₦airaland Forum

TWLifestyle:
womwn are polygamous in nature just like men - women just want quality men need quantity - a woman is wired to always look for someone more quality than her represent mate while men are wired for quantity .

TWLifestyle:
The only reason why you people flaunt wives and concubines is because you are violent bullies.

TWLifestyle:
If women were wired to be monogamous why are they now cheating and committing paternity fraud ? Lol

TWLifestyle:
loooool you ppl are hypocrites sha ! The gender of " men are naturally polygamous " is crying blood because they are discovering that women too can be naturally polygamous !

Tonnyray:
Wisely put and expertly articulated.
Every civilization eventually declines though as the seeds of hedonism and licentiousness germinate, grow, take root and bear their sordid fruit.
The death of western civilization is a given.

neyoohhh:
Awesome.

It's even worse in Africa because the African progressives confuse classical liberalism (economic liberalism )with cultural liberalism(woke degeneracy alluded in your write up).

Essentially they attribute cultural deviations as part of a necessary step forward, which signals more assimilation into leftists ideology, the bane of western civilization decline.

Liberty  in the modern world  means licentiousness (do as thy wilt/virtue of selfishness) , but it's true meaning is it's self governance (free if you govern yourself)which requires great discipline, cultural patterns and values that ensured the subordination of the abhorrent interests of the individual  to those of the family and of the society as a whole.

[
The Taliban doesn't need western value's, Africa doesn't need it either.

Martinez39s:
@CaveAdullam

Wetin be your own? Abeg leave that jacket for me!

Lightheaded:

I'm pained but not severely. Why? Because I expected more from my guy, he's not someone even guys trifle with. It's funny the things guys let ladies get away with but not guys. He'll learn sha, hopefully.

Lightheaded:
Picks mic...

I agree bruv. Something happened to a friend recently, my guy was having a fling with a babe in the same level for a while. Babe comes to his house and takes a jacket, guy tells her " a lot of people have already asked for this jacket including my younger sister I can't give you". Babe takes it to her house at night without guy's consent. Guy visits her more than once, realizes that she isn't even using it, just hanging it on a rope. Guy didn't talk.

Fast forward to later, guy sees a similar jacket in school on another guy, guy's surprised, tells one of his friends that that jacket looks stunningly similar to his because that friend had asked beforehand which he didn't bulge. Minutes later babe comes to greet the guy in the jacket. You know what that means, the new guy (which is in like the first level of university education) took the jacket from her place or she gave him. This is a jacket my guy really liked.

My guy told me he was astonished, bewildered, surprised, left agog, stunned, any other grammar that depicts shock abeg put am there. I asked him what he did, he said he didn't do anything because of his ego and self respect. I really vexed.

I told him point blank, this is disrespect of the highest order, totally insulting. I told him immediately he saw it he should've washed her straight up on the spot, treat her fvck up. Leave ego aside, it's infuriating. Even if he didn't get his jacket back, he shoulda shamed the shameless b*tch. Then warn her to never talk to him.

What I'd like us to take from the issue.
1. If a girl disrespects you let her know, don't condone such. It's weak, don't hide behind 'ego'.
2. Like they've said if you can take back your stuff in a better way, do. If you can't so be it. It's personal.
3. Learn to stand firm and say no if it doesn't favour you, don't fall prey to the "real men" or "stingy" or selfish gimmick. Na your money.

Drops mic in anger.

Junnior:
I initially didn't want to say anything, but now I am going to unapologetically state my opinion on this matter:

It is stup1d to collect back stuff that you gifted someone, boy or girl. There's no sense in it, as far as I'm concerned.

If things didn't go as you wanted, take your L and fvcking move on.

Collect back what was supposedly a gift -- who does that? It's disgusting sh1t. It's simp behaviour, as far as I'm concerned. It reeks of emotional pain.

I get it that it, for instance, hurt a lot when you buy her a car and other nice things, but she breaks up with you and continues flexing with all you got for her. But then, think about it, those things, did you lend her or you gave her?
It is simps that attach emotions to material things they buy for their women. As a redpill aware guy, you know that you don't do that. You only give her what she deserves and what you can afford to let go without hiccups.

For me, it isn't about ego or anything like that. If I give someone something, it's theirs forever regardless of what transpires between us later on. There is no sense in asking someone to return my gift, because for me to have given that gift, it means he/she deserved it. (Also, collecting back the gift will not correct the wrong that has already been done. It won't make you FEEL better. You're still gonna despise her afterwards.
That action of collecting back your gift is simply an emotional response. It's not logical. It's not necessary. It's not needed.)

If things between us later turn sour, I just move on.

Thanks.

Junnior:
I finally have a lil time to spare to read the self improvement books I have accrued over the past 3 years.

How do you suggest that I go about reading them in order to get the most from them?
I don't want to be overwhelmed, but I want to make sure I properly digest them.

Any tip would be appreciated.

Skepticus, Undercover, Caveadullam martinez32 bloodysperm, et al.

Junnior:
I finally have a lil time to spare to read the self improvement books I have accrued over the past 3 years.

How do you suggest that I go about reading them in order to get the most from them?
I don't want to be overwhelmed, but I want to make sure I properly digest them.

Any tip would be appreciated.

Skepticus, Undercover, Caveadullam martinez32 bloodysperm, et al.

CaveAdullam:
Rough Sketch

1. Women flakes, Men betrays.

2. It is (almost) impossible hovering around to collect your gifts when your formal allies sequester from you. It is "life threatening" as Regex as mentioned, and time wasting and if you eventually succeed, a Pyrrhic victory. You will end up creating enemies all around.

3. Those being stopped as a result of dignity or ego have enough and wouldn't bother. But they don't know something: the microscale game being played on them which is in a crescendo that will lead to an established result when each microscales merge together.

4. A girl can date different guys at a time and collect gifts from each one to establish herself. Some for recharge cards, some for phones, some for clothes, some for bags, some for house rent, some for uber etc. Each guy is a micro in the macro. Based on the fact that he provides his allocated share and still remain noncognizant about other guys, he wouldn't be bothered asking for a return of his gifts after breakup. Meanwhile, the lady is now living comfortably with his resources and that of others that were once provided.

5. Marriage is the only form of heterosexual relationship I recognize, though it is still a manipulative one. But a father/husband provide for and protect his wife/wives and children because of the benefits he will gain. His children will further his genetic line, help him maintain his already established dynasty and he can use them as a positive leverage to get things or go places.

Some may asked: do we not need to date before marriage? Lol! Story for another day.

6. Relationship must be mutual. Most especially, start gaining from them before they wake up to the game. This is a necessity when dealing with both men and women.

Sex is cheap and it can never be compared to expensive wigs, phones, monthly subscription, transport fares, bags, clothes etc. In fact, sex is enjoyed by both parties involved and men must not use these things in getting sex(as usual, there's an evolutionary background why men make offers for sex).

7. Be smart and manipulative as these women. Hide your resources, don't show off. If they have a greater investment in the relationship minus sex, they'll think twice before separating. Or, bear the loss.

8. The ladies I deal with work for me unknowingly, I definitely know they will require my help someday, but at any moment, I impose upon them to fix my tiles before their own day. And when they ask for help or something reasonable, I know I have already collected my own share beforehand.

9. Game enlightens men on the nature of women and how to get their maximum cooperation especially when it involves sex and relationship. The essence of game is for the man not to lose out his heart, money, gifts, time and attention when dealing with women.

10. It's not a matter of give what you can lose. Political and celebrity simps can lose houses, cars etc. on these daughters of Eve because they know that their source never runs dry. Relationship should be based on mutual benefits at least or the man being the parasite.


PS: "since you can no longer fvck me, cook for me, run errands for me, do some of my biddings, I think it will also be nice if you bring back what I used to easily identify you amidst other ladies". However, this will only be the case if you used money and gifts to simp to her pants. If not, you don't have any problem.

Authority: Guard your resources with all diligence.

Martinez39s:
Whether or not it is something one can afford to let go, whether or not one was emotionally involved, if a man wants to collect the stuffs he bought for a girl, there is nothing wrong in that.

If you see it as weakness and pettiness, na your own. In this place, we don't care. We don't give a fùck. If the opportunity is there and you can do it successfully, do it; nothing spoil. Funny enough, this issue of collecting your stuff back has been discussed here before, last year.

CaveAdullam:
1. Taking risks is all about the weight of your sacrifice versus the weight of the anticipated benefits. Like in medicine, potential benefits is neglected when it falls below the risk to be taken during medical diagnosis.

2. Firstly, risk aversion is because of fear, that is, fear of losing out in cases of investments or fear of inculcating punishments and backlashing when it involves superiors and subordinates respectively.

3. Where risk will yield potential benefits higher than the weight of punishment, such risk must be taken.

4. In the workplace, you must be competent before taking any risk, especially when it involves your boss. To not get punish regardless of the outcome of the risk---positive /negative, involve them or subtly seek their permission. They are greedy, when you agree to ration it 50:50 or 50:45, they will pretend they didn't see you between the cogs in the wheel if it involves money and the organisation.

5. For stubborn bosses, appeal to their superiors or someone they hold dearly with maximum respect. If you retract to your shell always, they'll continually oppress you.

6. Men are defined by their words and principles, not stupid ones though, because everyone always got an opinion which is subjectively the "truth" for them. To put into practice your words and principles structures you for a better man.

7. Becoming a leader of a group will warrant you to take healthy risks, and if that's your aim, taking risk will become normal and you will gain competence in the group you lead. People love others that can do what they can't do as a result of fear. (I'm aware of jealousy though).

8. Risks that involves other people especially your boss or superiors must be undertaken out of competence that you've gained before and logical conclusion. Even if you want to invest, these are the kind of people you will trust without hesitating.

9. Apart from fear, ego is another factor that will limit you. Potential benefits and outcomes must be considered first, because ego might blind your eyes from taking "worthy risks" or make you continue to sink in a quicksand when the envisaged result is a mirage or minuscule---sunk cost fallacy. Know when to act and when to stop. Ego or "I'm too big for this or this thing is too small for me" must not appear at the forefront.

10. Challenge your self every day and in most cases you'll find out that most risks are worth taking, though they involve life and death; time and chance. But with the right tools, right knowledge, right logical conclusion and at the right time, you will succeed.

Thanks.

Tonnyray:
In the true spirit of the thread and away from distractions can any meaningful person with experience enlighten the house on risk taking?
I strongly believe the ability to take risks is part and parcel of what makes a real man but this is a department I find myself rather deficient in. I am naturally risk averse. So away from just google searches are there folks here who have real life tips on developing capacity for risk taking?
Kindly take the floor please.

cc
CaveAdullam
BLOODYSPERM

Jessepaid:
women were never built to work with men...

You cannot demand competence and accountability from a woman...

It is impossible...

I face the same thing at work every day..

One day they are cooperative..

The other they act like small devil's...

For your theory to work brother cave...

Her ranking and yours must be ladders apart..

With yours topping hers i.e manager to secretary..

Jessepaid:
Because for operations to run smooth and for peace to reign amongst coworkers of different genders at the same organizational level, compromise on masculinity is often the case

Vicas2000:
The atthed was posted by someone on my list.

How does physical maturity corresponds to leadership traits?

Martinez39s:
The feminists can't do shit when it comes to walking the talk. None of the will ever muster the courage to face the taliban with arms. Feminism is the luxury of an easy and safe time.

Martinez39s:
Every news outlet were constantly talking about women and children being the victims, no mention of men. They were constantly talking about how the turn of events jeopardises women's right and the aspirations of the girl child. No mention of men.