lucy10: Please be honest with yourself, how is the price of commodities in your area as compared to GEJ regime.
Price of commodity is not a determinant of which government is better. A lot other factors affect the mechanism of price. Did you not do Economics in secondary school.
What was the price of a sachet of Milo under Abacha as compared to the price under Obasanjo? Does the disparity in price tell the whole story?
ericsmith: he understand what poverty is all about yet he built a school that cost 1m + as tution fee. he understands poverty yet he fly his team (abroad) just to strategise how to kick start a campaign that will only happen within nigeria. he understands what poverty is yet ,4 out 4 companies he owned not even one provides services that a lower income earner can afford. he understand what poverty is yet he supplies mikano to rich when their is no light but what about the poor. how many poor man children are on atiku scholarship scheme in ABTI university ... IF air were to be a commodity will atiku even produce for the poor ??
lucy10: Please when has it become a crime to invest or acquire properties, I guess you are the person that sold or built the houses for him. So when you buy more houses in future your family will call you a looter.
So, you can't see evidence of corruption in Atiku's political story?
Buying a lot of houses is not the crux of the matter but the circumstance that created such a spending spree.
Where did Atiku get funds to establish his university and how did an individual of hitherto modest means build a university without bank loans?
Look at it, my sister. If he can get so wealthy as VP, who would be able to stop him from embezzling or misappropriating funds as president?
lucy10: you can't dispute the fact that his employees are pulled out of poverty, he invested in areas he found opportunities. He mustn't have a company that produces pure water for you to agree that he understands poverty. Please what more can pull people out of poverty if not creating employment.
He understands poverty and yet the minimum wage he offered within his business was paltry. Abeg, tell us another story.
Providing employment does not necessarily mean the creator wants to pull people out of poverty. Ordinarily, if you have a business, you will need to employ people. So if you rob Nigerians blind and establish a company, you will have to employ from the pool of people you once robbed.
How will Atiku create jobs as a president? Will there be massive employment in his business enterprises or will he sell NNPC and enter into another scam deal to establish another business to employ a bogus 100,000 Nigerian youths?
lucy10: Those are fooled are those who believe that a failed government will take them to the next level, please other level is after failure if not doom.
And what does Atiku have to offer after a scam privatization that made him wealthier? From having one house in Adamawa, Atiku went to 140 houses in 8 years as VP.
He fools you. He can't fool me and other sensible Nigerians.
mycar: I will not pity anybody that will vote for Buhari again, yeah, its called self inflicted affliction. Buhari is a scammer else what else does he have in the bag for us if not his usual nonchalant attitude and disobedience to the rule of law.
Once he wins again, he will travel back to London for medicals. Scammer
lucy10: Atiku saying that he sold firewood doesn't mean he wants people to vote him out of pity, it only means that he understands what suffering is all about and will make sure he pulls out so many Nigerians out of poverty.
I have always said that if I catch my wife/fiancee/girlfriend with another man, that would be the end of the relationship. Why should I fight over a cheat? What if I lose an eye or even die? A big man like me knows better than to fight over a cheat.
jrusky: Hhmmm....ok go to your bible as I can see you are a religion student pls check where Abraham.only gift to Ishmael was a *kettle of water and a Mat* and he was send Eastward meaning Arabian Pannysular.
From this little statement above you should understand better. Good day.
You are confusing the word Arab with the word Islam
It is widely believed that Ishmael's descendants are progenitors of many Arabian tribes but being an Arab does not mean you are a Muslim.
jrusky: Great now you acted like a real sound guy. So no fuss about that but surely Mohammed must a descendant of someone for sure. Do you agree with me on that?
Of course. But there are no proofs that Ishmael is the forefather of Islam.
And mind you, I am not a Muslim nor do I do religion. I am a child of God and a strong believer in my Lord Jesus Christ.
jrusky: who is the fore father of Islam tell us Mr historian I have said what I knew so say yours for all to read.
Who then is your Islam forefather? Who is your prophet father and which descendant is he from? Educate us, hey don't foolishly come here to shout blasphemy. Educate us or f e c k off.
Islam has no forefather. The founder is simply Mohammed who was never even informed about Abraham, let alone Ishmael.
It is the mixed Arabs who claim to be descendents of Ishmael for many reasons, one of which is to lay claims to the land of Israel, especially Jerusalem. They believe that Ishmael was Abraham's son and so they should share in the Abrahamic covenant as much as the Jews.
Ever heard about the GCC countries? Among the GCC countries are Oman, UAE and Qatar. These countries are Islamic countries. They are not only peaceful but very peaceful.
jrusky: If not for a reasonable one like Muss I would have concur to your conclusion bro.
I said it long ago with the way Islam is and the Muslims behave I got to understand for Abraham as a father to send Ishmael the fore father of Islam out of his arena completely Abraham must have witnessed some horrible behaviour from Ishmael only God know the extent Abraham had suffered in the hand of Ishmael for a father to disowned his own son and send him eastward with a kettle of water and a mat it's something strange because anywhere, place or nation at peace the Muslim in that place, or nation are yet to grown up as a full men the very day they grow to a full men peace is dead in that land or nation.
In a short while guys just watch those jobless cursed, pretending terrorist called MAD-RIC will start threatening. Keep watching.........
Ishmael is not the forefather of Islam. Some of his descendents might have settled in Saudi Arabia, but there is no proof that they were the fathers of the Arabs who spread Islam.
enemyofprogress: Walahi Muslims are the major problem of the universe, eliminate them and there would be peace everywhere
How come there is peace in Islamic countries like UAE. Many of you dream of shopping in Dubai. It is even more peaceful than Rivers State where you have a lot of Christians.
IbrahimDamola: Domination of games is integral to winning matches. If a domineering team is not winning matches all they need to do is to fix the 'scoring department' and start winning. That's what the south africans need.
All over the world, big teams dominate matches before they can become consistent winners. So I think the Bafana team are on the right track. I wish the Eagles can play as cohesive as they do, it would be a wonder to watch.
So domination of matches is a pre-requisite to winning matches. Barca, Rmadrid, chelsea, arsenal all dominate games before they win.
Gernot rohr should be calling Stuart Baxter for lessons on tactics and technics after today's match.
This goes beyond Baxter. Bafana Bafana have always been like that. They appear to play for possessions but rarely win in the end. Another team is Cape Verde. They play very tantalizing football only to lose in the end.
Anyway, you are right. They need to fix their striking department. They are on the right track but it is laughable that after playing fine football for years, they have not been able to fix their striking department. Look at their stadia, they are always empty when Bafana Bafana play. They are entertaining to watch but the end result always leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of their fans.
IbrahimDamola: You 'scored' against the run of play. South Africans deserve the win, they are more cohesive, fighting for the ball and giving proper decisive passes, they hardly lose possession. They just don't have dangermen and finishers.
Nigeria deserved to lose this match. If Iheanachor the waste pipe goes to cameroun in 2019, he will be a big embarrasment. He shouldnt be getting call ups anymore when we have better players like Paul Onuachu.
That is how they play. Even their countrymen know them that is why they hardly come to watch them.
It is not a new thing if South Africa dominates a game. They always dominate games even against big teams. Even with their best strikers, they can dominate a game and still not score.
Ghana would have dismantled them with all their showy football.
LeSulk: Remember the days when we used to play 'the hopeful long ball'. (Between 2007-2014) Things have changed a lot since then. Then we hardly got goals away (be it Morocco or Mozambique) let alone win away.
My only problem with Rohr is that he doesn't seem to change or adapt his tactics to the current matchplay.
It was way before 2007 when the likes of Oliseh in defensive midfield would play a long ball and it would get to the man he wanted it to get to. Then we had Okocha who would curve the ball and the ball would go where he wanted it to go. Since Oliseh retired, we have not had a sure replacement.
I remember those days when South Africans were regular customers.
Now, tension no even gree me watch us play against them. This is a South African team that Senegal or Tunisia will tear into pieces in the first half alone.