₦airaland Forum

Janosky:
Emusan LIENUS, LYING genius

Lying liar JWs JaNosense

Yes!
Deuteronomy 6:4,Jesus quotes the Hebrew scroll YHWH, "initial statement" of his Father's name @ Mark12:29.

Lying liar, the one Pharisees and Sadducees have replaced with Adonai and Elohim

Don't forget.

John 17:6,26 & Mark 12:29, Jesus Christ says he taught them.
Sink that Bible truth into your brain.

Jesus made KNOWN not that HE TAIGHT them... You added that part to it.

Go and find out why the pronunciation was lost, na your assignment.
Use the skills you learnt at Jankara market to do that assignment.

You see, when the face of liar is shinning like sun

The pronunciation has lost even before Christ came, so if Jesus reintroduced the pronunciation it can't be lost again.

Jesus never used the name likewise the Apostles.

Janosky:
Na Janosky you dey ask?

No! I'm asking the deluded JWs JaNosense

Go and study Jewish/Hebrew history.
Stop this your stupidity.

Just imagine, but NT was written in Greek

Janosky:
Emusan has comprehension issues.

Says the person who have no sense

This thread is too big for your brain to cope with.
Just jakpa from this thread.

If you think so, then Kindly answer my questions

I'm waiting

Janosky:
You are a fraud DECEIVING yourself.

Fraudster JWs!

Is Jesus quote of Deuteronomy 6:4 in your Bible @ Mark 12:29?

If you truly have sense, you've known that the word "Quote" means referencing to initial statement.

So which book did Jesus quote is the question?

Why was the pronunciation lost and the Apostles didn't use it?

Stupid question from Jankara market graduate. .
Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12:29 dey pain you for brain.

The JWs fraudster can't answer it

Emusan LIENUS, will Jesus quote your GIBBERISH?
This 3 doghead slave no get conscience

Says the deluded JWs JaNosense
The thing pain am

John 7:16, whose doctrine is at Mark 12:29 & Deuteronomy 6:4?
Wahala for 3 doghead slaves

When you receive sense lemme know

Janosky:
Mark 12:29 Jesus quote of Deuteronomy 6:4,

Yes Jesus quote from it, but which book did Jesus quoted from?

Emusan LIENUS.

JaNosense cover your lying mouth.

Go and erase John 17:6,26 from your Bible.

I'm not Watchtower that do erase or add to the scripture.

Janosky:
John 17:6,26 & Acts15:14,17-18 proven you are DECEIVING yourself.
Jesus and the disciples knew God's name and used it extensively in their quote from the old testament.

You this fraud won't cease to amaze me!

So by extensively quoting from the old testament is using the name

Why must it be from old testament quoting and not direct usage?

Are you saying both Jesus and the Apostles don't have opportunity to use the name in their teachings?

Janosky:
John 17:6,26 , Jesus taught them his Father's name.

Lying liar JaNosense! Jesus taught his Father's name yet the pronunciation lost, how come?

Acts15:14,17, they knew that they are the people chosen to bear Jehovah's name.

You're shifting the goal post Mr JaNosense

Janosky:
Hypocrisy of a sifia pained LIENUS.

Lying liar JaNosense like his father the Devil!

Biblical Unitarian doctrine says Jesus never PRE-EXISTED, does it support your Trinity GIBBERISH?

Oponu.... Did I ever support any Biblical Unitarian articles or use their materials against your demonic organization?

You see the reason I do say you lack knowledge

Remove the rafter in your eyes,Mr hypocrite!

You're the one who is supporting Biblical Unitarian article against Trinity but when the same Biblical Unitarian articles go against your fraudulent organization. What do you say, lying liar JaNosense?

You can see you're the one who should remove the 4x4 rafter in your eyes

haddeylium:
Good question.
Absolutely! They called him by his name.
Firstly, Jesus name Jehovah is Salvation

You said "THEY called him by His name" yet you simply list where Jesus and the Apostles ONLY quoted the Old Testament.

Is that how people CALLED His name in the Old Testament?

Jesus read and quoted them the ancient scrolls. He quoted them exactly how they are. To change even one word would have put his credibility in question and he's against the superstitious belief of the pharisees.

Here are some examples of Jesus quoting the Old Testament that included YHWH's name:

Quoting Deuteronomy 8:3 Jesus says:

“It is written: ‘Man must live, not on bread alone, but on every word that comes from Jehovah’s mouth.’” (Mt 4:4)

Quoting Deuteronomy 6:16 Jesus said:

Again it is written: ‘You must not put Jehovah your God to the test.’ (Mt 4:7)

Quoting Deuteronomy 6:13 Jesus said:

Then Jesus said to him: “Go away, Satan! For it is written: ‘It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.’” (Mt 4:10)

Quoting Psalm 110:1 Jesus said:

Jehovah said to my Lord: “Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies beneath your feet”’? (Mt 22:44)

Yet the pronunciation of the name lost, how did Jesus pronounce it?

Quoting Isaiah 61:1, 2 Jesus said:

Jehovah’s spirit is upon me, because he anointed me to declare good news to the poor. He sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and a recovery of sight to the blind, to send the crushed ones away free, (Lu 4:18)

This happened in the synagogue, but the Pharisees and Sadducees couldn't accuse Jesus of blasphemy for pronouncing the name and this is the person they've been looking for opportunities to find charges against.

Quoting Joel 2:32 both the Apostle Peter and Apostle Paul [/b]said:

everyone who calls on the name of Jehovah [YHWH] will be saved. (Acts 2:21; Ro 10:13)

Both Peter and Paul later reveal the person as Jesus Christ

Peter said [b]"Only Jesus has the power to save! His NAME is the ONLY ONE in all the world that can save anyone." Acts 4:12 CEV

Paul said "So you will be saved, if you honestly say, “Jesus is Lord,”..." Rom 10:9 CEV

How can you make something known unless you tell others what it is. Jesus would have had to use the name to make it known to others.

So, why was the Apostles didn't know the pronunciation of the name?

And like an ambassador representing a kingdom, like an envoy or emissary who would proclaim to all who he represented…

Jesus never used the name.

It's so ridiculous to think by quoting book about your father is the best way of using his name not by telling people the actual name.

Vickyvice:
sorry this is coming late. Read 1st Cor 8 vs 5 and six in your Bible. That Father there is Jehovah in Psalm 83 vs18. He is different and separate person and greater than Jesus and Jesus always refered to him as d one who sent him. Getting to know who alone bears that name will make you ask many, but important questions

This doesn't address the questions asked which is directly about your first post.

The name was never used by any NT writers or characters

I'm expecting you to counter that by providing where the name was used by any of them.

Also, Jesus never used the name but I see some people trying to be clever by half saying Jesus quoting the Old Testament means Jesus used the name.

Meanwhile, If that's the case, Jesus must have used CORRECT PRONUNCIATION of the name.
Also, the scribes and Pharisees will have used that opportunity to accuse Jesus of blasphemy for pronouncing a name that was already forbidding to be pronounced.

Vickyvice:
putting the name Jehovah, in it's rightful place in d bible, nullifies the false teaching of Trinity.

That means NT shouldn't be considered as part of the scripture, since the name can't be found it.

Except for Psalm 83:18 which makes it impossible for the name to be removed, cos it directly/specifically states that he alone bears the name Jehovah. All or most places u see Lord in d bible, it's supposed to be Jehovah.

If this is true as you claimed, then why WTBTS refused to include the name in some places when they know it's about Jesus Christ?

This person is separate from Jesus and is referred to as Almighty God and greater than Jesus. Granted, he, just like Jesus, and even man, share some other names/titles, such as Lord, Father, eminence, Judge etc, but the Name Jehovah can't be shared.

Where was the separation happened, in the NT or OT?

haddeylium:
This God's name Jehovah appear originally more than 7,000 times in the bible.

Even your organization knows that YAHWEH is more accurate than Jehovah....

Besides, "more than 7,000 times in the Bible" why can't you explain that it's in the OT and not the entire Bible which include NT?

It's so sad that Man (not God) has removed and substituted God's name with mere titles like LORD and God (in some bible translations).

Yet as important as the name is, God still allowed man to do that to His precious name!

Which we can then ask, if God could allow His important name to be removed from Bible, how many of such important things man has removed without a trace?

Most answers claim that the reason is because “Jehovah” is not the correct pronunciation of God’s name in Old Hebrew. But that does not explain why Yahweh —or whatever the correct pronunciation is supposed to be— is not in most bibles either.
So, I’d say that that is not the reason.

The main point here, is that even your organization knows that YAHWEH is more accurate than Jehovah.

New Testament writers never used the name yet it was found in your translation NWT.

Jesus Himself never used the name.

So, who should have placed emphasis on the name more, Jesus who is God's incarnation or an illiterate person of Greek and Hebrew?

Another , some considered that God’s personal name was too sacred to be pronounced out of respect for Judaism superstitious belief , of whom Jesus said: “You have made the word of God invalid because of your tradition.”—Matt. 15:6
This is baseless as well.

Why do you people like lying just to propagate your organization?

This is actually the reason why the name was replaced with Adonai or Elohim which leads to its pronunciation lost.

So why putting the blame on the English or any other language translators?

it's impossible that we'll be in close relationship with a friend that we don't know his personal name. God is not nameless, his titles are not his name. He has a real personal name.

God was never introduced to us as friend but rather as Father.

But why did Jesus never addressed Him with the same personal name?

Ex. 3:15: “God said . . . to Moses: ‘This is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, “Jehovah the God of your forefathers . . . has sent me to you.” This is my name to time indefinite, and this is the memorial of me to generation after generation

Psalm 83:18(KJV)
That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.

"He has been given a name which is above every name at the name of Jesus..."

It's Jesus' name that every characters in the NT hold on to, not YAHWEH.

Conclusively, the central part of Jesus assignment on Earth is to make this God's name known.(Read John 7:26).
Is God's name as important to you as it is to Jesus?

Yet Jesus Himself never used the name.

If the name so much important to Jesus, it's Jesus Himself that will used it most than anybody.

Having a close relationship with God involve getting to know him by name

Yet no NT characters used the name, does that mean they don't have close relationship with God?

Janosky:
Emusan, bigotry and prejudice have taken over your SENSE
Please, read the screenshot over and over again.
Emusan proven his luminous incompetence to carry on this conversation.

Like I do say, you need to enroll back to KG for proper schooling don't let those 8 lying men continue to deceive you that you don't need education



The screenshot is about what Biblical Unitarian claimed which I'm asking if you're in support of it since you supported the same Biblical Unitarian on Trinity.

The truth is, out of your delusion, you rush to support that article about Trinity but forgotten that the same source has many articles against your own organization.

Hypocrite JaNosense!

Janosky:
Emusan:"Here, Biblical Unitarian is proving that Jesus never PRE-EXISTED in literally form but just an IDEAL"

Emusan, in the screenshot, do your own Trinity belief agree that Jesus never PRE-EXISTED?
Emusan is the hypocrite.

Go school you no gree!

Now, see the result just because some old lying men in Brooklyn is deceiving you.

You truly lack sense JaNosense!

I'm not using Biblical Unitarian articles here or better put it [b]I'm not in SUPPORT OF ANY OF THEIR articles

You JaNosense did support Biblical Unitarian article on Trinity but now that the same Biblical Unitarian articles go against your fraudulent organization, do you still support them?

That's where your sense was diluted

#2
Is Biblical Unitarian website a person?
Why would Emusan FALSELY claim that the expression "on point brother man" is addressed to an online website?
Emusan is a Jankara market graduate without comprehension skills.
His daftness is very luminous.

If you have the comprehension skills

You'll know, OP is just a copy and paste which you yourself realize by saying

"The guy references Biblical Unitarian for the facts he presented on this thread. Objectivity matters a lot."

Now, you agree that they guy OP presented a FACT from Biblical Unitarian, but the same Biblical Unitarian have the facts that:

1. Jesus never PRE-EXISTED but just idea which makes Jesus not to be Archangel Michael

2. Holy Spirit isn't an active force but Jehovah Himself

3. The divine name of God never used by any NT writers which means by including it in NWT is a fraudulent act



Now, what do you have to say about your Biblical Unitarian that is presenting FACTS

Emusan:
"Here, Biblical Unitarian is proving that Jesus never PRE-EXISTED in literally form but just an IDEAL"
Emusan LIENUS, LYING genius doing his thing

Another fact that you don't have sense JaNosense!

Where did I support any Biblical Unitarian claimed

You see, when you lost your senses shame will be far away from you.

You're the one who supported and article published by Biblical Unitarian on Trinity, now the same Biblical Unitarian articles go against your fraudulent organization.



Are you still in support of them?

Hypocrite!

[b]GIBBERISH
While Emusan's screenshot says he doesn't believe Biblical Unitarian claim that Jesus never PRE-EXISTED.
Hypocrisy of Emusan LYING genius.

What is this JaNosense saying here?

So from that screenshot, you mean I supported Biblical Unitarian claimed that Jesus never PRE-EXISTED but just an idea



If you lack simple comprehension, why can't you call a primary pupil in your area to explain my post to you

Firstly, "True Christianity has nothing to do with politics" is your own opinion not what the Bible teaches.

DappaD:
Over the past few months, there’s been a fuss over who’s going to assume the governor’s seat in a certain state in Nigeria.
Governorship candidates took their campaigns to popular churches.

Ok

This happens every election period with churches pitted against one another,

Lies! No church pitted against one another, just lies you've been fed with.

supporting one person over the other.

That's why we have choice, or was Jehovah wrong for giving us choice?

With some saying things like “It’s time to stop so-so&so church from being in power”.

Liar! Who made such statement? You can provide your evidence here!

The question I usually ask people is how these persons can really be classified as Christians seeing that their behaviour and conduct is nowhere near that of Jesus;

Are everyone in your hall have the same behavior and conduct of Jesus Christ?

Who rejected an offer of rulership more than once? Luke 4:6, John 6:15

Jesus rejected it because it's not the reason he came to this world just as Jesus didn't married, write any book, construct any boat (despite being a carpenter) e.t.c so Jesus didn't do many things because they're not part of His mission on heart.

You can't point to a single verse in the scripture where God forbid us to be a leader.

Who said that his Kingdom(government) was no part of this world and so his disciples wouldn’t get involved with political struggles? John 17:14-16; John 18:36

Those verses you quoted never say anything about Jesus disciples "won't get involve with political struggles" that's just your interjection into those verses yet you know people who are not Christian when you're lying against the scripture.

More pertinent is that these same churches would claim to be part of the body of Christ but love and unity in mind cannot be seen amongst them as is required of true Christians.

Sorry, having choice isn't against love and unity.

Among your congregation, a family refused their daughter to marry another JWs brother. To you does that mean there's no love among JWs or unity?

Your answer is as good as mine.

Also, these churches who claim Christian do not advocate for God’s Kingdom with Jesus as King instead they push for humans as rulers. Psalm 146:3

Another broad day lie!

Have you attended any of their service to know they don't advocate for God's kingdom?

How can you lie against another denominations just to massage your own ego?

Times like these are when I’m grateful being a Jehovah’s Witness because of my neutral stand in matters relating to politics.

It's your choice and not what the scripture says.

The only government I will FOREVER support and advocate for is that which Daniel 2:44 spoke about. This was the government Jesus constantly preached about(Luke 4:43) and I follow in his footsteps as a true Christian by preaching and teaching about that Kingdom! Matthew 24:14

God's kingdom is what God Himself will establish and no where Scripture ever says human government MUST STOP before God's kingdom will come.

Even your organization have Government on earth they called it "Kingdom Hall"

Finally, you're just repeating what your GB infused in you not what the scripture says.

achorladey:
The military intelligence he boasts of is something else.

That fake military officer

Janosky:
The daftness of Emusan is very luminous.

See the empty skull JaNosense

John 17:6,26 did Jesus Christ change his Father's name to "the Lord"?
Mark 12:29-30, did Jesus or Mark change the tetragrammaton in the Hebrew scroll of Deuteronomy?
Emusan, carry your stupidity outta this thread.

SENSE wey you, Emusan no get
Hypocrite!

So Biblical Unitarian is wrong right?

You will see the hypocrite going mute now

Geneva Bible and Amplified Bible is the published work of your fellow Trinitarians.
Your 'oly ghost taught them Jesus is Archangel Michael.
The same 'oly ghost is giving you & them conflicting revelations.

Whereas your beloved Biblical Unitarian says Jesus isn't Archangel Michael

Wahala for lying liar JaNosense like his father the Devil

Emusan claims he went to school ,but him brain no see that the same Biblical Unitarian is also against his 3 persons Trinity.

@color
If you truly have sense and don't lack simple comprehension, you'll see that is the point I'm driving at on this thread.

Biblical Unitarian is against Trinity but you supported them because of that to the extent of saying "On point, brother man" to their articles but when the same Biblical Unitarian articles go against your fraudulent organization doctrines, are they "On point, brother man"?

So you can see your hypocrisy life outside...

Emusan the hypocrite remove the rafter in your eyes.

You always confirm that you truly have no sense

I'm not here to use Biblical Unitarian materials against your fraudulent organization but for you to support Biblical Unitarian articles against Trinity when the same Biblical Unitarian has many articles against your doctrines, isn't that the height of hypocrisy by the lying liar JaNosense like his father the Devil?

Biblical Unitarian says your God/holy spirit is one person.

Yes that is what Biblical Unitarian says, but don't forget you supported its work on Trinity, so you should also support it when it says Holy Spirit isn't an active force but Jehovah Himself

Wahala for lying liar JaNosense today

Emusan, your brain no dey function

JaNosense even a toddler knows my point of exposing your ignorance and hypocrisy on this thread.

Since, you lack wisdom I don't expect you to behave differently.

Janosky:
Cry me a river.
Sifia pained WAILER

We know who is always living in pains and lack simple comprehension.

But "Jesus, Jeremiah, Jude, James, Jonah, Joseph, Job, Joshua, Jonathan" are there in your Bible.
Shameless Hypocrite.
TUEH !!

Keep exposing your ignorance!
Who is talking about those translation names?

JaNosense is trying to shift goal post

Biblical Unitarian claimed YAHWEH that was changed to THE LORD is what the NT authors used which means YAHWEH/Jehovah never appeared in any NT text.

You see your life outside, that's what your "On point, BROTHER man" says not mine.

Can you see that you're the very hypocrite here?

Wall of senses must fall on you today

3 doghead slave,do you agree with that statement?
Sifia pained WAILER.

Hypocrite!

Now you disagree but you can call Biblical Unitarian "On point, BROTHER man"

Don't forget OP just copy and paste

Daniel 10:13 Geneva Bible since 1599 ,before the corruption of King James Bible in 1611.
Malachi 3:1/ Genesis 16:7 Amplified Bible.
Why would your Trinity mentors led by your 'oly ghost reject your mumu claim?

Now it's Geneva Bible and Amplified Bible

Can you see how you have lost your tiny sense that remains?

I'm here to show you your hypocrisy for you to agree with Biblical Unitarian on this thread simply because it's against Trinity but when the same Biblical Unitarian articles go against your fraudulent organization, you start to shift the goal post

According to your claim " the God's nature (holy spirit ) is what God used to empower people" proven that holy spirit is God's finger, His active force..

Oponu.....go school you no gree!
Where did I make any claim

If your brain isn't paining you, you'll see, that is from your "On point, brother man" aka Biblical Unitarian

Despite the fact that I posted the link for you to read, yet you can still display your lack of understanding.

Biblical Unitarian claimed Holy Spirit is God Yahweh Himself not an active force.

JaNosense you must agree with Biblical Unitarian by fire by force

Mumu LIENUS,God's nature references an abstract quality.
God's nature is NOT a person.

Can you see your empty life outside

Even Biblical Unitarian didn't say Holy Spirit is a person outside of God. In fact the article is actually against the personhood of the Holy Spirit by proving that Holy Spirit is God Yahweh Himself not another being

So according to Biblical Unitarian, Holy Spirit isn't an active force.

Wahala for lying liar JaNosense like his father the Devil

Nice discovery!

But is that not a Cross sign that enclosed the first word?

Early evidence of Jesus crucifixion!

Janosky:
On point, brother man.

Shalom.

So he's a BROTHER to you

Cc:
MaxinDHouse

---

Now begin to say "on point brother man" to all these from the same Biblical Unitarian.

Here, the Biblical Unitarian trying to prove that the Name of God is YAHWEH which was replaced with LORD and that's what the NT authors used. Which means, Jehovah never appeared in any NT book

Here, Biblical Unitarian is proving that Jesus never PRE-EXISTED in literally form but just an IDEAL. Which means Jesus isn't Angel Michael as your organization erroneously claimed.

Here, Biblical Unitarian claiming that The Holy Spirit is another designation for the True God Yahweh but the God's nature (holy spirit) is what God used to empower people. Which means, Holy Spirit isn't an ACTIVE FORCE as your organization erroneously claimed

Wahala, for the follower of Biblical Unitarian and Watchtower!

SSIPON:
Last night I dreamt that a black dog was chasing me. What could it mean?

During my NYSC in Cross River state, I had a dream. In the dream, it's Friday/Saturday night meanwhile in reality it's Saturday/Sunday night.

And the dream goes thus, there was a communal clash (the village I am and another one) which leads to surrounding villages taking side with their favorite village, in short the whole thing leads to massive bloodshed.

But what surprised me most is that, in the dream, I saw the villagers taking oath that no matter what it will cost NO CORP MEMBERS in that village will be affected till the war will end.

I was so scared when I woke up, sweating seriously. When the day break, I narrated everything to my colleagues because my PPA has Corper's lodge. The astonished thing about it was that, while I was narrating everything to my colleagues, I remember I said: "I will tell this dream to Pastor tomorrow (Sunday) in Church to confirm the dream!"

NOTE: All these happened in the Dream!

But when I wake up in reality, it's Sunday morning which I have to prepare for service.

As usual, I went to church and the service went well but to my greatest surprises, after sharing grace and everyone was departing.

I just heard Pastor saying: "Please, tell everybody to come immediately. Devil is a liar"

After we all came, the Pastor proceed to say:"Please we need to pray, that I had a dream and the dream was given to me three times. In the dream, I saw two villages fighting that leads to massive bloodshed. I had the dream the first time, I woke up, prayed and slept, then the same dream came again like that three times."

In fact, I was dumbfounded and to be honest with you, I couldn't pray all the prayer points raised that day. How could me and another person in another location have the same dream at the same period? Was the question that was going through my mind.

When we came back to our lodge, I then told my colleagues the dream and what happened in the church, they were very surprised.

It's not up to two weeks, when fight actually broke out in some villages in one local government area of Cross River State called UGEP, though my village wasn't affected but the state government has to evacuate corps members in those affected areas and some corpers came to my village, when they narrated everything I was surprised to hear also that "the villagers vow that they will do everything within their power to ensure every corps members' safety."

Many lives were lost during that clash in 2012 if you listen to news then, you'd have read about it.

As the title implies "Do dream have meaning? Yes!

Though you might give it your own meaning but the deep things are still being revealed by God to His people.

Maestro21:
Is that what you read about your founder? That he is fake? cool.

You won't see the hypocrite answer that question because "Got questions" was his safe haven

And it's very simple, if he takes "Got questions" explanation on Mark 16 as truth (though he did because he won't have posted it here) then he should also take the same "Got Questions" explanation as truth about his organization.

Janosky:
LYING genius wey no get liver
(In screenshot) he pass off his conjecture & assumptions as fact.
If Emusan get liver, let him show the proof where I made a post for the FALSEHOOD he is claiming here.

Shameless lying liar JaNosense like his father the Devil.

From the screenshot, I never said "JaNosense made any statement" or can you point it out from the screenshot where i said you made any statement?

See the reason I do say you lack wisdom and simple comprehension

The discussion on this thread is about marriage in which your deluded hypocrite brother was trying to talked down on Chris but forgotten that your founder Charles Taze Russell also faced the same fate.

Now, you jumped in only to brought Mark 16 irrelevant nonsense as your name implies JaNosense to divert attention from the main point "MARRIAGE". Where did I discuss Mark 16 on this thread for you to quote me and begin to say the nonsense "Got Question" says about Mark 16 if not to divert attention?

Like I said, you have helped us to reach unanimous decision that Russell also failed in his marriage which then makes him unqualified to speak about marriage.



I know this is still paining you to the marrow

Janosky:
LYING genius, why are you so st✓pid?
Is code switching and code mixing criminal?

Jankara market graduate continue DECEIVING yourself

JaNosense the lying liar JWs like his father the Devil, anytime you get your fairly used brain, lemme know!

MaxInDHouse:
I only came for petra1 because none of you can chat like mature minds!

We know, you don't need to tell us hypocrite!

Janosky:
Mr LIENUS,If you get liver,show the proof where I said what you are FALSELY claiming on this public forum?

Mr JaNosense, can you show me the word I put in your mouth which you never said?

Janosky:
[/s]

LYING genius

Illiterate who can't compose simple sentence

E pain am well well

Maestro21:
Janosky,

See what your favourite "got questions" said. Is it true?

You're just getting to know him gradually.

You'll see he will soon switch to another source for screenshot.

That's their hypocrisy life.

petra1:
which prediction

The prediction is SECOND ADVENT of Jesus Christ. That is, the second coming of Christ.

Meanwhile, the idea wasn't Russell own just what he stole from his failed mentors Williams Miller, George Storr, JONAS WENDELL, & NELSON BARBOUR

Read HERE for more!

Janosky:
LYING genius doing what he knows best- LYING like kilode.
Emusan no get conscience.
Got questions your 3 doghead devotees told you Mark 16:9-20 was added by scribes, with extensive verifiable proofs & research, just continue WAILING upandan

I know your dull brain has been looking for a way to divert our attention from Russell failed marriage but you know I won't give you that chance.

Janosky:
Na your way ..... Emusan LYING genius doing what he knows best.

We know the liar here!

Did we ever claim that Mr Russell never had any issues in his marriage on this forum? by JaNosense 7:57am Nigeria time

The @color part is the main point I joined this thread and after several denial and defensive lies, you finally succumb like Russell did in the court, so any other ranting is just another style to deviate.

Now that you agreed that Russell had issue in his marriage, then he is unqualified to speak about marriage. QED

cc:
Archoladey
Maestro21
MaxinDHouse
Petra1

oluwafreshkid:
Every now and then, we wake up to news of shrines been burnt,
Men and women caught with charms and fetish items.
My question is, is it a crime to practice idolatry?
These items are religious items.
Execpt a crime was committed eg human ritual, I don't think a crime has been committed.
Kindly state your opinion

Have you not heard where church or mosque being burnt?

You won't see people burning anything because it's illegal but with a perception that something evil or untruth is going on there.

So to your question, traditional practice isn't illegal in Nigeria.