bringing in the bible by atheists to answer a question is just to show the absurdities in that fable, nothing more.

I believe if I just answer the question by just saying YES OR NO, you will ask me to elucidate further by stating my reasons. Then giving my reasons might lead to this and that or whatever my opinion is.

Ps do me a favor stop with ur " lacking comprehension" comments, so far I have remain civil but might change my mind soon.

Oh sorry it was never meant as an insult. Just that I find it strange that something quite simple was being misconstrued to a heightened level of mockery.
I have never insulted anyone before, but might have a good hearty laugh when I found something or someone being funny.

KingEbukasBlog:
Incest is sexual activity between family members or close relatives.

When I mean sexual activity , I mean consensual sexual activity just for the pleasure and not for procreation.

Rocreational incest is medically unadvicable due to the increased chance of genetically defective offspring, but since you're talking about, hmm, "safe incest", all I can say is that it's yucky and ewwy and gross, just like anal sex and the slaughter of chickens for food. Those 3 acts are in the same moral category in my view.

Seun:

Rocreational incest is medically unadvicable due to the increased chance of genetically defective offspring, but since you're talking about, hmm, "safe incest", all I can say is that it's yucky and ewwy and gross, just like anal sex and the slaughter of chickens for food. Those 3 acts are in the same moral category in my view.

The bolded...
Does it mean you don't eat it?

Seun:

Rocreational incest is medically unadvicable due to the increased chance of genetically defective offspring, but since you're talking about, hmm, "safe incest", all I can say is that it's yucky and ewwy and gross, just like anal sex and the slaughter of chickens for food. Those 3 acts are in the same moral category in my view.

you find the slaughtering of chickens yucky??
Well except maybe ure a vegetarian.

Seun:

Rocreational incest is medically unadvicable due to the increased chance of genetically defective offspring, but since you're talking about, hmm, "safe incest", all I can say is that it's yucky and ewwy and gross, just like anal sex and the slaughter of chickens for food. Those 3 acts are in the same moral category in my view.

"slaughter of chickens for food" warreva is wrong with dat

Seun:

Rocreational incest is medically unadvicable due to the increased chance of genetically defective offspring, but since you're talking about, hmm, "safe incest", all I can say is that it's yucky and ewwy and gross, just like anal sex and the slaughter of chickens for food. Those 3 acts are in the same moral category in my view.

are you a vegetarian?

hopefulLandlord:


I'm an atheist but Ebuka was specific about in.ce.st for "pleasure", meaning so long pregnancy and childbirth don't result from it, so this point is invalid

And how can you be 100% certain that pregnancy would not result from any sexual relationship? No contraceptive is 100%, not even condom.

Oh Seun has released incest from prison. I thank the most High that Richirich713 concluded his checks before that, if not...I would have been slaughtered like a chicken by now.
Anyway hope we are good Richirich713

[size=3pt] something is wrong. [/size]

photoshoot:
The bolded...
Does it mean you don't eat it?

Of course I eat it. It's very tasty! The point I was trying to make is that yuckiness and evil are different things. If something grosses me out but it's not objectively harmful to anyone, all I need to ask for is that the people doing it should please try to not do it in my presence.

dblackninja:
Oh Seun has released incest from prison. I thank the most High that Richirich713 concluded his checks before that, if not...I would have been slaughtered like a chicken by now.
Anyway hope we are good Richirich713

continue to thank the most High.

Richirich713:


Here's what king asked:



Nearly every atheist response ignore the "just for pleasure and not for procreation" part, most atheists responses focused on inbreeding and the bible, that I think is bad answers.

And what do you mean by " just for pleasure and not for procreation,," are you telling us that you can separate sexual activities for strictly pleasure from those that can lead to procreation?

wirinet:


And what do you mean by " just for pleasure and not for procreation,," are you telling us that you can separate sexual activities for strictly pleasure from those that can lead to procreation?

I think king is specially talking about "safe incest" as seun put it.

Richirich713:


continue to thank the most High.

Yeah I will But do you know who the most High is??

dblackninja:


Yeah I will But do you know who the most High is??

Yes he's the greatest being possible, the most High.

Richirich713:


Yes he's the greatest being possible, the most High.

No it's the ganger man over here. The one I buy weed from. He is always at the most High state

The one you're probably talking about is the confused one that loves incest so much to the point of hating it. Very confused being I think

Seun:
Of course I eat it. It's very tasty! The point I was trying to make is that yuckiness and evil are different things. If something grosses me out but it's not objectively harmful to anyone, all I need to ask for is that the people doing it should please try to not do it in my presence.

Lol ,


you dislike seeing blood I suppose....

KingEbukasBlog:
Incest is sexual activity between family members or close relatives. This typically includes sexual activity between people in a consanguineous relationship. Atheists subscribe to subjective morality, so the question should not be a problem.

When I mean sexual activity , I mean consensual sexual activity just for the pleasure and not for procreation .

A more lucid question : Would you sleep with your mum if it is consensual ?

Most atheists, especially those with scientific background would frown at incest, not just between humans but also between all animals. It degrades the gene pool as offsprings of such relationships suffer serious genetic degradation. Even the dynasty of the great Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamen was ended due to incest.
The irony of your question is that the Jewish religion which is the progenitor of Christianity promoted and encouraged incest. Abraham married his half sister, Isaac, his son married his cousin. I do not even want about Noah who slept with his daughters.

dblackninja:

No it's the ganger man over here. The only I buy weed from. He is always at the most High state

The one you're probably talking about is the confused one that loves incest so much to the point of hating it. Very confused being I think

Don't make assumptions about who he is just remember the eternal one exists.

plaetton:


I think it's silly to ask atheists whether incest is right or wrong.

Atheists are not from a different planet other than the one you call your own.

An atheist is subject to the moral and legal laws of whichever country is a part.

An atheist , let me repeat it to the daft brain for the millionth and one time, is simply someone who doesn't believe in the existence of imaginary creator and puppet fairy in the sky.

Gosh!!

Atheist president in North Korea coerce women even 13 year old females into sexual servitude . North Korea is officially an atheist state and if the president does it , why wouldn't fellow atheist masses do same ?

Now atheists lack any moral compass and do as they please - something being wrong or right depends on their personal perspective . Sir , you might hate me for this question but I have to ask . I'm sorry if you should take any umbrage at the question .

If you walk in on your grown up son and daughter having consensual sex , as an atheist how would you react ?

Now if you say its wrong , you have to explain to them why having consensual sex for the gratification being derived is wrong . I mean it is consensual , its for the pleasure , they are above 18 , why the heck will it be wrong ?

I need your response sir . Remember its all about scrutiny .

freecocoa:
Mumu of the highest order.

Your god himself originated inbreeding and you are here talking crap, the people of the bible are the greatest inbreeders of all time you mofo, haha.

Incest is against God's law in this dispensation . But sir seun , do you permit this type of vituperative attack on a forum of such cachet ?

Richirich713:

. They think they are the only ones who can scrutinize

Logicbwoy:


LIES! For someone claiming moral superiority over atheists, you are such a liar-

here is what an atheist told you on page one about incest-

He didn't answer the question , even a fellow atheist on the first page made the observation

Farmerforlife:

You know, I think that your question was a really good one. It brings out the inherent flaws in the atheist claim that they only act upon the morality engendered through science and logic. They have so far, proferred no single scientific or logical reason for not having one night stands with their mothers, sisters or grannies, just for pleasure, or why they should think it is wrong to do so. Therefore, I am convinced that they probably think that it is right to do so, but are just afraid to say it out loud.

Lmao ... they do not have the guts - it would be insane for them to admit they see nothing wrong in banging relatives just for the pleasure .

Blame atheism for moral decadence . It is apparent objective morality protects the sanity of mankind . Thank God for God