₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
Does your bible not say anything about not bearing false witness? Or do you just have utter disregard for you own gods?
[quote author=ScienceWatch post=63654686]Buda says the HOLY BIBLE was written by SCAMMERS.

ScienceWatch:
were you drunk when you said it ? What happened to your memory, you said it not more than two days ago. Hey hey.

Or is this just another one of your sly ways to investigate your own self. I don't have time for this. I can only help you in April Sir.

ScienceWatch:
Ok I will give it to you seeing that you revel in your ignorance and want to impress your Satanic following.

Why can't you go find it yourself? Are you experiencing demonic oppression or afraid of the dark? Do you sleep with your head covered.

themonk:
Once it is understood that atheism is merely the absence of belief in any gods, ............. The presence of a belief in a god and the absence of a belief in a god does not exhaust all of the possibilities.

themonk:
Seriously, I decided not to engage religious people in any argument whatsoever some time ago because i find it difficult to reason with them but then when i saw "sciencewatch" as his moniker, i thought he might be a lover of science and that i could reason with him a little, maybe teach him something and learn from him too. the first time he quoted me, he sounded hostile and i was like let me just calm down and explain to him he might understand but now i am so disappointed. . He just aims to win the argument and not to learn a thing, its sad. I pity him.

johnydon22:
You waste your time trying to engage the guy or the other one butterfly..

A little dose of attention they run wild with mind blowing nonsense that you begin to wonder.

Its nothing short of insanity really.

When ever you get such quotes, simply ignore and continue with people who actually understands what the hell you are talking about..

OtemAtum:
I am not Budaatum, I am Otem. We are two separate people. I am the one who said the bible is written by scammers, not Budaatum. And why do you think that it is only an atheist that can say such a thing?

ScienceWatch:
I have no problem with that.

butterflyl1on:
And jumping INTO meant touching the pool am I wrong?

JackBizzle:


It's time to ignore your foolishness

ScienceWatch:
So, why let everyone know that you have an INVISIBLE POOL at your house? By the way you said you had PAVING. where is it?

butterflyl1on:
You are talking to jackbizzle who called you a fool for saying I should touch the invisible pool by jumping into it and you in turn just called him a fool for saying the pool has water in it when I nor you ever hinted at that.

Both of you must love slinging mud at each other

ScienceWatch:
Wow ! That was very profound. You will make a very good detective. Budaatum almost fooled me here. All I know is that BudaAtum confused Jackbizzle while he had his nose up his ass. Buda Atum said something that the best science fiction writers has not dreamt up. He said to you, "Dont bump your head on the paving that is at the back of the house as you dive into the INVISIBLE POOL in front of the house. All I can say is that ButaAtum has invisible imagination, while it is lacking in Jackbizzle, Johnydon22 and TheMonk.

butterflyl1on:
Why would person A claim to have a physical pool at the back of his house if it wasn't there to start with?

Physical things require a physical assessment. Trying to talk about spiritual things by using physical examples such as this is plain ridiculous.

So let me rephrase.

Person A: There is an invisible pool at the back of my house

Person B: Let's go see (he asks this despite knowing that the word INVISIBLE was used)

We go to the back of the house and of course no pool can be seen by person B

Person B: (still ignoring the use of the word INVISIBLE) says I cannot see any pool.

Person A: (who is equipped to see the invisible pool) but I can see it, how come you cannot?

Person B: (ignores the question and also the use of the word INVISIBLE and calls others to come and see if they can see what he cannot)

Others: we also cannot see the pool (this they claim by following person B who ignored telling them that the pool is invisible and also they need to have special equipment before they can see it).

Person B: walks away and calls person A Delusional (while still ignoring the use of the word INVISIBLE and observing the special equipment being used by person A)

JackBizzle:
Lies in bold. Here is your comment that contradicts your claim that you didn't talk about touching the pool

butterflyl1on:


He is seeing a non existent paving WHEN THERE IS NONE.

you just killed me here with laughter my bro.

ScienceWatch:
With all due respect Sir. You are confusing yourself Sir. In your argument with the esteemed Butterfkyl1on, you did say the pool is INVISIBLE.
In your confused example, Person A dives into the INVISIBLE pool. Then you say express concern that person A might spit his head on the paving you see at the back of the house.

FLAKKA symptoms Sir.

ScienceWatch:
Ok. How about something visible to all Atheists.

ScienceWatch:
Stop ducking and diving......

butterflyl1on:
Person A who told person B about the invisible pool did not tell him so person B can ask to see it.

What you should be asking should be " what sort of special equipment is this and how is it applied"? Is it an external or an internal equipment? If external then person A Can offer person B same equipment but if internal then person A Has to show person B how to get and apply this internal equipment at the request of person B. But does person B ask the right questions and apply the right methodology for viewing? No he does not but simply runs around saying he cannot see this invisible pool despite knowing there is special equipment needed and ignoring the fact that it is invisible.

ScienceWatch:
Stop

butterflyl1on:
Why would person A claim to have a physical pool at the back of his house if it wasn't there to start with?

Physical things require a physical assessment. Trying to talk about spiritual things by using physical examples such as this is plain ridiculous.

So let me rephrase.

Person A: There is an invisible pool at the back of my house

Person B: Let's go see (he asks this despite knowing that the word INVISIBLE was used)

We go to the back of the house and of course no pool can be seen by person B

Person B: (still ignoring the use of the word INVISIBLE) says I cannot see any pool.

Person A: (who is equipped to see the invisible pool) but I can see it, how come you cannot?

Person B: (ignores the question and also the use of the word INVISIBLE and calls others to come and see if they can see what he cannot)

Others: we also cannot see the pool (this they claim by following person B who ignored telling them that the pool is invisible and also they need to have special equipment before they can see it).

Person B: walks away and calls person A Delusional (while still ignoring the use of the word INVISIBLE and observing the special equipment being used by person A)

CandidSeeker:
I responded to the OP with established definitions that you can verify.

You're here alleging pedantry, all because your ego will not allow you to accept that you are also religious.

Becareful not to generalize. I'm not one of those who says Christianity is not a religion, the bolded part of my post which you quoted says 'we are all religious.

-Peace.

butterflyl1on:
I am still waiting for your list of supernatural things an atheist can believe in and yet disbelieve in God who is also of the supernatural.

Sapiosexuality:
What exactly is atheism if it is not a BELIEF?

Deicide:
This is more of a Biological argument and not a religious one but it still relates.

IF WE EVOLVE FROM MONKEYS WHY ARE THERE STILL MONKEYS?

This s#it must end 2018 cause it makes you wonder if the person even has a knowledge of what he/she is talking about.

Fegelfire:
Are you... mentally challenged? Do you not know how to google something or borrow an encyclopaedia from a local library?

Gautama Buddha was a man who lived in Eastern India around 2600 years ago, 600 years before Jesus and 1200 years before Mohammad. He did not claim to be the "son of god", nor did he claim to be a prophet. He merely began taught a practice and way of life that drew a compromise between the cruelty of Vedic practices (etc. caste systems) and the asceticism of East India (fasting, self-destruction, etc.).

Some Buddhists do believe in spirits and other such stuff, yes. But to call Buddhism "theistic" and that they see Gautama as "God" is straight nonsense.

Geofavor:
Buddhism is Theistic. They call their God Buddha.

hopefulLandlord:
all pedantry does is stop discussion in its tracks

this muddles up a lot of things as anything can be a religion, I'm extremely enthusiastic about eating food, so food is a religion?

CandidSeeker:
RELIGION MAY OR MAYNOT INVOLVE GOD.

Going By The Definitions Below, We Are All Religious.

An activity that someone is extremely enthusiastic about and does regularly. -Cambridge

A pursuit or interest followed with great devotion. -Oxford Living Dictionaries

A specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects. -Dictionary.com

An interest, a belief or an activity that is very important to a person or group. -Webster

Samsimple:
I agree atheism is not a religion then what the hell are you guys f*cking doing in this motherf*cking religion section other than to disturb dem f*cking believers

hopefulLandlord:
create a different thread and let's trash this

ScienceWatch:
What more can I say in the face of all this attack? You say you want to ban me. Are angry that the internet is flooded with the shocking findings of an "alleged" German clinical study on Atheism.

butterflyl1on:
[b]Baby has no idea [/b]who mummy is and here is proof. Any other woman can place a tit in babys mouth and baby would gladly accept it. Baby asks no questions just has a hardwired set of commands such as eat, cry, shït and sleep (in no particular order).

butterflyl1on:
belief
noun
A. an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof.

B. trust, faith, or confidence in (someone or something).

The B part speaks for itself when I said earlier that we are hardwired to trust and be dependant. It's in our DNA. We always look up to what we see as LOVING, TRUSTING, WARM, KIND, etc.

A baby has never crawled or walked in his life but even without any observation, a baby somehow has the belief it can crawl and eventually can stand. It even also has the belief it can sit.

It's trust and confidence level is huge when it comes to being assisted. So tiny yet for the first time sees people so huge but never frets and never shows fear. Rather it immediately begins seeking comfort from these giants without fear of being crushed, dropped etc.

Regarding your question about zero knowledge and zero belief I thought you said knowledge and belief are not linked so why now ask such a question? Are you confused?

Knowledge is JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF. A baby has belief but when the belief is JUSTIFIED or PROVEN via observation or intelligence, it becomes knowledge. Knowledge it can work with at anytime.