Ishilove: How atheists invade any thread discussing Christianity
Been thinking about this. Are those threads discussing Christianity? Really?
I sincerely hope Christianity has not become what those people/thread depict it to be. If it is, then it must not only be left to die, it should, and will be killed!
Christ taught a superior way of reasoning than those whom we atheists attack. I assure you that He would make far better mince of us than he did of those of his time.
P.s. Note that we pretty much stayed out of this thread, for some reason.
"It's not that ancient people told literary stores that we are now smart enough to take symbolically, but they told symbolical stories and we are dumb enough to take them literary."
KingEbukasBlog: Switzerland , Norway , Finland all the countries with the biggest economies in the world are Christian countries and are highly educated .
ScienceWatch: lol damn loud !!!. Correction, it is an allegation. Anyhow, I showed your uninvited advice to my girl who is very reserved. She said thanks and that she has still not resolved the allegation but will continue to love me because It is better to be with some one that is straight.
Wait for this, she said to tell you that I have helped her investigate her "Allegations" against me. You will be updated on this soon.
Unfounded? If so, perhaps try not to make them unless you have some evidence or people may think you are in the fashion of just talking without engaging the brain first. And some might ignore you for not being worthy of consideration.
therationa: Your questions show how un-educated you are with the methods of science. No point discussing with you on matters beyond your capabilities, cause it would be like talking to someone from the bronze age. Sorry for the analogy, but there's no other way to proceed.
Am out. Bye
I want to be as intelligent as you are. One day. Thanks.
therationa: Skyone, I see you live in Essex. Have you ever visited a museum? What if you go down to the Museum of Natural History in London and see some hard evidence of evolution. Would that change you mind?
I was there, once again, yesterday. My conclusion was that atheists are arrogant people. They look with contempt on those who believe they know it all but don't have a clue. If the atheist could just forgive them, after all, it's not as if they know what they say.
If only the Natural History Museum could come to Nigerians. Though, they'll probably pray it down to hell!
ScienceWatch: someone mailed me to advise me that I am about to derail this awesome thread.
You are. It's just not my place to say you singlehandedly dragged him into the gutter though you probably think you were promoting his virtues.
Please inform your girlfriend (is she perchance an atheist?), that buda thinks a guy who is willing to play word games with her concerns is not exactly showing her due regard. She deserves better.
ScienceWatch: It would be most interesting to see what you will come up with if you re-examine Kingebukasblog's rules of engagement from an unbiased creative perspective instead of a personal agenda directed at the person of the highly esteemed Nairalander Kingebukasblog.
Despite the following.
budaatum: We all err (sin). Growth though comes from seeking the forest in one's own eyes. Pity is, the tree in the eyes of others is much more easily seen. No one sees into their own eyes unless one really tries. We console ourselves by claiming they are 'others', and we are not like them. O what lies we tell ourselves. But for the robust scrutiny of Nairaland. A mirror for those with eyes.
ScienceWatch: I have spent a few nights perusing the rules, instructions and international context of the proposed challenge offered by ...........
I am tempted to ask you to provide a report of your perusal, but I wouldn't wish to overburden you from the prior task given to you. However, perhaps give a hint of the sources that justify your position, please?
This is not an atheist versus non-atheist issue. Nor are you presenting it as your opinion. You said, "22yr clinical study", and it is the validity of that statement itself that is in question. Especially if made by an individual with Science as part of their name.
Don't ask us to accept your word for it's existence for what it says. If there is a study, present it for scrutiny. And perhaps desist from presenting "unfounded opinions" as fact in the meantime.
ScienceWatch: What does this mean? There are hundreds of "unfounded" opinions that Atheists cruelly thrust upon humanity daily without agreement and in conflict with international law.
BudaAtum, please take the time to examine the narrowly defined context in which I mentioned that the persons behaviour makes the allegations of the so-called 22yr clinical study that revealed "That Atheism is a mental disease" appear to be correct.
This expresses what I too have found. Op, if there is a bible that predates this that contains the said words please tell. An allusion is insufficient evidence!
Sarassin: Your timeline is rather disingenuous. In fact the full verse in the Latin Vulgate is not found in any ancient Greek manuscript that pre-dates the Latin Vulgate, not one! the full verse is likely an insertion by Eusebius, Bishop of Caesaria who was commissioned by Emperor Constantine in 331CE to produce 50 Bibles at state expense, this was the same text relied upon by Jerome to produce the Bible he was commissioned by Pope Damasus which became known as the Latin Vulgate.
It’s a bit of a “red herring” making a claim that the passage was removed. It was never there in the first place.
ScienceWatch: Fear can cripple a strong man. The liberating challenge that Kingebukasblog is offering the world must not go to waste because of cowardice.
I always thought you would be the one to show courage to lead this group of confused low-level unregistered Atheists to freedom.
Your demands for someone else to judge is a copout. The whole world is watching and judging.
The whole world can't be stupid enough to agree that KEB should be judge and jury in deciding in a discussion on which he takes the opposing side. I'm in fact not asking for an atheist to be judge. Any one with an ounce of objectivity and an understanding of the use of words would do. I'm even willing to accept you as judge as I am certain you are capable of seeing reason even if you disagree, though I would ask that you suspend the insults for the duration and request explanations if one has been unclear. KEB's ability to be honest is what I cannot stand.
Take the discussion on here. I pointed out that a string of references on wiki do not make a person credible. I posted a link to references of someone I know he would not, under any circumstances, accept as a credible person even though that person has much longer references than those presented. But what was his response? He sets up some straw argument and resorts to backslapping rhetoric. I'd find it amusing if it weren't pitiful.
So, if you define my not allowing KEB to be judge and juror in a discussion he takes the other side of to mean one is cowardly, then so be it. Like I've said, the whole world can't be so stupid that they would all share your conclusion.
We all err (sin). Growth though comes from seeking the forest in one's own eyes. Pity is, the tree in the eyes of others is much more easily seen. No one sees into their own eyes unless one really tries. We console ourselves by claiming they are 'others', and we are not like them. O what lies we tell ourselves. But for the robust scrutiny of Nairaland. A mirror for those with eyes.
Thanks for the update. And welcome back.
ScienceWatch: Hello BudaAtum, good to see you again. I was away for a while. It is good to be back to witness reality play out powerfully on this esteemed Nairaland platform. It is all good.
About Google admin, they sent me from pillar to post trying to track the removal of publication that ATHEISM is a mental disease. After a few emails Google asked us to be patient as it is not a normal part of their public service.
The evidence will be ready soon. I agree with you that I am a sinner and tend to accuse others of my own SIN. It is a weakness Nairaland robust critique is helping me to resolve.
butterflyl1on: Stock response you say? Must be invisible or simply vaporised
Ignoring me as you said was actually best for you because I don't take prisoners. However I blast all those who still choose to ignore, be ignorant and be an ignoramus. All sha is all ignorewhatever. Mark me and always maintain 500 yards distance.
At least you give me laugh with your sense of importance. All you do is throw insults like some semi developed juvenile. The only pity is you derail any intelligent thread you post on. But then, that probably is your intention. You will not learn nor will you let those who would learn, learn.
Don't worry. Your time will soon up as more people see through you.
NPComplete: Sorry to burst your bubble though, Chris Langan is not a Christian. At least not from his theories and beliefs. So reading may not have made him an atheist (sorry atheists it doesn't always work that way) but he sure is far less religious and definitely no longer a conventional Christian because of it.
No one thought he was an atheist. Wiki describes him as not being a conventional Christian. But we expect such lies and fabrications from the op.
Langan does not belong to any religious denomination, explaining that he "can't afford to let [his] logical approach to theology be prejudiced by religious dogma".[13]
resurgentxtian4: You are in this instance, a meddlesome interloper who means no good. I dont blame you, i blame all the christians who are bling to your game plan in Nigeria. You can keep the failed country. When the cream of the nation have left, we would see what you will do with the nation.
This is no defeatist mentality but a reconnaissance mission. That is if you understand what i mean.
Sorry, but didn't you deactivate? Did you forget to shut the door on your way out? I wonder why you'd think you get to say who speaks where and when?
NPComplete: This thread is just filled with a lot of meaningless banter and puerile memes. It veers totally away from the reason for the thread.
By the way, anyone who has read Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers will know about Chris Langan. I also believe in evolution and creationism like he does but sadly he is not the best example of anything. As a matter of fact he is more of an example of failed potential. And none of his theories have been verified or proven to have experimental value. Neither does he have any inventions or patents to his name.
So what is this thread about again?
Thanks for this. This thread itself is an example of failed potential. The topic could have made for an educative discussion, but that wasn't the intention of the op going by its title.
Are you just trying to miss the point? Here's another guy with lengthy references! It does not prove what your sidekick was attempting to use them to pfove.
butterflyl1on: Below are some notable things about him. You would do well to carefully scrutinize. Those places that featured him, I guess he went there to play video games right?
Please click on references for this individual and let me know if he plays video games, right?