Emusan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emusan's Profile › Emusan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 (of 397 pages)
GodsOwn2004:That's one problem with people like you, you said I don't know yet you couldn't provide the information that prove actually that I don't know |
Karlifate:Can I know the other ones you're talking about? |
hakeem4:A Builder is also an Engineer That's why the course of study is named in some institutions as "BUILDING ENGINEERING" |
quentin06:You're right! but I see many architects doing this in practiceNo architect can do that unless the architect is also a structural engineer, what you see are people who are just doing guess work. I guess thats one of the dividends of autocad, one can easily copy and paste other peoples jobs.You can copy people work on autocad especially the architectural drawings but each building has different structural members which need different structural analysis and detailing but what many so called professionals do is to copy and paste any structural drawings they have and do a guess work on the project. |
Holluwatarhyor:That means Julius Berger can do all the three aspect of civil engineering works i.e structure, highway and water(dam). I'm a Builder/Structural Engineer. |
NotKnown:You're wrong! Architect is the head of the building Team! So he/she must be there to ensure that the building was built as designed. Just as structural engineer a team member must also be there to ensure that all the structural members are built as designed |
Holluwatarhyor:Among the three you mentioned only BUILDER is an Engineer. Yes civil engineering is vast but it has been narrow down to just three. Which are: 1. Structure 2. High way 3. Water |
ikezudon:Yes an architect is the head of the project not the one who should execute the project. That's where the confusion started. An architect was trained to design, in fact many architects don't know the position of COLUMNS in the building and a structural engineer can introduce beam(s) into the building Las las, na wetin we design dem go buildYou're right but you don't know the working structural members of the building which hold the building in place. and we gats Dey there till dem build an finish.[quote]Yes to ensure what you design was what is on ground.Well many clients can bypass architect if their taste can be met but the structural parts of the building can never be overlooked by anybody. |
christistruth01:This is from a type Nigeria Engineer! How can you say something like this? Do you know importance of structural analysis and detailing? Can a bricklayer tell you how each members of the structure behave under loading? This is what is leading to many building collapse. The Problem is that in a Swampy area the cost of the reinforced fortified Foundation alone may cost more than the house to be built on it and the Nigerian Landlords will try to save costsYou're right on this! I also believe that the failure of Ajaokuta in produce Steel for the Nation has hit the Construction and Railway industriresy very badlyYou maybe right here Most buildings that collapse gave insufficient Steel Supports that are meant to carry most of the weight of the StructureI disagree! Most building that collapse lack structural analysis and detailing. Just as you suggested at the opening of your post. Many structure built in Nigeria are based on ASSUMPTION of this type of foundation can do it, this type of reinforcement will over carry the load or concrete mixing ratio 1:2:4 is for any building. These are what will be subjected to scrutinity during structural analysis and detailing and the most accurate result will be obtained. |
SeniorGee:Not only sweet talk, many clients self are looking for cheap structures ![]() |
Even the so called professionals don't know what Engineering all about especially when it comes to highrise buildings. They can't generate Structural Data They can't do simple Structural design They can't read structural analysis reports All what you see on site are copy and paste reinforcement arrangements from another design. Until the industry set the priority straight then we can start to talk of professionalism in construction industry. NIOB bill that can put all this quacks in their hiding hole has been with National Assembly for years now. What can one say about that? With this bill, for instance: Non-building professionals can't set up ordinary Block industry which means all the block industries will be owned by professional that will guarantee standard block. |
You always show how confused you are! MaxInDHouse:Instead of saying something is WRONG, you could have explained in details the usage of the verb WAS but I know your brain capacity isn't high for that. which means the word worked with God but as he is penning down those words the word isn't God rather the word WAS God at some point in time.If you have done little research on the usage of the verb WAS, you'd have saved yourself from this embarrassment. [s]Moses WAS God at a point in time too Exodus 7:1 therefore if Moses worked with God in delivering Israel out of Egypt and WAS God while in Egypt it doesn't mean that Moses IS God rather he served as God at a point in time.[/s]Irrelevant! ![]() So the correct interpretation of that verse would be:Just look at the nonsense you spew in above ![]() At least you can see how John patterned his statement with that of Adam and Eve. You have shifted from your initial point of BOTH GOD when I gave you Bible expository ![]() The use of capital for both God and the one with God makes no practical sense because all other verses afterwards shows that the word is God's messenger.Another delusion, there's no CAPITAL LETTER in Greek ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Imagine, Bible expository is a Pointless stories to you ![]() If you know the answer just answer the question directly:The answer has been given! ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:This is the correct scripture. So how come "no man has seen God" and "only begotten son who is at the side ofThe side of Father! Stop injecting your own delusion ![]() Lastly, the Word WAS GOD! |
Janosky:@underlined - so it must be a PROFESSIONAL but you entrusted your own interpretation of the Bible to UNPROFESSIONAL people at Bethel ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:The word is God! John pictures that with the story of Adam and Eve in the garden. Let me give you small Bible study on that. Firstly, The first COUPLE lived alone in the Garden. The two are to be viewed as ONE >>>Gen 2:24 - In the garden, two persons, the man and the woman, "became one flesh" >>>Gen 5:1-2 "God created man" (singular) "He made him" (singular) "Named them man" (singular) Yet it says: "He created THEM male and female" (plural) "He blessed THEM" (plural) "and Named THEM" (plural) "They were created" (plural) NOTE: The name EVE wasn't given to the woman not until after the fall, so both Male and the female were collectively called MAN. Secondly, Gen 1:26-27 "Let us make man" (singular) "God created man" (singular) "He created him" (singular) In contrast the same text also says: "....let them rule" (plural) "Male and female he created THEM" (plural) Lastly, Jesus refers to the first couple and after stating "they were one flesh" adds "they are no longer two" In line of this, would it be wise to say: In the garden was the woman, the woman was with the man and the woman was A MAN? Intellectual mind knows this is a wrong rendition because it will put the woman as A MALE which will be confused as the FIRST MALE. So the best way to understand that even though both the male and the female were both collectively called "MAN" "them" e.t.c is to render it as: In the garden was the woman, the woman was with the man and the woman was MAN Here intellectual mind knows that the woman was addressed as MAN per her NATURE. So John 1:1 shows two separate persons with one NATURE (God). Do you understand? Bible study 101 ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Don't worry you're coming back to your vomit at least "YEAR 1914" is a specific DATE. [ Show this forum a specific date where JWs said "THE WORLD WILL END" in any of their publications!I've don't that many times. Is year 1914 a specific DATE or not? God's Kingdom was established in heaven in the year 1914 nobody not even your pastors can deny all the evidences JWs have!Is year 1914 a specific DATE or not that's what I'm interested in? ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:You mentioned the "YEAR 1914" Is that A SPECIFIC DATE or not? ![]() Besides, check the screenshot below
|
MaxInDHouse:Just like I do say, you don't have single shame! ![]() If you didn't see where it was stated that "...BY AT END OF 1914" The group said the likes of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob will be resurrected in 1925... God's Kingdom was established in Heaven in the year 1914When was this started? You see after, boldly typing rubbish asking WHERE WAS IT MENTIONED WITH A SPECIFIC DATE, now you've mentioned the specific DATE yourself ![]() [s]Jesus (Archangel Michael) with his angels waged a war against Satan and his angels {Reve 12:7-12} and ever since then the effects of this established righteousness in the heavens has been felt globally! Matt 24:3-12[/s]Irrelevant!!! You've giving us the actual SPECIFIC DATE you've been denying since ![]() So we are to endure now to the end {Matt 24:13-14} when Jesus will advance towards the earth to establish his kingdom just as he asked us to pray! Matt 6:9-10That's your cup of tea ![]() But no specific date was mentioned regarding the END of the WORLD!But you just mentioned SPECIFIC DATE above! Oh sorry, YEAR 1914 isn't a date to the self acclaimed intelligence officer ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Compare that to what Watchtower says below, do the two statements close?
|
Mikee19:You can see how he was kept lying in other thread. ![]() That's how you'll know who is working for |
MaxInDHouse:Of course only you will look at the attached screenshot and say Watchtower never MENTIONED SPECIFIC DATE ![]() The second pic speaks a lot about the organization that produces you ![]()
|
MaxInDHouse:You could have done that than this pretentious attitude of yours ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:I've done that previously, why are you still playing blind to it ![]() Maybe the next thing to claim now is that enemies of your organization are behind those publications ![]()
|
MaxInDHouse:Look at him pretending as if he cares ![]() |
MaxInDHouse: I always tell people around me that if we are to concentrate on the flaws faithless humans are talking about then there's no way we can say we believe in Jesus of Nazareth.That's not an issue here! Your organization made several FALSE PROPHECIES with a specific DATE. He himself knew very well that many even among his own people will be stumbled if they keep contemplating on flaws rather what God said about the Christ:The case here is, did your organization make false prophecies with specific DATE? The answer is yes! Which you're trying so hard to deny despite the facts provided. Even Peter confirmed that faithless people will be stumbled and offended:This is not the subject matter, stop preambulating. So if you're expecting imperfect humans to be perfect in their assignment then you can never believe in any form of worship as God's arrangement.I never said your leaders SHOULD BE PERFECT, rather you're the one who made them FAR SUPERIOR THAN JESUS HIMSELF. I believe in the Word of God (Bible) despite the fact that God used imperfect human to pen His perfect word. There will always be errors in the way humans do things because they are imperfect but no matter what the sign that God is working with them will be there:This is nice, so can you show us the ERROR in your organization teachings? Don't dodge this question please. They will produce fine fruit of faith {Matthew 7:16-18} and Satan will continue to give you reasons why you should not work with them even when everyone can see that there's no better performing group than them!Rather Satan is giving you plenty reason to not free yourself from the prison of Watchtower society when Bible never talks about ANY BETTER PERFORMING GROUP. |
johnw47:The post I'm quoting contains a bug! Reason why Antispam bot keeps deleting it. |
MaxInDHouse:And it's actually BANNED and not BARRED! ![]() ITK won't kill |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 (of 397 pages)




