₦airaland Forum

Kobojunkie:
You are picking on an issue that has nothing to do with what I pointed out in my post.

The sales of human parts is not in any way unique to Africa and the existence of human parts markets is not unique to Nigeria either. My concern remains those storytellers who come telling us stories of the existence of forbidden market areas, they seem privy to but are more concerned with telling us of their personal stories and encounters than they are pointing us to the location or at least looking to raise a mob to raid

In this day and age, telling us that the authorities turn a blind eye to information received is bullsheet. If anyone knows where these sellers are, tag them make the whole country know and so we can find a way to shut these people down so those whose parts litter those markets are gotten justice for.

I don tire to hear the Nigerian excuse for almost just about everything one can think of. If people are not willing to go beyond themselves to do something better than save their own lives, but instead feel they need to regale us with their tales of woes we can all, like eejits, cry "praise the Lord" one more time, I think they should bury their story where they got it and spare us the rubbish.

budaatum:
Let this be clear! I am not accusing you of not understanding. That is not an accusatory crime. I am accusing you of being lazy, and only laziness would make you mix up the two so!

With that hopefully clear, let the relationship be meaningless or stop being lazy and take responsibility to let the onus make you go back over our discussions to seek that which you do not understand so you can make the relationship meaningful, because my faith and love for you does not include dying for you Hell, nor does it include brainwashing you since unbrainwashed you is what I admire so much about you in the first place.

I have undying immense faith that if you use that very powerful computer brain in that skull of your mind you will understand. You just need to have faith in you and know the choice is entirely your's.

HellVictorinho:
I neither love nor hate your mother.
I don't love dogs.
I don't love ants.
Actually, you don't even select who or what to love.
You just get exposed to something that's lovely or someone that is lovable by chance.
It's a matter of an exposure that happens by chance.
So,what you love today might become what you hate tomorrow including your mother.

HellVictorinho:
Budaatum!!!!!!!
Why not use your own brain to determine the importance of having a desire for something
Why not use your own brain to ask about the welfare of Hell?
Is that how a political party should exist?
You introduced me to the party but you don't even bother to ask how I've been faring despite what I've stated about my background before.
Don't lazily accuse Hell of being lazy!!!!!!!
I've been doing a lot to survive!!!!!!!!
If you don't really care about my survival,then you're just #__##&;++$$$;+
What kind of human being are you??
I've passed through Hell but you're telling me &$##&$$$-;
I am disappointed in you.
In fact,you have offended me.

HellVictorinho:
I didn't choose to have no reason to be more loving than an ant.
I also don't agree that your love is greater than that of an ant.
There's no philosopher or psychiatrist or psychologist that can determine how the love of any human being is greater than that of an ant.
Budaatum!!!!!!!!!!
Love is a feeling that is expressed by chance.
It cannot be measured.
You either love me or you don't.
If you write a poem to demonstrate your love for me,it doesn't mean it's greater or less than that of a pig towards something else.
If you ask me to marry you,it doesn't mean it's less or greater than that of a snake towards something else.
What makes you think your love can be greater or less than that of a hen?
The books you have read were written by humans and I'm also a human though I'm Hell.
Should you discard what I'm saying because I have not written any book?

shadeyinka:
You seem blind tonight.

LordReed:
Obviously the one who tells them the truth will set them free. My dear buda but I have not your wisdom and still deploy crude tools.

shadeyinka:
Explain to who?
Probably you! LOL!!

1. A True Christian must never marry an atheist
2. If a Christian by any means is ALREADY married to an atheist, she must not divorce him. She must Love and Obey him.
3. Divorce is only permitted if the Atheist desires a separation
4. She must do her best to secure the Spiritual life of her children

Thank God for you. You are an exception that only a few has received

HellVictorinho:
I want the APC/PDP to cease to exist.

shadeyinka:
Buda!
Buda!!

You are more precise than this!

Explain to ME??

Where did you read that?

LordReed:
Ah but my dear buda the story does tell us how not to copy gods doesn't it? LoL

shadeyinka:
Then let the Christian come out to EXPLAIN how God told her to marry an atheist!

HellVictorinho:
There's no reason why Hell Victorinho should be more loving than ants.

shadeyinka:
Indeed the letters kills but it's the Spirit who gives life

Why did God ask Hosea to marry a harlot?
Hos 1:2:
"The beginning of the word of the LORD by Hosea. And the LORD said to Hosea, Go, take to you a wife of prostitutions and children of prostitutions: for the land has committed great prostitution, departing from the LORD."

Because the Land had committed great prostitution!

Why is God asking Buda to marry an atheist?

God asked Ezekiel to cook with human excrement. Perhaps your conclusion is that Christians should cook with excrement
Ezek 4:12:
"And you shall eat it as barley cakes, and you shall bake it with dung that comes out of man, in their sight."


Buda, you have a lot of learning to do!

HellVictorinho:
Are humans more loving than ants

HellVictorinho:
I never said there's no group of united politicians.
I'm only saying that there are different groups of politicians that engage in battles towards the death of some and the survival of others.

HellVictorinho:
Stop this!!!!!!
Did humans show love to one another before the Bible was written or not
Answer the question!!!!!!!!

LordReed:
Unfortunately for me my dear buda, I often have to go down to the bottom of the barrel in order to meet them at their level or else I find myself talking over their heads since they are so low down. LoL

Martinez39s:
No, I am not afraid. I just don't want to engage in any discussion related to theism and atheism. Anyway, how is life?

Humans have fabricated religion

* Most religious texts are flawed and as fallible as the humans who wrote them. They must be criticised, challenged and, where appropriate, satirised or denounced.

* Religious beliefs do not exist in isolation but are propagated from one person to another.

* All religion is a lie since it is based on a false premise – God or gods exist. All believers are victims of this lie.

* Almost all atheists are agnostics, almost all agnostics are atheists.

God or gods do not exist

* Concepts of gods are myths created by humans.

* There are not two separate realms (the natural and the supernatural), but one (the natural).

* All gods are myths and lies.

Morality develops independently of religion

* There is no divine moral authority.

* Although atheism is not in itself a source of morality, it frees morality from corruption by religion.

* The religious inculcation and indoctrination of children corrupt their morality. Children are not born with any religious beliefs or affiliations; these are imposed.

Religion inhibits rational thought

* Religion is based on irrationality, superstition and unsubstantiated beliefs.

* All Religions encourage and perpetuate prejudice, ignorance and intolerance.

* Religion inhibits critical thinking, discourages scientific enquiry and restricts human progress.

* Religions don’t generally deserve any respect.

* All Religions are scams and a con game.

* Don’t let ‘I’m offended by your words’ stop you from telling the truth about religion and don’t say ‘sorry’ when people are offended by your words.

* Don’t let religious laws (cf. pictures of prophets) limit your freedom of expression since they have no authority over the non-religious.

* Religion is not just incorrect, it is malevolent, it ruins lives, splits families, and justifies hatred and bigotry – whilst claiming to be the source of morality. People die due to religion.

* Religion poisons everything. That is literally true when we consider the mind it infects. It makes good people do bad things, whilst thinking they are doing good, effectively turning good people into bad people, at least sometimes.

* Religion deserves to die.

budaatum:
Absolutely. That is indeed the error in the op ed. It claims a cause is required for bringing a thing into existence. But gives God a caveat. Why stop there, the atheist would ask? What's wrong with giving the creator of God the caveat?

The post itself is claiming all things that exist are created. The universe exists so a creator must exist. It says a lot more besides but you'll have to read it to figure that out.

budaatum:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMSS6mGQ6ZE

"It's not that ancient people told literary stores that we are now smart enough to take symbolically, but they told symbolical stories and we are dumb enough to take them literary."

budaatum:
There is no argument that many people believe in whatever they like and are called atheist or call themselves atheist or believe they are atheists. The definition of atheist is the issue here. As in what is an atheist.

If I call myself god, I am deifying myself. Say, buda, you are mad, please, atheist or not.

If I claim there is a creator of the universe, but there is no god, intelligent people would snigger. Any argument on the issue would be about definitions, same as what Allah people have with Yahweh. They would not be claiming there is no god, but which god is the real god. The same difference is that between those who claim 'aliens are the creator' and 'Yahweh is the creator'. The atheist is claiming not only that Yahweh and the alien creator are not gods, but that they don't exist regardless of whether you call them gods or not.

An 'atheist' who acknowledges the existence of a creator but just doesn't believe it, hasn't quite figured out their belief yet. That's like believing the million pounds in my pocket is not there. If they claim it too strongly, I'm sure we wouldn't mind taking the million pounds off them. They refused to acknowledge they had it. They wouldn't miss it.

Claiming the atheist acknowledges the existence of a creator but just doesn't believe it, is probably worse. They have a million pounds. We claim they haven't, regardless of what they make think. Then we take it off them! I have found this akin to setting up of a straw man just so we may mug them. What follows such statements proves my point:

Atheism Unwise And Potentially Dangerous

Atheism And Terrorism; Annihilation in The Quest For Atheistic Domination

Atheist Murderers(past/present) And The Murderous Tendencies Of Todays Atheists.

Some things have been deified. The atheist is claiming those deified things (the stone, the wind, Jesus Christ, the holy spirit, gods) are not deities, and some of them (angels, devils, fairies, the holy spirit, gods) do not even exist. The atheist does not accept the deification of things, nor the existence of deities or fairies, or ghosts, extra terrestrials, spirits, elves, angels, etc. If they do claim to be atheists, and claim these things exist, please subject them to the same arguments they use to disprove the existence of god, and ask them why it does not disprove the existence of fairies etc.

It like when we ask those who claim everything is created, and by a creator, what created god! We hold them in contempt for their acrobatic dishonesty!

Martinez39s:

Kobojunkie:
I never said anything about evidence being based on perception. There is tons of data out there today showing that indeed Religion poses a real problem to society.