₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
The post you responded to was meant for Emusan (OLAADEGBU) so your response to the post not meant for you shows that you're the same person behind the three accounts.
So stop deceiving yourself and answer the question!

Keep on the good work of your father the Devil.

I repeat, the day I'll decide to expose your lying mouth don't say you're just catching fun.

MaxInDHouse:
The highlighted are words befitting those who behaves in like manner

But you'll start fuming in your mouth even when words that are not as derogatory like those ones were used on you, hypocrite!

Well those words I used and you consider HURTFUL befitting you

not someone who just speak politely about his faith.

Who determined this, you or those you used those words on? Hypocrite....

So if i've ever used such for you present the evidence.

You did, stop pretending.

As for whether you're OLAADEGBU or not prove that by addressing the question

|

That's why I'm saying you should be happy to take up my challenge if you're very sure of it.

Who are you to tell me what to do online?

not running after me

You're the one who mentioned me on this thread, so who is running after someone here

because i have no business with you

Says the lying liar who will keep jumping from thread to threads to argue.

other than the fact that you're hiding behind three monikers.

That's why you're afraid of taking up my challenge on this, which means you're just a false accuser like your father the Devil

Janosky:
Una see this Dubious,LYING Emusan dey show screenshot of Revelation 1:8 because he knows that @ Revelation 22:13 Ellicott Commentary REFERENCES Jehovah God, referring to Isaiah 44:6.
Ellicotts Commentary on Revelation 22:13 is CONFLICTING to Ellicot Commentary on Revelation 1:8.
Why would the same ghost give CONFLICTING revelation to Emusan & Ellicott,a Bible scholar Trinity believer?
---------------------------------+----------------------
3 EVIDENCES Revelation 1:8 applies to JEHOVAH God.
1).Revelation 1:1 Jehovah God is OWNER of the revelation HE GAVE Jesus.

2) The content & context of Rev 1:5-7, says Jesus is firstborn from the dead serving his Father.
Is Jehovah God firstborn to anybody?
No.
Matthew 27:46 & John 3:16,did Jehovah God die for anybody?
No.
3)
Isaiah 44:6 & Revelation 1:8. 22:13 applies to Jehovah.

.
Mumu Trinitarians,
Deut 6:4 & Mark12:29 examples,is Jesus called "Lord God" in old testament & new testament of your Bible?
No , NEVER !!!!!!
Jesus is NOT "Lord God Almighty" at Revelation 1:8.

If this Bible truth dey vex you,ku nye isi na wall & feel happy with your delusion

Like I do say, when it suits you hypocrite, you agreed but when it doesn't you disagree.

Look at the @underlined the idiotic JaNosenses now claimed Ellicott is CONFLICT

JaNosenses the lying liar JWs like his father the Devil

Wilgrea7:
Hi there,

Unfortunately, I don't know enough about consciousness to give an authoritative answer, but I will try my best. I think there's a big difference between response to stimuli, and what we define as consciousness.

To me, consciousness isn't just about being aware of the environment, but being aware of the fact that you're aware. When we look at the brain, we have different parts of the brain that influence different things. Things like speech, sight, memory, facial and environmental recognition, and so on, are controlled by different parts of the brain.

If you encounter a dangerous situation on the street for example, the part of the brain responsible for flight and fight gets activated, and you either run, or go into attack mode. We understand that part.

But the part of the brain that says "I am Wilgrea7, and i am aware of the fact that I am aware of things", is still a big mystery. We do things everyday. But the part of us that says "I, as X individual, am aware of the things I'm doing, and aware of myself doing these things" is the part that gets people confused.

Using the analogy of the device that vibrates and blinks in the presence of sound. The device just responds to environmental stimuli. But the device isn't aware that it is responding to the stimuli. It isn't aware that it is a thing which can respond.

Animals are similar to humans, in that they've evolved to respond to different stimuli. When hungry, they go hunting. When tired, they rest. A lot of their actions, similar to ours, are biological. But as far as we can tell, most animals aren't aware of themselves doing these things. They just do them. They aren't aware of the fact that they are individual beings, which can be aware of themselves.

That's what makes it a mystery.

I hope it makes some sense to you, because it sure as hell doesn't to me

With your recent posts, it looks like you're now supporting Intelligent Design theory.

Though I made a comment on one of your thread but bot removed it.

MaxInDHouse:
I know you're spiritually empty

Thanks for that!

all you can do is exchange hurtful words with people

I've never used words like CRAZY, MAD, WORTHLESS, WEREY, ASINWIN e.t.c on this forum yet these are words found at the tips of you spiritually FULL hypocrite!

soon your secret will be exposed OLAADEGBU!

If you're sure of this then my challenge shouldn't be an issue for you, in fact you suppose to embrace it wholeheartedly because only those who have secret afraid of open challenge.

seunmsg:
Dude is so pained. You’re not Yoruba. Period.

But if your aspirant needs their vote they'll become Yoruba.

The challenge, can you tell BAT to go on national TV and say it openly that Ogu called EGUN are not Yoruba?

MaxInDHouse:
There's nothing in your brains OLAADEGBU!

So you're not ready for the challenge.

If you're not OLAADEGBU answer the question

You're now the owner of Nairaland who can decide which question I should answer or not

instead of engaging me

I can't remember mention you here, can you remind me?

because everyone here knows that i'll lock you up in a box with the scriptures.

Waooooo what a wonderful scholar

So answer the question:

Why Are Both Jesus And Satan Referred To As The Morning Star?

I can't remember OLAADEGBU created this thread solely for me, can you

There are many threads I will view on Nairaland religion section and I'll just pass.

You're the one who sees Nairaland as your birth and death place

That's the only way you can prove that you're a different person

No! The best way is for you to take up the challenge, if you know you're not a false accuser like your father the Devil.

stupid arguments when the topic is left unattended to!

Says the person who can't sleep, breath and live without coming to Nairaland to argue.

Just let me know when the thread was specifically for me.

MaxInDHouse:
Please don't TEACH them!
OLAADEGBU, Emusan, Johnw47

Are you ready to take up my challenge on this?

I will create a thread specifically for this!

only does three things on this forum, it's whether telling Deeperlife News, Stylishly asking questions regarding what Kumuyi don't know or attacking Jehovah's Witnesses. You can can't see him use using any of the accounts to chat with people about faith apart from those three things.

You're like your father the Devil, the false accuser of the brethren.

A little searh about my account on this forum would've helped you but since you're just a son of your father the Devil and self lying liar acclaimed intelligence officer.

Me and Atheists, Muslims, Pagan e.t.c had discussed on various issues on this forum but you can open your mouth to boldly lie.

Well it's the seed of your father the Devil that is manifesting in you.

And if you're so confident in what you're saying then just say yes, you're ready to take up my challenge on this.

Janosky:
Luke 22:42
New International Version
“Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done"

Luke 22:42, did Jesus Christ bend to the opinion of his Father?
Yes.

Olodo.... despite you read "WILL" in that verse you can still call it OPINION...

Luke 22:42, did Jesus Christ agree with the opinion of his Father?

The Father and the Son ARE ALWAYS in agreement.

What happened in Luke 22:42 is to demonstrate the Son's humanity.

Matthew7:23, according to Jesus Christ,Can Saga and the LIENUS receive Sense?
Confused Trinity slaves throwing tantrums.

When you don't even have a single strand of sense

Janosky:
Emusan LIAR

Emusan Mumu Slaves of Trinity delusion.
Revelation 22:13 Ellicott Commentary
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
(13) I am Alpha . . .—Here (as in Revelation 21:6) we should render, I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end. (See Note as above, and comp. John 1:1; Isaiah 44:6.) The repetition of these glorious titles is not a mere idle repetition, or designed to give a rhetorical fulness to the peroration of the book: it is closely allied with the preceding thought. The warning has been given that men by continuing in sin (Revelation 22:11) are inviting against themselves the law by which act ripens to habit, and habit makes character, and character forms destiny. The moral laws set going by sin work thus:—Retribution is no dream: it is a terrible fact: it is written large over nature. But the eternal laws of God, though righteously ordered, are not God: the refuge from the eternal laws which we invoke against ourselves by our sin is to be found in the Eternal God: “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” For those hunted by the wickedness of their own doings, God himself provides a refuge: underneath all laws are the everlasting arms (Deuteronomy 33:27)."

Cc:Sagenaija,Coman cure your delusion.
For the record:
Ellicott na your fellow Trinity slave.

Ellicott Commentary screenshot

It just so unfortunate that you can be so proud in ignorance!

Had it been you know the meaning of what you quoted it'd have been better for you we'll you're JaNosenses for a reason

You better cure your delusion with this screenshot below

Ellicott says Rev 22:13 is applied to OUR LORD and strong declaration of His DIVINITY....

I'm sure JaNosenses agreed with Ellicott on this

ANTIlSLAM:
So those questions you left unanswered after I answered all your questions are hurtful questions right? But you firstly used hurtful words, have you forgotten? I understand all your tricks, not today you've been doing such.

Trust me, I will keep on exposing your JW religion May peace locate you

@color is the main point.

That's how hypocrite behave and don't forget that it's a tactics to boycott those questions

Janosky:
Revelation 22:10 & Revelation 3:12,Acts 3:13, according to your Bible,,i both Jesus and that angel servants of the God of Abraham?
Yes.

Mr LIENUS @Revelation 22:10 & Revelation 3:12 & Acts 3:13, whom do both of them Worship?

Emusan LIENUS

I only ask simple question but see how this deluded JaNosenses is ranting up and down.

Why did the Angel didn't accept the worship from John since it's Jehovah word?

sagenaija:
Trying to do damage control? You need to try harder.
Is it really so difficult for you guys to simply exegete one verse?
If like you started off with "both are in agreement" (I'm not suggesting that that is the correct interpretation of that verse) then what is the point of "one needs to always bend to the opinion of the other"? If they are in agreement in the first place which other opinion is one bending to? Do you see why I say that you guys end up tying yourselves in knots? Being in agreement means having the same opinion. That does not call for one bending to "another" opinion. Attempt another answer. This time focus on the verse. What is it saying? What clear message can you see from it?

That's because their not that intelligent.

How can you say: "Both are in agreement" then go further to contradict yourself by saying "even though one need to always bend to the opinion of the other"! Luke 22:42

That @underlined is so funny that can make one ask, how can this come from a supposed educated self acclaimed intelligence officer?

Janosky:
John 12:49= Revelation 1:1.
International Version
For I did not speak on my own, but the Father who sent me commanded me to say all that I have spoken.

New Living Translation
I don’t speak on my own authority. The Father who sent me has commanded me what to say and how to say it.


Trinity delusion made you guys REFUSE TO RECEIVE SENSE.
Just jejely continue in your folly

You have to put equal sign because you know more than your god

Does your Ellicott and Geneva Bible equate it?

Anyways, Rev 22:13-15 is about Jesus Christ

Jesus is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the ending, the first and the last.

If it pains you and your father the Devil much you can hit head on the wall.

The word of God is yeah and Amen

Janosky:


See as Mr LIENUS dey display iberibeism in public.

1 Thessalonians 4:16 and Daniel 10:13, the same Michael at Revelation 12:7-9, Archangel Michael , Jesus Christ the Head leading every other rank of angels whether Cherubs or seraphims (Matthew 25:31).
Mr LIENUS,go and Delete these verses from your Bible & have peace.

See painment, anytime Jesus Christ is mentioned you and your father the Devil mind will just puff up in pain

Jesus created you and your father the Devil.
Jesus is your Creator even Jehovah says the incarnated Son Jesus is FAR SUPERIOR THAN ANY ANGEL which includes your Michael

Janosky:
Emusan delusion nauseating

New King James Version Genesis 4:19 & Daniel 10:13, ONE of/the One/of One= First, Senior.
In screenshots Strong's h259 , the password to cure Emusan delusion.

"Then Lamech took for himself two wives: the name of one was Adah, and the name of the second was Zillah"

Daniel 10:13
But the Prince of the Kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days, but, lo, Michael, one of the chief (arch) princes (Angels)"

Daniel 10:13 & Genesis 4:19, ONE of/the One/of One= First, Senior,Head.

Is "First" attributed to Jesus Christ @ Hebrews 1:5 & Colossians 1:15.

Is Daniel 10:13,12:1 cross reference to Jesus Christ by your Trinity mentors?
YES!

Biblehub references "ONE" as First, Senior,"Head over ALL powers and principalities."

Yet,Emusan continues to emit GIBBERISH.

I know you will never make sense, JaNosenses the great Gebbrish typer

But let's substitute the "first" for "ONE" in Daniel 10:13

"Lo, Michael FIRST of the CHIEF(Arch) Princes(Angels) came to help me..."

So does this mean Michael is the ONLY archangel JaNosenses?

citygarden:
It was true Atiku said it in his campaign strategy in 2019, but nobody trust keeping meat with a cat. Nigerians don't trust you at all.

Now imagine if this has been done since 2019, the progress it'd have made by now.

Just the same way this APC of part rose against removal of fuel subsidy in 2012 but still contemplating of doing it now.

MaxInDHouse:
Suit yourself!

That's nice!

MaxInDHouse:
The answer to your questions is NO!

Quote my question and answer it.

For a record

MaxInDHouse:
Quote the highlighted from your copy of the KJV. This is what mine says:

"But the Prince of the Kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days, but, lo, Michael, one of the chief (arch) princes (Angels), came to help me, and i remained there with the kings of Persia" Daniel 10:13 KJV

Archangel no dey there o!

Does Arch mean CHIEF or not?

Does princes mean ANGELS or not?

Until you answer these questions

But at least I've help you with the above.

Now the same KJV say:

"Yet Michael the Archangel when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said the Lord rebuke thee" Jude 1:9 KJV

No one argue if Michael isn't an archangel but it's you who refused to acknowledge that Michael isn't ONE OF THE CHIEF(ARCH) PRINCES (ANGELS)

How can the same translator use ARCHANGEL in one verse then change the text to CHIEF PRINCES in another verse?

Does your NWT use the same WORD throughout their translation?

But it's very simple only if you can answer these simple questions

Does ARCH mean CHIEF or not?
Does Princes mean ANGELS or not?

I've been asking you more than three times now, why are you avoiding these questions?

because you know your ignorance will be exposed.

Ọmọ if you're worried about your TRINITY it's dead long ago that's why you can only see the unique teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses today standing tall above all others! Matthew 5:14-16

Cry me a river!

Who is talking about Trinity here?

So far, you're the one going back and forth on simple question.

MaxInDHouse:
I don't know what else you want but i'll assure you that if you can't bear facts there's no reason looking for someone upon whom you want to pour your frustration.

Now it's talking about fact and frustration

No wonder you keep boycotting my question.

Does the word ARCH mean CHIEF?
Does the word PRINCES mean ANGELS?

If you can't find the KJV use ARCH for any other angel then it simply means there's none other than Michael

Micheal is called ONE OF THE ARCHANGELS in Daniel 10:13, true of false?

You can ask your brother to help you with the screenshot of that

but should you insist on your own understanding i'm OK

My own understanding or what the scripture says

You want to change the narrative, I know your style

please present the WORKS of your FAITH! James 2:18-26

The works of my faith are all abound around you unless you are too blind to see them.

MaxInDHouse:
Let the KJV render the word ARCH as CHIEF first Sir

Smile.....so you're waiting for KJV

You didn't attempt any of my questions above, why?

Does the word ARCH mean CHIEF?
Does the word PRINCES mean ANGELS?

i am one of Jehovah's Witnesses and i never call myself THE Jehovah's Witness because i know that there many WITNESSES of JEHOVAH

Since you're "ONE OF JEHOVAH WITNESSES" does that mean YOU'RE the Only Jehovah witnesses?

You need to read more on how DEFINITE ARTICLE "THE" is used in a sentence.

but the scriptures never called Michael one of the ARCHANGELS.

But that's what Daniel 10:13 says

So if you can't show me in your KJV it's OK

By answering my question above, we'll see if Michael is ONE OF ARCHANGELS or not

hold onto what you want to believe while i hold onto mine!

This your line doesn't work on me you that, if you want to hold onto what you belief, you should have stayed in your hall and not coming to faceless forum to rant

Picture 1: Placenta!

Placenta can be referred to as the second baby because both the baby and the placenta are part of the whole conception process and it has only one purpose just to feed the baby.

Why should there be a need for placenta in the first place?

Well, without the placenta, the embryo won't survive because the baby is carrying both the mother and the father DNA. Which means, the embryo's blood and the mother's blood must not come in contact. That's the reason why placenta is in place to bridge the cap.

The uniqueness of this is that baby developed their own blood.

The placenta extracts just nutrients from the mother's blood, process and pass them to the embryo.

Baby is also developing in an amniotic sac which is fill with fluid called amniotic fluid.

Wait you might ask:

1. How will the baby able to breath inside THE FLUID, when it's hard to breath under water?

2. Or how does the baby survive without breathing in oxygen since we all need to breath in oxygen?

In actually sense, babies do breath but not the way we breath, just that they don't breath through their nostrils.

The placenta is responsible for this, it extracts oxygen from the mother's blood and passed it to the baby and remove carbon dioxide from the baby and passed it to the mother's system.

cc:

Lalasticlala
Royalboy
Mynd44
Seun

MaxInDHouse:
When under inspiration John wrote:

"In THE beginning was THE Word, and THE Word was with God, and THE Word was God"

Why don't you conclude that there were many more WORDS of God?
Isn't it clear that using "THE" signify the only ONE?
Beginning took place ONCE so the word is ONE person also.

This your analogy is off point because my point isn't centered on the definite article "THE" but the phrase "ONE OF THE CHIEF..."

Scam alert! This is a division tactics

Now that Jude under inspiration wrote:

"THE Archangel" not "AN archangel" you want to change facts shey?

Daniel 10:13 is also with the definite article THE "One of THE..." so all Archangels have that.

It's evident that ALL Archangels are with that definite article "THE"

Well there are many angelic sons close to the father in heaven and Michael is the foremost of them all that's why Daniel referred to him as the great Prince {Daniel 12:1} and Isaiah called him the Prince of Peace {Isaiah 9:6} because only Michael is cool headed unlike the others.

That's not the point, the point is Micheal isn't the ONLY ARCHANGEL according to that Daniel 10:13

We can see that when God sent Gabriel (one of the Princes) to Zechariah inside the most holy inside the temple. Gabriel revealed his personality telling the man that he is the angel who is standing before God Almighty {Luke 1:19} then Gabriel out of provocation told Zechariah that he will not be able to speak again until what he revealed to him happens! Luke 1:20

Now look at the @underlined, isn't it intellectual dishonesty to classify Gabriel as "ONE OF THE PRICES..." but remove the CHIEF?

So is Gabriel THE ONLY PRINCE here?

He has shot himself on the foot

Truth is starring at you there.

But why did this angelic Prince strike the man with dumbness?

Well it's because no human enters the most holy apart from the high priest in Israel so for Zechariah to have seen a man in that place it means such a man is not ordinary but an angel. So because Zechariah doubted this powerful spirit being he cursed Zechariah and made him dumb!

No wonder Jehovah sent Michael (Jesus) the most cool headed angel to come and deliver us because any nonsense from a human could provoke an angel sent to help you but from the onset Michael love humans most out of all the creatures God used him to create in the beginning! Proverbs 8:31

Nobody needs this long Story sir

So he alone is THE Archangel and there's no other, that's why Daniel revealed that this same Michael is the Prince that's standing for our salvation despite all our sins {Daniel 12:1-3} no other angel can go through all what Jesus suffered in the hands of the creatures he wants to save! Hebrews 12:3

You're still lying @underlined.

Micheal isn't ONLY THE ARCHANGEL

According to Daniel 10:13

Arch = Chief
princes = Angels

Will it be appropriate to render that Daniel 10:13 as "Lo Michael, ONE of the Archangels came to help me..."?

The center point here is about ONE AMONG OTHERS

Just as you're ONE OF THE JEHOVAH WITNESSES and doesn't make you the ONLY JWS.

Janosky:
Oga, did your own Revelation Bible begin from verse 8?

Oga, study Revelation 1:1 & receive SENSE.
Revelation 1:1 = John 7:16
This is the revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him"

Trinitarians superglued to delusion

Deluded JaNosenses

So why didn't the Angel accept the worship from John since it's Jehovah word and not another person?

Always spewing nonsense.

MaxInDHouse:
So there's no other angel called the archangel throughout the Bible except Michael.
Thanks Sir!

You're still displaying your lack of comprehension.

Micheal is ONE OF THE CHIEF/ARCH PRINCES (Angels)

Must you be spoonfed like a baby all the time?

Ok let me put it this way

MaxinDhouse is ONE of The Jehovah witnesses.

At least this is how you do introduce yourself on this forum.

Does that make you MaxinDhouse THE ONLY Jehovah witness?

Learn.....

Janosky:
Emusan LIAR shame on you emitting falsehood.
Revelation 14:12, Revelation1;1 & 22:13-15, Did Jehovah God give Command and Revelation to Jesus?
YES !!

None of the scripture here ever say Jehovah gave COMMAND to Jesus

Lying liar! When will you out your father the Devil to shame for once over this your numerous lies?

Jesus Christ is like a Minister reading the President's letter to Citizens Forum & in paragraph 13 reads "I am Alpha & Omega".
Who is that "Alpha & Omega" in the President's Letter?
Not the Minister, Jesus.
Your Trinity mentors robbed your Sense.

Oponu oniro oshi.

Rev 22 Jesus called Himself "Alpha and Omega, the first and the last"

I know your father the Devil is still angry with that statement.

Throughout the Revelation Jesus is the ONLY one saying HE IS COMING, in fact your lying organization agreed that Jesus had COME not Jehovah

[b]Emusan must you always emit your foolishness on this forum?
Is Protos /eshatos @ Revelation 1:17 (screenshots proof) the same as Alpha and Omega?

So Alpha and Omega Is different from FIRST AND THE LAST

Oma se oooo, yet the deluded JaNosenses will be parading himself up and down on this forum as a Greek and Hebrew scholar.

But the same Protos and eschatos was used in Rev 22:13

Oni ro ole.

Emusan,Come back here and emit more FALSEHOOD

The lying liar JaNosenses like his father the Devil.

Janosky:
Continue to insult yourself,Mr LIENUS.
They come online be throwing tantrums "the name is not in the new testament", the name is not God's name blah blah blah...
Tomorrow Sunday,all of them go enter their business centers singing. "Jehovah is your name, Jehovah is your n....a....m.....e".
3 deities worshippers and their HYPOCRISY.
D

Typing nonsense and ranting as usual.

Did Catholic formulate the name Jehovah or not?

Talk true and let your father the Devil ashamed for once

MaxInDHouse:
According to God's word there is just one single angel referred to as the archangel Sir but if you know another please quote the KJV!

That's why I do say you lack scriptural knowledge.

The word translated as ARCH means "FIRST, CHIEF"

But in Daniel 10:13 "One of the CHIEF PRINCES..."

Meaning there are MANY CHIEF/ARCH princes

You must learn

Janosky:
Genesis 10:25 & Daniel 10:13,"ONE" is Senior, First, Leader. etc.(Strong's (h259,go & confirm.)

But you lied the other time that there's ONLY one archangel

See JaNosenses, there's no amount of your lies that can cover up your delusion on this forum.

So actually, THERE ARE MANY archangels that means Jesus can't be an Angel.

Another doctrine in the drain