₦airaland Forum

Janosky:
that they dont av time for JEHOVAH,
Yes!
The life of a professional footballer revolves around the round leather game throughout the duration of his playing career.
Jason Worilds & Peter Knowles were sports men who quit sports to worship JEHOVAH.
Mark 12:29-30 (Aramaic Bible).

See this hypocrite!

But you're busy promoting the same thing that makes people not to have time for your god

Out of 16 posts you ever created on Nairaland, 6 of it are about FOOTBALL

Unless you deleted this your moniker, if not you've put yourself in a hot soup with this statement.

Janosky:
John 17:16, JEHOVAH'S servants " are no part of the world" , & would not in your own words "dominate the world" the world that JEHOVAH said is "passing away",1 John 2:15.

You know this and your brother still claimed if all Nigerians become JWs there will be peace.... I guess Nigeria isn't part of the world

Besides, the same brother of yours also said, JWs has conquered many kingdoms.... Is he lying or the kingdoms are not on this earth?



The world if passing away yet you'll still live forever on earth

achorladey:
Earlier on the thread he was boasting about the +/- 400000 members in Nigeria out of +/- 200 millions of people living in Nigerian. Should that be a milestone to shout on top of the mountain over for 100years, then other Christian religious denominations scattered all over Nigeria should go to heaven and shout it to the ears of everyone since their numbers will be in multiples of theirs equally considering the short span of their existence too .

He even made similar claim that Muslims do make like "There will be peace allover the world when everyone becomes Muslim" according to him "so if everyone in Nigeria is a JW there will be no killings justified by political ambitions!"

Then you will begin to wonder, if they can work hard for 100years with fruitless efforts of just a population of 9,000,000. How long will it take them to dominate the world?

MaxInDHouse:
Well it's OK, i'm sure the OP himself heard you so let's see how he focus on the topic he raised!

You can too

I know you don't like accusing Mr A for the action of Mr B, so face that person not me. I'm still your friendly Maximus!

Of course, I've replied him but this isn't about accusation just exposing the lie you said earlier that "when he found out that the 100 years issue doesn't put JWs in a bad light as he expected!"

MaxInDHouse:
The world over is feeling the force behind this greatest army of PEACE!

Now you're going back to the main point.

No wonder it's 100 years of failed prophecies

They have conquered so many kingdoms and brought out people for the name of their God and throughout the earth everyone has heard of JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES!

Mention one kingdom they conquered.

Please! Please!! Please!!!
Present a better performing group than Jehovah's Witnesses!

You're still looking for better group after 100years of fruitless efforts.

tctrills:
Honestly I am beginning not to understand you, what is your point

You don't understand him truly, since you said you find some of his words interesting, you have massage his ego. So he needs to feel relevance at that moment.

MaxInDHouse:
I quoted you indirectly because i'm not arguing with you rather telling you why the thread changed into something else.

At least you agreed now that you do "ARGUE"

Even that, his post still not the one that change the thread to BLOOD TRANSFUSION rather the tactic of You deviating from the main point.

As for the person that called him "EWU" i think you supposed to ask him not me nah, after all it's not me!

It's not a question in the first place, so I only brought that point to show you that, this thread really hit the hard part of JWs that was the reason your fellow brother can call the OP EWU out of frustration.

MaxInDHouse:
Don't mind the OP jàre, he was the one who switched over to blood transfusion

Reading what he wrote, he didn't switch over but only brought that as a point.

when he found out that the 100 years issue doesn't put JWs in a bad light as he expected!

It actually did because if not you & your brother won't still be on this thread pushing it to 8pages.

One of your brother even called the OP "EWU" I guess you know the meaning.

---

Lastly, did I quote you before you reply my post?

See how they use style change the thread from 100years of fruitless efforts to another lie of blood transfusion

Janosky:
The evidences dey pain you
Continue WAILING.

Still looking for the evidences (plural)

When you can't simply answer if it's Roman that killed Jesus or not

Whose eye Witness?
Your so called "eye witness" Proven FALSE by the Washington Post, BBC News, Wikipedia and more importantly, the Complete Jewish Bible.

Josephus Flavius witnesses how executed
person survived for three days on Roman's cross.

Where are the links from BBC, Washington Post, Wikipedia?

This is the holy Scriptures believed by the same people whose ancestors demanded for Jesus execution on the stake.[/i]
John 19
Complete Jewish Bible
19 :5-6
So Yeshua came out, wearing the thorn-branch crown and the purple robe. Pilate said to them, “Look at the man!” 6 When the head cohanim and the Temple guards saw him they shouted, “Put him to death on the stake! Put him to death on the stake!” Pilate said to them, “You take him out yourselves and put him to death on the stake, because I don’t find any case against him.”

At least Pilate is a Roman ruler, which means Jesus was crucified by Roman, this shows that Jesus died on the cross because that's what Roman used for centuries before Jesus was born.

Very childish,silly claim
For your mind, Janosky wrote the link for the BBC, Washington Post, Wikipedia and the Complete Jewish Bible
Emusan too dull.

Simple, provide those links nah, why are you afraid of pasting the links here?

How many chapter and verse did Josephus Flavius write in Emusan Bible?

He wrote none but he wrote many works which made him to be one of the most reputable early century writer and historian.

How many did your lying 8 men write?

1. Galatians 3:13 , Paul copied Deut 21:21-23 to reference Jesus execution on the stake .

2. [b]Galatians 3:13 & Deuteronomy 21:21-23.
John19:6-7, 39-40,was Jesus tried, killed & buried according to the law of the Jews?
Yes!

Jesus was tried & killed by Roman Government which is the only one that has authority to pronounce death judgement one any one.

The Roman only follow the customs of Jews of not LEAVING A CRUCIFIED PERSON on the cross overnight which is the reason they normally break their legs to hasting their death.

Which can be confirmed in the crucified person unearthed and examined by archeologist Vassilos Tzaferi group.

In fact, had it been you read that article, you'll see, Vassilos mentioned that, it is what the NW Testament writer John wrote about Jesus.

John 19:16, Acts 3:14-15 Emusan receive SENSE
The soldiers followed the "plot" of the Jewish leaders.

1. Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15, who IMPALED Jesus Christ? The Jews..

But the soldiers are Roman soldiers

Even the Jews don't use crucifixion as a mode of execution and according to that Deu 21:21-23 which I'll keep knocking on your dull skull, it is the dead body that should be hanged not mode of execution.

The Roman crucified Jesus as their usual method

2. The Bible evidence:Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15, proven Emusan's question lacks merit.

I don't even need to expose you further here because it shows your father the devil is really proud of you.

3. Oga,stick to your Bible's evidences:
Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15 .

Case closed

The Bible evidences are:

1. The Roman crucified Jesus
2. Roman soldiers carried it out according to their method
3. Jesus shows His hands to His disciples where there are imprint NAILS (plural)

This is supported by historical evidences that:
1. Roman has been crucifying people on crosses centuries before Jesus was born
2. Jews themselves don't used crucifixion as capital punishment for execution.

Wisdomlaw1:
U are one of the apostate

You know this and you still giving yourself headache

u need to get a life

Are you the owner of life.

Jehovah witnesses is not problem, the country is in bad shape and insecurity is at a record high

You don't even understand his post yet you jumped in. O ma se oooo!

ur mates in the civilized world are inventing so many things

What you yourself have invented?

Or you're waiting for apostate to invent something you'll later enjoy then turn back to the same apostate and started calling him/her all sorts of names?

you are lazy person that's why u put so much energy to write thrash. Ewu

The thing really pained you, assuming this is not a faceless forum, you won't call him ewu because you'll like to hide your hypocrisy of JWs are perfect Angel.

Janosky:
This half baked illiterate no want to understand this English from BBC News

Now it's about BBC News NIT Washington Post again

"The Roman word "Cruz" generally translated 'cross' ORIGINALLY HAD A LESS SPECIFIC MEANING refering to any object on which victims were IMPALED or hanged"

How does this erase the eyes witness testimonies of Roman executing people on cross?

BBC News NEVER said crucifixion or anything close to it.
E get why

Firstly, post the link to that article from BBC news.

You always hide link to articles you know you just cherry-picked from.

These WAILERS, Achorladey & Emusan, should continue DECEIVING themselves[/b]

No wonder you couldn't attempt any of my questions.

Josephus Flavius a great historian of early century wrote that he witnessed where Roman crucified people and he said it's on cross.

1. Jews themselves never executed anyone on pole, only the lifeless body hanged on pole according to Deu 21:22-23

2. Roman Empire has been executing people on Cross never used POLE, until you provide the source that says otherwise.

I know you've been searching Google up and down but found none, reason you stick to that cropped portion of BBC news to dismiss the historical evidences we know today.

Here are my questions again!
1. Who crucified Jesus? a) Roman b) JWs c) Nigeria
2. Has Roman ever crucified with POLE? a) Yes b) No
3. If your No. 2 is Yes, provide your fact and if it's No! You know the next thing

Janosky:
Continue WAILING and console yourselves.
The BBC news proven your cross is NOT originally called "cross"
It's original Greek meaning is "stauros", single, upright POLE where convicts were impaled.
"IMPALED" continue uttering the word until it registers in your brains
.

This is what you can come up with

The challenge still remains, provide just one single case where Roman crucified with POLE!

You can now deny historical evidences just because you hold on to a lie.

Let me summarized it with questions!

1. Who crucified Jesus? a) Roman b) JWs c) Nigeria
2. Has Roman ever crucified with POLE? a) Yes b) No
3. If your No. 2 is Yes, provide your fact and if it's No! You know the next thing

achorladey:
The post no dance to his religious organization tune. He has to call it NONSENSE

Absolutely!

The Roman has been crucifying people on crosses centuries before Jesus was born.

According to history "Accounts of the suppression of the revolt of Spartacus in 71 B.C. tell how the Roman army lined the road from Capua to Rome with 6,000 crucified rebels on 6,000 crosses."

How come Roman will suddenly use POLE for Jesus.

I know if possible for them they would have denied Roman execution of Jesus Christ.

Janosky:
Nonsense!
At the excavation site, Was his two hands tied on opposite sides of a transverse beam?

So it's nonsense!

On a similar thread, you are still unable to answer my question, it's Roman that crucified Jesus Christ, can you show us just one instance where Roman crucified person on a POLE?

The article wrote by archeologist Vassilos Tsaferi spells this out. Which you're still turning a blind eyes to.

There was no any proof that the Holy Spirit was with JWs in the first place.

Janosky:
Emusan LIENUS says "Jesus never pronounced the divine name"
But the LIENUS DECEIVING himself claims "JEHOVAH is a mispronunciation"

Jehovah is not accurate, let it keep hitting your dull skull.

The name wey Dem say Jesus wey come from heaven no fit pronounce na only Emusan and Encyclopedia knows the correct pronunciation.
Emusan is a genius in LYING

If not because you're olodo.... Nobody says Jesus can't pronounce it but Jesus DIDN'T PRONOUNCE it as well as ALL THE EARLY CHRISTIANS. Reason no known Greek manuscripts we have in possession today have it.

The divine name "Jehovah" was found in Bible manuscript of the 14th century,
Did your Catholic priest you lied "coined Jehovah" write any Bible manuscript in the 14th century?
Emusan is too dull for this forum

Oma seee ooooo

Even your organization knows about Raymundus Martini

Continue WAILING & DECEIVING yourself.

Mr continue wailing and deceiving yourself, we know you

Las, las Jesus Christ is not your mate on any level.

Jesus is our Creator, I never said He was my mate on any level.

John 17:6,26, Jesus Christ knew his Father's name before disclosure to the disciples.

Yet the name was never used by Jesus and any of His disciples.

You are very daft, LYING genius[/b].

People know who is daft on this issue.

Trevor007007:
There is something about Max that you guys keep missing, he is very proud about his faith even sighting scriptures from the holy scriptures to support God's backing on the name they bear, but non of you have shown even a slight hint of yours, prove that you love your religion and that they are united as one group by saying the name of your religion like Max does, and that you are recognised by your religious group anywhere in the world that they are present, it is that simple.

This your statement is funny, the New Testament supposed to be flooded by the name CHRISTIAN if that's how the first apostles did.

Or better still, Jesus supposed to flood Revelation given to John with name.

Quick check, he isn't the only JWs on this forum, have you asked yourself, why others don't jump from thread to thread the way he is doing?

Janosky:
Emusan LIENUS doing his usual routine of LYING

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 15
Jehovah by George Foot Moore

Had it been you obtained formal education, you won't have posted this article because it shows you truly dull.

JEHOVAH (Yahweh[1]), in the Bible, the God of Israel. “Jehovah” is a modern mispronunciation of the Hebrew name,

Do you understand that @color part?

resulting from combining the consonants of that name, Jhvh, with the vowels of the word ădōnāy, “Lord,” which the Jews substituted for the proper name in reading the scriptures. In such cases of substitution the vowels of the word which is to be read are written in the Hebrew text with the consonants of the word which is not to be read. The consonants of the word to be substituted are ordinarily written in the margin; but inasmuch as Adonay was regularly read instead of the ineffable name Jhvh, it was deemed unnecessary to note the fact at every occurrence. When Christian scholars began to study the Old Testament in Hebrew, if they were ignorant of this general rule or regarded the substitution as a piece of Jewish superstition, reading what actually stood in the text, they would inevitably pronounce the name Jĕhōvāh. It is an unprofitable inquiry who first made this blunder; probably many fell into it independently.

That @underlined was done by a Catholic mock! Even your organization knows.

The statement still commonly repeated that it originated with Petrus Galatinus (1518) is erroneous; Jehova occurs in manuscripts at least as early as the 14th century".

I don't know why you bolden that part but whatever you have in mind add this to it.

EARLY 14th century.....


I know you don't understand the article you quoted and the implications of it on your claim.

Las Las, Jesus never pronounced the divine name nor does the name found in any known Greek manuscripts we have today.

achorladey:
That is to SAY PROMINENT members are FAKES.

You yourself paapaa no be real Jehovah’s witness going by your sayings so far. A real Jehovah’s witness don't engage apostates or come to apostates filled websites? Why should you take poisons or be feeding at a dumpsite.

The same person who says that someone isn't a REAL JWS will still come and be shouting "ALL JWS have the same line of thought"

The funny part from his post he said, "I never knew that Jehovah is about to use that opportunity for me to bear another witness."

What of the numerous one Jehovah didn't give him opportunity to witness?

Yippeedaniel:
Oops. I had one 3 yrs ago. N me n the other broke up 2 months ago. I used to goto memorial with her.

To them you're enemy of Jehovah who is going about to tarnish Jehovah image.

DappaD:
Hmm. There is more than one side to a story shaa.

Of course since it's about JWs, this must come out.

I know you’re aware there are JW families where not all the children eventually make the truth theirs and get baptized ?

So not all JWs have the same line of thought

Some accompany their parents to KH only to be bench warmers and when they leave home, they do what is truly in their heart. So does having affiliations with Witnesses mean one is truly a JW ?

But if this should be about Christendom, will you have said the same?

The Chelsea CDM by the name of Chalobah evidently has family links to Witnesses, yet that doesn’t make him one. You dig ?

Not even only this!

That can be a side to the story.

Which is true, as many of such were recorded about JWs.

The other side to the story is that the person might even be baptized but deliberately flouting Jehovah’s commands by even dating an unbeliever in the first place. How is that person exemplary ? Can the person be viewed as a real JW ? 2Thessalonians 3:14

But if the same happened in Christendom, you'll believe that's what they were teaching them or what they see their leaders doing and copy

And if it so happened the person was a baptized Witness and the issue of abortion became known in the neighborhood, will the elders conceal his sin ? Or will not the elders in the person’s congregation discipline him and disfellowship him considering the severity of the sin ? 1Corinthians 5:11; Exodus 21:22
So how is the person still viewed as a JW after all that ?

Then what happened in Christendom also happens within JWs.

The third side to the story is there might even be no story at all. The individual you quoted has a long record of demonstrating his hatred for JWs.
Imagine him arguing that God’s name isn’t Jehovah simply because he wants to discredit the Witnesses. So it might be another cooked up story let’s tread carefully so our enemies do not take us for fools. Exodus 23:1, Proverbs 14:15

You can deny it or pin it on the story teller but the truth is Jws are human living, we have heard about their own short come as other denominations.

You can wave it because it's about JWs but the truth is, JWs commit more atrocities than this.

Note: I'm not saying other don't but no how you want to sugar coat it, the way JWs see themselves as angel, it's not in reality.

A JWs brother impregnated a JWs sister, and both of them were treated even worst than the devil. To the extend that the sister delivered the baby which is a girl who is doing well today but her mom died after the birth. I can't forget this statement from my JWs girlfriend, "My Aunty died unhappy"

Barristter07:
This is really bad ,if true.

There are many cases like this, remove that "if true"

Janosky:
This LIENUS is a LYING genius
Emusan LYING bail out
Your LYING are of many types

Point out the lies on my post!

Janosky:
Alabama na New York?
Is kingdom hall a residential estate ?

Alabama is hall sold to Christendom, which negates your lie that JWs didn't sell any hall.

Besides, my post was about the Estate in NY

Emusan , continue LYING & DECEIVING yourself.
You are very dull[/b]

Can you see that you're the dull one here, because my post is of two types.

Go school you no gree

haddeylium:
You cannot help but laugh at the pathetic life these anti-Jehovah’s Witnesses are living. . Their hate for Jehovah's Witnesses is so great that it overshadows their THINKING.
"Oh! JWs cannot be right, let's argue it."

Now, you're begin to so, how meaningless the thread was yourself.

Someone mentioned that; "Jehovah" is wrong, and "Yahweh" is more likely right.

So you don't know that even your organization, also say the same thing

Why is that Yahweh not in your bible in more 7,000 times it appears?

So America Standard Bible is your Bible you said above that people can read on Biblehub

Many translations have it in Old Testament just that no known Greek manuscripts we have today that have the divine name.

Janosky:
This Jankara market graduate no dey understand English, that's the summation of Achorladey's claim.

Which you derived from yours!

Emusan, please answer:
Does Bible Greek have letter 'J'
Is the name you call "Jesus" fake?

You think it's because of letter "J" Jehovah is inaccurate?

For your dull brain, Jehovah is inaccurate because of its formation (though some scholars argue against the letter J). Remember Jehovah was coined by a Catholic mock

Janosky:
This LIENUS, you say "Jesus never pronounced the divine name"

Yes! Jesus never pronounced the divine name.

but you know the Divine name "Yahweh is more accurate"
You well ?

Even your organization agreed that Yahweh is more accurate, so it's not my thing only.

Janosky:
You have no proof for your FALSE claim.

A screenshot was on this same thread by the OP, isn't that enough proof?

Yet , you & Rott WAILER accuse JWs of selling their property.[/b]
Øde

So they didn't sell it to Christendom, why can't you provide the same image of the same hall at this moment to proof the OP false?



I understand, but if you're the very one who attached screenshot now, it will be undeniable proof

Janosky:
Sifia pained LIENUS
Matthew 5:5 Jesus words must come to pass.

That's why your organization is acquiring estate for them ONLY IN USA

That verse needs to be changed to "God blesses those people who are humble. The earth Real Estate in NY will belong to them!

Bishopkingsley:
I thought that was old light that they have abandoned such lies

That old light refused to off only that, date was not attached again

MightySparrow:
They should have kept the place for family of Janosky or MaxInDHouse in paradise on earth.

I know the two will be so happy to leave Nigeria for such a place but now Christendom is taking over their hall