₦airaland Forum

abobote:
Nothing justifies this barbaric

Sure.
But a mistake is a mistake.
I modified my post you quoted, read it.

Acidosis:
You "mistakenly" killed over 110 innocent children and the people involved plus the military chiefs still have their jobs?? No one is thinking of resigning on grounds of incompetence, morality, or even empathy?

We are not at war. No external aggression whatsoever. No internal aggression deserving any airstrike either. You killed over 110 children unprovoked and everyone is simply moving on??

When the wicked rules, the people truly suffer.

So bandits are not internal aggression deserving airstrike?
Ask any soldier that has faced bandits before, you'll know bandits are upcoming ISWAP.

Don't the military themselves crash their airplanes by mistake? Don't they get friendly fire by mistake?

It was mostly someone mistakenly giving a wrong coordinate or someone erroneously misinterpreting a correct coordinate.
Either ways, a mistake is a mistake. Even you make mistakes.

Farfalla:
The world is changing, but not as quickly as you may think. Gay men in their 20s can easily move in together but a 47-year old gay MD of a multinational firm in this part of the world will not openly move in with a lover. I'm speaking strictly from my observation in my locality. If I lived in Johannesburg I'd probably witness a different outcome.

You do have a point!

Citing J'burg as an example location, do you per chance live in SA?

Danyel1z:
It's not right to beat a woman, I don't support that. My neighbor tho, they were both yabbing themselves, instead of the man to leave the house, he was throwing words back at the wife before you know it, the wife said "you deserve hellfire" Omo, beat by Dre no reach the kine beats weh this man produce.

Why should the man leave the house?
If I were to be a woman and the man leaves the house for me, when he comes back, I'll resume from where I stopped. Let me see how many times he will be leaving the house.

To the main issue, I won't hit a woman unless she hits me first.
Incase of her hitting me, I'll give her X5 of whatever attack she gives me.

Farfalla:
I am straight, so I am physically attracted to men....unless of course you think you're quoting a man?

Bisexuals are attracted to both men and women. Homosexual men are only attracted to men, but they can sleep with a woman out of obligation, even when they find her disgusting. It's usually a gruelling experience for them but many do it to save face.

I didn't see the (f) beside your moniker.

Only a few percentage of gay people will sleep with opposite sex just to safe face.
The world is going liberal, people are practicing homosexuality without fear.

I might even be gay but am I going to write it on my forehead? Only few people might know.
So why should I incovinience myself to sleep with people I ain't attracted to?

Samantha124:
Ra batuske mumu za za sa za za refefe meow ra ra raaaa!!!!🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

I don't think you get it.

Caseless:
bisexuals nko?

Yes bisexuals swing both ways.
But homos? No!

Farfalla:
Just because they're not attracted to women doesn't mean they can't have sex and sire children with them.

Because of the stigma associated with the LGBTQ community in this part of the world, a lot of gay men in Africa, particularly the older ones, are legally married to women and even sire children with those wives, but clandestinely carry on with their gay affairs with their partners (who are also probably married).

I watched a documentary some years ago focusing on a gay prostitute in a certain African country, who revealed that over 80% of his clients are "respectable" family men.

There's a difference between bisexual and homosexual.

If you're straight, can you have sex with a man? If no, then there's no way a gay man will have sex with an opposite sex.

Samantha124:
Let me go and pray for my new thongs...🏃🏻‍♀️🏃🏻‍♀️🏃🏻‍♀️... Holy Ghost fiiirrreeee!!!!🔥🔥🔥

Don't forget to pray in tongues for your new thongs

That fallen breasts part off me

Bliss62:




If you have never handled a Riffle before you won't understand this woman is a bad ass... She handled the recoil like a pro


.

fa4dmike:
May be a military lady. I love active gurls

She's DSS

tishbite42:
We have bisexuals

Yes.
And bisexuals aren't gay

owolabi5:
Ask Will Smith

1. There's no proof that Will is gay.

2. A gay man can never kiss a woman talk more of having intercourse with a woman.

Soulsymbol99:
They are obviously gay

Do homosexuals impregnate women?

Officialenny1:
The way i love this man body ... I don't mind him fucking me till day light

It's either you're gay or a male pretending to be female.

traware:
She will claim to have been paralyzed with fear because of the power dynamics between Jamie and her (wealthy male celeb and a broke female nobody)

With what you typed in your signature, are you sure you're fine?

lexy2014:
very true but I was even saying lets assumed it actually happened. is it touching of breasts and putting hand inside her pant that resulted into all these: "suffered and continues to suffer severe emotional distress and anxiety, humiliation, embarrassment, post-traumatic stress disorder and other physical and emotional damages".

like u said the lie is very obvious

The emotional distress and the likes is a common lie to make the accusations weighty.
It's easy to make such lie because it cannot be easily confirmed.

It's her lawyer that'll suggest that lie.

EhisChelsea1:
I think here actually lies the answer we seek. We can deduce from this biblical verse that UNTIL this moment, the DESIRE of the woman was not the man and the wan was NOT ruling over the woman….they were equals…

….BUT from this moment upward, the Man was PLACED over the woman and the woman HAD TO submit and be subjected to the man’s lordship…..biblically speaking from this curse verdict placed by God himself…..

….HOWEVER, Jesus came and PAID the PRICE and REDEEMED BOTH MAN AND WOMAN from THIS CURSE placed by God as a result of the fall of man…..

….now, DOES IT MAKE ANY BIBLICAL SENSE that the woman should continue to be under that curse verdict EVEN AFTER Jesus has paid the price for her redemption?

Does it make sense at all?

Ephesians 5:22 - 24 that talks about wives submitting to husbands was written decades after Jesus came, died, and resurrected.

Since Jesus has paid the price, why do other curses still stand?

QuinModah:
My sister people don't know the pressure in NA

Why did you help her change it from Airforce to Army??

Moyinoluwa35:
That's why I left Nigeria airforce ..thank God am better now, spent two years was receiving 128k monthly as a second lieutenant, but the envy , hates and death threat was much cos I did not give room to the oga at all, am working in another govt place am okay , money is not everything but peace of mind is all

Dey lie small small abeg.

Even someone that has neither entered base nor barracks will see through your lies.
You just want to implicate the innocent girl on your dp.

Westerhoffe:
Shame on you.
For just 5 minutes pleasure, you're paying with 4,383 days behind bars.
Now you'd be sex-starved for 12 years.

Ode omo.

But… what is in this thing that people violate others because of it?

The manner in which he carried out the act is crazily surprising to me.
In a country like England for that matter.

I won't be surprised if na village people doings.

1Sharon:
I didn't need to completed the verse because na una memorised favourite verse be that.

Why are you changing the definition based on the context ?

Submission required from a wife to husband cannot be required from a church member to church member na.
Gosh! Can't you think??!

I'm done with you.

1Sharon:
African people are the first people on earth! We did not come from any Adam & Eve. Every other race comes from black.

"They" or "them" are used for gender less entities.

God is referred to as a male in the Bible, as I said before it is because the Bible is a product of a male mind. As for the Quran? Even worse.

I don't need words you pulled out of your anus. I need facts that has stood the test of time just like the bible I quoted.
If you don't have a concrete proof to backup your claim, I dismiss your claim and mine continues to stand.

When you were in primary school(which is more recent than bible time), did your teacher teach you anything about pronouns for genderless entities?
This is why people in the bible didn't have a pronoun for God. "They" and "Them" were reserved as plural pronouns.

The last paragraph, you can believe whatever about that. No one really knows.


I'm done arguing!

1Sharon:
Ephesians 5:21- submit to one another. Don't quote only the parts that favour you.

This is a proof that you don't know the bible.

1. You didn't even complete the verse.

2. Paul was writing to the church at Ephesus. Submission in the context of a christian relationship(christian brothers and sisters) includes the idea of putting someone else, and their needs, above ourselves.

3. We are talking about submission between married couples and Paul expressly stated that wives should submit to their husbands in Ephesians 5:22-24

luminouz:
I take God beg you, no quote her again...this thread will become meaningless

It pains me to see someone take pride in ignorance. Make I school am small.

1Sharon:
The first woman is an african woman, not a middle Eastern woman called Eve.

Since you're acknowledging God doesn't have a gender, why is he perceived as a male?

And why is calling God a female blasphemous?

1. I gave you my own proof as to why I believed Eve was the first female. So please give me your own proof why you believe the first woman is an African woman and not Eve.

2. God acts like a father figure hence, people refer to him as father(male). Now ask yourself, in the bible time, what pronouns could be ascribed to a genderless entity?

3. In the bible, there's no express statement that accounts for the gender to refer to God as. If referring to him as female is what rocks your boat, it is not a blasphemy.

Kobojunkie:
Wrong, that was God placing a curse on marriage and childbearing by cursing the woman for her sin against God.

Just so you know, Eve was cloned from Adam so Eve was a female copy of Adam.

The point is, God has made man to be over his wife and a wife to be under her husband.
I don't know what this is if not submission.

Eve wasn't cloned.
Paper is made from a tree. Does that mean papers are cloned trees?

1Sharon:
Africans predate the story of Adam and Eve.

God should not have any gender. But he is seen as a male, but a male mind is the mind behind the bible. God doesn't have XY chromosomes.

The emboldened doesn't answer who the first woman is. If you don't believe God for creating the first woman to be Eve, you should know who the first woman then is.

Yes, God doesn't have a gender. But how does he being referred to as a male affect you?

Just say you don't believe in God. All these things you're saying reeks of ignorance.

1Sharon:
Lol. you really believe Eve was the 1st woman?

Why won't the bible say that since it came from a masculine mind?

It's the same reason God is seen as a man and not a woman.

You seem to have a wealth of knowledge I do not possess. Kindly share more.

Who then was the first woman? When was she created?
Which gender do you think God is? And why do you think so?

Magnoliaa:
It is interesting that it is these two scenarios that are culturally far apart that you can bring up. Very interesting.

Because in the real world, couples who eat at the dining table and uses a washing machine do not exist.

You're overthinking things.

I deliberately mentioned these two relatively extreme scenarios which implies everything else in between.

The point is marry your type.

1Sharon:
Before holy books, women existed.

Highly laughable.

Gen 3:16
Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

That is God talking to the first woman to ever exist.