BluntCrazeMan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BluntCrazeMan's Profile › BluntCrazeMan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 (of 554 pages)
BigCowHornn:Relax bro. You don't need to explain too much to them.. They wanted us to expose all the information from the IREV COLLATION that we would be using at the tribunal.?? Make them relax first. The tribunal will make it open. And INEC will finally be busted for a Corrupt Body it is |
ShaqFu:You think Election is a small something?? Yet people are being killed because of it.?? N300bn+plus spent recklessly because of it. |
johannu:That was the summary of the whole write-up.. But the commenters on Nairaland missed it totally. |
TemmyT002:We all doubted him |
beerfraud:Seaport in Asaba or Anambra?? At which exact location.?? This lady should stop saying things that are way beyond her intellectual grasp. |
burp18:because he is the man in question?? |
fergie001:Thanks so much |
muykem:Can you quote the relevant sections abbegg |
Thanksful:Osun Comes to mind. Different non-party expert-reports were used by both APC and PDP. |
Spirit04:The Expert wanted to establish non-conformity.. And he succeeded in doing that. |
Thanksful:Witnesses must not be Party Men. Likewise Experts. Better learn this now, and stop sounding silly. |
Thanksful:Must All Experts come from WITHIN the Party? |
You guys didn't read Peter-Obi’s Petition.. But let me help you a bit. Peter Obi had three sets of results. 1. Copies of the original results given to the agents. 2. The IREV RESULTS and analysis, (probably done and brought in by Mark Essien). 3. INEC’s CTC Results gotten from the INEC. Putindbutt: ozo13: ozo13: |
Thanksful:Define “AN OUTSIDER”.. And then also, define “THEIR OWN”.. |
Thanksful:You didn't read Peter-Obi’s Petition.. But let me help you a bit. Peter Obi had three sets of results. 1. Copies of the original results given to the agents. 2. The IREV RESULTS and analysis, (probably done and brought in by Mark Essien). 3. INEC’s CTC Results gotten from the INEC. |
Geeoriginal:Let's still watch out how it would sail during the whole tribunal case |
smokinloud:Ok. Say something else. We don hear this one taaya |
ozo13:If I could remember very well, that the Mark Essien guy said that he intended to tender his work as an Evidence in the tribunal.. Which he did. So, which abandon again are you referring to.?? Go back and read the LOOONG POST abbegg. |
Fergie001, Litigator.. Other learned men of the law... Please, help me out on this one abegg. |
I am aware that the Petitioners have 21 days -- from the date of the declaration of results -- to file their cases at the tribunal. I wouldn't find the length of time they've got to serve the Respondents inside the Electoral Act. But then, the Respondents also have 21 days -- from the date they were served the petition -- to file their reply at the tribunal. (That already is 42-days-plus gone).. And that is,, before the hearing would begin. |
Faber:I remember someone saying that His works cannot be used by the Tribunal.. That he was just being a lazy bizzi-bodi.. |
I am asking questions here please. I need to know.. It used to be 180-days (about 6-months) for tribunal.. And 60-days (about 2-months) for supreme court. ... Making a total of 240-days (about 8-months). I want to know if the new Electoral Act 2022 still provides the same timeline for Presidential Election Tribunal Cases..?? (Or whether the timeline had changed..)** And if so,, I want to know the relevant sections.. THANKS.. |
Someone will unlawfully kill more than one human beings and go scot-free... Now, you're trying to pretend that you guys love animals.. |
All through the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal, the INEC were busy trying to establish that Electronic Transmission is not a necessity, and that INEC might choose at the last-minute to do Manual Transmission. They even went as far as bringing a Tribune Newspaper to the Tribunal Court, and tried to portray that the INEC Chairman said that INEC cannot do Electronic Transmission any longer, but they were so silent on the part inside the same news-article which said that INEC would upload the results on the IREV-Portal realtime and instantly. https://tribuneonlineng.com/we-wont-transmit-raw-figures-of-election-results-inec-chairman/ (We Won’t Transmit Raw Figures Of Election Results, INEC Chairman) But then, since the issue of the Instant Upload to the IREV-Portal is still contested at the courts, let's leave that particular Judgement for the Judges to fully decide.. But you see the aspect of TRANSMISSION.?? The New Electoral Act 2022 concluded it very well.. Whether INEC chose to use Electronic Transmission, or MANUAL TRANSMISSION,, There MUST Definitely be a Transmission. Now, let us take a good look at the Section-64 of the Electoral Act,, starting from Sub-Section-(4)... Section-64: Sub-Section-(5) Subject to subsection-(1), a collation officer or returning officer shall use the number of accredited voters recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 47(2) of this Act and the votes or results recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 60(4) of this Act to collate and announce the result of an election if a collated result at his or a lower level of collation is not correct. Sub-Section-(6) Where during collation of results, there is a dispute regarding a collated result or the result of an election from any polling unit, the collation officer or returning officer shall use the following to determine the correctness of the disputed result— Sub-Section-(7) If the disputed result under sub-section-(6) were otherwise found not to be correct, the collation officer or returning officer shall re-collate and announce a new result using the information in sub-section-(6) (a)-(d). Sub-Section-(8.) Where the dispute under sub-section-(6) arose at the level of collation and the returning officer has satisfied the provision of sub-section-(6) (a)-(d), the returning officer shall accordingly declare the winner of the election. Sub-Section-(9) A returning officer or collation officer, as the case may be, commits an offence if he or she intentionally collates or announces A FALSE RESULT and is liable on conviction to a fine of N5,000,000 or imprisonment for a term of at least three years or both.INEC had already agreed that the only way for any Collation Officer to verify the accreditation data at any collation-level is by cross-checking with the accreditation values that were captured inside the BVAS-Machines. [Section-64(4a)] And that the only way for any Collation Officer to verify the results at any collation-level is by cross-checking with the photos of the results that were captured inside the BVAS-Machines. [Section-64(4b)] The INEC also agreed that these verifications must be done by cross-checking against the Accreditation-Values and Photos of Results that are inside the “MANUALLY” Transmitted BVAS-Machines. AGREED.. No Wahalla... But they should also note that, according to the Section-64(4) of the Electoral Act, the “TRANSMISSION” must cut across all the levels of collation, up to the returning level. (The Electoral Act mentioned “A Collation Officer or Returning Officer”, which means that it involves all the Collation Officers as well as The Returning Officers too - there are no exceptions.) Thus, all the collation officers along the whole line, and up to the final returning officers must all wait for the Manually Transmitted BVAS-Machines to get to them, before they can commence collation.... WHICH IS SO DIFFICULT, TIME-WASTING, AND HIGHLY UNOBTAINABLE.. And should there be any disputes at any level of collation,, these same MANUALLY TRANSMITTED BVAS-MACHINES must be relied upon in settling the disputes,, and correcting the collated results.. [Section-64(6)] |
The Government Should Be For The People..., And not against the people. Even if the State Government chose today to Celebrate ONE YEAR IN OFFICE,, it might be understandable, but then, the new sanitation date shouldn't be strictly and tightly enforced.. |
Today (Saturday - 25th March 2023) is supposed to be the day for the State-wide routine monthly sanitation day in Anambra State.. But an abrupt statement which was released by Mr. Paul Nwosu - The Commissioner for Information - at the late hours of Friday-Night, which announced the cancellation and the unwarranted postponement of the sanitation exercise by One-Week, is more-or-less an invitation to resentment from the people of the State, which definitely would not go down well if the State Government decides to impose strict penalties and punishments on people (as had always been the case) for not carrying out the sanitation exercise on the new date. That the Routine Monthly Sanitation Got Postponed without the prior knowledge of the people of the State is not the main issue.. But then, trying to enforce the Sanitation with task-forces on the new day, yet without the proper sensitisation of the people about the newly set date would paint the Government in a bad light, in the sense that the Government do not really care about the people. The Government should feel the impulse of the people. Many people who didn't get the message of the postponement of the sanitation exercise on time had already done their sanitation exercises today, and they already planned-up the next weekend. We hope that the Anambra State Government gets this message as quickly as possible, and get soft on the Penalties and Punishments which they might mete out on the new postponed date of the routine monthly sanitation exercise. |
PandoraObi:I can smell lies from 30,000-miles away.. |
Very Good. Keeping the tradition alive. |
Omooba77:Too much Nonsense in one statement. |
MrMcJay:Please, do you have the link to download the Osun-Appeal Judgement?? |
Maize247:He himself should be the one to tell the full story of all the Victimisation he faced.. Not someone else.. |
PandoraObi:You know Somalia and Yemen?? If Igbos can go to Somalia and Yemen and Survive,, then, they can survive anywhere in this world. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 (of 554 pages)

