₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,403 members, 8,511,677 topics. Date: Monday, 02 November 2026 at 07:38 AM

Toggle theme

Deadlytruth's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Deadlytruth's Profile › Deadlytruth's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 (of 170 pages)

Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 7:47am On Sep 03, 2018
redflame:
See, it is not as easy as you presume. They needed to be tried in court before any judgement will be passed. And mind you the coup was initially celebrated by the public, go and read about the event again.

What I think is that the northern elites were impatient and angry that they were no longer holding power. They only used ironsi careful but slow method in following up the incidence as an excuse.
The bolded is no justification for laxity in punishing the coup makers. I always wonder which public celebrated such carnage. Could it be the Northern public which lost their cream de la cream political leaders and top echelon finest army officers or the Western public which lost their two biggest military wigs or the Midwestern public which lost their cynosure finance minister who, in the thick of the crisis suddenly regained his humanity hence began to caution his boss, Balewa, to retrace his steps from the path of wanton abuse of power against political opponents?
How exactly was the public approval statistics gathered to warrant such generalization?
There must always be a handful of demons in human form who would celebrate and justify any degree of carnage but that doesn't cut it.
When Obasanjo invaded Odi and killed thousands of innocents did few unrepentant Obasanjo worshippers not come on air to defend it as the only possible way to maintain peace in the Niger Delta? Did that represent the genuine public's perception of that genocide?
Investment › Re: Nigerian Stock Exchange Market Pick Alerts by Deadlytruth(m): 7:00am On Sep 03, 2018
Ugosample:
That was too bad!

I remember that fiasco undecided

Why are we as a people like this in Nigeria?
So bad indeed. The level of impunity and irresponsibility on the part of those in power in Nigeria is just too high. They are too insensitive.
I heard there were retiree and pensioner share holders who invested all their life savings in those two nationalized banks. It was a very harrowing moment for them. Young as I am, I put myself in their shoes and I started weeping.
It was from that moment I realized the truth in one of Lord Luggard's statements that the average Nigerian craves for power and position without knowing the responsibility attached to it.
Investment › Re: Nigerian Stock Exchange Market Pick Alerts by Deadlytruth(m): 12:35am On Sep 03, 2018
Agbalowomeri:
Has to be good dividend-paying coy
My intention wouldn't be for dividend though but to wait for my 100-200% target Lol
For a coy to give you 100-200% capital appreciation based on fundamentals improvement alone could take up to two years. Coys which give such percentages within a few weeks to 3 months mostly do so on news of buy over by a foreign or local investor, or some other news eg. DF from 78Kobo to N6 between February 2016 and May same year; M & B from N1.30 to N 6+ within 7 weeks early last year, etc.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 12:21am On Sep 03, 2018
gidgiddy:
Whatever decree that was passed by Ironsi is not the issue. The issue is how Nigeria went from a structure of 4 Regions to a structure of 36 states. Who abolished the 4 constitutionally created Regions we had? Today, not one of the 36 states in Nigeria was constitutionally created. So the narrative is that whoever abolished the 4 Regions is the person who destroyed the structural arrangement of Nigeria. Gowon abolished the 4 Regions and created 12 states, Murtala Mohammed took it from 12 states to 19. IBB also created some states. Ironsi was the only person who met 4 Regions and left 4 Regions. Therefore, anybody who accused Ironsi of being the one who destroyed the structure of Nigeria is an ignoramus.
Ironsi met 4 strong regions but left 35 powerless and centre-dependent provinces.
Gowon abolished those 35 provinces with another decree which returned Nigeria to 4 regions. He restored the civil service back to the regions as against your argument that the military can't operate a decentralized system. This subsisted for 11 months.

However, Ojukwu's declaration secession over the rejection of Aburi Accord by the sovereign public pushed Gowon into creating 12 states in order to weaken Ojukwu's power base towards the war.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 12:12am On Sep 03, 2018
gidgiddy:
I don't care what Ironsi said, I'm after what he did.
Those were the words of a Decree, and I guess you know a Decree means immediate action.
Investment › Re: Nigerian Stock Exchange Market Pick Alerts by Deadlytruth(m):
Ugosample:
I no blame una
Blame experience.
I once bought and longtermed AFRIBANK and BANK PHB only to wake up one day to see them nationalized by SLS 33 days to the deadline which he himself earlier on set for them to recapitalize.
When asked why he didn't wait for his own set deadline the guy claimed he discovered they wouldn't be able to meet beat it even if he waited it out. See answer? Meanwhile they had already found some interested foreign investors.
The aggrieved share holders went to court but SLS never showed up for any hearing. They called on GEJ for executive intervention but that one just dey flex for one corner for Aso Rock. Him no even send them. Last last the matter just end and all shareholders' funds enter voicemail till today. My saving grace was that my units of shares in those two banks were such that I could afford to give as a gift without shaking.
Wetin eye never see for inside this long term matter? Long term is long throat in Nigeria.
Investment › Re: Nigerian Stock Exchange Market Pick Alerts by Deadlytruth(m): 11:46pm On Sep 02, 2018
Agbalowomeri:
I can still do 18months to 2 years max sha, depending on my entry price
Can you buy and do 18 months with Diamond it this current state of it?
Investment › Re: Nigerian Stock Exchange Market Pick Alerts by Deadlytruth(m): 11:44pm On Sep 02, 2018
Alaadin:
this is the deadly truth
Na so o!
Investment › Re: Nigerian Stock Exchange Market Pick Alerts by Deadlytruth(m): 6:20pm On Sep 02, 2018
Coolcash1:
AIICO's shenanigan and other "jumanji" things by our corporate cow boys are the reasons why I can never invest my money long term in NSE...My slogan is rise and chop.... wink I always laugh at those who come here to preach such to uninformed rookies... grin
I never knew I have a longtermophobic brother here. Nice to discover you today.

Long term is risky in Nigeria.
Investment › Re: Nigerian Stock Exchange Market Pick Alerts by Deadlytruth(m): 6:17pm On Sep 02, 2018
DeRuggedProf:
There is absolutely no price to guarantee sleep, you may wake up and see the floor price frozen with no bids for years... grin
I still hold Goldlink Insurance... grin
I once bought UNIONDAC in large quantity in 2009 at 75 kobo and went to sleep thinking it was a good sleeping price. It took me another 9 years to bail out at 39 Kobo just two or three weeks ago.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 5:55pm On Sep 02, 2018
nku5:
Isaac Boro's adventure was not a mutiny please. He was a civilian at the time he gathered about 150 men, attacked a police station and declared Niger Delta Republic. That is treason in a simple form and he was tried in a court at Port Harcourt. You can't compare it to the Nzeogwu coup that destroyed an entire government, took down the Prime Minister, Premiers, Ministers, Army Generals etc
Isaac Boro was an officer of the Nigeria Army as at when he declared The Niger Delta Republic.

He too committeed treason just like the coup plotters hence should have received the same treatment.
Can you provide a link to substantiate your claim that Boro was not a soldier at the time in question? Then when did he later become one that Gowon armed to fight against Ojukwu and frustrate Biafra? You mean Gowon provided arms for a civilian to fight Biafra soldiers?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 5:51pm On Sep 02, 2018
gurnam:
Get out of here with your rubbish

A statement made OPENLY should have an audio record. Can you please give a link to such ?

You guys are born to lie without shame
From my own research, Awolowo actually made that statement, in fact on two different occasions. However, Ojukwu interpreted it out of context.
Moreover, Awolowo was a bloody civilian who had no standing army under his command. He had just come out of prison and therefore couldn't have within the short interval rallied the Yoruba soldiers and convinced them to a secession war. Even the top Yorubas military officers, like Ademulegun and Shodeinde, who could have rallied round him and quickly help him get the loyalty of the juior ones had all been killed in the Jan 15 coup of the previous year. The Western Region was totally occupied at the moment in question by Anti-secession Northern soldiers who had been deployed there in the days of Balewa-Zik regimes to help wallop Awolowo's supporters so as to clear the coast for Akintola's unhindered emergence as Premier.
In essence Ojukwu should have seen it clearly that the circumstances did not permit an Awolowo declaration of Oduduwa Republic at that moment.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 5:14pm On Sep 02, 2018
gidgiddy:
You don't get it. Military rule is always temporal. What is permanent is civilian rule. So if Ironsi centralised power using decree, the same decree would have been removed whenever civilian rule returned since civilians don't take military decrees into democracy. But when Gowon came, he divided the 4 Regions into 12 states, Murtala came after him and increased it to 19 states. The result of this state creation is that by the time civilians were returning, it was impossible to return to the regionalism of 1966. Had Gowon, Murtala and IBB kept the 4 Regions they way Ironsi left them, all the civilians would have had to do is to decentralised government and continue with 4 Regions. Ironsi only changed the style of governance, but he did not tamper with the structure of Nigeria. Gowon came in and destroyed the structure.
Okay can you tell me exactly what Ironsi meant with the following utterances in his May 24 1966 national broadcast?:



1. ...the problem of Nigeria whose last vestiges needs to be removed is intense regionalism...
2. The former regions are hereby abolished and Nigeria broken down to smaller provinces..
3. Nigerian ceases to be what is called a federation thus her official name is now no longer " Federal Republic of Nigeria" but just "Republic of Nigeria"..
4. The Civil Service is now unified and therefore every civil servant must now see himself working for Nigeria rather than to for his region....

You mean all these were temporary?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 5:12pm On Sep 02, 2018
Shayetet13:
And which history book have you been reading? In that your history book, what agreement did Ojukwu reach with Awolowo after he released him from Calabar prison?
I don't share this sentiment that it was Ojukwu that released Awolowo.
Both Awolowo, Enahoro and many other political prisoners in prisons located in different regions of the country were realeased at the same time on a single order. Now, who between Gowon and Ojukwu could have issued an order that would be implemented in different regions simultaneously?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 4:57pm On Sep 02, 2018
RillJ:
Bro, you really have no idea what is killing this country. Check this out!

“Of the 193 UN member states, 165 are governed as unitary states”

China, France, UK, Italy, Spain
are some of the notable countries that practice Unitary Form of Govt in the world today. Do these countries have the kind of challenges that Nigeria has self-inflicted upon herself?

Ironsi was/is not our problem unless we want to continue in the pathetic delirium of boot-licking our oppressors while blaming their wickedness on those manly enough to heap dirt on.
Those countries you mentioned are almost ethnically homogeneous unlike Nigeria which is heterogeneous. Each of them are languages. They speak Spanish, Italian, English, French and Chinese. But is there any spoken language called Nigerian?
Unitary System would work for them but not Nigeria.

Ironsi came across it in his elementary secondary school Government textbooks that unitary system must always lead to anarchy, marginization, bloodshed and war if experimented in an ethnically diverse country. Why did he go ahead to pioneer the process that would eventually result in a full blown unitary system?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m):
horsepower101:
Focusing on the decree while ignoring the context surrounding that decree is one of the most evil things Nigerians have done to Ironsi legacy.

A military man who saw chaos happening to his beloved country did what any person in his position will do and that was to first and foremost bring order to his country.

The easiest way to stop the national bleeding was to bring the regions under his control since their leaders were assassinated by a south south man.
This is the height of all the illogicalities I have ever seen.
Contrary to your claim in the bolded, the root cause of the crisis was the very fact that the government at the center had repeatedly illegally arrogated to herself extra-constitutional powers and grossly abused same to unduly and illegally interfere in the purely internal affairs of the Western Region as a Atiku recently succinctly analysed in one of his restructuring campaigns, rig the 1962 census and re-rig the 1963 rerun of it; disobeyed the Privy Council's (Supreme Court equivalent of the time) verdict on Akintola's legality as Premier, and finally rig the 1965 federal elections.
Common and simplest logic therefore dictated that whoever claimed to have genuinely come to the rescue should have further weakened the center to forestall such brazen abuse of power in the future. But Ironically Ironsi decided to promulgate Decrees which even further strengthened that very center of abuse of power. Did that make any sense at all? Moreover, while the crisis lasted, neither the Southern politicians on the receiving end nor the citizenry blamed it on the constitution let alone demand for a review of it. So exactly in whose interest did Ironsi commit that historic blunder?
For an educated military HoS to perpetrate such illogicality obviously signaled that he was not after genuine national interest but a hidden agenda purely of his own.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 3:54pm On Sep 02, 2018
Shayetet13:
That is what is called breaking point. All over the world, except with the fulani herdsmen, people dont usually start retaliatory or reactionary moves almost immediately. They give benefit of the doubt while talking, complaining and agitating hoping that common sense will prevail until they can no longer take it. That is how every sensible people behave. Thanks for noticing that Ojukwu and Ironsi were sensible. However, we cannot say the same of the northerners cos they continued killing, provoking a succession(From a people who would rather be on their own than retaliate by killing back just like the herdsmen do today over cows). You could see clearly that the succession move was the only civilized move to take at that point that breaking point was attained.
I, personally, would not have breaking point when it comes to the issue of killing of my kinsmen. I will begin to take action immediately after the first incident. Ojuwku and Ironsi should have known that a person who can even kill without it being for the purpose of self defense will never one day see reason to stop killing. To such people, killing is fun hence they deserve not patience in the hope that they will change. In fact the practical truth of life is that the earlier you demonstrate to your enemy that you posses the capacity to retaliate to a greater degree whatever he does to you, the more careful he will be about you. That is the essence of the Former USSR's MAD treaty and the US philosophy of "War is the path to peace". Were Ironsi and Ojukwu not aware of these principles?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m):
nku5:
For goodness sake don't compare the ironsi regime to the latter crude military administrations of people like Buhari or Abacha.

You don't just gather people who planned an unsuccessful coup and execute them. You investigate and arraign them before the relevant court or tribunal. The government was waiting for the investigative report on the coup by then IG of police M.D.Yusuf.
Ironsi's military junta was as crude as all those of his successors because he armtwisted the civilians and subverted a sovereign people's constitution to land himself in power unlike his predecessors who only took over from fellow military governments. Secondly he was impervious to public opinion throughout his six months reign unlike his successors who allowed themselves to be guided by public opinion in one or two instances. So his was the crudest.

On the punishing of the coup plotters,
he set up a panel to investigate it and was waiting for the report according to you. Beautiful defense! But why couldn't he do same with Isaac Adaka Boro's mutiny which even happened after Jan 15, but quickly charged him to court and got him convicted and sentenced to death by hanging all within two months? Double standards?
Again, based on Isaac Boro's mutiny Ironsi quickly promulgated the Anti-secession Decree in his constitutional amendment that followed. However, he refused to promulgate a Decree of capital punishment for future coupists in that raft of new Decrees. Why?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 2:54pm On Sep 02, 2018
gidgiddy:
Centralizing government is not the same as destroying the regional structure. They are two different things. It is not possible for Ironsi to have destroyed the Regional structure since all 4 Regions were still existing even to the day Ironsi died.

It is one thing to change the system of governing, it is another to change the structure of the country. Gowon changed the structure of Nigeria by subdividing the 4 Regions he inherited from Ironsi into 12 states.
You seem not to understand the context of Wirinet's argument. Creating States is not the problem. After all the eventual breakdown of the regions into 12 and more regions or states had already started under the democratically elected government of Balewa. The creation of Midwest had sparked off demands for Middle Belt, COR and other new regions which couldn't have been ignored by the civilian government.
Ironsi's creation of over 35 provinces was therefore not a misstep in light of that. But the issue is with the autonomy which Ironsi took away from the regions hence centralizing the authority which constitutes this your very idea of altering the structure.
Had he created 1 million provinces but left their civil services under their control, allowed them to operate exactly as the former regions were operating; no one would have been accusing him of foisting unitary system on the country today.
Why centralize a hitherto uncentralized authority? This is the single real question the whole argument revolves around.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 2:44pm On Sep 02, 2018
Shayetet13:
You are speaking as though Ojukwu woke up one day without any provocation to declare biafra? When you want to condemn Ojukwu's action, atleast consider the totally unprovoked massacre of Igbo race severally in the north. As the leader of the eastern states, what other option is there to react to the senseless killings? Order killing back? He is no animal! So what other option is there? Cower and accept the continuous killings? Igbos we know are no cowards. His decision to succeed was the best line of action. His mistake probably was that he trusted a certain tribe so much to keep up to their end of an agreement. If that tribe didn't agree at first, he would have considered other options towards the succession declaration.
But the bolded started many years before Ojukwu became the Eastern governor? It even happened right under Ironsi's nose as HoS but he and Ojukwu did nothing. So why did Ojukwu later suddenly begin to give the massacres in the North as excuse?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 2:37pm On Sep 02, 2018
horsepower101:
You also ignored the FACT that he (Ironsi) left the regions INTACT. It was GOWON that broke up the regions into 12 states by fiat in order to weaken the eastern region.

He only placed the civil service under military command because of the crisis in the nation at that time.
Wrong. It was Ironsi that broke up the regions. Gowon even partially restored them at a point before he backpeddalled again.
In his May 24 1966 national broadcast, Ironsi, with his own cursed mouth, declared as follows:

1. ...the problem of Nigeria whose last vestiges needs to be removed is intense regionalism...
2. The former regions are hereby abolished and Nigeria broken down to smaller provinces..
3. Nigerian ceases to be what is called a federation thus her official name is now no longer " Federal Republic of Nigeria" but just "Republic of Nigeria"..
4. The Civil Service is now unified and therefore every civil servant must now see himself working for Nigeria rather than to for his region....

If Ironsi did not dismantle federalism and the regions, then can you tell us what exactly he meant with these utterance of his highlighted above?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 2:32pm On Sep 02, 2018
wirinet:
In all your write up, you avoided the fact that it was Ironsi that unilaterally imposed the unity or centralised form of government on us. So who should we blame for destroying our regional structure?

Why should we blame Nzeogwu and co when his coup failed? Did Nzeogwu ever take over the government? If Ironsi was not complicit in the coup, why did he simply reinstall the regional governments after the coup and return the army back to the barracks?
O, he wanted to rule the whole of Nigeria.

We do not love the status quo, the political elites (from all regioins) love the status quo. It gives then unlimited power and access to the national purse.
Thank you for the bolded. I have also asked them this question several times.
Nzeogwu coup did not result in taking over government, so how was it supposed to be his fault that Ironsi destroyed federalism?
Ironsi's crushing of the coup was supposedly to prevent military take over. But Ironsi himself ended up taking over as a military man. So Ironsi's action gave the same result as that which Nzeogwu's would have given if successesful.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 2:23pm On Sep 02, 2018
horsepower101:
You have to give yorubas credit where credit is due. No tribe in Nigeria can beat them in propaganda..

Yorubas understand that if you repeat a lie so many times, it becomes true and they have exploited that vulnerability in human nature.
In his May 24 1966 national broadcast, Ironsi, with his own cursed mouth, declared as follows:

1. ...the problem of Nigeria whose last vestiges needs to be removed is intense regionalism...
2. The former regions are hereby abolished and Nigeria broken down to smaller provinces..
3. Nigerian ceases to be what is called a federation thus her official name is now no longer " Federal Republic of Nigeria" but just "Republic of Nigeria"..
4. The Civil Service is now unified and therefore every civil servant must now see himself working for Nigeria rather than to for his region....

If Ironsi did not dismantle federalism and the regions, then can you tell us what exactly he meant with these utterance of his highlighted above?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 2:23pm On Sep 02, 2018
gidgiddy:
You guys are still peddling this age old lie?

Ironsi was the only military head of state who came in and kept the 4 Regions he met on the ground. All others like Gowon and this same IBB came in and subdivided Nigeria into states.

If IBB and others had kept the 4 Regions as Ironsi did, Nigeria would have returned to Regionalism whenever democracy returned.

The state creation exercise by Northerners destroyed the structural arrangement of Nigeria so if you want to blame anyone about the structure of Nigeria, blame them and not Ironsi
In his May 24 1966 national broadcast, Ironsi, with his own cursed mouth, declared as follows:

1. ...the problem of Nigeria whose last vestiges needs to be removed is intense regionalism...
2. The former regions are hereby abolished and Nigeria broken down to smaller provinces..
3. Nigerian ceases to be what is called a federation thus her official name is now no longer " Federal Republic of Nigeria" but just "Republic of Nigeria"..
4. The Civil Service is now unified and therefore every civil servant must now see himself working for Nigeria rather than to for his region....

If Ironsi did not dismantle federalism and the regions, then can you tell us what exactly he meant with these utterance of his highlighted above?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 2:19pm On Sep 02, 2018
redflame:
The 5 majors were initially cheered by the general public and media organizations, so don't blame ironsi for not executing them immediately.
But Ironsi himself reportedly wept uncontrollably on hearing about the brutal murders of Balewa, Bello, Akintola and his own fellow high-ranking officers like Ademulegun, Maimalari, Shodeinde, Largema, etc.... meaning that he knew deep down within him that the coup was both morally and legally wrong. So why should a reasonable and rational leader of the army allow the public's sentiments affect and sway his resolve to punish some mutinous junior officers who committed such havoc against innocent officers in brazen violation of military ethics of which he (Ironsi himself) was the chief custodian?
Politics › Re: Positive Things Restructuring Nigeria Will Bring! - Foreign Diplomat Reveals by Deadlytruth(m): 2:03pm On Sep 02, 2018
chiagozien:
i will like to have it If you think am wrong.
Good! Here they are:
1. Aburi Accord was an agreement hurriedly put together by individuals acting on emotions rather than deep thought, reason and extensive debates that characterize genuine law making process, hence it was bound to be fraught with a lot of loopholes that would have later created room for constitutionally approved lawlessness and eventual anarchy.

2. Aburi Accord was a proposal for confederation contrary to the sovereign will and choice of the people expressed as federalism in the we-the-people Independence constitution of 1957 drafted in London by duly elected representatives from every federal consituency thus in line with universally accepted standard procedure of constitution drafting.

3. Unlike the 1957 Independence and 1963 Republican constitutions, Aburi Accord was drafted by the military establishment which had already subverted and destroyed our sovereign constitution without us demanding a construction review in the first instance, and without them explaining to us why they did so. Also involved in the illegality were unelected civilians and civil servants who, by the civil service anonymity principle, should not be heard let alone participate in politics and the legislative process which derives from it.

4. It is a universal principle of democracy that it is civilians that make laws for military, and not the other way round as we have with Aburi Accord. The military must be subject to civilian and in fact elected politicians' authority. But while drafting the agreements in Ghana the soldiers in attendance, including Ojukwu, mocked and derided the politicians all through and even accused them of causing the crisis which was actually caused by their own mutinous fellow army officers who staged a coup that had no place in our constitution.

5. Among all the seven points of the Accord, there was no agreement on return to civil rule which majority of Nigerians were expecting back home, no fixed date for any election, nothing! it was all agreements on how soldiers were going to share power henceforth among themselves along regional lines. It was a regional army proposal. Where on earth is regional army ever operated?
Those soldiers with the shared regional powers would have later had their emotional wounds healed with time and then unite into one big family which would have evolved into a perpetual and United power hegemony over the country.

6. With the implementation of the Accord, a precedent would have been set that any set of soldiers who don't like our sovereign constitution can just wake up from the barracks one day, allege corruption against the civilians, kick them out of power, throw away the constitution, pack themselves to a far away country, bring up another constitution from their own whims and caprices, return to the country, foist in on the people and go scot free. Then after sometime, another set of soldiers reapeat same, and it continues like that.
You know soldiers always have a "good" reason to dislike an existing constitution drafted by politicians.
Was that the kind of Nigeria you wanted?
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 1:22pm On Sep 02, 2018
NdiaraIGBO:
After reading the above, I now like the fact that he was killed like a Dog!!!!!!
To me, he even died a good death by just a bullet. Those his Hausafulani ADC's should have tied the fool to the back of a military truck and dragged him all over Lagos streets till all his flesh was eaten away.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 1:19pm On Sep 02, 2018
Amumaigwe:
And he created the unitary system of government on the advise of 'his people' past, present and future?
The advisory committee which proposed unitary system to him was nearly 100% Igbo in composition. Ojuwku too was a very influential governor under Ironsi but rejoiced at the promulgation of the Unification and Anti-secession Decrees by Ironsi rather than dissociate himself from them by resigning from Ironsi's junta. But just 15 months later the same Ojuwku could no longer live with the Anti-secession Decree he approved of hence he began seeking Biafra.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 1:11pm On Sep 02, 2018
gurnam:
Lmao! You are really bitter!! Every affliction affecting you igbos is caused by Yoruba people grin

Which Yoruba man promised you Presidency, if you need clarification about your promise, go and meet Boss Mustapha grin

Back to OP
The name Ironsi evokes a tribalistic, foolish, self-serving, greedy, Mr Decree 34 man. A typical Ibo man!

He was killed like a common dog. May his soul Rest permanently in the deepest part of hell fire grin
He wanted to create an atmosphere that would make it very easy fulfill the previous threats by Azikiwe that Igbo gods had destined them to lead Africans, and another one by another Igbo that it was just a matter of time for them to dominate Nigeria.
Such a terrible people.

Ironsi hated federalism with a rabid passion because it was hindering his kinsmen from assessing and exploiting other regions.
Politics › Re: Aguiyi Ironsi & Babangida At A Reception In 1966 (Throwback Photo) by Deadlytruth(m): 1:04pm On Sep 02, 2018
Uchek:
Ironsi is not the founder of unitary system of government. Gowon/Awolowo government destroyed Nigeria's federalism. Go educate yourself for the benefit of your unborn generation.
In his May 24 1966 national broadcast, Ironsi, with his own cursed mouth, declared as follows:

1. ...the problem of Nigeria whose last vestiges needs to be removed is intense regionalism...
2. The former regions are hereby abolished and Nigeria broken down to smaller provinces..
3. Nigerian ceases to be what is called a federation thus her official name is now no longer " Federal Republic of Nigeria" but just "Republic of Nigeria"..
4. The Civil Service is now unified and therefore every civil servant must now see himself working for Nigeria rather than to for his region....

If Ironsi did not dismantle federalism and the regions, then can you tell us what exactly he meant with these utterance of his highlighted above?
Politics › Re: Positive Things Restructuring Nigeria Will Bring! - Foreign Diplomat Reveals by Deadlytruth(m): 12:46pm On Sep 02, 2018
chiagozien:
What is restructuring?



Same people that joined the north to kill easterns when gowon broke the aburi accord will always be making noise everywhere in the name of restructuring.
What restructuring will be better than the one they agreed at ghana.
Aburi Accord was a historic illegality which would have made the country 100 times more lawless than what we currently have if it had been implemented. If you want detailed analysis as to why so, I will gladly oblige you.
Investment › Re: Nigerian Stock Exchange Market Pick Alerts by Deadlytruth(m): 9:02am On Sep 02, 2018
moneywoman74:
The change of strategy is that, I need more money now as responsibilities has drastically increases, therefore dividend alone is not enough.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 (of 170 pages)