₦airaland Forum

johnw47:
sewer mouth false accuser beelzebubAgent of absolutely no understanding

the pope is certainally not my pope

see yet how you have extreme endogenous confusion

1Co_14:33  For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.

Pro_18:2  A fool hath no delight in understanding,

Pro_19:1  Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse in his lips, and is a fool.

Really

Then whose Pope is he?

That article exposed the pagan origin of the trinity doctrine and it's connection to 666, it also exposes the role your church the (Catholic Church) played in bringing this false doctrine into Christaintity.

solite3:
Yes

You are joker, you are trying to make God a lair.

johnw47:
beelzebubAgent, you know i don't enlighten a sewer mouth false accuser
of absolutely no understanding at all:

Mat_7:6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

Is that all you can say after I exposed your Pope displaying 666 sign and other pagan symbols.

MuttleyLaff:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d8/P._Oxy._LXVI_4499.jpg/220px-P._Oxy._LXVI_4499.jpg
^{Red arrow points to χιϛ (616), "number of the beast"
in the fragmented Papyrus 115}

Light years ago, when I was researching and trying to get some study on 666, was when I came across the alternate 616 number. The popped up alternate 616 number, then right there, just poured cold water on my 666 researching and spoiled the enthusiasm of further studying 666, that is why I tried bringing it to BlueAgent attention by asking him the question:
Are you aware, the fragmented Papyrus 115, states 616, as opposed to 666?.

But the evidence shows that the number is 666.
The pagans used an equilateral triangle to represent their gods and it is still used today by occultist and pagans to represent their gods. if the number is not true, the pagans are in a better position to know.

https://www.duetsblog.com/2018/02/articles/non-traditional-trademarks/hands-off-jay-zs-hand-gesture-trademark/

https://www.illuminatirex.com/illuminati-signs/

www.themasonictrowel.com/Articles/degrees/degree_3rd_files/the_equilateral_triangle_gltx.htm

johnw47:
lie lie™ barrister

they are called son's of God and Jesus is God, as many scriptures show




Joh 1:10  He was in the world, and the world was made by him(including man and everything that was made), and the world knew him not.

^^^ Jesus created man, therefor men are son's of Jesus - sons of God, the Word is God, john 1:1 +++
but men knew him not, and you still know Him not


Joh 1:5  And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not

You are more confused than can be imagined.

johnw47:
beelzebubAgent, you know i wont waste any more time explaining anything to you a sewer mouth false accuser
having absolutely no understanding, with lies and confusion

https://www.nairaland.com/5382917/trinity-doctrine-false-doctrine-it/7#81785581

btw, i don't believe the Son is the Father, i believe Father and Son is two persons in God, as in john 1:1
read your post and see how there is no one more duh than you

Is there any meaning in this nonsense you posted?

blingxx:
How many tax do you pay?

Do people without jobs pay tax?

solite3,johnw47

solite3:
How do Trinitarians ignore the fact that God is the father of Jesus?

Trinitarians only says that the father, the Son and the holy Spirit is one being.
Which is properly backed by scriptures

One being that have capacity for different will and mind?

RandomGuy48:
The original post is mostly too goofy to really bother responding to, but I did want to note something regarding the Number of the Beast.


How do you get 666? From three instances of 60 degrees? That's not 666, that's 180. Or is the claim that because you found three 6's in the form of three 60's that makes 666?

Sorry, but that doesn't do it. It isn't three 6's that make the Number of the Beast: It is the specific numerical value of six hundred and sixty-six (this is more obvious in the Greek text). You do not get to that value with three 60's.

Furthermore, the Number of the Beast is identified in the Bible as either "the number of a man" or "humanity's number" (depending on how you translate it). Triangle angles are neither of those things.

So what is the Number of the Beast? Most likely a reference to Roman Emperor Nero, who was a persecutor of Christians. "Nero Caesar" in Aramaic adds up to 666. Notably, a few early manuscripts of Revelation have 616 rather than 666. Now, this could be just a simple scribal error. But there is another possibility as to why it was 616. An alternate way of writing Nero's name in Aramaic causes it to add up to 616, and Nero's name in Latin adds also up to 616.

But whether or not the Number of the Beast referred to Nero, it certainly doesn't refer to anything involving the degrees in a triangle.

See logic.

Your analysis is too lame and naive to worth a respond

blueAgent:
Women Going Topless in Public is Now Legalized in Six States.
Pomidor Quixote
Daily Stormer
September 21, 2019.

Finally! The nipple has been freed!

Thank you, Progress. Now we don’t even need the
internet in order to be exposed to pornographic
imagery.
Going topless has been effectively
legalized in six states after a town
decided it was not worth anymore
money to fight an appeal.
Fort Collins in Colorado had already
spent $300,000 defending the law and
trying to stop women from taking their
tops off in public.
They had been appealing a decision,
which was upheld by the Tenth
Circuit Court of Appeals in February,
that the law amounted to
unconstitutional discrimination.
As the Appeals court covers Wyoming,
Utah, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico,
and Oklahoma, women in these
states can now effectively bare all
without breaking the law, reports NBC
News.
Wait, did I say “pornographic imagery” before?
I meant grotesque nightmare-inducing horrors.
Do you want to see the nipples of overweight,
deformed women? Because that’s what you’re going to
see, mostly.
The decision is a win for the Free The
Nipple campaign which wants wants
equality for women.
Previously a federal court judge had
concluded the ban was based on
‘ negative stereotypes depicting
women’s breasts, but not men’s
breasts, as sex objects‘.
Not so long ago you could argue that it’s not the same
when men do it because they don’t have breasts, but
nowadays most men have breasts.
Despite this fact, women are not attracted to the
breasts of these modern men. That, combined with the
facts that men do like women’s breasts and that
women can now legally show the full tit in public in
some places, gives women power.
The Appeals court dismissed Fort
Collins’ worry that ending the ban on
going topless would mean women
would ‘parade in front of elementary
schools or swimming topless in the
public pool.’
They said there had been no ‘harmful
fallout’ in Boulder and Denver, where
women are allowed to take their tops
off.
No harmful fallout… yet.
Are women legally allowed to parade topless in front of
elementary schools or not though? Because that
should be what matters.
The ‘prohibition on public exposure of
breasts by women and girls over 10
years old’ will be gone from the city
code of Fort Collins as of this week.
Campaigners Brit Hoagland
and Samantha Six sued Fort Collins
for the right to decide if they wanted
to go topless, reports Kgun9.
Ms Hoagland said: ‘ Addressing small
parts of inequality can make a big
difference in how people are treated,
and I thought free the nipple was
just one small step closer to how it
should be.’
“How it should be” according to who?
Why is equality good? Why is it a goal? I’ve been told
diversity is a strength, so I’m pretty skeptical about
this equality thing.
If we’re going to make everyone equal, they better
figure out a way for men to give birth and for women
to grow joysticks so they can pee while standing
without making a mess.
Attorney Andy McNulty said: ‘The
idea that women’s bodies are purely
sexual is something that, it was
perpetuated by this law.
‘ By getting rid of this law, we are
saying women and their bodies are
more than just a sexual object.
They’re human beings just like men .’
But they are not “human beings just like men.” The
only reason women exist as women and not as men is
to use the baby-factory organs they’re equipped with. If
they weren’t meant to get pregnant, they wouldn’t
come with wombs and stuff.
That makes them literally sexual objects because sex
is about reproduction.

https://dailystormer.name/women-going-topless-in-public-is-now-legalized-in-six-states/

Why is it that most women are easily manipulated and just inherently stupid?

ladyGKilaBCrueD:
Nice. After all, Adam and eve were once naked before they fučked up. This can only happen in a sane and lawful country. If it was a country like Nigeria where most of the men are sex-starved savages, na one million rape cases we go dey report everyday. Spits.

Rape rates in US are high already even before this new law, imagine what will happen after the first 6months when this law takes effect

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58e24c14e4b0c777f788d24f

Maximus69:
No Sir!

(1)The Beast is the collision of world government {United Nations}!

(2)Babylon the Great is {Catholic's Trinity} that united different forms of worship under a mysterious teaching program that's incomprehensible to so that all those involved finds it so difficult to teach! That's why it is called MYSTERY! Revelations 17:2-5

So there both different entities.

You'll notice that the Bible writer later wrote that the Beast later destroyed Babylon the great! Revelations 17:16

Of course the united nations {wild beast} have been having undue relationship with Babylon the great {FALSE religion} for so long and they've both joined hands in killing many faithful men during the dark ages!

That's why the Bible said they've been having illicit sexual relationship for long so that the woman {Babylon the great} got herself drunk with the blood of God's faithful servants! Revelations 17:6

God bless you!

True.
Sorry I mixed it up.

Women Going Topless in Public is Now Legalized in Six States.
Pomidor Quixote
Daily Stormer
September 21, 2019.

Finally! The nipple has been freed!

Thank you, Progress. Now we don’t even need the
internet in order to be exposed to pornographic
imagery.
Going topless has been effectively
legalized in six states after a town
decided it was not worth anymore
money to fight an appeal.
Fort Collins in Colorado had already
spent $300,000 defending the law and
trying to stop women from taking their
tops off in public.
They had been appealing a decision,
which was upheld by the Tenth
Circuit Court of Appeals in February,
that the law amounted to
unconstitutional discrimination.
As the Appeals court covers Wyoming,
Utah, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico,
and Oklahoma, women in these
states can now effectively bare all
without breaking the law, reports NBC
News.
Wait, did I say “pornographic imagery” before?
I meant grotesque nightmare-inducing horrors.
Do you want to see the nipples of overweight,
deformed women? Because that’s what you’re going to
see, mostly.
The decision is a win for the Free The
Nipple campaign which wants wants
equality for women.
Previously a federal court judge had
concluded the ban was based on
‘ negative stereotypes depicting
women’s breasts, but not men’s
breasts, as sex objects‘.
Not so long ago you could argue that it’s not the same
when men do it because they don’t have breasts, but
nowadays most men have breasts.
Despite this fact, women are not attracted to the
breasts of these modern men. That, combined with the
facts that men do like women’s breasts and that
women can now legally show the full tit in public in
some places, gives women power.
The Appeals court dismissed Fort
Collins’ worry that ending the ban on
going topless would mean women
would ‘parade in front of elementary
schools or swimming topless in the
public pool.’
They said there had been no ‘harmful
fallout’ in Boulder and Denver, where
women are allowed to take their tops
off.
No harmful fallout… yet.
Are women legally allowed to parade topless in front of
elementary schools or not though? Because that
should be what matters.
The ‘prohibition on public exposure of
breasts by women and girls over 10
years old’ will be gone from the city
code of Fort Collins as of this week.
Campaigners Brit Hoagland
and Samantha Six sued Fort Collins
for the right to decide if they wanted
to go topless, reports Kgun9.
Ms Hoagland said: ‘ Addressing small
parts of inequality can make a big
difference in how people are treated,
and I thought free the nipple was
just one small step closer to how it
should be.’
“How it should be” according to who?
Why is equality good? Why is it a goal? I’ve been told
diversity is a strength, so I’m pretty skeptical about
this equality thing.
If we’re going to make everyone equal, they better
figure out a way for men to give birth and for women
to grow joysticks so they can pee while standing
without making a mess.
Attorney Andy McNulty said: ‘The
idea that women’s bodies are purely
sexual is something that, it was
perpetuated by this law.
‘ By getting rid of this law, we are
saying women and their bodies are
more than just a sexual object.
They’re human beings just like men .’
But they are not “human beings just like men.” The
only reason women exist as women and not as men is
to use the baby-factory organs they’re equipped with. If
they weren’t meant to get pregnant, they wouldn’t
come with wombs and stuff.
That makes them literally sexual objects because sex
is about reproduction.

https://dailystormer.name/women-going-topless-in-public-is-now-legalized-in-six-states/

State001:
http://igberetvnews.com/980219/security-buhari-receives-briefing-from-service-chiefs-photos

Useless & incompetent government.

blingxx:
See them ... Yet their citizens (especially blacks) are victims of gun violence, tax, drugs, Internet fraud... You are one of those who still think america is perfect,

Lemme tell you something an average American has 3 jobs with 3 diff shifts a day in order to evade to tax

How many jobs do Nigerian's have?

madridguy:
USA looking for every avenue to attack Iran.

I believe it was a False flag from US and their Allies.

Barristter07:
If Jesus is the source, why are angels and other human creations not called Jesus sons??

I wonder.

kkins25:
What entity, was the writer referring to? Another man couldn't possibly have the power to change languages. Lord was bolded in the text, we can assume it was yvwh hand work of dashing people igbo youruba and hausa

The entity is the Beast, it is also known as the mystery Babylon.

kkins25:
then he is very dumb. I hope he is satisfied with the world he has now.

Job 11:7
Canst thou by searching find out God? canst thou find out
the Almighty unto perfection?


1 Corinthians 1:25
Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the
weakness of God is stronger than men.

budaatum:
The Lord who said, "Blessed are the Peacemakers", is scattering?
I'm so glad He retired and His Son took over!

His son cannot do anything that is not in accordance to the will of his father.
John 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.

budaatum:
The Lord who said, "Blessed are the Peacemakers", is scattering?

I'm so glad He retired and His Son took over!

You are assuming that God scattering the people is a bad bad thing, but that is not true.

MuttleyLaff:
Are you aware, the fragmented Papyrus 115, states 616, as opposed to 666?

Smh

Yes I have heard about it, but so far there is no concrete evidence to support that claim.

kkins25:
most importantly why is yvwh against world unity?

No he is not against World unity, if he had allowed men to unite it could have lead to Sin and wickedness been pervasive which could have lead to the second destruction of the world just like in the time of Noah.

The purpose of God scattering them was to minimize the effect of Sin.

budaatum:
Below is a quote from Pied Pipers Of The Truth Movement: Where Exactly Are They Trying To Lead Us?


"In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by broadcasting so many contradictory opinions from all sides and for such a long time that it will make the Goyim lose their heads in a maze of confusion. They will come to realise that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in political matters, especially when it is intended that the public should not understand the issues being discussed. In that way the Goyim will leave the opinions and understanding of the issues to those who guide the public. This is the first secret."

When some read the above, they go look for the medicine that makes them immune to losing their heads in a maze of confusion and being brought into a state of bewilderment by making sure their own opinion is their own well thought out and considered opinion. That way, they aren't in anyone's hands.

Besides, see us here, 2,333,202 members and counting, all with our opinions and not "Goyim will leave the opinions and understanding of the issues to those who guide the public"!

Yes, conspiracy theory. And an opinion. To be considered but not to be accepted as the entire truth.

They can confuse others not me, their aim is to discourage people from searching for the truth.

Jesus said by their footsteps you shall know them.
No matter how they try to confuse people the truth will still emerge.
Mind you that most of the things that were predicted by people called conspiracy theorists in the past with regards to NWO are been fufilled before our eyes

budaatum:
Below is a quote from Pied Pipers Of The Truth Movement: Where Exactly Are They Trying To Lead Us?


"In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by broadcasting so many contradictory opinions from all sides and for such a long time that it will make the Goyim lose their heads in a maze of confusion. They will come to realise that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in political matters, especially when it is intended that the public should not understand the issues being discussed. In that way the Goyim will leave the opinions and understanding of the issues to those who guide the public. This is the first secret."

When some read the above, they go look for the medicine that makes them immune to losing their heads in a maze of confusion and being brought into a state of bewilderment by making sure their own opinion is their own well thought out and considered opinion. That way, they aren't in anyone's hands.

Besides, see us here, 2,333,202 members and counting, all with our opinions and not "Goyim will leave the opinions and understanding of the issues to those who guide the public"!

Yes, conspiracy theory. And an opinion. To be considered but not to be accepted as the entire truth.

They can confuse others not me, their aim is to discourage people from searching for the truth.

Jesus said by their footsteps you shall know them.
No matter how they try to confuse people the truth will still emerge.
Mind you that most of the things that were predicted by people called conspiracy theorists in the past with regards to NWO are been fufilled before our eyes.

budaatum:
Is an ideology "that intends to unite men across different nation's, languages,religion,cultures for the purpose of acheiving a New world Order(NWO)", a bad thing?

What exactly is this "New world Order(NWO)" that they want to achieve?

It's a government that has Satan as it's leader.

solite3:
I dont know why you are still writing long epistle.
Jesus and God has same nature that makes him truly God.

Psalms 2:1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 2:3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 2:4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision. 2:5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.

2:6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. **

2:7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. ***

2:8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.

2:9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel. 2:10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. 2:11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 2:12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.


In verses 6 and 7 God calls Jesus his son and also informs us that on a certain day Jesus was BEGOTTEN.

Tell me what is difficult here for trinitarians to comprehend?

solite3:
Nothing to hold hence the insult
Jesus is God Almighty your creator denying him makes you just like the atheist

How can Jesus be the Almighty and still be called Son?
Is like me having a son called Mr A and I told the world that i have a Son who is Mr A, eye witnesses also confirm the fact that I am the father of Mr A.

But the only ones disputing that am not the father are trinitarians who think they know me and my son better than I do.
Is it not weird that Trinitarians will ignore over 100 scriptures that say God is the father of Jesus and Jesus is the son, just to promote a doctrine that has no scriptural or divine backing.

budaatum:
I should spend my time trolling through conspiracy theories? You are funny!

What are "the objectives of the tower of Babel"?

How is the tower of Babel "symbolic of man's United effort in their rebellion against God"?

Really you call it conspiracy theory?

Like i said before the tower of Babel presently is symbolic, it does not refer to a physical tower but an idealogy that intends to unite men across different nation's, languages,religion,cultures for the purpose of acheiving a New world Order(NWO).

budaatum:
No, I'm not "insinuating that the Bible is false", but that human understanding of it may be false.
Satan is, after all, not lazy.

An Almighty God would not have lied to Adam and Eve, and would not fear those who build towers of babel.

I did not intend readers to understand it literally.

I think the tower of Babel is symbolic of man's United effort in their rebellion against God, I doubt if it's purpose was to get to Heaven.
please click this site and you will find more compelling evidence that their is a conspiracy going on the World stage torwards acheiving the objectives of the tower of Babel.

http://revolutionharry..com/?m=1

Bruno3000:
Not all Christians believe ib the doctrine of trinity. Its teachings are faulty and unbiblical. Thanks for the info anyways.

You are welcome Bro.