₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
See mumu rumour carrier!
My friend everyone knows the publications of Jehovah's Witnesses, so present a publication with a specific date on it àbí it's just the same lies against this group just like your friends?

MaxInDHouse:
So you lied against the group!
I know there's no evidence of your assertion that they predicted the end of the world but if i say you lied from the beginning you will just continue arguing fruitlessly.
Next time people are spreading rumours try to verify things before you join them spreading such rumour. JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES never predicted anything they're just anticipating the end of the world just like ancient servants of God.
You're free to prove me wrong by presenting just one of their publications where a specific date e.g (Saturday, 8th January 2022) is written.
In the absence of that then you've been misinformed my friend!

MaxInDHouse:
Osama bin laden will carry weapons against you but i will never raise any weapons against anyone. So you're wrong Sir!

When wisdom speaks intelligent people will know that this person is highly intelligent so if you don't know how to contribute to the discussion why not follow quietly and learn?

plaetton:
Isn't that the point?
A God or belief system is as good or bad or as silly as the mind that creates it.

There is no such thing as a perfect human. The human psyche is far too complex to ascribe simplistic terms like perfect or imperfect.
Just like everything else in the universe, we are constantly evolving both in mind and in body.
Every era has its set of values or worldviews.
The grand folly of Religion is the futile and comical attempt to adopt Bronze Age myths, beliefs systems and values in the modern era.
It becomes a joke, as it currently is.

CEOwatazs:
To tender advice nah crime again abi kini?

Optimistic4life:
The shame, mockery

motayoayinde:
BTW, UMAR IS A SLAVE OF ALLAH LIKE YOU AND I.

motayoayinde:
YOUR CURSES ARE A WASTE!

I SERVE THE ONE WHO HOLDS THE SUPREME POWER.

ALLAH.

motayoayinde:
WHAT ELSE IS?

ISN'T DARKNESS THE OPPOSITE OF LIGHT?

motayoayinde:
THE DISCOMFORT OF COVERING DURING HEAT IS INSIGNIFICANT COMPARED TO THE DESTRUCTION THAT COMES WITH NUDITY.

BESIDES, IT'S THE COMMAND OF MY LORD.
IT MUST BE OBEYED.

Hammyaladin:
Why are you angry?? Freedom is two way. If You can allow your woman roam about with pant and bra.... Islam also reserve the right to let women go out modestly... Only a Hot individuals will complain towards a harmless way of life .

Lukgaf: A woman [or a man] should not try to comprehend Islamic rulings with her reason

Hammyaladin:
This was how women dressed before but sadly today, they roam about naked like animals while there male counterpart dress's well without showing there balls and genitals

Workch:
You don't even know the difintion of a vaccum dude.
A vacuum cannot contain a gas, even in minimal quantity unless it's partial vacuum.

You don't know what a vacuum is and you don't want to leant it. Thete are no gas molecules in vacuum, no pressure. All your gaseous pressure statement is junk science

Workch:
I think you also have basic comphension problem.

Where did i infer that Copernicus was the first to muster the idea?

We can't have a discussion because you are in a haste to find errors instead of comprehending.

The point is: none of the philosophers proved spherical earth, no one is arguing your strawman argument as to whether they didn't hold such beliefs.

Calm down and digest my statements

Workch:
You don't even know the difintion of a vaccum dude.
A vacuum cannot contain a gas, even in minimal quantity unless it's partial vacuum.

You don't know what a vacuum is and you don't want to leant it. Thete are no gas molecules in vacuum, no pressure. All your gaseous pressure statement is junk science

First go read carefully about vacuums, I cannot keep repeating something to a Sciolist.

I didn't even know where I said we have perfect vacuum.

Workch:
Trust I did.

Copernicus was the first person to prove spherical earth and heliocentric solar system.
All the philosophers were just arguing.

I mean, every newbie in science knows about Copernicus and his works

Workch:
If you remove all gazes from a vacuum, you cannot have any pressure. Don't even talk about gaseous pressure in an a vaccum, it only works in a partial vacuum.

It's basic science for god sake.

Why talk about gaseous low pressure when you already remove all gases. Doesn't make any sense

There's no perfect vacuum yes, and the reason is because something always come from nothing called "virtual particles". This makes it impossible for us to have a perfect vacuum. Something must come from nothing. This gives credence to my initisl argument with evidence from quantum physics that something comes from nothing in vacuums hence we cannot overrule the universe coming from nothing like virtual particles.

Educate yourself dude and stop looking for virtual errors.

Workch:
Your links where argument made, same argument they always make.
None provided evidence for spherical earth.

Workch:
You must be stuck in stone age.

You stopped making sense when you said "low gas pressure in a vacuum".

Does that make any scientific sense to you?

You should read up on what gas pressures are and then relate it to the defitnion of a vacuum

Workch:
nonsense, none of them proved anything with logic until scientific methods started popping.

Logic alone is flawed without evidence.

Whether or not you want to argue all night, it's stupid to rely on pure logic to make accurate conclusions and that's why your so called philosophers argue about jargons every now and then.
There is usually no evidence to close the case. It's the same reason none of them could prove spheriod earth until we found evidence

Workch:
none of them figured the earth is sphere. They were arguing baselessly on it.
The first person to actually test it is copernicus and then Galileo and that gives credence to the fact that logic without evidence is useless.

None of the great philosophers could prove spherical earth, none of them. It's more reason logic alone is not enough for me and for any reasonable person.

Calm down, don't be in a haste to find virtual mistakes, get the pioints first

Workch:
By definition, nothing means without mass, radiation or any detected force.

Something with mass and force has come out of that definition of nothing in quantum physics.

LordReed:
Please where did I mention genetic predisposition?

LordReed:
Please where did I mention genetic predisposition?

LordReed:
There is nothing like mind of your own, we are products of those that came before us.

LordReed:
Facepalm.

You are just so determined to read meaning into everything. I was referring to our thoughts, we have absorbed the thoughts of others in one form or another and it shapes our thoughts now. It in no way indicates determinism nor does it absolve anyone of personal responsibility, you are still the decider of your own actions.

sonmvayina:
Christians believe that one needs a blood sacrifice for the forgiveness of sin and that one who does not have a blood sacrifice will die in their sins and go to hell. For Christians, the ultimate and only blood sacrifice that counts with God came in the death of Jesus. Christianity believes that if one does not accept the death of Jesus as one’s blood sacrifice, then one is condemned to an eternity enduring the punishments of hell.

In Judaism the centrality of the animal sacrifices ceased, not with the second destruction of the Temple by the Romans, but rather with the first destruction of the Temple by the Babylonians. One must keep in mind that the vast majority of Jews never returned to the Promised Land under Cyrus of Persia. They remained in Babylonia. By the time Jesus was said to have been born, eighty percent of the world’s Jewish community lived outside the Promised Land, and did not care about the cessation of animal sacrifices. When the Temple was reestablished, the Jews of Babylonia made an annual financial gift for the maintenance of the Temple and the land, but never worried that God would not forgive them their sins without a blood sacrifice (much as Jews all over the world do today). They had no such fear because the Bible makes it explicitly clear that no blood sacrifice is necessary for the forgiveness of sins. The Bible also makes it clear that an animal sacrifice is not the exclusive means of obtaining forgiveness.

LordReed:
There is nothing like mind of your own, we are products of those that came before us.

Workch:
OK, my vote goes for Abraham. After hearing voices in his head he gives up his home and makes his family and sex slave live in a tent. He mutilates his own genitals, then his son’s then actually gets the kid to help him build an alter so he can offer him up as a human sacrifice. The voice in his head tells him to stop at the last minute. But still later after getting his sex slave pregnant he sends her and his other son out into the wilderness to die because he wife nagged him about it.


I mean. Bleep.

What Abraham needed was a course of Chlorpromazine two to four times a day in conjunction with some sort of talking therapy twice a week. However, it seems god isn't a man of science or medicine.