₦airaland Forum

The medical professionals in the house help please!

The first scan was done at 8weeks + 2days and it shows Dichorionic Diamniotic twins (DCDA) and subsequent scans have been showing the same result.

Note: From three different hospitals

The confusion happened yesterday as the result came out (from the same hospital using for antenatal which is the one that did almost 98% of the previous scans) to be Monochorionic Monoamniotic (MCMA)

My question is, can DCDA suddenly change to MCMA or ALL THE PREVIOUS SCANS aren't done correctly?

cornelboy:
Was playing with your head and I got you big time. I saw the way you were changing between OLAADEGBU and johnw47

This is how the lying liar JWs behave.

I know it'll come to that when evidence will be presented that you/MaxinDhouse will say you're just catching fun

The truth is you own the moniker Antimuhammad but for the other one I can't say.

You did that to argue against Muslims by posting articles from answeringislam.org

cornelboy:
You were right when you said Emusan can't reason from the scriptures.

I was asking him if the miracles Jesus and his disciples did was instant or gradual. He replied by asking me if Adam's punishment was on that very day or took years.

Miracles in those times happened the very minute it's said to have happened in the Bible.

Baba ran when I told the question he ask was irrelevant.

Where/when did you ask me the question and my reply to you

MaxInDHouse:
It's God's active force light machine programmed to do so many things that's in line with God's purpose it is not a person!

That is your Holy Spirit is a robot

cornelboy:
How did you spell OLAADEGBU in that post?
Baba you no smart.

You didn't answer my question but you're asking question back

Is that smartness

MaxInDHouse:
So an engine programmed to speak for someone is a person shey?

So Holy Spirit is a robot....

JWs abracadabra

Well let Courz talk about what he knew about Jesus of Nazareth, that's the person i'm expecting to talk i'm done with you OLAADEGBU!

Then face him....or I hold you before

MaxInDHouse:
Holy Spirit is not a person but the active force God uses to accomplish His purposes God later allowed Jesus to possess the force as well so Jesus can send out this force to accomplish his father's purpose!

It is not a person!
I repeat "The Holy Spirit is not a person!

Yet The Holy spirit TOLD you

What a good student of English

Anyways, when I finally expose your lying mouth then you'll know you're among those false preachers who made lies in the name of God.

cornelboy:
How that one take concern you Mr Trio?

I said "stop the editing", I didn't say I never editted his post.

Emusan stay your lane na.

That's nice! I guess it's Holy spirit who also told you this bah...

MaxInDHouse:
God's Holy Spirit is ever there to guide us, the day i accused OLAADEGBU but it's the Emusan account that responded telling me i accused him, immediately God's Holy Spirit told me "now you know who is behind the moniker"

It's then i began to recollect that OLAADEGBU never for once disagree with Emusan and it's this same Emusan that always attack anyone that criticize OLAADEGBU.

I was really grateful that day, then johnw47 came arguing as if he's the person i'm talking about not until he himself said he's OLAA then i began to correlate that neither OLAADEGBU nor johnw47 nor Emusan knows how to reason from the scriptures the three accounts are only good at insulting critics.

Then i realized that it's the same person!

I'm quoting you for future reference, so that you won't deny or edit your post later!

Holy spirit told you yet Holy spirit isn't a person

cornelboy:
I didn't say anything

I know you can't say a word

MaxInDHouse:
You don't know what an Apostate means shey?

But you who know the meaning, see the definition you gave...

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm well it's our duty to TEACH you people whether you will accept or not.

Someone who didn't know the meaning of Apostate is teaching another person...

Wonders shall never end

Apostate is a person who once took an oath to remain loyal to a course but later denounce it and failed woefully to explain why nor able to present a better option.

Can you provide the link of where you got this definition from or just from your deluded brain

I never vowed nor take any oath in Islam it's just the religion of my parents who also found themselves in it because their own parents were Muslims too. So there's PRACTICALLY no reason why i was a Muslim than birth

But when @Antichristian will tell you that you know nothing about Islam, you'll try to prove to him that you're a scholar of Islamic.

But see here how you openly vindicated him out of your hypocrisy

Truly, you're nobody in Islam before you fall for the lies of watchtower

but as for Jehovah's Witnesses organization i studied really hard, questioned so many things before i finally accepted the faith.

So you actually VOWED AND TOOk OATH with JWs. That's very interesting.

Keep learning from me!

When you don't have anything to offer

GodsOwn2004:
Thanks for enlightening this @Emusan_the Builder cum Engineer guy.

And I appreciate his enlightenment!

But it's obvious you and him don't understand my initial point.

dammyllare:
Smiles, what ignorance...
Alright, let me school you.

1. Environmental Engineering

2. Geotechnical Engineering

3. Transportation Engineering

4. Structural Engineering

5. Water resources Engineering

6. Materials Engineering

7. Construction and management engineering.

Thanks for the enlightenment, I never claimed I have all the world's knowledge.

There is still more but I will leave you to your ignorance and read up to avoid public shame next time.

Evidently you just want to massage your ego.

Note, survey is also a specialization under civil engineering

It's obvious you didn't get my initial point.

cornelboy:
Mr courz, do you see anything like racism among them today?

But there was racism and other atrocities among them when Jesus chooses them bah and the same people who are racists then are now part of Jesus heavenly ruling

Courz:
You are paranoid and terribly afraid of the many people against you. You desperately need to assure yourself that these many people are one person only to make yourself feel better. See a Psychiatrist!

And the funniest thing is how he'll be claiming to be an intelligence officer

Janosky:
Greek 1510 "WAS" without definite article at John 10:33, Acts 28:6, Acts 12:22, "was a god".
Four scriptural evidences & examples & more which your fellow Trinitarians agreed.

This has been thrashed years ago

Wayo Trinitarian dubiously put "is" wey no deh him Bible at John 1:1

Olodo....I didn't quote scripture here (remember you too said 'the woman IS a man') so I know what I'm saying Jesus is God, or you put it in your own way Jesus is a god, isn't it?

Wayo Trinitarian posting faulty analogy.

Did your Bible tell you Adam and Eve is one being?
John 10:30 & John 4:24, did Jesus Christ tell is one being?

Your Friend OLAADEGBU said "Jesus is Jehovah".
1 Corinthians 11:3 Greek: "the God is Head of Christ, the man is head of woman".
Do you agree?

Adam and Eve are one not the same being.

I know you're too dull, He says Jesus is Jehovah not The Father

Genesis 5:1 references only Adam.
Genesis 5:2,"so both Male and the female were collectively called MAN"
Yes !

That's the point, so tell your brother MaxinDhouse that

Did God ever tell Emusan that Adam and Eve is one being?

Did I tell JaNosenses that The Word and The Father are ONE BEING?

Why do you claim that 2 entities, Jesus & his Father is one being?

Can you provide where I made the claim?

You have started displaying your father the Devil traits

Did God collectively call his son & himself by one name as he called Adam and Eve "Man"?
No !
Oga, your fake analogy goes to the dustbin.

Olodo....MAN isn't a name

Genesis 1:26 "Let us make man" references only Adam.
Why?
Genesis 1:27, "And God went on to create the man (Adam),in God's image He created him (Adam).

Genesis 2:20-21 Eve was an afterthought.
"The man" Adam, did you see it?

Lying liar!

Eve was captured in that Gen 1:26-27

Gen 1:26 says "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and LET THEM have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."

This single statement shows you're a lying liar JWs like your father the Devil.

Imagine, your god is having after thought

Emusan,Why do you like to deceive yourself?
Genesis 1:26-27, is Eve "the Man"?
No way !
Genesis 1:27" ;DThe Man" Adam ! Full stop.
The woman is not "the Man" Adam.

Who says the woman is THE MAN? Mr JaNosenses

The woman is a man By nature.

That is my point which you called FAULTY ANALOGY, so are you okay upstair?

Likewise,"the Word was with the God (his Father, ho Theos) recall,Adam is "the Man" not Eve).

Nobody says Eve is THE MAN, now you understand why THE MAN was used for Adam

That's for distinction between male and female. The same Ho Thoes was used for the Father

Likewise,"the word is a god" like God,godlike, divine by nature.

If you agreed that "the woman is a MAN by nature" then your above point is nonsensical because Eve and Adam have THE SAME NATURE not that the nature of The woman RESEMBLE that of Adam

Sense is far from you!

By nature ,the word resembles God.
By nature, the woman resembles Man.
Na JWs ,Emphatic Diaglott, James Moffat,Sahidic Coptic truly understand John 1:1[/b]

It's evident the reason why you have to employ the word "RESEMBLE" meanwhile, Eve or the woman never RESEMBLE the man rather have the SAME NATURE with The Man.

In conclusion, The Word has the same NATURE with The God which is the point of John 1:1, so the Word is GOD not a lesser god.

MaxInDHouse:
Let him continue deceiving himself, his lies has been exposed: OLAADEGBU, Emusan and johnw47 belongs to the same person he's just switching accounts!

Keep piling it up!

But don't say you're just catching fun when your lying mouth will be exposed on this

Janosky:
Luke 16:22-23,is Lazarus living inside Abraham?

Whenever it suits this lying liar, Luke 16:22-23 is figurative but here see him using the same Luke 16:22-23 as real event

Una want to change holy scripture to suit Trinity GIBBERISH.

Is it not you and your organization that do change the scripture especially a place like Luke 16?;

hakeem4:
I agree with all you have said; but saying people copy structural reinforcement is all rubbish. how do you copy it?

It's rubbish, yet you went to ask "How do you copy?"

Yes people copy reinforcement details from previous design.

quentin06:
Plans and drawings mean the same thing, you could call them technical drawings, no let english cause problem for you.

No! They don't.

Plan is the bird view/horizontal view of a structure i.e Floor or roof

There are Elevations & section which are vertical view i.e Side, back or front

The whole working drawing consists of Architectural drawings, structural drawings, Mechanical drawings & Electrical drawings.

dammyllare:
Smiles, very funny individual. You know next to nothing as regard the functions of a civil engineer or how many specialization we have on this profession

You can see how you that know keeps exposing your own ignorance!

I never mentioned FUNCTIONS of civil engineering but the options courses available within civil engineering.

And if you know better, kindly say it rather than just said I know nothing.

GodsOwn2004:
Your statement below shows that you don't know anything about civil engineering.

That's one problem with people like you, you said I don't know yet you couldn't provide the information that prove actually that I don't know

Karlifate:
No one narrows anything. Just say those are the three you're conversant with.

Can I know the other ones you're talking about?

hakeem4:
how is a builder an engineer for crying out loud?

A Builder is also an Engineer

That's why the course of study is named in some institutions as "BUILDING ENGINEERING"

quentin06:
But the structural engineer is the one who is supposed to provide structural plans m(drawings) of the building

You're right!

but I see many architects doing this in practice

No architect can do that unless the architect is also a structural engineer, what you see are people who are just doing guess work.

I guess thats one of the dividends of autocad, one can easily copy and paste other peoples jobs.

You can copy people work on autocad especially the architectural drawings but each building has different structural members which need different structural analysis and detailing but what many so called professionals do is to copy and paste any structural drawings they have and do a guess work on the project.

Holluwatarhyor:
Julius berger is a civil engineering company and they can handle the building of structures,because I'm not getting you,are you a builder or a civil engineer to start with??

That means Julius Berger can do all the three aspect of civil engineering works i.e structure, highway and water(dam).

I'm a Builder/Structural Engineer.

NotKnown:
The architect has NO RIGHT whatsoever to supervise any building. What are you supervising? That they should follow the drawing or what?
So what then is the job of the structural engineer? What's the job of a builder?

You guys take a lot of things for granted in Nigeria. If Nigeria was truly working a lot of you would have been jailed.

You're wrong!

Architect is the head of the building Team!

So he/she must be there to ensure that the building was built as designed.

Just as structural engineer a team member must also be there to ensure that all the structural members are built as designed

Holluwatarhyor:
you are not totally right,I've worked with the telecommunication industry to construct a network mast,an average technician can't build a network mast without the assistance of a civil engineer,there's a difference between a civil engineer and a building technician/someone who studied building.


Civil engineering is vast,so some builders,surveyors and architects call themselves engineer also

Among the three you mentioned only BUILDER is an Engineer.

Yes civil engineering is vast but it has been narrow down to just three.

Which are:
1. Structure
2. High way
3. Water

ikezudon:
The Architect is the head of the project and has every right to supervise the building construction.

However, he is not an island of knowledge and can only be successful on the project alongside a qualified engineer.

Yes an architect is the head of the project not the one who should execute the project.

That's where the confusion started. An architect was trained to design, in fact many architects don't know the position of COLUMNS in the building and a structural engineer can introduce beam(s) into the building

Las las, na wetin we design dem go build

You're right but you don't know the working structural members of the building which hold the building in place.

and we gats Dey there till dem build an finish.[quote]Yes to ensure what you design was what is on ground.

Just as structural engineer will be there too.

That's why architect wasn't the only building Team.

[quote]Sadly, clients love to play a quick one and shortchange us in a bid to save money (so they think). Them no Dey even pay for design.

Well many clients can bypass architect if their taste can be met but the structural parts of the building can never be overlooked by anybody.

christistruth01:
It is my personal Opinion that Bricklayers can manage buildings up to 4 storeys high if they are well experienced or trained and have laid the Foundation to very Strong and reinforced

This is from a type Nigeria Engineer!

How can you say something like this?

Do you know importance of structural analysis and detailing?

Can a bricklayer tell you how each members of the structure behave under loading?

This is what is leading to many building collapse.

The Problem is that in a Swampy area the cost of the reinforced fortified Foundation alone may cost more than the house to be built on it and the Nigerian Landlords will try to save costs

You're right on this!

I also believe that the failure of Ajaokuta in produce Steel for the Nation has hit the Construction and Railway industriresy very badly

You maybe right here

Most buildings that collapse gave insufficient Steel Supports that are meant to carry most of the weight of the Structure

I disagree!

Most building that collapse lack structural analysis and detailing.

Just as you suggested at the opening of your post. Many structure built in Nigeria are based on ASSUMPTION of this type of foundation can do it, this type of reinforcement will over carry the load or concrete mixing ratio 1:2:4 is for any building.

These are what will be subjected to scrutinity during structural analysis and detailing and the most accurate result will be obtained.

SeniorGee:
It's quite unfortunate. These artisans sweet-talk the clients into patronising them because of their "experience", and yet they have no technical details thinking all sites are thesame!
Pls patronise professionals so that you can sleep well.

Not only sweet talk, many clients self are looking for cheap structures

Even the so called professionals don't know what Engineering all about especially when it comes to highrise buildings.

They can't generate Structural Data
They can't do simple Structural design
They can't read structural analysis reports

All what you see on site are copy and paste reinforcement arrangements from another design.

Until the industry set the priority straight then we can start to talk of professionalism in construction industry.

NIOB bill that can put all this quacks in their hiding hole has been with National Assembly for years now. What can one say about that?

With this bill, for instance:
Non-building professionals can't set up ordinary Block industry which means all the block industries will be owned by professional that will guarantee standard block.