₦airaland Forum

ayindejimmy:
Why was Putin going around threatening the world with nuclear weapons?

Nobody mentioned nuclear weapons until Putin started going paranoid

I repeat - note the word 'deterrent'. For Russia to mention that word, I presume it means someone had threatened.

DenreleDave:
Shut up your mumu mouth.... The question was who first threatened nuclear weapon... Stop shifting from the main argument

Russia mentioned they were activating their nuclear deterrent. Note the word 'deterrent'.

What people fail to realise is that a nuclear war will harm the entire world. That is why this aggressive nature of the top military nations annoys me - they are playing with lives in a pathetic attempt to relive the old days and people with no idea are cheering and choosing sides. We all lose the moment the first nuclear weapon is fired.

I can't recall where I read that the world is still seeing the effects of the last nuclear tests. Tests!!

What is the name of the pastor?

Optimistic4life:
This option is definitely not in the picture at all.

He said I am free to remarry if I want but we aren't divorced and also remarrying isn't a day's affair nor a joke.

He must be joking. How can he say you are free to remarry and you haven't officially separated. He must know your faith and is setting you up.

helinues:
What's crude oil, what's petroleum?

See the set of people I have been wasting time engaging with..

Oh lala
Oh my mynd

There is no subsidy on crude. We export it.

Low risk? Convert to dollars and invest in dollar based money market funds or bonds.

Ginomel:
I hate that infantile reference, please quit it. Unless I will conclude I am not dealing with somebody mature.

War is evil, and will always be. It doesn't do any one any good.

If there is any one good here, Ukraine is good and Russia is evil. Ukraine is defending ,while Russia is oppressing.

There could not have been any war if Russia didn't invade Ukraine. So Russia is evil here.

If someone slaps a man's innocent wife and the man retaliates,will you say he is bad?

But war is evil and doesn't do any one any good So WAR IS EVIL.

That is the thing. Ukraine is not innocent.

Ginomel:
Be a little mature, don't succumb to insult because I am very mature and civil in my submission.

That said, evil is evil. Loss of lives is evil. Subjecting people to refugees status is evil, Iraq invasion is evil and inhumanity to mankind.

There is no justification for evil. World politics is not about war. If it was, Russia will not be facing backlash from most countries in world except China and probably one other country

Why do we have embassies in countries? It's to promote peace, so World politics shouldn't be evil ,unless an Adolf Hitler is in power, because you wouldn't like to be in their shoes if you were in a war torn location.

I know you know how Adolf Hitler ended due to his evil tendencies.

My problem is you are saying one side is evil. That is juvenile thinking. You think war is waged by good and evil sides. That isnt true. In the world wars, both sides committed atrocities. Even in this war - no side is truly evil.

goodheart01:
Can u also post a verification that I’m wrong? In war there are propaganda and counter propaganda.

Russia owned media outlets are also playing their own part in the counter propaganda

You are the one making allegations.

Ginomel:
Can I know one reason you are supporting evil? Are you enjoying the constant loss of lives due to putin stupidity.

Can I know the reason why you are supporting Russia and the invasion

Putin is evil? By what standard are you measuring evil?

If you warn a goat not to enter a bear's den and the goat proceeds to - is the bear evil for attacking the goat?

If you warn a child to not do xyz else you will discipline them and the child does so, are you evil?

Be careful with the evil or no evil. The media pushes the narrative that Russia evil, Ukraine bad. That helps them do a lot of rubbish. Russia launched military operations into Ukraine. What is different between what they did and NATO's attack on Iraq/Libya? What of American backing for the murder of several pan African leaders?

Let me not vex this morning - what kind of child uses the word evil in world politics?

goodheart01:
Special military operation kii u dia. Military operation and he has lost more than 5 of his most reliable generals. Who uses his best generals and war planners for just an invasion? Military operation wey no fit capture Ukraine under one month. Abi Putin tell u sey to get victory no dey hungry him??

Can you post verification that 5 generals are dead? Be careful with media and read the small text. They often say words like unverified, reports etc.

Truth is the first casualty of war.

DukeNija:
They’ve been one step from capturing Kyiv for 2 weeks now. Read live feeds and not BS stories. Russian soldiers have not advanced on any front in this war, infact, they’ve been pushed back.
Their new strategy is bomb every city to surrender. Even Mauripol is not yet taken despite the hellish desolation cause by Russian bombardments. The only advantage Russia has right now is air power which is why Ukraine is literally begging for Anti air missile defense systems like Iron dome and THAAD.

Use of heavy artillery to pummel cities to submission is not new doctrine for Russian military. I suggest we behave like true neutrals in this war. I read posts where I see people make comments without hard facts to back it up. Ukraine has had a lot of military aid from NATO. Without that, this war would have been over.

The longer this war lasts, the worse the impact long term on that region. I hope peace talks are successful soon. War helps nobody.

True peace is always welcome.

NairaMaster1:
Who told you no air strike can happen to Iraq and Iran, that is because US only hit target, they don't hit civillians and their infrastructure like Putin.

You are joking right. You need to read up on bombing atrocities by the US. Let's not discuss atomic bombs. Check fire bombing. Check the so called 'collateral' damage by the US in Iraq, Syria and Libya.

ipobarecriminals:
the baztard Putin lilly liver goats are using Airstrike why not ground fight

Do you know Russia's method of battle? They are not like the US who do Shock and Awe as if it is Hollywood.

Russia first sends in conscripts and inexperienced soldiers to take targets. As the conscripts are navigating and checking the land, they are bringing in the artillery - yes Russia prefers to first ask the town / city to surrender - if not they blitz the location unless there is a specific target of interest. They also don't mind losing as many soldiers as their Western counterparts. Check all their wars, body count is nothing to them. While this is going on, they will detail special forces to specific targets.

I expect Russia to surround Kiev within the next 2 and a half weeks.

uunwanaobong3:
Ukraine is really seeing hell in the hands of Russia.

Their tears have been interpreted as laughter by the western media...... So they are actually asking Biden to visit them and get first hand information and not to rely on propaganda media,... Personal I am in support of this great idea by Ukrainian government, if Biden is a really man with balls and not transsexual, he should visit Ukraine, simple, case close.

How does visiting prove that he is a man? Oh because you and that Ukraine state said so. If they were men in Ukraine they should have finished Russia by now. Shebi every week they announce they have killed one general or the other.

I would advise Biden not to go near Ukraine. The way they are behaving they can set him up for murder so that World War 3 can start.

GOD is indeed merciful. The fact that this certified criminal is opening his mouth to say such us proof of his mercy.

As for Delta State, you have work to do. This man is still a godfather in your state? No difference between you and Lagos.

illicit:
The bride na mumu

Not the bride. She has no control over what groom and friend does. It is this OAP that is a mumu. Later on she will cry about how people treat her post this revelation. Not to mention that she must have thought that she was a positive someborri for doing this rubbish.

When I see such threads it tells me the person is a juvenile and learning life. It is not up to you to define weak or strong. The strong overpower the weak. That is nature. It is not by mouth.

Best friend in 3 months?

Older than you?

You want to date him?

He must have money and is experienced in dealing with women. You must be somewhat inexperienced in sex or relationships. You may also have low self esteem.

My advice - take some time away from him. Focus on doing something else. If you are having sex - physical, phone etc with him, stop it. Those things can make your brain cells malfunction.

The US sha. They don't want peace it seems. Putin will not use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. There are Russians there and it is close to his nation.

Benny6944:
OP what's this?
So funny


An estimated 25 million Soviet citizens perished in the titanic conflict with Nazi Germany between June 1941 and May 1945. Overcoming massive defeats and colossal losses over the first 18 months of the war, the Red Army was able to reorganize and rebuild to form a juggernaut that marched all the way to Berlin. But the Soviet Union was never alone: Months before the United States formally entered the war, it had already begun providing massive military and economic assistance to its Soviet ally through the Lend-Lease program.


"I want to tell you what, from the Russian point of view, the president and the United States have done for victory in this war," Stalin said. "The most important things in this war are the machines.... The United States is a country of machines. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war." Nikita Khrushchev offered the same opinion. "If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war," he wrote in his memoirs . "One-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war.

Do post the source of the above.

Benny6944:
Another OP who thinks through his Anus.
Same US rescued poor Russia under Hitlers invasion.
Same US have the best Arms for war so how do you think they gonna do that with their shameless old tactics in war? Can't even take down Ukraine in 48hours, what a shameless post

The US rescued USSR from Hitler? What history book have you been reading?

seanwilliam:
Either way
The biggest winner remain
1. USA
2. USA
3. CHINA
4. NATO



Biggest loser
1. Russia
2. Russia
3. Russia
Russia economy is gone!

I know y’all will mention Ukraine, trust me , the country will recover in no time . Many countries will support them with aids and grants .




i buy all types of giftcard and PayPal/Skrill and any other funds. I’m tested and very trusted

The biggest winner is China. Countries will start to restrict US and Western companies to avoid what happened during this war. China continually stressed that it doesn't support sanctions. I expect BRICS to come out stronger.

blowjohn:
Which countries have actually ever threatened to use nuclear weapons?

Russia

You are joking? The list is longer than 1.

No it doesnt. Even the verse which requires such for certain positions - is 'if i recall correctly' a view of a human being.

goodheart01:
That’s the problem with u people, u don’t read to understand, always quick to argue. I wasn’t comparing Russia against US, but against NATO as a whole. Together with NATO they have more than 6,000 warheads. Hope understand now?? Moreover what difference does 5,500 or 6,255 nukes make?? Anyone with common sense should know that all it will take for US and Russia to destroy the whole earth will be around 20 warheads, and the other thousand of warheads become moribund because no one will be alive to use them.

Now let me shock.... out of the 6,000 plus nuclear warheads Russia has, only 1,458 are active, meaning they are already deployed, 3,039 are available (can be deployed if needed) and 1,760 are retired (out of use and awaiting dismantlement). That means 1,760 of those warheads are no longer functional. Gerrit??

You think it is shocking that the nuclear arsenal isn't entirely active? You know what budget is required to maintain all those warheads? You think once the order is given, then countries wont start prepping for nuclear war? You think right now countries havent started activating pre-planned strategies in this area? The nos. above states their capabilities. Case in point - Russia stopped dismantling their weapons due to their view on 'Western provocation' else they would have had less by now.

You seem to misunderstand my point. We are at a critical point where the world must ask the idiots in charge of these countries to stand down!! The combined West, NATO and Russia are threatening the lives of over 6 billion people in the world with their stupid selfish short-sighted decisions (economic, political etc) and escalations. LET THAT SINK IN!!

B2Bmen:
and u think Russia alone can sink the whooooolllleeee world abi? Russia alone cannot sink Ukraine even with nuclear bomb let alone NATO and the whole Europe. U think sey the whole world na just ajegul? Talk with sense next time. NATO have finished their calculation and risk assessment with putting and are now ready for him unlike when the war was just starting they now know that putting has nothing and his army and munations is nothing to write home about compare to their 30 nations allies. Who else notice are bold NATO is becoming to putting now unlike before the war started. They dom study Russia and their war game finished and are ready to take putting out now for Europe to know peace.and who else notice putting is not talking and forming vugar again like before. E no believe weytin him eyes see for Ukraine that the army and tanks he is using to intimidate NATO and almighty America can be this disgrace by armless Ukrainian soldier's. Na now putting go fight real war.

Erm yes Russia alone by its actions can sink the world if they launch all their nuclear arsenal. Once they launch, mutual assured destruction comes into play because others will surely launch.

NATO is bold ke? Did Russia attack NATO? Ask yourself why is NATO putting mouth in this matter? Why? Ukraine is not a NATO nation.

brutal1:
Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov confirmed russian casualties also you can't totally disregard the news from the west. The west got the intelligence report that russia was going to invade ukraine and russia denied it all the time. If there is anyone that should not be trusted here it should be who denied their intention in the first place.

You didnt answer the question - where are you getting insight on the numbers of Russian casualties, the political situation in Russia etc.

The West are the same ones that told us there was WMD in Iraq. I trust neither.

Jacopini:
USA 5,550. Russia 6,255
France 290. China 350.
Uk 225. N-koria 40-50

So dey have enouy to sink each oda nd d world with it,

Buh who are develop enough to deal wit d aftermath?

Y fight a battle nobodi wins? Wen u can fight one(no nuclear) nf see who wins?

That is precisely why I want peace. Instead I see idiots in charge of countries escalating rather than de-escalating the situation. The only reason IMHO must be money. The war mongers are lining up as vultures to see how they can make money - this could be from contracts to rebuild Ukraine, supply Ukraine with weapons etc.