DrummaBoy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DrummaBoy's Profile › DrummaBoy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (of 93 pages)
An interesting write up. Thought it would be relevant here. hoasis: Creflo Dollar had the audacity to tell his followers that they would receive a “Facebook curse” for listening to materials that expose corrupt leaders on the internet. This so-called “Facebook curse” is pure superstition and fear-based control. Other false shepherds have issued similar empty curses for those who listen to Christians and information online about their ‘ministry’ and lifestyle.www.nairaland.com/1820823/false-shepherds-social-media |
The OP is an interesting thought. For a while, I think that Jesus is the author of Facebook as it has become a tremendous source of information on falsehood. The internet as a whole also. My former pastor told us his son went on Google search for the word "Benny Hinn". He said the young man was troubled at the volume of negative writing on a supposed idol. He told his son not to worry about it; that people would always write these things. I felt and still feel he was wrong. why so much negative publicity on one man? If you Google "David Martyn Lloyd-Jones", you won't find negative report on him. Neither on Gbile Akanni or D L Moody. Why is that it is these modern day Pentecostal pastors that have all the negativity? There is no smoke without fire. One nl, an American, was telling us on fb that he was chatting with Mike Murdoch on his fan page on tithes. Before he knew it, he was deleted from the forum. I left my former church BC the pastors told me to stop posting things in Facebook. Are they are afraid of something? Now while the internet is a source of great information we must beware what we learn here. Nevertheless the www has been a means of exposing falsehood, like no other. And corrupt pastors have reasons to be afraid. |
alexleo: @DrummaBoy,You are welcome. |
frosbel: Grace is to overcome sin not to promote self !frosbel I sent you a PM. Seen it? |
alexleo: Ok dear. No problem. Tithe has been an age long practice in the church. If God sees it as an error and wants to correct it now then let his truth prevail. I dont have problem with tithing and i dont have problem with giving as recorded in the new testament. By the grace of God i do both and i have no regrets. However, if tithe is false as you people said then let your message triumph over it and crash it in Christendom, if not, then let your message crash. If both are good let them each stand. Amen. I stand for God's truth. God bless you.Thank you Alexleo for understanding. Let me invite you to our WOF thread where I just did a summary/index of the discussions we have been having on that thread, that will permit ease of navigation on the thread https://www.nairaland.com/1790500/word-faith-movements-doctrine-proponents#24330864 One thing I have learnt from that thread is that tithing is the least of the problems of the church today. We have only discussed 7 of 20 topics and the revelations are damning. If people will keep tithing but unlearn the falsehood being unveiled on that thread, I will be content. But truth is there is all likelihood that when men unlearn these things, the tithe falsehood will also disappear. Lastly, in the proposed text I made available for the tract, I suggested a condition where tithing can be acceptable, I will find it now and just cut and paste here. I say this so that you wont think that I feel tithing is such a great evil. What I detest about it is the compulsion its been made into today and the fact that a corrupt clergy system thrives on it. The text: DrummaBoy: [size=16pt]SHOULD YOU TITHE TODAY?[/size] |
[size=16pt]MY SUBMISSION ON F7: HOLY LAUGHTER[/size] Question: "What is holy laughter?" Answer: The term "holy laughter" was coined to describe a phenomenon during which a person laughs uncontrollably, presumably as a result of being filled with the Holy Spirit's joy. It is characterized by peals of uncontrollable laughter, sometimes accompanied by swooning or falling down to the floor. Firsthand accounts from those who have had this experience vary somewhat, but all seem to believe it to be a sign of a "blessing" or "anointing" of the Holy Spirit. The experience of holy laughter is, by nature, a subjective one. Therefore, in an effort to find the truth of the matter, we must try to be objective. When our definition of truth depends upon our experience of the world, we are a very short way from becoming entirely relative in our thinking. In short, feelings do not tell us what is true. Feelings are not bad, and sometimes our feelings are aligned with scriptural truth. However, they are more often aligned with our sin nature. The fickle nature of the heart makes it a very unreliable compass. "The heart is more deceitful than all else, and is desperately sick; who can understand it?" (Jeremiah 17:9). This deceitful-heart principle is specifically applicable to the phenomenon known as "holy laughter." There is no doubt that people have indeed begun to laugh uncontrollably at revival meetings. That is a fact. But what does it really mean? Laughter is addressed a number of times in the Bible. Often it is used to describe a mocking or scornful response, as was the case with Abraham and Sarah who laughed when God told them they would bear a child in their old age. Some verses use it as a sign of derision (Psalm 59:8; Psalm 80:6; Proverbs 1:26), and still others make pointed statements about the nature of laughter itself. Solomon, for example, made the following observation in Ecclesiastes 2:2: "I said of laughter, ‘It is madness,’ and of pleasure, ‘What does it accomplish?’" He then goes on to say, in 7:3, "Sorrow is better than laughter, for when a face is sad a heart may be happy." Proverbs 14:13 says the reverse: "Even in laughter the heart may be in pain, and the end of joy may be grief." Both of these verses are true: a sad person may laugh to cover his sadness, and a person may cry although he is inwardly happy. So, not only does emotion fail to give us truth, but we also see that laughter is not always indicative of joy. It can mean anger, sadness, or derision. Likewise, the lack of laughter does not automatically mean sadness. Laughter is clearly subjective. The most convincing scriptural argument against what is called "holy laughter" is found in Galatians 5:22-23. It says, "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law." If self-control is a fruit of the Spirit of God, how can uncontrollable laughter also be a fruit of His Spirit? Revival leaders claim that being filled with the Spirit means that we are sort of "tossed about" by His whims. But the idea that God would make people act drunk or laugh uncontrollably or make animal noises as a result of the Spirit's anointing is directly opposed to the way the Spirit acts, according to Galatians 5:22-23. The Spirit described in Galatians 5 is one who promotes self-control within us, not the opposite. Finally, there was no one in the Bible more filled with the Holy Spirit than Jesus, and not once does the Bible ever record Him laughing. In light of these things, it is profitable to take a look at the following passage from 1 Corinthians 14, where Paul talks about speaking in tongues: "But now, brethren, if I come to you speaking in tongues, what will I profit you unless I speak to you either by way of revelation or of knowledge or of prophecy or of teaching?" (v.6). "For if the bugle produces an indistinct sound, who will prepare himself for battle? So also you, unless you utter by the tongue speech that is clear, how will it be known what is spoken? For you will be speaking into the air” (vv. 8-9). "What is the outcome then, brethren? When you assemble, each one has a psalm, has a teaching, has a revelation, has a tongue, has an interpretation. Let all things be done for edification. If anyone speaks in a tongue, it should be by two or at the most three, and each in turn, and one must interpret; but if there is no interpreter, he must keep silent in the church; and let him speak to himself and to God" (vv. 26-28). "...for God is not a God of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints" (v. 33). In those days, many people in the churches were speaking in languages that were unrecognizable to others, and, therefore, Paul says they were useless in the church because the speaker could not edify others with his speech. The same could be applied to holy laughter. What does it profit (Paul asks) unless we speak to one another with revelation, teaching, knowledge and truth? Again, he says, "Let all things be done for edification." He caps off his argument by saying, "God is not a God of confusion, but of peace," which makes it clear that he does not want the atmosphere within the church to be one of confusion and meaninglessness, but one of knowledge and edification. It seems, from what Paul is saying, that which is called "holy laughter" would fall under the category of what is "not edifying" to the body of Christ, and should therefore be avoided. We have recognized that a) laughter is an unreliable emotional response; b) it can be a sign of several different emotions; and c) it does not accomplish anything useful. Furthermore, uncontrollable spasms of emotion are contrary to the nature of the Holy Spirit. It is advisable, therefore, not to look to "holy laughter" as a means of growing nearer to God or as a means of experiencing His Spirit. Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/holy-laughter.html#ixzz37vWH8Y88 |
@Image123, Bidam and Gombs I believe my posts for the last hour or so has answered everyone of your queries. If you still have anymore, I advice you read those posts again. Outside of this, I humbly request that the three of you should stop derailing this thread. If you are bent on "saying this truths" or you are certain that someone conscience is being pricked on tithe or you think someone misquoted your sermon, you can open new threads for those, I can assure you that Seun will not complain. Pls, this thread, again, is about designing an anti tithe tract, that common sense should dictate only those opposed to the fraudulent regime of tithing can participate in. |
alexleo: Its a very simple thing. If I am not lying about an issue and somebody quotes Ananias case to me i will simply say - no problem. A clear conscience shouldn't panic in such statement. When you panic it shows there is something behind it. Let me tell you that nothing is biting me about what you people are doing. I'm not rigid about tithe. I'm not also convinced to stop and i dont condemn those who are not paying tithe. As you are led pls go ahead. Its a free world. My simple prayer is- If what you people are doing is truly from God, may it prosper but if it is not from God, may it crash. Amen. I dont think the Op banned tithers from commenting. If he did, i will stop commenting.Good. And "amen" too to the bolded. Read my last response to Bidam and see my statement on judgement, that I am ready to be held responsible by God for what I am doing here. |
Bidam: LolLol? That's a new one. I expected you to say "yawn", but apparently you yourself know that you've overused it and thus the resort to the more common "lol". I threw out a bate and it caught you. Very good, let's start the "exorcism"... If you are clean then you shouldn't be afraid of my post.Nobody is afraid of you, awe, if anythingvat all, it's your cognition we question and that is why one must endure you in an exchange like this bc ideally you should be ignored. One of the work of the Holy Spirit is God's righteous judgement. Jesus said He will Purge His Church. As for me i am never afraid in the Household of faith. It is only guilty folks like you that are afraid.Your friend on this forum, Image123, was the one who came to the new thread on WOF sermonizing about Jesus' parable on the wheat and tares. Telling us that we should not expose errors because Jesus said wheat and tares should grow together. I took pains to explain to him that that scriptures shows us that it is the duty of God's servants to distinguish wheats from tares, something that is well done on that thread. As for rooting out tares, that is the exclusive presrrve of God. We were not doing God's job on that thread. This is exactly what you have expressed in the above statement. If God be true to his word, and judgement must start in his house, then every man who has been using the name of Jesus to merchandise the gospel is on a collision course with God's wrath. Everyman who is teaching a false gospel of a monetary tithe and have set up avenues to fleece Christ flock is also going to collide with this wrath. All those who have aided and abated this false gospel shall not be left out. And if I and others, have in anyway stood against Gods righteous will in his church by championing an anti tithe position, we shall also not be left out in Gods judgement (I say this with every sense of responsiblity). Your rantings here like a sissy won't change biblical truth and reality.Let your words be seasoned with salt and have grace in them. Even in rebuke, learn to do it in love. The GRACE you seem to enjoy now has an expiry dateApparently, for you too. For what exactly are we without the grace of God? |
alexleo: Are you afraid of what Bidam said? Is your teaching a lie? Search yourself. I don't understand the panic.I believe you are directing your question at the wrong person. It is Bidam you should be asking those question and possibly, also, ask him what could be eating him up. Check the Genesis of his post here, it has been one diatribe after another. What exactly has anyone said that requires a reminder of Ananias and Saphira? Is it not high time someone shows him the source of his frustrations, which is so well captured in the scripture trustman provided? If anyone is panicking here, it should be firstly Gombs and then lately Bidam. And for reasons no one can tell because no one has asked them for anything to make the tracts. So the first question that you should be asking them both, or which all of you tithers should be asking yourselves is what exactly is your business here on this thread? And if it is to exercise your freedom of expression, then what exactly is biting you guys about the printing of a tithe tract? Or are you pastors whose business would be threatened by the project? Let's start with those for now. |
trustman: Luke 6:45:Well said... In fact, very well said... On a second thought, could it better said than above?! |
^^^ In other words, the pain the Master endured was sufficient sufferings for our sins. There was no need for a hell torture. Two things, sir, that I request as addition to your splendid writeup. First is the Sanhedrin you spoke about that constituted the pharisees and saduccees. The historical records on the pharisees does not paint them in the evil picture that the NT paints them with. The Pharisees were a religious group that descended from the Macabees, a godly family, God used to restore true worship to Israel in a period after Malachi and before the NT and who also carried out military campaigns. The pharisees simply continued the tradition this godly family had taught Israel. But by the time of Jesus, they were practicing dead orthodoxy and were ready tools in Satan hands. I believe that Jesus disciples intentionally painted them in the light they did in their writing bc by practicing religion, they had become evil people who would crucify the saviour. The question I leave with you is this: what does it take for a Vatican, a CAN, or a WOF group of ministers to become pharisees who will kill prophets sent to them as Jesus rightly said in Matthew 23? The second thing I wish to add to BabaG well written document was that Jesus did not only endure pain on the cross, he endured shame also. Our Master was crucified na_ked - butt open. With the whole world, men, women, disciples staring at him. In the language of modern success teachers, Jesus was a failure. This is the picture that wrought our redemption. It is neccesary to say all these to show that the fable of JDS is unnecessary. Jesus death was ignominious enough. It need not be painted worse with lies. Jesus physical death secured our redemption and that is sufficient. |
Image123: You're crying more than the bereaved bro. Find something to do.I accept that bereaved aspect; is the fraudulent practice of tithing not as bad as murder? As long as you are on this thread, I have time for you. And pls don't throw in that "last word" of yours. It won't work this time. I want you to give this the best you've got. Hopefully by the time we are done, you would learn not to dabble into things you should not. Let's go there... |
Image123: It is a clear Bible truth that bible time economy wasn't currency or naira driven.Like I told you before, I will tell you again, this thread is not a tithe discuss or debate, it is meant to draft a tract. If despite all that what written in the discuss has not convinced you as to the real nature of the tithe, open a new thread for it and I hope those who have time to waste can meet you there. Stop detailing this one. |
@Image123 You know, its not by force to comment on threads. The fact that you have a "reply" button on a thread does not mean you must use it even when you have nothing worthwhile to say. Read the title of the thread: its a challenge to write an anti tithe tract for 50 pounds. If you are unhappy about it, you can offer double for a tithe tract or simply just ignore the thread. You come here claiming to be busy and not having time to post. None of us here is jobless. We make out time for what we believe is important. FYI I have proposed a text for the tract, its on page 1. You can start to make some sense by either posting a rebuttal to that text or simply *scat* Enough of distractions. If it's not zakat, it is tithe can be money... kilode; can't you guys even see that the thread is not for tithers? Abegi... |
Image123: Remember, remember. i remember God's Word above my necessary food. You called it "arguments" BTW. The fellow you were addressing was stating a clear Bible truth about the economy. You were not interested in going there AT ALL. Instead, you referred him to a thread. Remember that.Yes, the choice to repeat those words "remember" was deliberate because of the tendency for people like you to forget. It is hoped if one mentions it enough, you won't forget this time. What you call "a clear bible truth" should better be called "Image123 position on that discuss" and that is why I referred him there. Mark Miwerds and candour took the pain to thrash out every biblical reason why tithes can never be money, why should I repeat it all over again when an easy reference was available. If the guy you reference was not so lazy, he could have easily gone there to look up what was said. But here you are encouraging him not to when he would have also had the opportunity to see your own submission on the matter and then make an informed decision, rather than wallow in ignorance. |
Image123: And your many days arguments for and against should not supersede the Word of God.First I was hoping you would remember that you were part of that project - a major actor for that matter. Secondly, I was hoping you would remember that we labored to ensure that that project was not another mere "argument" but a solid discuss on tithes meant to be a reference point for other discussions in the future, like this thread. And lastly, I was hoping you would remember that it was the bible we used mostly as reference in the discussion and that I am not saying anything in that post you quoted implying something superseded the word of God. |
@klbakare So far in your posts here, your focus has been on witches, wizards and demons. Is this the focus of the scriptures? Are these the Central truths of the bible? Jesus cast out demons; is that all he did? How many of them did he send to hell? How many of them did he kill? How many times did he call "fire"? How many times did he accuse someone of being demonized? I ask you to take a few minutes to Google the term Christian cults and see what you will find. Particularly search out info on the group the QUAKERS who started well but ended badly. There are just a few of them left now. Blockus has been trying to show you that the emphasis of the Christian gospel is in sharing the knowledge with the unsaved. Living in love in the process. Sometimes having to defend the integrity of the gospel from perversion and living in holiness before God. In the bid to kill demons, many MFM people have failed in this primary assignments. Thus we see s cult following rising up. Some two Xmas ago, Sahara reporters went to your camp on the express to cover the watch night service. For reason best known to your GO, they were refused. When they protested, ushers bundled two of them and had them locked up in a "jail" on the camp, without food or water for close to two days. They were eventually released and no reason was given for their unlawful detention. Is that Christian? Were they being exorcised of demons? Should a church camp have prisons and if they do, are church members being imprisoned too? The worst that can happen to a mortal being is for their thinking faculties be stolen from them. I should also ask if you still have the ability yo think? |
@Blockus So very well said. @kilabare Let me let you into a secret. There is a blessing in some of the discussions that we have here on nl. On this forum there is no pastor or bishop, everyone presents an idea, for which others can oppose or defend. Their perfect liberty. Ideas rule: right or wrong. Now, whatever else the gospel of Jesus might be, it is first an idea. Conversion itself is bringing men to understand this idea first, repent and believe. What you propose on the OP is the willingness to share the MFM idea. And you have invited us to even question it. Now, for me, I am not really going to question but to show you that the MFM is gearing more towards beings a cult than a Christan assembly. Stay tuned... |
Pastors will not free anyone. Its the people that should free themselves. I saw this post on fb by Keny K'ore the musician: "No other truth is as central to the Christian faith as the death, resurrection, and the SECOND COMING of Yeshuah Hamashiach. It's a wonder how so many Christians know scriptures about how GOD wants us to be Billionaires, but they're confused about the events leading up to the second coming of their Saviour. Now you can see how it is more likely that Jesus would come like a thief in the night, with the CHURCH TOTALLY UNPREPARED and CAUGHT UNAWARES, than Him coming to meet all the mega CHURCHES and denominations PREPARED and GOOD TO GO. They'll be busy chasing after money, contacting anointing for prosperity by giving money to prosperity preachers. People's faith would be almost totally misplaced. Don't say it can't happen to you, it's already happening around you. WATCH AND PRAY!!!-Matthew 26:41." Then I referred the person who Posted it to a discussion I am having on WOF, www.nairaland.com/1790500/word-faith-movements-doctrine-proponents the very root of the problem Kenny is complaining about and I heard no response. Many Christians complain like keny but cannot pay the price to uphold truth. My point: many people themselves love it this way. Falsehood flourish bc people have itchy ears. So the fault is not those preaching this nonsense, the fault is with those listening to them and keeping them in business with their tithes and offerings. So let the people continue in the bondage until they learn... |
^^^Well OP, let's start with the question provided above and see how it goes. While ruminating on those questions, I want to know why your headquarter church "imprisoned" staffs of sahara reporters a few years ago? Just that for now. |
I invite folks on this thread, the mother of all tithe thread on nl, to peruse the text below being proposed for a tithe tract to be published by members of nl. DrummaBoy: [size=16pt]SHOULD YOU TITHE TODAY?[/size]www.nairaland.com/1810931/design-anti-tithe-tract-50/1 |
Pastor Tunde Bakare spoke of a vision/dream he had once. He was in a Nigerian church known for its great number of congregation. He was ministering in a ministers meeting. After the ministration he said "In Jesus name..." and the chains which were on the ministers initially fell off. The GO of that church approached him angrily asking why he released them ![]() Now I am not the type given to visions to validate messages or ministry but their is some truth in those words of Bakare. The fact is that if people hear sound teachings, the chains of religion will fall off them. This is what upset the pharisees the most with Jesus. This is what angers modern church leaders most with sound preaching. Pastors will prefer messages that will continue to enslave people to them. So they can continue to have influence over their lives and especially their finances. We are in the time when these will end and discussions on nl like this are the ones that will aid it. |
So far we have all been guilty of derailing this thread. It is not meant to debate/discuss tithing, it was meant to present text for a tithe tract. I request we return to the original purpose of the thread. |
NativeBoy: Again, tithing predates the nation of Israel. I definitely tithe based on Malachi 3. I'd be foolish not to when God promises that he will bless those who do so.End of discussion. I rest YOUR case. |
NativeBoy: Why not? We have a different economic system. One that's built entirely about money.Now let's not go there ra ra at all. Before I proceed, let me refer you to our 58 days academic discussion on tithes. M4 did a sound analysis on tithe not being money. Weigh the arguments for and against and see that tithe being money was never and can never be scriptural: www.nairaland.com/1548047/theological-discuss-tithing-rhymeyjohn-image123/6#20318249 |
Gombs: Cos, this won't exist outside Nairaland...I can bet my right arm.Gombs, you can keep your right hand but this project will fly. |
NativeBoy: You and I know that a lot of the burnt offerings were required for atonement and consecration and the like. Which have been perfected in Christ.... perfected in Christ... ehen, now we are getting each other. Jesus has fulfilled the Law and perfected its requirement in us. If there are principles to be learnt from the law, how can you not understand that the principle behind tithing was giving? The principle behind the Jewish ordinance of tithing food cannot be tithing money now. Abi! ![]() |
BabaGnoni: I too was playing Devil's advocate with our friend's quoteThank you sir for that keen observation. Its been edited. |
NativeBoy:Let's start from here. It's plain dishonesty to claim a dislike for argument but have no qualms responding to issues on nl. Whether argument or not, the aim is for the discussion to birth understanding. So my rebuttal will be brief and I will ask that you reread my post as I feel that I have been very clear. Tithing as well as circumcision are not commandments to non-Jews. I believe I was pretty clear in stating that.I understood you then and understand you well enough now. You are mistaken in your interpretation of Paul's actions. Paul was against circumcision because the Jewish part if the church was making it a requirement for salvation and for being a true believer. You will find I have made no such remarks. In fact I have stated the contrary.I agree with you. When I made those remarks I was responding to the general perspective on tithing and not necessarily yours here. True, you made no such remarks. I believe you might want to rethink your list. If you are saying that taking an action because you know there are benefits associated with it somehow nullifies the action, then I wonder how you interpret a majority of scripture. Using the circumcision example, if my motive for doing it is because I know the health benefits, how is that wrong? If I tithe because I know God will bless me for doing so, how is that wrong? If I show mercy because I know God will show mercy, how is that wrong? If I forgive knowing that God will also forgive, well you get the point? Scripture is filled with doing things knowing that they please God. Nothing wrong with acting in accordance with that motive. The tithe is not compulsory but it is pleasing to God and there are benefits associated with it.I do not get your point. Maybe I should rehearse my own point so you could get me. My point is that the motive is what justifies the action. And my list was concerned with motives. I said that the motive behind circumcision is the reason the apostles jettisoned it. I also said I find the same motive behind tithing and thus the need to jettison it too. There is nothing wrong in doing a thing in religion that will benefit, my point is there everything wrong in tithing based on Jewish practices for blessing. I however made it clear in my last response that giving with no such strings attached (such strings being blessings as found in Malachi) is permissible. And going by Jesus admonitions in Luke 6, it is not wrong to give trusting God for a blessing but it certainly wrong to tithe, like the Jews did to get a blessing. The benefits are in the list you made excepting 2,3, and 4. Abel and Abraham tithed before the giving of the law. Tithing won't put you right standing with God and won't take you to heaven.I am not sure about Abel tithing o, you may want to recheck that. Abraham also carried out circumcision, burnt offerings and sacrifices, it doesn't it make them Christian practices. As long as 1 and 5 on my list is still approved by you, my point is proven. You are tithing based on Malachi 3:8-10. A tithing that is based on Jewish practices and not on Christian giving. |
[size=16pt]MY SUBMISSION ON F6: JDS (i.e. Jesus Died Spiritually)[/size] I have no submission for JDS. The ones I have heard, is upsetting enough. I endorse everything BabaGnoni and trust man have written on it. If there are no further submissions on F6, I request you gentlemen for us to move quickly to F7. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (of 93 pages)


