₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
He is not. Globally he is liked more than people like Kier Starmer, Macron etc. You guys are just making Loud noises and throwing tantrums when people don't subscribe to the hate mob mentality.

To you, trashing rules means applying the rules. Eg, close border, ice, etc.

Or, you punch him and accuse him of lies and he fights back. Trump is unique, he is himself. Most of the things people think about him are instilled in them because many of those things are things other leaders claim to do, but he is the one with the guts and the one who keeps his words more than they do to accomplish those things.

No world leader has ever been as crude. The fact that you can't admit that is just well... Normal.

How many leaders use expletives to the camera? And that's just one minor thing. But never mind.

IjeBos:
Why are you still arguing with him?
All his arguments are based on White Christian ideology.
I used to listen to talk radio a bit on my drive to work, had to stop because how hateful is was and how illogical the arguments always were. But I recognize everything he says. It's just rehashed and dressed up with different lingo.
The arguments aren't meant to be logical or appeal to intelligent people looking for intelligent arguments. They are meant to appeal to emotional people.
So, I think any black person who goes to White Christian/Nationalist sites to get information has a psychological issue most emanating from self hate/insecurity.

You sound like a smart person, there is not any amount of reasoning that will change them.

Pardon me jaare, correct man. Its just that I find it hard to get over some of their utterances.

tctrills:
So, the rule is that I need to criticise him first then I will be permitted to join the discussion. I dont agree with that line of thought.

Online, I am here to express conservative principles not to be all over the place.

We all have our online priorities. Just like the war in Sudan is not your business, you rather talk about Israel even though you are African

If you know in your heart that you cannot ever criticize Trump, then know in your heart that unknown to you, you worship him.

tctrills:
It's also funny how you want Trump Catholic followers to begin hating him just because he has problems with the Pope. Why should that be the case.

I was checking to see if they would be able to draw a line there. But not for many. Many dont realize it but Trump is equal to God for them. This is true for many Christians.

bemeruca:
Deepsight

I don't like Obama, but you don't see me crying all day about Obama. Almost everything on this thread related to Trump isn't coming from us; it's coming from you obsessed mobs.

That's cult-like behavior. I don't like Hasan Piker, I dislike many people on the left, but I don't post about them almost always. Hasan Piker is calling for the deaths of Republicans, saying a lot of things, and you haven't posted a single thing about him or critic him. Your focus is to lie about Kirk, who got shot because of the kind of lies you spread, while Hasan Piker encourages people to kill Republicans based on those lies.

Trump is a unique category of his own as a leader and you know it. There has never been a president like him. No one has trashed all rules of civilized society so absolutely. He has actually succeeded in creating a world of his own because he has pushed the limits to the extent that people let him get away with anything and everything saying "Thats just Trump."

No one has even been as vulgar, as crude.

tctrills:
If people ask me to critize any one, I definitely wouldn't. Why would I criticize someone just to please you? That's not right. And you making a big deal out of our not criticizing Trump is a non-issue to me.
For example, I love Peter Obi, and I don't criticize him online, should that disqualify me from criticizing Tinubu and his failed government? I dont think so

The problem is that if you can't see anything wrong he ever does it's good grounds to disqualify you as an objective discussant

tctrills:
It is funny that you leftists demand that we criticize Trump, but we have never asked you guys to accuse or criticize Obama, Biden, or even Kamala. Why do you guys require that we criticize Trump? I dont get it

Because most of you are blind cult followers who worship him as God. Asking for a criticism is a test to see if you can ever disagree with your God. 99% of you fail.

And people even here have asked for me to criticize Obama and co and I have - heavy criticisms for that matter, not light irrelevant ones like some of you try to sneakily do with Trump as proof of being objective.

Emzymagadon:
Which name una don see wey shock una pass for real life? 😂
Drop am make we laugh small 😭

Appeal-Court

xxxxxxxxx

tctrills:
Not really, I told you we agree 95% of the time. The 5% are very minor. It makes no sense to discuss the 5% when there is so much going on.
You are very rude, but I dont really care. Come to think about it, I dont like the way Tinubu speaks, but I have never criticised him for that because it is inconsequential. There are bigger things to be worried about. I never criticized Biden for talking like a fool

How dare you accuse me of being rude, what effrontery, speaking to your humble, calm, gentle, amiable, friendly, peace loving senior in such a brat like manner? Kneel down at once.

tctrills:
Why should I criticise Trump? Our political views allign 95% of the time, as for the 5% diffrence, it doesn't deserve public criticism.

Not having a single criticism is evidence of blind and cult followership. There is no leader of whom a rational person can have no criticism, speak less of a loquacious, rude and divisive leader.

tctrills:
Why should I criticise Trump? Our political views allign 95% of the time, as for the 5% diffrence, it doesn't deserve public criticism.

You are Catholic then and you have reduced the pope to a political leader for the sake of Trump.
You should be excommunicated.

TV01:
...because, and to be honest, behind the bogus scholarly facade you like to present, you are a bit of a tit really. Just saying. I can't shake the feeling you are either never married or divorced .


TV

Jesus Christ. Do you have a crystal ball or something.

tctrills:
How is that important?

I am trying to see, since you have never criticised Trump, if his utterances against the Pope would be enough to evoke a criticism - if you are Catholic.

WizardOfNG:
Lol. Like Gbajabiamila said "enter dem, scatter dem and finish dem".

ADC is the main challenge to PBAT and APC. Yet they are done already before election day because the Party is nothing but a congregation of desperate political oloshos.

2027 is the year the lord has set for the emancipation of Nigeria 😎

Bagudu. We are waiting.

raumdeuter:
Actually at the time Trump asked for the death penalty, the police claimed they got a confession from the guys admitting to the murder which later proved to be coerced

If today you hear that a group of say Hispanic guy killed a girl and they "confessed " to the crime then you ask for the death penalty. Are you racist

Stop being selective. Trump maintained his stand even after the truth came out.

Moreover calling for the death penalty for minors?

GracieX3:
Wow. Are you seeing how much you defend racism, especially from Trump?

Trump spent money on newspaper ads claiming the guilt on a group of innocent coloured men. You do not see that as racist.

And you are now comparing it to Kyle Rittenhouse. Kyle Rittenhouse killed two people and injured a third. Opinion was divided whether it was murder or self defence. Keep in mind that it could go both ways because he was defending himself but he carried a gun to an already charged protest. Both sides had their points, so no racism either way.


O.J. Simpson got away with murder. Some blacks cheered because the police department was racist. Had they not been racist, Simpson would have been indicted. The whites who wanted him jailed were in their right.


Two different scenarios to the Trump's action on the central park five is racist because he had no proof but believed that they were guilty. There was no real evidence tying them to the crime.

Well said. Trump judged those kids by their color. And what tctrill's misses is how reminiscent what he was doing was of the culture of lynching.
He was calling for a lynching of innocent colored kids, simple.

raumdeuter:
Bringing a weapon is not a crime. Until he was attacked by 3 white guys and he defended himself

Anyway I was giving context, I have not given a view.

raumdeuter:
You asked for specifics on what he did for non celebrities.

No I did not.
Why are you not on your knees? Raise up your hands and close your eyes.
In fact, kneel on uncooked rice.

raumdeuter:
This post reeks of ignorance and very uneducated

How is Trump proven to have engaged in those acts?

Will you shattap and kneel down at once? How dare you speak to a gentle, kind, gracious, humble, polite and unobtrusive personage such as myself in such a manner.

raumdeuter:
Actually accused Kyle Rittenhouse of being a racist white supremacist for shooting 3 white guys

Not even you are stupid enough to fail to note that he was bringing a weapon to a race based riot inspired by a shooting of a black man.

raumdeuter:
The thousands of blacks that he granted pardon under the first step acts are not celebrities

Or the biggest funding he gave HBCUs they are not celebrities

Its jolly easy to cherry pick a couple of things you think he has done seemingly well by blacks ignoring his massive and long and well documented history of racism.

Zone outwards and take a birds eye view and see clearly, Uncle RR.

tctrills:
Your difference makes no difference. You really have not explained why one should be seen as racism and the other is not. Yes, no two cases are exactly the same, but we must judge with a standard. It seems you have 2 standards, one for Trump and one for your leftist brethren.

Are you Catholic

tctrills:
Oga, I think you are racist by your standard.

Let's use your favorite Gemini.
Here is the prompt: Have the Epstein files implicated Trump in sexual child abuse so far?

As of May 2026, the various releases of the "Epstein Files" (including documents unsealed by the courts in 2024 and those released by the Department of Justice under the Epstein Files Transparency Act in late 2025 and early 2026) have not provided direct, corroborated evidence or legal proof that Donald Trump engaged in sexual activity with minors.

While the files contain mentions of Trump, the information regarding sexual activity specifically with minors consists of allegations rather than proven facts. Here is the direct breakdown of what the files contain regarding these claims:

1. Unsubstantiated Allegations
The 2026 DOJ release included FBI memos (specifically Form 302s) memorializing interviews from 2019 with an unidentified woman.

The Claim: The woman alleged that in the early 1980s (when she was approximately 13 years old), Jeffrey Epstein flew her to a building in New York or New Jersey where Donald Trump allegedly attempted to sexually assault her.

The Status: The FBI characterized these claims as "unverified" and "unsubstantiated." The Justice Department noted that some files contained "sensationalist" claims, and Trump’s legal team has dismissed the allegations as "completely baseless."[b][/b]

From what you have read above, are you racist? It says the files have not provided direct, corroborated evidence or legal proof that Donald Trump engaged in sexual activity with minors.
Are you a racist?

Wrong prompt. I said from what is in the public space. Not just what is in the Epstein files.

Almost half of those files are still hidden / redacted at least much of the key evidence. And that is illegal. And also what is in the public space makes it obvious why.

tctrills:
To your last paragraph, give me your reason first because O don't see reason for the question.

If you are, I want to hear your view on Trumps attacks on the Pope.

To your first paragraph, you claim accusing a young man of murder stops being racism if the actions of the innocent man is perceived by his accusers to be racist.

Oga even you must accept that this racism thing is making no sense.

By your logic, if I wrongfully accuse you of being racist as was the case of Kyle, I am not racist but in Trump's case, he is racist.

Can I beg you for a mighty favour. Please explain this to me like I am 10 years old. This one over me, I confess.

Make it simple, show how leftist are not racist in accusing Kyle but Trump is a racist.

Note, Kyle did not even shoot a black man

I was only providing context to show you its quite different from the case of the kids. I did not say my view.

tctrills:
Please what do the Epstein files prove against Trump?

Answer the above because that's the easiest to fact check.

Anyone accusing Trump of molesting minors, should we call such a person a racist?

How about a white man who still believes OJ Simpson is guilty of killing is wife even after the jury found him innocent, is he a racist?

From what is in the public space already, every unbiased person knows Trump has engaged in those degenerate acts.
My problem with you is this knee jerk defense of all things white supremacist, Trumpian and Jewish supremacist.
Just be balanced. I dont think I have heard you criticize a single thing Trump has ever done.

Are you catholic?

GloriousGbola:
if tinubu thought like you , ACN would be a lagos party to this day

what is lagos money against federal money?
what was lagos income when bola tinubu was sworn in vs when he left?

is it his fault that peter obi had no actual strategy to grow anambra's income?

all i hear you saying is oh lagos state has so much money so Bola tinubu just threw money at elections - the end
did we not see acn lose in ekiti and in ondo?

i am sorry, but all you are doing is dropping defeatist excuses. it is fine if in you want to belive that all Bola tinubu needed was lagos budget please go ahead.

Bola is one of the most clever politicians so it was not just money, but the money factor cannot be played down. However I still dont think you can compare the fund generating potential of the two states. Not by a mile.

Kukutente23:
So after losing elections in Ekiti and Ohdo did he stop there or he sponsored more candidates? When Aregbec lost in Osun, I'm sure it was your saliva they used to gather the best lawyers in Nigeria to fight the case
Without money, you can't achieve anything in Nigeria's politics
It is same money that made AC from Lagos to enter all the SW states. Why hadn't APGA being able to add one state to Anambra? Ojukwu is not popular enough or Igbos don't like APGA abi?
And for the records, alpha beta grew Lagos income not Tinubu. Reduce your lies
And for you to be comparing federal money with state money only shows your ignorance

Alpha Beta is Tinubu effectively, no?

LottiOk:
You knew this all along but kept decieving your fellow opposition/Obidents that they can be win PBAT in next year's elections. After giving many Obidents false hope, you're now clearly stating the obvious facts even though you still display your usual illogical reasoning in those 3 points you outlined could give the opposition an edge.

The way You Obidents enjoy lying to yourselves and think your lies will ever manifest as Truth really baffles me.

Why do you think I am an Obidient? How do you know I am not Atikulated or Kwankwasiyad or even Sowored? And when did I tell anyone that opposition or Obi will win next year? Stop telling lies and making assumptions okay?

The only person I have ever voted for President is Gani Fawehinmi.
And the only other time I escorted my family to the polling both, I asked them to vote Nuhu Ribadu.

basilico:
Deepsight . Here is proof AI chatbots can make up stories.

March 8 this year. I was following PDC UK open Darts festival from flashscore.com and I asked Gemini what's the latest.

Gemini reply: Gerwin Price had just beaten Johnny Clayton 10-4.

My response: They haven't played yet it's Josh Rock and a guy from Poland.

Gemini then corrected itself and said the match has not yet begun.

In any case Gerwin Price beat Johnny Clayton 10-8 not the 10-4 the bot had claimed.

Trust AI at your own risk. On several other occasions Gemini has made up it's own results when it comes to PDC darts.

I am aware and I counter check. Its even better now, in the early stages the thing used to write some real gibberish.

tctrills:
Let's break it down: the guys were young, and Trump spent money to push a false narrative against them. The only difference here is that your Leftists did not spend money to push their campaign against Kyle Rittenhouse. Even after he was exonerated, they continued to push the false narrative. And Kyle was really young. So the only thing that made Trump's case different was the money he spent. Is that what makes Trump a racist while you leftist are not?
Note, many on the left are spending campaign dollars accusing Trump of all kinds of things on the non-existent Epstein files. Are they racists?

I think the Kyle Rittenhouse case is markedly different because of the context of the riots about the police shooting of black a black man. Therefore his actions were seen as attempting to defend a racist police shooting - seven shots which left the victim paralyzed. I am only giving context. Very different scenario.

However, one thing you should know is that I know there are racists on the left too, but just far less and racism is not an ideology they way it is for the right, even if unsaid.

Epstein files are non existent?
You are truly on something.

Are you Catholic. I have a reason for asking which has nothing to do with anything debated in the last few days.

GloriousGbola:
So this is the thing. I am from kwara state. Kwara has 16 lgas. The only lga you probably know is ilorin, the capital city. Same for most states in Nigeria. Many lgas but only the capital is really developed like that. The rest are mostly backwater. You will see your free and organized elections in the capital city, but the game is run in the hinterlands. It is only in your capital city you have an educated middle class that are actually focused on the election. Go to your impoverished back water lga and for them election is a in 1200 when they can get some free food and maybe small dash.

The governors largely have control over the election machinery in their states. Off the top of my head osun is the only state I have seen that may be a true battleground state where multiple actors control the electorate.

Most other states the governor has full control over the outcome via his lieutenants. Wike was a lieutenant elevated to governor which is one reason why he is still in control. He has a full understanding of the electoral process in rivers.

I am saying you may see high turnout in the capital cities, but it will ultimately mean nothing. It is actually more likely that the capital cities will have people preferring to relax at home rather than queue in the sun and rain to vote.

Also thanks to orange man, the voice of international observers is no longer what it used to be. We are now learning work where America is concerned in election mago mago.

Very well and intelligently analysed.

Lol @ learning work from orange man. True!

tctrills:
This is being lousy. Whenever a white man accuses a black man of a crime, is it racism?
So, when you guys (Black guys) accuse Trump of various crimes, are you being racist?

You guys are making the definition of racism to be some kind of mystery.

Many leftists on this platform accused Kyle Rittenhouse of murder. Would you today call all your leftist friends on this platform racists?

You miss the point about the central park five. Many blacks/ latinos have been accused of crime without racism being brought up. It was the way Trump went about it. He took out full page adverts in four newspapers at a cost of 85k USD to demand the death penalty even before anything was proven (only two weeks after the incident) and worse than this, after they were exonerated he never withdrew his stance or apologized for it. After New York City settled a lawsuit with the five men for $41 million in 2014, Trump wrote an op-ed in the Daily News calling the settlement a "disgrace" and a "terrible mistake."

On top of all this, I hope you know those guys were juveniles between the ages of 14 and 16.