₦airaland Forum

Sagamite: Good!

Next time, we should all collectively tell them and Obama & Cameron and their impressionable, moronic mouthpiece proxies to fck off when they start their homosexuality crusade and criticising countries for banning homosexuality by referring to Human rights.

Every country on Earth selectively applies it.

pickabeau1: You are side stepping my q

Drugs are harmful and introduce psychological change in the users.

What is harmful in two loving people who just want to be together... They just happen to be related

Why r u being selective in your bigotry.

damiso: Biko my geography is bad But when did texas become a county and is dallas not in texas?

Sagamite: If your argument is that laws are selective and the Germans are being selective in applying their concept of "human rights" here, then I can see why. If not, I can't.

pickabeau1: No...I don't want to be sterilized
Our love must culminate in children like everyone else

Why deny us rights available to others

Some parents have genetic issues n may have kids with other congenital diseases n are not sterilised

Why d double standard

carefreewannabe: Saga is pulling your legs, honey.
He is not one of "them". Trust me sis.

crackhaus: Haaaaaaa! Just like I guessed, coco is not happy...

Candy girl, pray tell me...how come you support abortion which causes harm (in the form murder) to an innocent unborn child, but in the same vein you frown on sexxual relations between siblings because according to you, it isn't fair to the kids who might be born deformed?

Do the kids whose lives are being cut off by abortion not also deserve a voice for their plight? Is it fair to them?

Sagamite: Abortion is harm to the child.

When una fuku-faka, fuku-faka without condemn and then kill a poor, innocent, defenseless baby.

All women, who are not raaped should be force to have the child.

pickabeau1: Cococandy...

Im still waiting for your answer to my q

I love my sister.. She loves me
We are both adult.. No mental illness

Why can't we be together

Why can't we live n let live...

How does it disturb you Or anyone else

crackhaus: Keep dodging, you know exactly where I'm going with my question...another proof of your tendencies to tailor your opinions according to where it suits you.

You're all of a sudden eager to obey the 'do not derail a thread' rule.

Mondisweets: I guess the appropriate thing to do is to say screw the children rights and the mother's parental rights, so long we take revenge for every man that has lost custody to their children in a peaceful/messy divorce.

This men violated these children's rights by forcing them to participate in something they had a right to choose to or not to attend. He forced them to attend a ceremony THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BE PART OF, all in a bid to get publicity.

He went on to use them as his guinea pigs to get publicity, again the best interests of the children was violated.

He builds a 10yrs marriage on deception and obviously has extra-marital affairs during his marriage and for some reason such a person is deemed fit to have sole custody of his children who are not for his union in the first place.

No man or woman who is fit and proper to have sole custody of his/her would take underage children to bars or force them to go to gay film festivals. You cannot force or impose your sexual orientation on your children, its their choice to make whether they want to be part of _homosexuals society or not.

Lets say screw these children's right to freedom of choice and association so long we use them to get revenge on every woman out there that got sole custody of her children, thats all that matters. Whether actions of parentals are psychologically detrimental to the children or not, its not their decision to make, so long the gay father gets what he wants. Your judgement based on sentiments is far much more important than the protection of the best interests of the child

Nonso23: No. But i see a very fitting equivalent in the name of your 'house husband policy/stay at home dads'.
Then I ask myself: Who becomes primary care giver to a child in such a home?
The 'stay at home parent' obviously.
Reconciling the above conclusion and your first paragraph (read previous post) is where the problem lies.

I don't preach the house husband/stay at home dad message.I only state that I understand it if the woman makes more money and the man can't cater for the family if she doesn't work. Hence it becomes something they HAVE to do because that what suits their style and will ensure their survival. I bet you expect me to be unrealistic like most of yous are and root for keeping the traditional roles in cases where it is not productive to do so.


The emboldened. I see more house-husband gospel than 'be more involved in your child's upbringing' from you. Although both of them seem like paraphrased substitutes when critically appraised. Approaching it from that angle automatically erodes the notion that the mother is the primary care giver and installs the house-husband in her place. That is my point.

only to dane people will it seem so. Gender roles are still defined pretty much. That's why moms get the kids and dads are made to provide in case of a split union and even in most marriages. They are only reassigned or SHARED by the couple THEMSELVES within their marriage if they see it as their best option in that circumstance.


I don't know of any great marriage where the couples make 'demands' of each other though. I think dialogue and consensus' is more appropriate.

you believe in dialogue and consensus? Yea. I could say we are on the same page or I could just try to be mischievous like you and say that all your NL post history favors dictatorship. Even if you say otherwise. Who will spank me for DELIBERATELY miscontruing your opinions?
No one. Just like you're doing now.


It is very amusing and i'm enjoying myself.
Why the personal attacks by the way?? Oh. It's easier to ignore the latter portions of my post by employing the misdirection tactics.
Anyway, your 'shifting of goalpost' style is more or less a regular now.

well you find it amusing. I don't. So please next time you're looking for cheap fun,quote people who don't mind repeating themselves even when you choose not to get it. And until you provide a link to a post that I said men should be regarded as primary care givers same as women(unless the couple decides by themselves to do so),your goal shifting phrase will keep appearing like the joke that it is.

bukatyne: 35yrs ke?

He said 45yrs and had a club promoting marriage for 35yrs.

He is the only saint na...

Abeg, don't rain on his parade

r231:

thats what she said

crackhaus: Simple question, no be fight.

Do you or do you not support the opinion that abortion should be banned and made illegal?

r231: tell me something......

crackhaus: What's your opinion on abortion, should it be banned and made illegal as well?

bukatyne: LOL!

I just wanted to be sure

It is like me condemning LTGBs and enjoying a scholarship sponsored by them. Common sense would dictate

I either support them,
I am indifferent to them
or I condemn them and reject their scholarship.

Condemning them while enjoying their funds is eating my cake and having it

carefreewannabe: I agree but the title of this thread is misleading.

The German government is against in.cest.

Babygal4eva: I never considered myself a feminist till I joined Nairaland and then suddenly my opinions are considered feministic. If that is the case then yea I'm a feminist and proud

Sagamite: You cannot ban people's human rights or circumvent their human right based on the "possibility" (your "may affect" of it affecting others.

You cannot deny them their rights to bear kids, privacy or have a family life based on something that is not a certainty.

bukatyne: And what is the end?

Dead babies and broken legs?

And these women of pure heart, do they by any chance enjoy the fruits of the labour of earlier feminists?

TribalEAST: gender equality/feminism is actually a spirit that operates in most ladies and makes them lack submission. Most of them don't know they are feminists until they come across the ideology which appeals to that spirit in them, a good reason why they accept the concept readily. The women with pure heart discard every inch of it cos they can see the end thereof.

Sagamite: How does two consenting adults in love who are engaging in inceest affect you?

How does what they do in the privacy of their bedroom affect you?



Two consenting adults! Human rights! What can be wrong with love? Privacy of the bedroom!

sexybash: @ coco I am just stating the obvious
We live in.a society where people are not allowed to be themselves thereby giving room for hypocrisy
Why do men run to get married shortly after they loose their spouse go figure
Most at times the so called new woman is a side chick from yesteryears
I know men who has father kids which thier only wives know nothing about and they secure financial future of those kids
If as a man I can afford polygamy why won't I go for it
Solomon who commuine with God directly practice it
If one can afford it why don't you go for it

sexybash: What make you think so

sexybash: As for me oh monogamy equals hypocrisy from both parties

Nonso23: The way you say A on one thread and B on another is really amusing. Mother = Primary care giver now abi? Because divorce is involved. Whatever happened to your gospel of 'stay at home dads' as primary care givers to the child. This una 'victim' chant is very amusing.

Chai! Una don see ojoro wey pass una own.
NO. That isn't how the judge will interpret the above. The gay man can make a case of self preservation - (protecting himself from the attack of society. A very strong case for homosexuals BTW) and also claim to have considered his homosex condition as something he had to protect his family from and deal with his own way. Which he did for 10 solid years without cheating. Yes he did not cheat. The court upholds the principle of ''Innocent till substantial evidence proves you guilty''. From the story, e sure me say wifey no get shishi to put forward as evidence else she definitely would have so he was a faithful husband....

The Judge was impressed with his case. I would be too, if i were in his shoes.
The truth is everything you and Mondisweets listed are very insufficient to launch even a feeble appeal in homosex tolerant countries.

He's in a better position to take care of them in the eyes of the law not forgetting his LGBT rights too.

The story doesn't look doctored at all. It's just not the norm you women are used to regaling yourselves with.

Maybe now you'll feel the pain of men who lose their kids and half their fortune in a very peaceful divorce. Messy divorce, anybody
Enjoy your Independence day celebrations.

Agrika: Is not as if I don't trust him at least I know the man I married...is just that the rate at which these type of stories are "flying" about is becoming alarming...in my mum's hospital a man with 4 wives was recently diagnosed of having HIV...the illiterate wives are yet to find out...God Abeg oo protect ur children

kokox: Hmmmm I don't trust those offshore workers...90% of them are flirts.
Am married to one so I know.
Social media makes it so easy for them.
Not trying to scare you but please be wise and be prepared. You may be lucky if your guy is amongst the other 10%.

jaybee3: We can start by doing mouth to mouth test so as to determine the strength of your vocal cord