Budaatum's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Budaatum's Profile › Budaatum's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 (of 1630 pages)
TATIME:Those verse do not imply a dictator, Tatime! Jesus never said he was dictated to nor did he dictate to anyone! He is the Lord of freewill, and hoped your will was God led. You appear to me to be misunderstanding the teachings of Jesus, but if that's your understanding, then you be dictated to. I will express my freewill according to my understanding since I can't worship a god of lemmings. |
It is not legal to abort a foetus at 9 months in New York! |
hahn:Here is a link to the act. If you read the entire article you might find that op distorted the facts a bit! ARTICLE 25-A REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACT SECTION 2599-AA. ABORTION. § 2599-AA. ABORTION. 1. A HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER LICENSED, CERTIFIED, OR AUTHORIZED UNDER TITLE EIGHT OF THE EDUCATION LAW, ACTING WITH- IN HIS OR HER LAWFUL SCOPE OF PRACTICE, MAY PERFORM AN ABORTION WHEN, ACCORDING TO THE PRACTITIONER'S REASONABLE AND GOOD FAITH PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT BASED ON THE FACTS OF THE PATIENT'S CASE: THE PATIENT IS WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR WEEKS FROM THE COMMENCEMENT OF PREGNANCY, OR THERE IS AN ABSENCE OF FETAL VIABILITY, OR THE ABORTION IS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PATIENT'S LIFE OR HEALTH. |
ebusnwaoma: |
lovelygurl:He's an im.becile! Or a 2 year old. |
TATIME:God has proven to be quite incompetent at dictating how people must act Tatime. It failed in the garden of Eden, and has failed ever since that one could claim God doesn't even try to dictate anymore, and people like you try to take it's place with you corrupt doctrine. Thankfully, there is the philosophy of Jesus Christ, which frees people from dictators! |
Mrpojj:Yes we do. Apc won! |
They are in the Bible then! I figured so, and think it is the lack of human comprehension that makes some people to not know this despite it being in there. |
9inches:I do not preach, 9, since I am an atheist! You are asking me about my understanding and I'm telling you about it, I do not expect you to abandon your belief and follow mine! Any understanding I may have is solely for myself. Also, Jesus gave the mandate to understand and go directly to the Father to every human being when he freed people from the church of his day. It is my opinion that one wastes the body and blood of Christ if one then goes to shackle oneself to a church Christ died to free one from. And besides, buda is created to behave as described in this post. |
9inches:I've explained my position on the host. There was a time when the Church sanctioned slavery, exploitation of women, and sold indulgences - tickets to get into the heaven, and I'm sure the Church at the time would claim it was led by the holy spirit, or by God. But the holy spirit is simply the human mind itself and understanding or misunderstanding is down to the individual. For many centuries before the Pentateuch was written down it was memorised and passed down verbally from generation to generation. You might understand how different variations and versions could be remembered. Humans then eventually wrote the text down over many years by joining various versions and variations together to make a whole, and continously edited to fit the narrative desired at the time. That's why there are various contradictions in it, and also why it is the "Word of God". Sorting out the so called contradictions is like fertilising the mind. One can't help but grow through the process of trying to understand it. |
Ubenedictus:see here. |
XxSabrinaxX:Don't you go telling anyone now. ![]() |
XxSabrinaxX:As far as the existence of gods are concerned, buda is an Atheist. An atheist atheist, in fact. The sort who unequivocally states that there are no gods except for those that people create in their minds! Saying that though, and I'm sorry for not sticking to English as you've requested, some call buda buda, some think buda is Christian, buda has recently had to admit to being a builder and buda is going to a hell that doesn't exist! It's the demons in buda, see. They are legions. |
XxSabrinaxX:Oh, come on Sab. Surely its me obfuscating and not you miscomprehending, lol. That last statement of yours conflicts though. I find words are like coffee. You get a better cup when left to brew. |
XxSabrinaxX:Wouldn't it be funny if you are imagining me shoving a belief in a deity in your face? It will be like it's a zebra, but you think it's a horse. Don't be surprised if you load your goods on it's back and it just runs off with it. Zebras don't do domestic like horses do. |
XxSabrinaxX:You are missing what I'm saying, or just don't understand a word I've written even though I'm slapping your face with it and poking it in your eye. 'Blind' people don't do science, Sab. That's why Jesus is said to spit on mud and rub it in peoples' eyes so they can see. Everythig else you say below I agree with 110% XxSabrinaxX: |
Someone is going to have to tell me what's said in these videos. 3 lots of 44 minutes is just way more than I am willing to sacrifice my eyes to. I'll read the comments though, meanwhile. |
XxSabrinaxX:To be honest, I really don't have any burden to prove to you that there are no gods, and I don't. But then, if I were a theist, I wouldn't be proving to you my god exists either, at least not in the way you'd be expecting. It is my opinion that everyone can determine whether gods exist or not, and what they exist for. Besides, attempting to prove to you either way is to assume you'd understand it if I slapped you in the face with it and stuck it in your eyes as if your mind worked like mine! buda does not ridicule herself by making out she is the equal of anyone! |
XxSabrinaxX:Lol! Lol again! A favorite word to describe atheists is "fool", which leads me to conclude that atheism is illogical to those it is illogical to. And there are many that atheism is illogical to. As for me, however, creating figments in my imagination and claiming they exist and are real would serve me better if it worked with the imaginary million pounds in my bank account with which I'd love to buy a real spanking brand new red Ferrari! I'm yet to find a Ferrari salesperson who would theistically believe me though. I'm beginning to think they must all be foolish atheists, unfortunately. Atheism tends to have a relationship with the scientific method, by which I simply mean, the "use of the senses to properly gather information about structures and/or process". If it's a horse's hoofbeats, and I think it is those of a zebra, you can see how I could be influenced to perhaps kill and eat it instead of keeping it to help me till the land and provide even more food to put on it's back to take to the market to sell for more money to feed me, my family, and my next door neighbour. Imagine the look on my stupid face after killing the zebra and it turns out to be a horse just because I chose to believe some stupidness I cooked up in my head! |
XxSabrinaxX:So, why claim one can not know the hoofbeats are horses and not zebras? I can subjectively claim they are elephant hoofbeats even, but I should not expect objective individuals to agree with me unless I show them evidence for my claim, or they are the sort who have faith in my saying so without any evidence. When such crap is pulled on you here Sab, I've seen how you react! |
9inches:I understand it to be talking about the host being the body of Christ. Is that incorrect? Barron admits Jesus was speaking metaphorically which I agree with, for Jesus did not cut off some of his flesh and give it to his disciples to eat! Here is what he said in relation to it: “The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them; and those who exercise authority over them call themselves Benefactors. But you are not to be like that. Instead, the greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who rules like the one who serves. For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one who is at the table? But I am among you as one who serves. "God ordains strength out of the mouth of babes and sucklings", see, "the one who rules like the one who serves". The flesh and blood to me is the Word of God that life has been injected into. And by 'life injected into', I mean not just claiming "Lord! Lord!", but "doing my will". One can eat all the words one wants but if they do not become the flesh and blood in one, one worships in vain, 9. Please be specific when you ask about videos you post so I know what part you specifically mean. |
9inches:Christ never said any one particular church is his church or body, 9! It is the Pharisees who taught stupidly like that thinking they were the happy chosen few and everyone else was damned! Did Christ not say they will be replaced by stones if they do not do his will? Were the damned Gentiles not included on Christ's 'Church' in the end? Jesus said “For no one who does a miracle in my name can in the next moment say anything bad about me, for whoever is not against us is for us. Truly I tell you, anyone who gives you a cup of water in my name because you belong to the Messiah will certainly not lose their reward. Essentially, I don't even have to be a believer not to talk of go to any one particular church. All I have to do is give you, who belongs to the Messiah, a cup of water and my reward is guaranteed. Even you acknowledge this fact by stating "buda is at risk of preaching heresy", despite knowing that buda actually qualifies as a heretic by all definitions. There is a huge difference between religion and understanding what Christ taught, 9, and there's a difference in people's ability to understand. Christ pointed this out when he said "the blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is proclaimed to the poor". Each receives according to their need and ability to receive, is the point. The poor after all do not need to be cured of ailments that they do not have. |
XxSabrinaxX:Xx, please! Where do you get the idea that there is "no way to objectively prove the supernatural", or disprove it, to be more accurate? The supernatural is always subjective is the first alarm bell you should hear! Or are you unaware that beliefs are subjective by the nature of them being held by a subject? The supernatural can easily be proven to objectively be non-existent. Unfortunately, subjective prone subjects tend not to have any of it. It is for this reason that you argue with theists. You're both banging your subjectivity against one anothers. |
PastorAIO:Oh, I know he's not the only one. I'm in conversation with one who's asking me to agree that the host is Christ! It's amazing how easy it is to forget despite being clearly stated that, “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments." |
9inches:Absolutely not in line, 9! For it is not that which I eat that is sinful or righteous, but that which comes forth out of me! |
XxSabrinaxX:Then I would have to go find a ism that better defines me because I do not have a "lack of belief in a deity" just as I don't have a wishy washy lack of belief that there isn't a million pounds sitting in my bank account. I get off my ass, go to the bank and ask so I can know instead of believing or not believing like some theists do, and which atheists abhor them for doing. |
9inches:Know that I appreciate the time, patience and consideration that you take to respond to me. You are saying, or rather, what I hear from you is, "Lord, look! buda over there is not one of us yet he heals in your name"! And you fail to heed the parable where it says, "thank god I'm not like buda the tax collector". Remind me what happens to those who heed not these lesson please for they are errors I'd like to refrain from committing. 9, have you ever wondered why there are two creation of humans in Genesis? Do you know why there are four contradicting gospels? Have you wondered why Paul and James disagreed? And what the heck was that Jesus doing disregarding the Catholic Church of his day, the Pharisses and Sadducces, and claiming a direct phoneline to God the Father! Yet, here is you asking me to replace the direct line he linked me into and divert it to some priest in some church! Don't you know the difference between stones and life giving bread? You see, even in the Bible, the disagreeing is obvious so how much less we humans who read it? And to be honest, it is my opinion that we are better off for the diversity in understanding, and God itself planned it would be so. Or why the heck would one read "so that it could be said that out of Egypt God called his son"? The criteria to know which understanding is true is clearly given. Can you tell me what that criteria is please, 9? |
vaxx:It is the ignorant who are always most confident! They, and those who actually know, I guess. |
tintingz:Some of us are telling you that there is sufficient evidence to categorically state that gods do not exist! And whatever anyone decides to believe is inconsequential and irrelevant, since the very idea of 'belief' stinks of theism! |
happney65:It isn't for me to provide evidence for him being a thief since all I have is perception. And I'm not stoning anyone! I don't like Trump. I have a perception of him being a buffon and everything I read about him suggests he is. I like Buhari. I have a perception he is much better for Nigeria than Atiku and everything I read about the two of them makes me have the view I have. So, call me names if you like. But I know it's my pvc and I can use it to stone or vote for whoever I want to despite your rants and raves! It's the beauty of democracy! |
vaxx:But that does not mean we wouldn't correct his errors, as you well know we would! Or the op would go propounding the same ignorance thread after thread misinforming everyone then some lazy theist would quote op to support their silly argument! Besides, his thread was to correct such ignorance so we must help op! |
Bacteriologist:Obviously, you don't have "energy for that level of thinking". Because rather than count the grains of sand to determine which is true, you'd "don't care how prominent minds define it", and insist those who do shouldn't either! Because, according to you, whether gods exist or not is a mutual exclusion. Despite the proper definition and meaning you yourself gave not admitting to holding a mutual exclusive view. And when the theists comes along and claims the number of sands is how they say it is, you claim they are "ignorant", "stupid", "illogical", "making up ridiculous conclusions" and "need to stop"! Here's two definitions of Hypocrite, XxsabrinaxxX. Just so we know what it means. Hypocrisy is the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness, while concealing real character or inclinations, especially with respect to religious and moral beliefs; hence, in a general sense, hypocrisy may involve dissimulation, pretense, or a sham. Hypocrisy is the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticizes another. In moral psychology, it is the failure to follow one's own expressed moral rules and principles. Hypocrisy is when one douchebag calls out another douchebag for being a douchebag, and the second douchebag responds to this by calling the first one a hypocrite. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 (of 1630 pages)

. So you do know what you're doing.....