₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
Yes, there is no hope that you can conjure a reasonable argument from that.

If your argument is “Trump used ugly rhetoric about Haitians,” say that.

If your argument is “Trump has no legal right to end TPS,” prove that.

If your argument is “Trump ended TPS because of race,” prove the racial motive.

But TPS people were legal at the time does not change the fact that TPS is temporary by law.

Temporary means it can end.

Dogs and cats are not proof.

You are hardly a reasonable person because of bias wrapped in hatred.

voiceunheard:
You know why you are saying this? Because you don't know the aftermath of the promise. He made a massive unprovoked commitment to someone in crisis without a genuine effort/plan to fulfill it.

tctrills:
This is no point.
Every day we hand our kids over to strangers in the name of teachers at school. There have been cases of teachers doing very bad things to kids but we do not kill our kids because we fear to hand them over to strangers.

There are irresponsible biological parents, there are irresponsible foster parents and there are irresponsible adopted parents but saying that the solution is to kill the unborn, that's crazy.

I would not want my child to be with a stranger but you are telling me that the alternative is to murder my unborn, I will choose the stranger everytime over killing a human being.

Have I answered your question ❓

bemeruca:
What does eating cat and dogs has to do with what we are talking?

If they have temporary protected status and Trump decides not to renew it, it still does not prove anti immigration.

tctrills:
I don't understand. What's going on?

LordReed:
Then charge him to court if you think he can be held liable. I can promise you you be laughed out of the court.

bemeruca:
Full, something that is temporary has an end. It's like saying Trump has issues with people who overstayed their visa. No, the visa has expired, it's the country's law that has issues with it.

Their temporary status has ended or trump is ending it because it is temporary. This is so hard to get?

NerdCat:
Thanks for giving me audience.

No. I find all evidence presented in support of the concept to be insufficient and the logical architecture of classical theism - in particular - to be structurally compromised.

I think, therefore I am. 🙃

Tho I suspect you're looking for a more rigorous answer, so I'll say that I'm an arrangement of matter that just happens to be conscious, and self-aware. I'm not entirely sure how I gained this awareness, though I can try to speculate. I'm equally not sure how much more time I have left on this planet.

Meaning for me isn't discovered, but constructed. I don't believe in an objective meaning of life, as per the religious rhetorics for instance. Personally, I build my own meaning of life from my curiosity of life itself, the people around me, the universe in general etc. If I hard to pick my current purpose/meaning - it's to acquire sufficient material resources in terms of food, money, and more, to satisfy myself and my loved ones for as long as I can breathe.

No, and I think the desire for it is psychologically understandable but also quite dangerous in epistemic terms, as it too easily becomes the engine driving belief rather than the conclusion following from evidence. What I find more interesting is the question of whether "I" persist continuously even now, between sleep cycles. That one keeps me up at night, fittingly enough.

cococandy:
They literally just stopped legal immigration from 50 black and brown countries.
These liars can keep deceiving themselves and their moms but we all know the truth

bemeruca:
Who said its illegal?

raumdeuter:
It is Temporary

bemeruca:
Temporary oga. Holding on to delusia

raumdeuter:
Haitians here on TEMPORARY protective status.

The word Temporary has a meaning

raumdeuter:
The rich and successful people are our problems. Lets take their wealth. Says a leftist whether its in South Africa or in New York

victorazyvictor:
Na the truth na...

victorazyvictor:
Na lie!
Anybody that avoids church is 1. Stingy or not real, patronise native doctors.

Is she popular than Dr. Paul Enenche or Pa Oyedepo or Apst. Suleiman?

bayelsaowei:
The conservatives dislikes immigration as a whole. Forget the sell outs here saying the Conservative Party is all for legal immigration. Lies and rubbish.

The green card process is now being attacked. Immigrant VISA interview dates for those who are being processed via the right channel is now slow paced and highly frustrating or stalled.


How about immigrants who have done everything right and ready to obtain citizenship? The Trump administration and its conservative goons have ensured some immigrants who are already approved for U.S. citizenship are delayed and even last-minute cancellations of their oath ceremonies.

Suddenly the “we are going after the worst of the worst criminals” has turned into a crackdown on immigration all together.

bemeruca:
He does not have anything against them. What is their status?

bemeruca:
None. Conservative are pro legal migration.
Liberals are pro illegal migration


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIpUfS9N4tw

bemeruca:
You are lost and misguided.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsQn0ZuodyI

GracieX3:
This is brain dead in so many ways

1. Conservatives are anti-immigration. The particular black xenophobic south Africans are anti-immigration.
2. The same xenophobes do not like their fellow blacks. You don't see them fighting white immigrants. Just like how uncle Tom Conservatives don't care about racism from whites and white privilege but will fight DEI and blast black Americans. They dont care about Trump's white DEI hires eg (Hesgeth and Kristi Noem)

NerdCat:
Agnostic feels the closest, yes. I don't dismiss the spiritual outrightly. The existence of consciousness alone gives me sufficient pause for that. But what I resist - often strongly - is the leap from "materialism is incomplete" to any specific theological architecture like perhaps Christianity or Islam.

raumdeuter:
Answer what?

Which side protest, destroy properties, want to claim what others worked for. They are victims. Nothing is ever their fault.

bemeruca:
The Black community. also, illegal migrants

raumdeuter:
Conservatives in the US want legal immigration
They are big on faith and family values
Does this sound like the South African guy on the street protesting

Democrats have been protesting every weekend burning stuff like in the summer of love

raumdeuter:
In the USA one side wants legal immigration one side wants chaos and blame everyone else for their failures

JuanDeDios:
This post reminds me of Ishola Oyenusi. Girlfriend told him her birthday was near. Most men who have no money would have shrugged and explained that they're broke, or go out to hustle for something - or, if they're really foolish, go and borrow. But not Ishola. Dude brought out his gun from where he kept it, went to Herbert Macaulay Way in Yaba, stopped the first brand new car he saw, killed the owner, fenced the car, and viola - birthday party money was ready.

raumdeuter:
Actually those black South African are examples of the average liberal who are perpetual victims and seek to blame everyone else for their problems

Sounds familiar?

South African blame others, liberals blame others

mmadu4:
Marriage is not an achievement. A child is not either . But we have to do it because of pressure

NerdCat:
To your second question, the answer is no - I hold the question genuinely open. Materialism hasn't closed every gap yet.

voiceunheard:
You are trying to say that this doesn't fall under detrimental reliance? A promise isn't a legal binding but he interfered with my legal right if not that I later went to the police.

What about the death threat?

Image123:
🤦‍♂️