Kevin Samuels, a self-proclaimed relationship guru and image consultant who is best known for his misogynistic comments about black women, in particular, has died.
He was known for dating advice and YouTube videos where he operated under the self-proclaimed title of an “image consultant.”
Some of his most popular videos include “How Much Do You Cost to Submit?” and “Modern Women Are Average at Best?” Just last week he sparked outrage on social media after he said unmarried women who are 35 years old and over are considered “leftover women.”
“If you live to 35 and you’re not married, you’re a leftover. You’re leftover. Men know you may have a problem,” he said. “Whether you want to hear it or not, I’ll go with you. I’m telling you the truth you don’t want to hear.”
Although Samuels himself was twice divorced with an alleged single status, he never shied away from speaking his mind when it came to relationship topics. Rumors regarding his death began circulating on Twitter and other social media outlets earlier this evening, leading to an online battle between Samuels’ fans and critics. Those who have found fellowship in the influencer’s ideology accused his critics of celebrating his death.
“Kevin Samuels told broke men & mediocre faced women to shoot in their range and only one group wants him dead because of it. LMFAO,” one user wrote, for example.
A young woman shot back, “I don’t believe Kevin Samuels is dead, for the record. But me not feeling bad if he is doesn’t mean I’m ‘celebrating’ it. He went out of his way to be cruel. We are not required to mourn virtues he didn’t show. And asking black women, of all ppl, to show tact is audacious.”
Further details surrounding his cause of death have yet to be revealed.
Rafaell: On Facebook oó... and it turned out to be a COMPLETE DIZASTER !!! We've been separated for almost 3 years now, and are about going ahead with divorce processes.
Too bad. Sorry about that. Hope you get a second chance at love.
KOPArespect: I will like to be brief, I joined this new company April and I am still within my 3 months probation period but I will like to leave due to the fact that I got to know there is inequality in payment of staffs even in the same level. I think that is one of the reasons why they claim salary must be kept a secret.
The issue now is that I have undergone several trainings and issued about 3 professional certificates. Will I have to pay for the training as indicated in the bonding agreement whereas the termination clause states that either party can withdraw having given 2 weeks prior notice.
*Note: the present job is roughly 220k without accommodation in Portharcout and my new offer is 250k with accommodation in the same state
You are at liberty to terminate with a two weeks notice but you'd have to reimburse the Coy for the costs of the training you did undergo.
Wizzy13: 7th of this month is her birthday, so we went to a photo studio only for her to tell me that she's not gonna do that with me. I felt bad and i left immediately, guys pls what is the reason for her action
It's not a pre wedding shoot na but I can understand why you are angry.
Solofresh2: There is course mate of mine. We were close friends in school. So there is this day she followed me to my home (because I don't live in the hostel, I rented an apartment outside), I was so hungry so she decided to cook for me. After we finished eating, one thing led to the other and we had sex. This girl is in her early twenties just like me.
Since that day, she never lets me rest. We have been having sex and she told me she has a boyfriend. She comes to my house and we always end up having sex all the time. I have told her enough is enough but she keeps coming. I use protection though.
I blamed myself for letting her know my place How can I discard this girl totally because as long as she comes, I will keep sleeping with her.
Does she come unannounced ? If no then, you should have the willpower to avoid her, if no one day when she comes don't open even if she knows you're in.
Kreddy: There's this girl I've been dating for a year now. I met her at a friend's wedding. I've met her mother before we went far in the relationship and thankfully she "yessed" the relationship. Two months ago, I had a disagreement (due to her unfaithfulness) with my fiancee. I was a little bit tensed and I ended up calling her a dog. I really love her, there's a time I visited her out of blue,She asked me to sit which I denied,I angrily asked her if she put a charm on the chair for me to sit on. It took some weeks before we came to terms again. I was not aware that all my statements had been reported to her mom. Last Friday,I was publicly embarrassed by her mother. I was with her on that faithful night,in the middle of our discussion,her mother just showed up and told me she can't marry me. She made allusion to my utterances, (charm). I left the spot shamelessly. Now today the girl visited me and asked me to impregnate her to avoid being given to a man who's being giving her mother money. This girl was raised by a single mother,her elder sister was also supporting the mother. it's only her immediate brother that's against her being given to the man. The man, who's being conversing with her mother and sister on phone,wants to make her the second wife. The main issue is that, I'm an undergraduate at my penultimate year, living with my parents. I can't yield to her request (impregnating her) which might be disastrous, I'm not financially stable. The girl really loves me and I do too. She burst into tears when I told her to follow her mother's Will. I have lost my sense of reasoning,I can't just arrive at a logical conclusion. What should do?? This night,she also confided in me that my brother's wife who's related to her father,used to tell her mum how wicked my mom is, that my mom use to control her children. This I didn't really see it as an issue. If I were to take up this matter,my mom would really not take it lightly. Though I was advised by my younger brother to confront her on it. But I'm resisting the urge. I really need your inputs on this matter.
Ceeman18: Lol. Another cock and bull story. See public release. Poorly written and scripted. Pls patronnise us for your power steering pumps of all car models.
Very poorly written, a coy represent itself as a single entity with "I".
Oluwapresley: Isn't this the same format of these Ponzi guys saying their bankers have frozen their accounts and then leaving investors hanging? Just that this one seems like a legitimate freeze for them to call flutterwave out like this.
Anyways, for me and my family, we won't be involved in any online investment ever again. Not after what my eyes saw last year with almost 3m going into thin air.
Ehinjuola: Hello NLanders, I got caught up with something on my neck in my neighboood recently.
There's this woman (A) who bought a sewing machine from one woman (B) 9 years ago, suddenly woman B just came from nowhere to come and claim the sewing machine that she sold years back that she only use the machine as a collateral from woman A that she didn't sell it for her.
Now the issue is Woman A has sold the sewing Machine and also insisted that if truly woman's (B) use it as collateral for how many years now she would wish if Woman B paid her back with the interest on the money which the money is way much more than money for 100 sewing machines.
Now questions is, how will I go abt it cause I happened to be one of the landlords in my area( I guess I am the youngest) and we are called to come and judge over the matter. 1. Woman's A doesn't posses the receipt of the sewing machine and as already sold the sewing machine 2. Woman's B want the machine at any cost claiming she has the receipt with her and she will use it against woman's A in court ( If the judgement didn't suite her taste in landlord meeting)
Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)
Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.
Since there's no evidence that shows that B transferred possessory rights to A. A should just deny that B ever gave her any sewing machine since B is going mad. Has B heard of the principle of laches and acquiescence ? I guess not. As she's shouting court upandan.