Personally, I love true - not wannabe - feminism proponents and practitioners. And I don't see myself happy putting up with a non feminist.

True feminist are propagators of freewill as a right for all while also upholding the philosophy that goodness towards others isn't negotiable. A strong believers of reciprocation. I see no evil in egalitarianism.

Wannabe feminists however are the worst forms of human beings. To them, rudeness, contentiousness and all accompanying vices that made up people of the manipulative ethical leanings are theirs to practice against the male folks. They're a contrast of true feminists. They long to domineer the male folks.

Simplicity remains the ultimate sophistication. If truly this happened to be her sub-bedroom closet, it simply means that she was a very materialistic person. And that by extension makes her a covetous and opportunistic proponent and practitioner.

Unfortunately, all covetous and opportunistic people are automatically domineering/possessive - control freaks. Loyalty is never enough for them, you must always be servile to them, and of course your servility itself can never be enough for them in the long run too, because they're ungrateful and insatiable personifies. Thus, they're emotional abuse experts. Funny but irritating thing is that they're always quick to cry victims.

Now I could only imagined in pity what the man must have passed though in her hands. Physical domestic violence in any relationship is always a reaction to a long-term emotional abuse.

However, physical distance separation is always a better alternative to physical combat reactionary measure. The man ought to have separated from her at the inception immediately after he noticed that she's of the manipulative ethical leanings, and avoided the advanced stages of her shenanigans that irked him to resort to physical abuses as his defence mechanism.

Insanity is when someone goes to a battle and expect a kid-glove treatment from his opponent. . . Kwankwaso in this regard is likened to my IPOB tribesmen.

Reserved personalities are of two different types. Actually, any introvert is a reserved person but not all reserved persons are introverts. A nonconformist that's of a calm disposition is a clear example in this regard. What's true though is that there's no boisterous person that's of a reserved personality.

So before you say that you prefer a reserved guy over a loud one; ask yourself what type of a reserved guy do I really fancy?

baby124:

You don't even know the difference between feat and fit. Yet you are typing epistle about your self importance. I know you are completely delusional because none of your ancestors plus you inclusive can talk to even my puppy with confidence in real life. What my puppy eats as snack, you can't fit chop for a year. Imbe

Hahaha! If you wish doctor all my other words in order to have a feel-good moment. Feat and fit my foot.

baby124:

Don't mind that old man quoting scripture and parables. When a guy that he can give birth to is getting married, has a business and is expecting a child. I usually won't even advice this till they are independent. But this couple already own their businesses which is more than what I was doing at their age. One just has to wish them well and zoom off or pack their bad belle one side. But this baba here no gree o.!

You're about the most stupid person I've ever had an encounter with. For one, your wretched parents aren't fit to lace my shoes.

Once more, I don't need a parochial person like you and your ilks to pronounce my accomplishments or non thereof, when I was about the boy's age. So also I don't need your parochial validation to substantiate my pronouncements herein.

As I said before, you don't know me from Adam. And the very fact that you're privileged to share a common platform like this with me isn't reason enough for you to continuously exhibits your stupidity around.

Conceit is truly God's gift to small-minded people like you. For one, I've never expressed and don't hold malice against the young family. However, my stance remains that he's not in position yet to pronounce for or against early marriage for others or to spite others, citing the fact that he's not seasoned in the journey. Anyone seasoned in any particular cause of life is experienced in same regard but not all experienced people in same cause of life are seasoned. This is simply my point.

More so, in the event that he reached a seasoned status in marriage with his wife, which I wish them, by which stage too both of them would have achieved selve-realization and emancipations in; mental, social, belief system and economic spheres of life, if they will still remained mutually happily in the marriage then, then and only then would he be a bit qualified to bring on advices about advantages of early marriage. Even his success would still not be a yardstick for others, since the journey of life isn't a competition for people of noble class.

It's only people of small-minded class like you that competes with others. Because the aims of this class of people in pursuit of prosperity isn't really because they wish to use their good position, if they're lucky to achieve one, to help the less privileged around them no, rather their aims of aiming for prosperity is always to enable them use it to spite and oppress the less privileged ones around them. The good thing is that success is subjective; therefore its each to his own.

In summary, a little brat like you can never understand what "irreconcilable differences" mean and why it remains the major reason for divorces world all over. Fancy and financial resources aren't all it takes to sustain for a long time, any form of union where all the parties involved are expected to be mutually happy.

Limitless72:




Are u saying he's jst blinded by Love...
Nd their marriage would be for the main time?...
Bad belle ur plan no go work!!!
U better keep those ur analysis behind and pray for them...mtcheww

Ignorance is truly a disease. LOL. Now vamoose and look for your ilks and mates elsewhere, because I don't join issue with a nincompoo.

baby124:

Lol. I am sure your submissions are even beyond your own understanding. LMAO. Delusional for sure

Milady wahala no feat you, so desist from it.

baby124:

What makes you think he's not principled? At 24, did you have the business sense to own your own business? He and his wife are working to provide for themselves. He did not run away from his responsibility at 24 or obsessed with sampling everything that walks. This young man is quite principled and I am impressed to be honest.

You don't know me from Adam, therefore you aren't in position to either pronounce my life accomplishments or non thereof.

Meanwhile, you fall within the class of people that hears and knows some certain words but lack understanding of the same words. . . I don't envy you at all. In the context I used "principle" in that post, I referred to his ethical leanings.

Dear, keep off, because my submissions are beyond your understanding.

He should bring on the advice if they remained together and equally happy after they achieved their individuals selve-realization, and emancipations in mental, financial and belief system spheres of life.

Citing the connotations of his message, he's on this early bird race because of his inclination for superficiality rather than his status as a principled person.

In the meantime, I wish them the best in all their endeavors.

There's nothing surprising about this news since the accused is a religious prelate. You can never separate religion of any type from all forms of exploitation. The culprit like his counterparts is an opportunist of the first order.

The last place to find a genuine goodness/God is in any thing religion.
.

So people really believe this whack story.

Don't tell me that you made it mandatory that she would always be the first - between you two - to greet you in all mornings.

@OP

Nobel people settle to marry they don't marry to settle. . . However, settling in this regard is always subjective, its on the basis on an individual future set-standard.

Also, note that it's not the early morning bird that catches the day.

More so, a sane and sound person that lives on other people's opinions is not better than a dead person - that doesn't mean that they don't seek for advices or listen to other people's opinions, no. By the way, only small-minded people competes with others while nobel people creates their own paths and encrypts it.

My submissions will only make sense to you if you're a realist. However, if you're an idealist, which means you're a faith proponent like every religious person is, then it won't surprise me if it makes no meanings to you.

I don't see a happy and healthy romantic relationship without an ingredient of self-servility from both parties involved towards each other. But then, since for instance; freedom of information doesn't automatically permits act of stupidity, therefore there's always an exception, and do's and don'ts. To this end, I'll say to each his own.

@OP

Anyone who practices these negative attitudes you listed are called "too clever by half" person. . . Even though some women are in the majority in doing them, yet there are some men that exhibits a distinct of these negative attitudes. Generally, those who exhibits theses negative attitudes are those I personally and usually group as small-minded class of people.

Believe you me, if you're a self-willed, altruistic, smart and conscientious person, you wouldn't like to have anything close - like relationship - to do with these set of lowlives. Because you will never lose to them since you're naturally ahead of them, and this is where your problem with them would start. Resist them from carrying out their shenanigans around you they will cry victims. Disingenuously allowed them sometimes to practice their shenanigans around you and you see them erroneously concludes that truly they are smarter than you. Then mete out equal treatments to them and see them cry murder.

Nobel women don't exhibit any of these negative attitudes, because they are proponents of reciprocal. This is why I love real feminists - I don't mean wannabe feminists, no.

Saraki and his associates are really teaching Tinubu and his own associates real politics. What I hear from this message is a cry of manipulator who's being played and defeated in his own initiated battle of wits.

The unfortunate thing is that the populace would always bear the brunt of this kind of macabre in play.

I wish PMB speedy and total recovery.

An average Nigerian is so perfidious.

I'm with Senator Nnamani. Restructuring rather than agitation is what we need. In fact, as a people, we must first change most of our screwed fundamental principles and ideologies in order to gain relevance in the schem of things. Because even either agitation or restructuring is achieved, without a change in most of our fundamental principles and ideologies, we can never make a lot of collective progress.

The Difference between people of noble class and those of small-minded class is that while the former hardly have more than one friend - of course with multitudes of associates, proteges and mentors - the latter class has multitudes as friends - in reality, those he assumed friends out of ignorance of not knowing what constitutes a friendship are indeed his enemies. . . Frenemy ish. More on this small-minded class people, they hardly have associates, proteges and mentors because they lack understanding.

Nobel people builds their hope and future around their ambitions not around friends while small-minded people always builds their future and hope around the frenemies, thus the reason why you'll always hear them whine about disappointments.

There's everything wrong to have hope on a fellow mortal. But there's nothing wrong in hoping that fellow mortals can be of help to you in times of need.

The very moment you begin to tell yourself the hard truth that you owe the world everything while the world owe you nothing, there and then will mark your journey of greatness.

The epilogue is older than the internet. The copycat-blogger only used the imposed wedding photos to substantiate it.

Gej a brilliant but unintelligent man. Intelligent people never stop because others say so, they do because they have self-conviction to stop.

Associating with a small-minded people is one of the hardest things to do. . . When you disingenuously allowed them to carry out their shenanigans around you, you see them revel and conclude in their erroneous belief that they're truly smarter than you. Resist them from carrying out their shenanigans around you, you see them cry victims. Then, reciprocate their vices in equal measures and see them either plan to kill you or kill themselves.

But na wa for you, your said immediate negative reaction at the traditional wedding ceremony wasn't palatable at all. In fact, the issue between the two of you is a fundamental one.

Well, assuming that she (your wife) had not uttered the separation word, I'd say, initiate a peace move (not begging) with her mother. But as it stands now, you really need to allow your wife to self-willedly come on her senses. Maybe she just achieved self-realization just immediately after tying the knot with you, and then realized that indeed you aren't what she need in a man. . . Never say never. If this happened to be the case in the end, kindly let her leave for good. Never deny anyone freewill, so long as cruz of the matter - her decision - is not intended to enslave you.

One of the worst things that will ever happen to a sane and sound person is, putting up with a disgruntled party. Believe you me, living with a frenemy is dangerous. Loyalty isn't negotiable, because it breeds understanding which itself breeds love.

And for the sake of your child, allow either your separation or reconciliation with your wife not to cause enmity between you too. Yes, two people previously in any form of relationship can separate without necessarily becoming enemies.

The issue between you too isn't really a problem rather it has to do with disparities in your individuals ethical leanings, it's fundamental. You and her/her family aren't of the same ethical leanings.

Kudos on your new job! However, next time learn how not to be a judge in your own case. . . It's againt natural justice.

Meanwhile, the mistake most people always do is concluding that they're loyal to others. In reality, it's the other party that's in position to pronounce your loyalty towards him. In this your case, the action of your former boss towards you showed that he didn't see you as someone loyal to him.

Also, the mistaken of servility for loyalty is rampant with most people. True leaders never reward servility in the long run, despite how savouring it could be to them why it lasted. For they know that behind every servile person is a potential traitor and hypocrite.

More so, there are those who hear about loyalty but neither know nor understand it. And there are those who hear about it know it but don't understand it. Only those who hear it knows it and understand it, never plays with it.

Believe you me, he gave you a treatment a smart person usually gives to a too clever by half opponent.

It was a game between a leech and predator. . . It's unfortunate that a leech can never outsmart a predator in any game. Opportunism is a vice.

VanBommel:
bros e be like say na your dept be that . Hope say you don grad sha?

Brother me! Met Mat at Futo can really make a smart person to appear like a dummy. The course in particular and its lecturers by extension knows how best to frustrate guys.

Meanwhile, I studied Mech Engr there and I passed out more than a decade ago.

Met Mat doing Futo guys strong thing since its inception there.

[quote author=DeRay98 post=55834818][/quote]

It's obvious that you were able to read through my submission. However, it's even more obvious - citing your opposition to it - that you neither know nor understand the content of that same submission. I don't envy you at all. Lol.

Foremost, I'm neither an atheist nor a religious proponent. . . Simply, I'm SBNR.

Well, yes, I've always experienced miracles. Aside my usual daily miracles that are too numerous to mention here, I was once privileged to have a knocked keyless door of my guardroom-like compartment, in my house, which had no other source of ventilation, flung open after I had spent close to 4 hours inside it. In that 4 hours, I did all my limited human best with bare hands to open it but without success.

I resigned to fate in profuse sweat and concluded that I'd reached an end to my earthly existence, having lost almost every energy in me. But to the glory of source of all, on my last trial of placing my hand on the doorknob, it freely opened.

That singular bitter-sweet experience made me to understand the ill of living alone in a house, or leaving my mobile phone behind when entering into such a room or places of its ilk. I'd die in there without anyone knowing my whereabouts for weeks if not months, because I was new at the place then, so I neither knew my closest neighbours who lived in their own gated house opposite me nor had people that visits me at home.

Humbleness induced by poverty/lack of better choice vs humbleness induced by principle; If her action is truly necessitated by the latter then, she's right to ascribed realness to herself. However, if the former is the case then, she's simply superficial.

There's actually no need for this long epistle. They should simply start living life on principle rather than expediency.