₦airaland Forum

Basher8583:
Still I dare the lawyer to try it. When they make those charge and bail lawyers scape goats please don't come back here to cry witch hunting again.
Igbos are so stubbornly daft always doing the wrong thing the wrong way.

All these evidence they have now why didn't they present them during the court session. This is what happens when over confidence takes over you

Is it that the supreme Court is a cult or why should the Court's decision not be reviewed even just once!,the way you are so vehement in your support for the supreme Court appears the Court's ruling suits you much.

Nfora:
Professional liar.

Sahara Reporters:

[b]''Supreme Court in Abuja rules in favor of Peter Obi, he will now complete his tenure as the governor of Anambra State while Mr. Andy Uba, erstwhile household assistant to former President Obasanjo will vacate power immediately since Peter Obi is entitled to stay in office till May 17, 2010.

Supreme Court judgement read by Justice Katsina Alau in a unanimous decision where all the seven member agreed without dissent.



Wild jubilation across Nigeria, as the most controversial governor, Andy Uba is unseated by the Supreme Court.

Last minute efforts by Andy Uba and Dangote to bribe Supreme Court judges with $7 million failed.

Peter Obi still in London said he will be returning home shortly to take over as the governor of Anambra State for the remainder of his tenure.

-----------------------------

Background:

Gov. Peter Obi (born July 19, 1961) was governor of Anambra State in Nigeria from March 17, 2006 to November 3, 2006 and again from February 9, 2007 to May 29, 2007. He is a member of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) party.

He replaced Former Gov. Chris Ngige, whose 2003 election victory was overturned by the Nigerian Federal Court of Appeal on March 15, 2006.

On November 2, 2006, Gov. Obi was impeached by 16 members of the state house of assembly after 7 months in office. He was replaced the next day by Dame Virginia Etiaba, his deputy, making her the first ever female Governor in Nigeria's history.[/b]''

http://saharareporters.com/2007/06/13/peter-obi-wins-tenure-extended-until-2010-andy-uba-out


Gov Obi Vs Andy Uba: Supreme Court Blasts Okonkwo Of NAP


In a unanimous verdict, the Supreme Court yesterday in Abuja dismissed applications filed by former presidential aide, Dr. Emmanuel Nnamdi Uba, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Anambra State gubernatorial candidate of the Nigeria Advance Party (NAP), Mr. Ifeanyichukwu Okonkwo, seeking to set aside its earlier judgment which declared Dr. Peter Obi as the legal occupant of the governor's seat.

The court described Okonkwo as a blackmailer who goes about extorting money from politicians and declared that he was "not fit to even live in the jungle."

Earlier, Justice George Adeshola Oguntade had sought from Okonkwo clarification on the purpose of N10 million bribe he allegedly received from Obi. He said he was paid the said sum to withdraw his preliminary objections to Obi's appeal and not to withdraw the main appeal.

It also lambasted Okonkwo for his brazenness in approaching it with an application to set aside its own judgment upon the claims that he was paid N10 million by Obi to compromise himself at the Court of Appeal


For more details:

https://www.nairaland.com/109239/gov-obi-vs-andy-uba

well my opinion was based on an earlier piece I read were the writer claimed the supreme Court had ruled in favor of ubah only to change their minds after obi forced a review, perhaps that claim was only concocted,but be that as it may,I still believe there are lots of valid point to prove that the supreme Court erred n so asking for a review is not a futile venture after all, nothing ventures nothing wiins.

GenBuhari:
You got it right . The chances a single supreme court judging making an error is very low. So it is virtually impossible for 7 supreme court justices to make same error.

This case is done and dusted. I am sure Ihedioha and his lawyers knows this, that is why I am sure this is fake news .

Nfora:
Professional liar.

Sahara Reporters:

[b]''Supreme Court in Abuja rules in favor of Peter Obi, he will now complete his tenure as the governor of Anambra State while Mr. Andy Uba, erstwhile household assistant to former President Obasanjo will vacate power immediately since Peter Obi is entitled to stay in office till May 17, 2010.

Supreme Court judgement read by Justice Katsina Alau in a unanimous decision where all the seven member agreed without dissent.



Wild jubilation across Nigeria, as the most controversial governor, Andy Uba is unseated by the Supreme Court.

Last minute efforts by Andy Uba and Dangote to bribe Supreme Court judges with $7 million failed.

Peter Obi still in London said he will be returning home shortly to take over as the governor of Anambra State for the remainder of his tenure.

-----------------------------

Background:

Gov. Peter Obi (born July 19, 1961) was governor of Anambra State in Nigeria from March 17, 2006 to November 3, 2006 and again from February 9, 2007 to May 29, 2007. He is a member of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) party.

He replaced Former Gov. Chris Ngige, whose 2003 election victory was overturned by the Nigerian Federal Court of Appeal on March 15, 2006.

On November 2, 2006, Gov. Obi was impeached by 16 members of the state house of assembly after 7 months in office. He was replaced the next day by Dame Virginia Etiaba, his deputy, making her the first ever female Governor in Nigeria's history.[/b]''

http://saharareporters.com/2007/06/13/peter-obi-wins-tenure-extended-until-2010-andy-uba-out


Gov Obi Vs Andy Uba: Supreme Court Blasts Okonkwo Of NAP


In a unanimous verdict, the Supreme Court yesterday in Abuja dismissed applications filed by former presidential aide, Dr. Emmanuel Nnamdi Uba, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Anambra State gubernatorial candidate of the Nigeria Advance Party (NAP), Mr. Ifeanyichukwu Okonkwo, seeking to set aside its earlier judgment which declared Dr. Peter Obi as the legal occupant of the governor's seat.

The court described Okonkwo as a blackmailer who goes about extorting money from politicians and declared that he was "not fit to even live in the jungle."

Earlier, Justice George Adeshola Oguntade had sought from Okonkwo clarification on the purpose of N10 million bribe he allegedly received from Obi. He said he was paid the said sum to withdraw his preliminary objections to Obi's appeal and not to withdraw the main appeal.

It also lambasted Okonkwo for his brazenness in approaching it with an application to set aside its own judgment upon the claims that he was paid N10 million by Obi to compromise himself at the Court of Appeal


For more details:

https://www.nairaland.com/109239/gov-obi-vs-andy-uba

well my opinion was based on an earlier piece I read were the writer claimed the supreme Court had ruled in favor of ubah only to change their minds after obi forced a review, perhaps that claim was only concocted,but be that as it may,I still believe there are lots of valid point to prove that the supreme Court erred n so asking for a review is not a futile venture after all, nothing ventures nothing wiins.Man, this is human set up,you can't rule politics out of the conduct of the supreme Court especially during this regime.

Nfora:
Professional liar.

Sahara Reporters:

[b]''Supreme Court in Abuja rules in favor of Peter Obi, he will now complete his tenure as the governor of Anambra State while Mr. Andy Uba, erstwhile household assistant to former President Obasanjo will vacate power immediately since Peter Obi is entitled to stay in office till May 17, 2010.

Supreme Court judgement read by Justice Katsina Alau in a unanimous decision where all the seven member agreed without dissent.



Wild jubilation across Nigeria, as the most controversial governor, Andy Uba is unseated by the Supreme Court.

Last minute efforts by Andy Uba and Dangote to bribe Supreme Court judges with $7 million failed.

Peter Obi still in London said he will be returning home shortly to take over as the governor of Anambra State for the remainder of his tenure.

-----------------------------

Background:

Gov. Peter Obi (born July 19, 1961) was governor of Anambra State in Nigeria from March 17, 2006 to November 3, 2006 and again from February 9, 2007 to May 29, 2007. He is a member of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) party.

He replaced Former Gov. Chris Ngige, whose 2003 election victory was overturned by the Nigerian Federal Court of Appeal on March 15, 2006.

On November 2, 2006, Gov. Obi was impeached by 16 members of the state house of assembly after 7 months in office. He was replaced the next day by Dame Virginia Etiaba, his deputy, making her the first ever female Governor in Nigeria's history.[/b]''

http://saharareporters.com/2007/06/13/peter-obi-wins-tenure-extended-until-2010-andy-uba-out


Gov Obi Vs Andy Uba: Supreme Court Blasts Okonkwo Of NAP


In a unanimous verdict, the Supreme Court yesterday in Abuja dismissed applications filed by former presidential aide, Dr. Emmanuel Nnamdi Uba, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Anambra State gubernatorial candidate of the Nigeria Advance Party (NAP), Mr. Ifeanyichukwu Okonkwo, seeking to set aside its earlier judgment which declared Dr. Peter Obi as the legal occupant of the governor's seat.

The court described Okonkwo as a blackmailer who goes about extorting money from politicians and declared that he was "not fit to even live in the jungle."

Earlier, Justice George Adeshola Oguntade had sought from Okonkwo clarification on the purpose of N10 million bribe he allegedly received from Obi. He said he was paid the said sum to withdraw his preliminary objections to Obi's appeal and not to withdraw the main appeal.

It also lambasted Okonkwo for his brazenness in approaching it with an application to set aside its own judgment upon the claims that he was paid N10 million by Obi to compromise himself at the Court of Appeal


For more details:

https://www.nairaland.com/109239/gov-obi-vs-andy-uba

well my opinion was based on an earlier piece I read were the writer claimed the supreme Court had ruled in favor of ubah only to change their minds after obi forced a review, perhaps that claim was only concocted,but be that as it may,I still believe there are lots of valid point to prove that the supreme Court erred n so asking for a review is not a futile venture after all, nothing ventures nothing wiins.

nairavsdollars:
Temidayo Akinsuyi, Lagos



https://www.independent.ng/igbo-political-leaders-havent-learnt-any-lesson-from-civil-war-junaid-mohammed/

I don't always agree with Junaid but I strongly believe there is a lot of sense in what he said especially the lack of tact by the igbo political leadership, political n power acquisition is a delicate smart game you know.

Basher8583:
Iliterate.. this is not bbnaija. This is a serious issue you are trivialising like this.
In otherwords you are saying the SC judges are dumb and did not know what they were doing abi. They just wasted thier time during the proceedings.
I dare the barrister who will take the case for review. Im sure he knows the repercussions of such actions. Unless him go sleep for law school and no sabi book but settle pass.

it's nothing new, impossible or without precedence,go n check Peter obi's case, please write based on facts.

References:
https://m.guardian.ng/news/ihedioha-returns-to-supreme-court-seeks-review-of-ouster-verdict/

I have said it severally that no matter how one look at the supreme Court ruling in the I'm elections matter,the judgement was flawed,the best they could have done was to cancel the elections completely n ask for a rerun, this is a chance for the supreme Court to redeem or destroy herself.

OVIHINNO:
There can't be over voting because of the following facts;
The results from the 388 polling units were totally excluded. That means both the accredited votes and valid votes weren't taken into consideration by INEC when they made their declaration.
Naturally since the supreme court added those valid votes from the 388 polling units automatically accredited votes will increase with at least the combination of valid votes scored by all the candidates, void votes, cancelled votes etc
There cannot be valid votes without accreditation

please why can't the new tally n results be made public now?

GoTV:
As a born again Christian who is meant to speak the truth at all times, i think this amoketun issue is being hypocritically blown out of proportion to expand hatred for other tribes especially the Fulanis. Why must we Christians be the brain behind the vast support for Amotekun when the Nigerian constitution is clear about the roles of the armed forces and police in the security of the country? Why must we form an ethnic militia to target fellow Nigerians when the constitution guarantees freedom of movement and doing business nationwide as long as we are Nigerians? What we fail to realize is that the south east cheering on Amotekun sees its as a synonym for their biafra agitations and they will rather support anything that will disband the relative peace and unity of Nigeria. The IPOB sympathizers will be the one to cry wolf when Amotekun starts targeting their tribesmen who commits various crimes in the south west. MURIC recently condemned the killing of a CAN pastor and sympathized with we Christians, how many Christians will condemn the killing of an imam or Muslims? Instead we rejoice when tragedy strikes them forgetting we are all humans before religion. Instead of emulating our Muslim brothers who have remained silent on this issue of Amotekun, we Christians are disturbing the cyberspace with hypocritical comments. Amotekun will never see the light of the day as long as we remain one Nigeria. It's a bad policy and a tribalistic security outfit aimed at persecuting other Nigerians. On behalf of we Christians, i condemn Amotekun. Let's learn to live in peace and harmony

When you people say the Constitution guarantees freedom of movement,does the Constitution accept that one's movement and activities should be a threat to another's existence and survival?

EsomahJD:
https://www.sunnewsonline.com/amotekun-will-promote-swest-seast-ssouth-secession-plans-tanko-yakasai/

From the body language of the northern hausa/fulani, it's crystal clear that they are so scared of Nigeria breaking up n them becoming a landlock sahel Savannah landmass with endless catastrophes,the dominance of the Nigeria's security by them I'd a well thought out plan, this is the reason someone like buhari with poor individual capacity n competence but an avid promoter n supporter of northern dominance n supremacy is massively supported while everything is been done to destroy a person like Atiku who is nationalistic in his dealings,I believe this ametokun has shown Tinubu n his kinsmen the kind of people they are toying with,if eventually the ametokun capitulate then the south should just forget it,it should now be clear that the north dread a United south but it's up to the Southerners to find a common ground amongst themselves or laments indefinitely while the north jeer them cheekily.

garfield1:
I hit you hard.you are lost in a jungle of hatred,even ihedioha cant save you

Don't fool yourself,I just felt you are a hypocrite n sycophant y I ask you to get lost because I find your type disgusting.

OVIHINNO:
The evidence presented before the supreme court was that elections took place in those polling units and Uzodinma overwhelming won. PDP and INEC couldn't disprove that. There was no way the Supreme Court would be calling for another election when the facts before her shows that there is a clear winner. The supreme court justices are not magicians. They decide cases on the strength of the evidence presented

you are just dancing round the point I raised while avoiding it completely,the results showed overwhelming victory for uzodima but also proved overwhelming over voting so how do you marry the two?,why can't the new tally be made public by the supreme Court since inec refused because they said it was the supreme Court that did the tally n declarations?

garfield1:
You just hate apc so nothing will make meaning to you.inec and pdp are the one that messed up.everybody tried to rig but hope did his smartly and covered it up with the law making him the winner

get lost.

NGpatriot:
Meaningless rant and emotion, the lawyers and INEC failed to prove their case and even couldn't proved basic evidence so why should I take you here in NL with poor understanding of the case seriously?

INEC don move on, the former governor don move on, I suggest you you move on too.

yeah, everyone has to move on because it suit you today but tomorrow shall come, history is been recorded, I'm moving on too.ok.

garfield1:
The tally you are seeing is from card readers.look for the one in the manual registers

show that one now if you have access to it, anyway one try to analyze this drama it still remain that the supreme Court messed up jare,n its all about Apc gaining ground in the SE by hook or crook period.

Blindersoff:
If indeed there was violence, rigging or any other malpractice where is the incidence form Inec documented the reason for cancellation in and why did they not present same to the Supreme court?

It is like comprehension is your issue.

now it appears we are on same page,you don't expect inec to present what they were required to, that's why I expected the supreme Court to have asked inec to explain why they omitted the results from the 388units,a news piece I read some days back showing the new supreme Court judgement results clearly showed massive over voting that one wonder whether the supreme took notice of that at all,most surprisingly neither the supreme Court not inec is coming forth with the latest results, which ever way I try to look at the whole thing, it's still clear that the court messed up,the best was to have cancelled the whole election but something tells me the whole drama is all about Apc gaining ground in the SE by whatever means.

rentAcock:
I would love to have a job where my only work hazard is exposure to "movie production lights". These celebrities try so hard to make their life appear tougher than the common man. You are paid millions per shooting to look cute on tv and read some scripts and you want to complain about the production lights. I guarantee you that growth in his eyes very likely had nothing to do with light exposure.

Don't mind him jare, that's most likely to be pterygium,I experienced it n was operated on at eye specialist hospital damboa road maiduguri in 2006.

CuriousMynd:
A joint security patrol have arrested two suspected kidnappers on Thursday at at Gwarjo village in Danmusa Local Government Area of Katsina, Igbere TV reports.

The suspects identified as Abdullahi Rabiu and Isa Rabiu were reportedly nabbed in the forest.

Two Dane guns and some locally made ammunitions were recovered from the kidnappers.

Reacting to the incident, the Police Public Relations in the state, Gambo Isah disclosed that the suspects would be moved to the command headquarters for further investigation.

He said the visit to the forest was to demolish a structure used in hiding kidnapped victims, noting that security personnel were not relenting in the fight against banditry and other criminalities in the state.

http://igberetvnews.com/1291505/two-suspected-kidnappers-nabbed-katsina-forest/

what is this unnecessary exaggerations all about,is that how a forest looks like? Same thing with the so call sambisa!.

Blindersoff:
[s][/s]

Absolutely none of the nonsense you wrote is the concern of the supreme court. This was not the appeal before it and if you had gone through the judgement you will see that you just spewed a ton of foolishness in one post.

The appeal was for the return of previously cancelled votes and not voter scrutiny or violence at the PUs or rigging.

If there was rigging or violence which caused INEC to cancel the results why was there no incidence form indicating the reason for cancellation presented before the Supreme court?

If there was one can you produce it for me to see?

INEC focused on the appeal before them from the lower court and Judgement was delivered accordingly and correctly. if you still wish to wail over it then go ahead and keep doing do but if you wish to see and read the full Judgement so your confusion can be cured. then visit this link

https://www.nairaland.com/5649058/full-supreme-court-judgement-imo

We learn everyday and you should cease this opportunity to learn from the judgement above and become more intelligent rather than mouthing off like a leaky faucet

it's like you have compression issue,if truly there was no violence, rigging or any electoral malpractice whatsoever,then why did inec cancelled the results?,at least even for record purpose the supreme Court should have inquired from inec,or are you telling me now that inec just forgot about results from 388 polling units?,haba Mr Man.!

garfield1:
There is no overvoting anywhere.if you insist,prove so with the voters register

please can you state the elections results tally as concluded by the supreme Court?

NGpatriot:
Election cancelation or not was not the case before the supreme court and you can not make up your own case and narratives to substitute the case that was filed and litigated before the SC.

Curb your emotions and read and comprehend the court case and the subsequent judgment.

was the excluded results from the 388 polling units not the issue?were the not included because they were cancelled by inec at collating centre?so what are you talking about?,you can cheer the supreme Court because it probably suit you but it's a fact that they bleeped up, instead of correcting a wrong deed,they have only succeeded in promoting n reinforcing a worse deed.

OVIHINNO:
Any sane mind will know 7 supreme court Justices can never be compromised at the same time. Agreed those results might have been forged but the onus of proof lies on the respondents. Like its said; He who allege must prove. The supreme court only worked with facts presented before her. Supreme court judges don't dwell on sentiments and emotions.

So even as those results clearly showed over voting,you don't think the supreme Court should have cancelled the results as a whole instead of declaring uzodima,is it right then that a fraudulent evidence should be tendered to support one's case n for the court to accept such?.

NGpatriot:
https://dailypost.ng/2020/01/24/amanze-ajoku-how-inec-and-lawyers-ruined-ihediohas-case/

No matter how hard the supreme Court may try,the truth still remains that they Bleep up big time,ok the rules require that results should be cancelled at polling unit only,but if the supreme Court had carefully analysed their re computed results they would have seen that the results clearly showed gross over voting,ballot stuffing n rigging, with poor security at the polling unit it will be suicidal for any electoral officer at that level to cancel any result with devilish thugs threatening,the best the supreme Court should have done was to cancel the Imo elections in part or wholly but they had to satisfy the powers that be n so they had to source for this justification,now the supreme Court had only confirm that a politician should do whatever it takes to make sure that an election result is produce at the polling unit n such politician is good to go, I'm surprised that the supreme Court never mentioned anything concerning inec reason for the cancellation,the reason given by the supreme Court is just an after thought that doesn't hold any water, shame on them n their supporters.

Blindersoff:
At your words in bold, THEN WHY DID INEC GO AHEAD TO DECLARE IHEDIOHA AS WINNER IF THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY CONNIVANCE WITH IHEDIOHA?

You see, this case shows that PDP connived with INEC to rig the elections but failed at the point of proof before the supreme court.

Clear cut and simple.

NGpatriot:
https://dailypost.ng/2020/01/24/amanze-ajoku-how-inec-and-lawyers-ruined-ihediohas-case/

No matter how hard the supreme Court may try,the truth still remains that they Bleep up big time,ok the rules require that results should be cancelled at polling unit only,but if the supreme Court had carefully analysed their re computed results they would have seen that the results clearly showed gross over voting,ballot stuffing n rigging, with poor security at the polling unit it will be suicidal for any electoral officer at that level to cancel any result with devilish thugs threatening,the best the supreme Court should have done was to cancel the Imo.units elections in part or wholly but they had to satisfy the powers that be n so they had to source for this justification,now the supreme Court had only confirm that a politician should do whatever it takes to make sure that an election result is produce at the polling unit n such politician is good to go, I'm surprised that the supreme Court never mentioned anything concerning inec reason for the cancellation,the reason given by the supreme Court is just an after thought that doesn't hold any water, shame on them n their supporters.inec declared the results excluding the results from the 388 units, it's those rejected results that are in dispute n not the whole results.

NGpatriot:
https://dailypost.ng/2020/01/24/amanze-ajoku-how-inec-and-lawyers-ruined-ihediohas-case/

No matter how hard the supreme Court may try,the truth still remains that they Bleep up big time,ok the rules require that results should be cancelled at polling unit only,but if the supreme Court had carefully analysed their re computed results they would have seen that the results clearly showed gross over voting,ballot stuffing n rigging, with poor security at the polling unit it will be suicidal for any electoral officer at that level to cancel any result with devilish thugs threatening,the best the supreme Court should have done was to cancel the Imo elections in part or wholly but they had to satisfy the powers that be n so they had to source for this justification,now the supreme Court had only confirm that a politician should do whatever it takes to make sure that an election result is produce at the polling unit n such politician is good to go, I'm surprised that the supreme Court never mentioned anything concerning inec reason for the cancellation,the reason given by the supreme Court is just an after thought that doesn't hold any water, shame on them n their supporters.

Blindersoff:
At your words in bold, THEN WHY DID INEC GO AHEAD TO DECLARE IHEDIOHA AS WINNER IF THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY CONNIVANCE WITH IHEDIOHA?

You see, this case shows that PDP connived with INEC to rig the elections but failed at the point of proof before the supreme court.

Clear cut and simple.

NGpatriot:
https://dailypost.ng/2020/01/24/amanze-ajoku-how-inec-and-lawyers-ruined-ihediohas-case/

No matter how hard the supreme Court may try,the truth still remains that they Bleep up big time,ok the rules require that results should be cancelled at polling unit only,but if the supreme Court had carefully analysed their re computed results they would have seen that the results clearly showed gross over voting,ballot stuffing n rigging, with poor security at the polling unit it will be suicidal for any electoral officer at that level to cancel any result with devilish thugs threatening,the best the supreme Court should have done was to cancel the Imo elections in part or wholly but they had to satisfy the powers that be n so they had to source for this justification,now the supreme Court had only confirm that a politician should do whatever it takes to make sure that an election result is produce at the polling unit n such politician is good to go, I'm surprised that the supreme Court never mentioned anything concerning inec reason for the cancellation,the reason given by the supreme Court is just an after thought that doesn't hold any water, shame on them n their supporters.

NGpatriot:
https://dailypost.ng/2020/01/24/amanze-ajoku-how-inec-and-lawyers-ruined-ihediohas-case/

No matter how hard the supreme Court may try,the truth still remains that they Bleep up big time,ok the rules require that results should be cancelled at polling unit only,but if the supreme Court had carefully analysed their re computed results they would have seen that the results clearly showed gross over voting,ballot stuffing n rigging, with poor security at the polling unit it will be suicidal for any electoral officer at that level to cancel any result with devilish thugs threatening,the best the supreme Court should have done was to cancel the Imo elections in part or wholly but they had to satisfy the powers that be n so they had to source for this justification,now the supreme Court had only confirm that a politician should do whatever it takes to make sure that an election result is produce at the polling unit n such politician is good to go, I'm surprised that the supreme Court never mentioned anything concerning inec reason for the cancellation,the reason given by the supreme Court is just an after thought that doesn't hold any water, shame on them n their supporters.

Lenadiva:
AKUME is a politician of repute whom Benue people are yet to produce a leader of his calibre. Before u criticise a person make sure u know well about him first.

Akume's house in wannune is off the road to the general hospital by govt sec sch,look I know Akume more than you do so don't preach to me, perhaps you are only writing from the perspective of an apci supporter.

Lenadiva:
He is better than you and all your generations unborn.

If you don't know,he is not only foolish but a bastard,go n find out before you kill yourself bitch.

Versatella:
FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA ABUJA.

21-01-2020.

JIME Vs ORTOM.

The supreme court has affirmed the election of Governor Samuel Ortom of Benue state .In their unanimous judgement ,the court dismissed the appeal for totally lacking in merit, availing that ,the appellant has failed to prove the case of none compliance against the respondent.

They upheld the ruling of the tribunal.

The seven man panel of Justices that sat on the case are ;

Hon. Justice Olabode Rhodes-vivour

Hon. Justice Nwali Sylvester Ngwuta

Hon. Justice musa Dattijo Muhammad

Hon. Justice Amiru sanusi

Hon. Justice Amina Adamu Augie

Hon. Justice Paul Adamu Galumji

Hon. Justice Uwani Musa Aba Aji



https://www.thecable.ng/breaking-supreme-court-upholds-ortoms-election/amp

Anti open grazing reloading, fulanis take note.

nzeobi:
What of the prophecy that was given to akume

Akume is a big fool.

ahmedkoded95:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/01/it-would-have-been-major-blow-if-apc-lost-kano-plateau-%E2%80%95-buhari/amp/

Buhari hypocritically pretending as if he was not aware upfront,you don't want blows but you are dishing out dirty blows to others,no matter how long power will surely change hands someday, buhari/Apc has really taught Nigerians how to use power n I hope those who are cheering without qualms today will not complain then because the internet never forget,notes are been taken daily n continuously.

LasgidiOnline:
The Supreme Court will today Tuesday 21st January 2019 hear the petition filed by the Benue State governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress, APC, in the last election, Mr.Emmanuel Jime who is challenging the victory of Governor Samuel Ortom of the People Democratic Party, PDP.

Hearing of the suit was contained in a hearing notice sent to the parties in the matter by the Director of Litigation of the Apex Court.

According to the notice, the Supreme Court would on the same day hear the cross appeal filed by Governor Ortom.

LASGIDI ONLINE recalls that the appeal which was earlier scheduled to be heard on Monday, January 13, 2020 alongside those of Kano, Sokoto, Plateau, Bauchi and Imo States was later adjourned to Tuesday, January 14, 2020.

The Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad further adjourned hearing in the appeals for Benue, Plateau and Bauchi, saying, their appeals would elapse on January 26, 2020.

Since the shift in date, supporters of both parties and candidates have in the last few days taken to the social media to dish out analysis as to why the ruling of the court would swing in the favour.

Who do you think will win at the Apex Court today?

https://www.lasgidionline.com.ng/2020/01/supreme-court-hears-jimes-appeal-against-ortom-today.html

Ortom may not be performing up to expectations but for standing up vehemently against the hienous agenda of the callous fulanis,I want him to remain n consolidate on the resistance, the effect of allowing the fulanis to take hold of benue is too dangerous to contemplate,by whatever method jime lost the elections,in fact jime/Apc also did engaged in malpractices,jime was even reported to have been arrested on election day for electoral offences,jime is certainly going to be a stooge as he can not be given the governorship without preconditions,Akume is really a big disgrace.

RZArecta:
Source: https://www.sunnewsonline.com/arrest-yoruba-leaders-backing-operation-amotekun-now-miyetti-allah-tells-fg/

This journalist self lacks confidence,why not directly ask the miyetti Allah man whether HISBAH is legal or illegal n should be cancelled?

Blue3k2:
I dont think his argument holds water. The supreme court could rule all these state security agencies are illegal. The sec 214 (1) of the constitution says no other police force can be established. The question is what defines a police force. I think item 68 of exclusive list would give the FG the win in court.

It's not like federal government enforces all the laws it has under its exclusive list like the minimum wage. When states pay dont pay workers the minimum wage who goes to jail or gets fined?

These constitution should just be amended. It seem a majority of states want decentralized policing. It's just as dumb to centralize prisons and fire arms in hands of federal government.

Constitution exclusive list:

2. Arms, ammunition and explosives. 
45. Police and other government security services established by law. 
48. Prisons
68. Any matter incidental or supplementary to any matter mentioned elsewhere in this list.

Section 214. (1) There shall be a police force for Nigeria, which shall be known as the Nigeria Police Force, and subject to the provisions of this section no other police force shall be established for the Federation or any part thereof.

Then it's better all such security bodies are cancelled than allowing the federal government of be buhari/Apc to biasly outlaw others n allow others to operate out of sheer sentiments n bigotry.