₦airaland Forum

Janosky:
[s]Stop this foolish rant exposure of your luminous ignorance & daft mentality

Got questions is a popular website of your renowned Trinitarian mentors.
Go there and receive tutorials and thank me later.

More so, your Trinitarian Bibles confirmed that Jesus Christ is an angel, Genesis 16:7 & Malachi 3:1, (Geneva Bible & Amplified Bible plus others).
The million dollar question is:
Why is the same ghost giving conflicting revelations to Maestro21 & his fellow Trinitarian devotees who translated the Bible?

They knew what Maestro21 and his Pastorpreneurs do not know.
Jesus Christ the angel @Genesis 16:7 leads other angels @ Matthew 25:31 & 2Thess 1:7-9.
Pronto! [/s]

@maestro21 don't fall for this trick, he wants to deviate from the main issue.

Russell failed in his marriage
Rutherford failed in his marriage

Yet the deluded people believe them to have final say on things not just marital issues but can boldly condemn another person for what they believe just because of the self acclaimed only we have the truth.

Very hypocrisy people!

Janosky:
You have been ranting upandan accusing Mr Russell of wrongdoing in his marriage.

So Russell didn't do anything in his marriage yet he was taking to court and the couple got separated. What a Jehovah witness abracadabra

Ogbeni, did Mrs Anita Oyas take your Pastorpreneur to court for humble, exemplary living and marital fidelity?

So Russell was taking to court for humble, exemplary living and marital fidelity

Kai even Russell will be shaking his head for you beside Jesus right now

You are too dull

Says the deluded JWs who is defending the indefensible.

Janosky:
According to the irrefutable evidence,

We can see the irrefutable evidence coming from the same LYING Washington Post as you claimed earlier

If Washington Post is lying how can they still provide IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE

Only a deluded person won't see the error.

Who paid damages for making defamatory, unfounded and libelous allegations against an innocent man serving Jehovah God?

What of the payment Russell made for lying and abandoned his own marital responsibility

Emusan LIENUS is a sifia pained bigot!

If you're not in severe pain and professional in bigotry, you'll provide a link to those articles so that we can read and see what the WHOLE articles are all about not just by cropping ONLY THE PARTS THAT SUIT you and you think people who are wiser than you and your GB will just swallow it.

The evidence is, Russell and Rutherford failed in their marriages which make them unqualified to speak about marriage despite even being in heaven coruling with your Jesus



You won't have a sound sleep because of this tonight

Janosky:
The screenshot proven that Emusan LIENUS won't disappoint you proven himself.
Emusan is a genius at LYING
He doesn't have to tell this public forum his Sense is fairly used.
We done see am.

Even see the way a supposed graduate is composing simple sentence. O ma se oooo!

This is the result when you're being deceived that you don't need formal education.

Bunch of illiterate blind followers.

What is in the screenshot?

You can just see how you're deviating from my post simply because you lack knowledge and understanding.

And it's only a lying liar like JaNosense that can do that.

All the Mumbo jumbo won't amount to anything.

So like I said, trying to get sense even if it's fairly used one

MaxInDHouse:
Hosea's wife WAS A PROSTITUTE who was sleeping around with other men and God asked Hosea to keep going back to plead with her to return home each time she goes out to commit adultery.

Wonderful!

But in this case your Pastor Chris is the Prostitute here and when the woman couldn't bear his adulterous lifestyle any more she filed for a divorce.

Just as Russell is a wife abuser and tormentor which his wife even endure for more than five years before filed for divorce.

So Chris IS NOT QUALIFIED TO COUNSEL OTHERS ABOUT MARRIAGE BECAUSE HE HIMSELF FAILED WOEFULLY IN THIS REGARD!

So in all, both Russell and Chris are not qualified to counsel other about marriage because they themselves failed woefully in that regard.

achorladey:
Na that one wey dey shout research research I just dey smile for. Trying to attach, APOSTATE, INFIDEL and DISORDER to people he said are faceless dey make me laugh.

He go read history books tire

You know I always like them to start their initial gragra before I start with them.

Maestro21:
Emusan is a legend.

See wounjury he is dishing out.

Achorladey is a word smith.

See posers they cannot answer.

Haahahahahaha.

They are hypocritical and cunning people.

They can sugarcoat anything just to promote their demonic doctrines forgotten that all what they accused other for, are also found within their organization.

You can see how their trying to defend their founder and Rutherford. When it's obvious that the way their founder treated his wife is show shameful that even unbelievers can't treat a woman such way.

Firstly, the they lied that Russell never pushed for separation whereas it's Russell himself who first brought up the issue of separation.

Secondly, their publications lied & provide half info many times just to cover up their founder's evil towards his wife the same way they're doing on this thread.

Lastly, the wife fell seriously sick during that period, imagine what their founder says "It's a judgement from his God" I wonder what their hypocritical mouth will say if it's another person that says something like this to a bedridden wife.

Here is just few statement at the trial of the marriage in court by the wife.

---

Q. Mrs. Russell, after you separated from your husband in November, 1897, where did you go live?

A. I went to my sister's. [80/1006 Cedar Avenue]

Q. And how long did you live with your sister?

A. A year and a half.

Q. Did you receive any support from your husband during that year and a half?

A. None whatever.

Q. At the expiration of the year and a half, which would be about April, 1899, where did you go live?

A. The house next door to my sister [79/1004 Cedar Avenue], which was owned by my husband, which was left vacant, the tenant moved out and I went in and took possession of it and notified Mr. Russell I was there.

Q. How long did you live in that house?

A. I remained there for four years.

Q. During those four years, did Mr. Russell contribute anything to your support, outside of permitting you to live in this house?

A. Nothing.

Q. And during those four years, how did you make a livelihood?

A. I rented furnished rooms.

Q. I believe during this time Mr. Russell gave you some furniture?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. And that would bring us down now to April, 1903?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. And did you leave that house on Cedar?

A. On April 16, 1903, Mr. Russell and these men who are with him today came over to my house, and with some others from the office, they were persons connected with the Watch Tower Society and also the [United States] Investment Company and they came over and took possession of the house, and turned me out of the house; he kept the furniture and even retained my pocket book which carried the money that I had received from the rent of rooms.

EDITORS NOTE: Maria Russell either misspoke when she said, "April 16, 1903", or the court reporter got it wrong. The correct date was Monday, March 16, 1903. See Section below to see what all occurred during the week of March 16, 1903 between Maria and Taze Russell.

OBJECTION

Q. And then I believe shortly after that eviction from this house you instituted these proceedings for divorce? And also proceedings in the [C]ourt of Quarter Sessions for non-support. (See following section.)

A. Yes. Sir.

Q. In which the court sentenced him to pay $40 a month?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. Which has been done from that time down until the present?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. Have you had any financial aid from your husband except this $40 a month which you have received since about April 1, 1903, down to the present time?

A. None whatever.

Q. Mrs. Russell, have you any means of your own?

A. I have no means of my own, excepting a very small legacy from my mother, just a few hundred dollars, and that has helped to eke out life with that $40 a month which I have been living on since that time. Mother just died just before I was evicted from that house.

Q. Mrs. Russell, prior to the time you left your husband, did he ever propose a separation?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. When was that?

A. That was just before we moved down to the Bible House. It was in 1895.

Q. And at that time you were living on Clifton Avenue, Allegheny?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. Did or did not Mr. Russell at that time make any threat as to what he would do with his property unless you acceded to his demands?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. What were they?

A. He proposed that on the ground of incompatibility that we agree to separate, and if I would do so he would give me that house in which we were living, and when I broke down at the suggestion, he said if I did not agree to it, that I would not get anything.

Q. After this proposed separation and threat, Mrs. Russell, where did you go to live, you and your husband?

A. We moved down to the Bible House.

Q. At whose suggestion?

A. Mr. Russell's.

Q. And I believe you continued to live there until the final separation in November, 1897?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. And I believe you continued to do work in the Bible House for Mr. Russell?

A. Yes, Sir, down to the time I took sick; and after that I kept on with the work all the time I was there.

You can read the full details HERE

Janosky:
This one wey call himself Maestro21 dey think say he get SENSE. Kai !!!!!!
The screenshot proven Your bigotry is luminous.
For the same reason, in 1908, the US Court of Law awarded damages of #15,000 US dollars in favor of Mr Russell against The Washington Post for libel & character defamation, you Maestro21 moniker is proven your st✓pidity on this forum.
Emusan LIENUS ,Coman follow your friend continue WAILING upandan.

Still doing everything possible to defend the failure of Russell and Rutherford marriage just because whatever the gods did must always be right

Janosky:
Emusan LIENUS doing what he knows best- DECEIVING himself, MISLEADING gullible sheeples & LYING on this public forum.
The Washington Post in 1908 paid $15k dollars (in screenshot, over $430,000 by current estimates) for libel & character defamation. Emusan no get conscience repeatedly LYING like the Washington Post in 1908.
TUEH !!!!

Washington Post is now lying the same Washington Post that has been your usual & favorite source

Hypocrite!

My question is did you know anything about Russell and his affair with Rose Ball?

I know you don't have sense as your name implies JaNosense.

Janosky:
The screenshot proven you addressed my comments.

See the lying liar JWs like his father the Devil

I addressed your comment when you FIRST JUMPED to quote me on what you didn't understand.

Shameless lying liar JWs.

Confirmento !
Just continue....
You no get conscience.
You are a genius in LYING.

I've heard you great JaNosense.

Try to look for sense at least you can still get a fairly used one.

Janosky:
Spurious claim of a sifia pained LIENUS copied from other resentful, embittered LIENUS

Now it has become spurious claim



Shameless lying liar JaNosense the son of his darling father the devil

Janosky:
Sifia pained LIENUS
Who would give you info about their activities in a place where it takes place under restrictions?
Emusan,You too mumu. Kai !!!!.

Then shut your dirty mouth up.

Yes, we preach everywhere,we know how we do it.
Go & drink , Panadol & Anti malarial medicine, you are not thinking straight

Who asked you
See the idiot taking panadol for someone headache

Mr LIENUS consoling himself.
You are a genius in LYING

JaNosense the lying liar like his father the Devil

Always remember that.

You'll see how it'll pepper him

Janosky:
Who dey fleece their members & stash away in offshore secret tax Havens (alias storing treasures in heaven?)

As usual, No Sense!

Did Russell's wife ever alleged her husband had mistresses?
NEVER!!
Can we make similar claim about the Pastorpreneur divorced by his wife/business partner?
Capital, NO !!

I bet you didn't know about Russell and his affair with Rose Ball

That's an assignment for you

The con man neglected his wife dey nack his mistresses steady while under "anointing"

The same thing Russell did to his wife and even forcefully broke into her apartment

Janosky:
You seems to be high on hallucinatory substances, making FALSE claims.

Your father the Devil will always be ashamed of you the way you lack wisdom and understanding.

Who would give you info about their activities in a place where it takes place under restrictions?
Emusan,You too mumu. Kai !!!!.

Then shut your dirty mouth.

But your brother claimed they do it despite the fact that there was restriction and was accusing True Christians of being the one who caused it.

Can you see the reason why you're jumping like kangaroo?

Your claim of living in a warzone is rooster rubbish.

because you're living with me....

Warzone no get network na so you no get conscience,LYING to DECEIVE yourself.

If not because you lack wisdom, your deluded brother knows what I'm talking about but you just jump into what doesn't concern you and you're spewing thrashes.

Anyways I don't expect much from JaNosense!

petra1:
is that what they teach

Just do a little small background search on them, you'll know better!

Janosky:
See who is talking?
Which mess no dey Christendom?

Which mess no dey Jehovah Witness?

List the mess in Christendom
I'll list the mess in JW....let's compare and contrast

MaxInDHouse:
We are JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, no divorced person can stand before us to teach about keeping marriage vows, because he himself is a failure in that field!

But not only did the divorced Russell and Rutherford stand before JWs teaching about marriage before they died but ruling with Jesus in heaven today

Janosky:
Matthew 19:3-9 & 1 Corinthians 11:3 are some of your Bible's teachings on marriage for JWs.

But failure Russell and Rutherford are in heaven ruling with Jesus to teach you about marriage

Emusan,Have you taken your medications today?

Don't forget to help me collect it from kingdom Hall when you're coming

Janosky:
Wetin concern 3 doghead slave with the location/territories where JWs dey preach?
If your SENSE dey where God put am, you won't ask for such info

So you didn't know origin of the post you quoted but only to jump into the discussion like a lost baboon

Mr LIENUS DECEIVING himself.
Where you get data & connectivity for "warzone" where the Government banned data & network?

You can ask your deluded brother about that

Oponu Janosense

MaxInDHouse:
The man (Chris) may be an eloquent speaker but that doesn't make him qualified to TEACH others about marriage because he himself failed woefully in that aspect.
That's my point!

Just as Russell and Rutherford failed woefully in that respect, but unfortunately they are in heaven teaching you people about marriage today.



Hypocrite!

Trevor007007:
See Aboki , still yet nothing to offer. Fault finders, am learning about you faceless guys, Achorladey, Emussan=

Nothing to offer yet you're struggling to defend the failure of Russell and Rutherford

The only fault finder here is you and your brother who always see fault in other but never within them.

Trevor007007:
typing warriors, e Jo, biko which is the infidel? as in which one of you, type your info make I japa

You're the very infidel here.

achorladey:
He is looking for apostate and infidel.

Tactics of running away

Trevor007007:
Very funny faceless individual, you just typed nothing.

Another way to divert attention.

It's now you know it's faceless, if it's not faceless what will you have done?

Imagine this shameless statement from you

"you can not link them together, whether the wife separated from her husband or the husband separate from his wife.....Trevor007007 Oct 13th, 2021

Just to justify the failure of both Russell and Rutherford

Trevor007007:
You wey no know anything about somebody still dey point finger, Rutherford failed in his marriage my foot, you and you cohorts actually have no iota of shame, your words to you and your likes. Yes Chris wife file for divorce, which was later accepted by the husband through his holier than thou statement in his podium against his wife, something Rutherford never did, Nairaland warrior typing a reply to Trevor007007

Do you have iota of shame?

We can see how you're lying about the whole issue that is so glaring in the history.

Still trying to justify the failures of Rutherford and Russell

Now, another angle is "Holier than thou statement"

Didn't Russell came out to make his own holier than thou statement too and accepted the court alimony?

The thing is, you people can easily point the accusing fingers but when the same measure is to be applied within your organization, you'll must find a way to twist it.

Trevor007007:
Na now you decide to use sarcasm, leave denominator alone or whatever, I only made a research to know more because I hate falsehood, I saw how you guys where happy that you have chased the other guy, but that was not my concern, my concern was to know what really transpired and I found the core truth without bias.

@underlined says it all.

You're claiming to find the truth and not to be bias but what you've been doing since is to put the blame on the wife as if the husband isn't part of the union.



Whether you like it or not, Russell is a failure in that regard.

achorladey:
He should allow Max to do his work and defend or deny Russell just as he has rubbished Chris for over 3 to 4 pages.

Russell must be defended at all cost reason why he has been trying to twist the truth.

achorladey:
He still does not understand that the position he holds still does not take away the fact that Russell was a failure based on Max summation. Reality says he was unable to live according to the Timothy account Max and his brother was branding about.

Just as you said before, look at the way lame defence mechanism he put forth.

He is even trying to shift the blame on Maria Russell just to pain Russell in a good light.

Forgotten that both failed

Trevor007007:
From this your post above you just prove to me that you are not different from the lai Muhammed

We can see who is not different from Lai Muhammad.

Trying to justify Russell by all means

Trevor007007:
Oh I thought it was you, so it's Petra, okay oh! But all I know is that Russell never divorced his wife on any ground, the separation was not even his idea at all, Wikipedia only gave little info about the issue but more research on the matter helps to clear things.

Did Chris divorce His wife too?

Was the divorce Chris' idea at all?

Nothing to clarify, Russell failed just as Chris failed so both don't have any reason to teach about marriage. QED!

Trevor007007:
A deep research on this issue is scattered online, just using a weak info on Wikipedia is not enough Mr Emussan, dig deeper Nairaland warrior.

I can't stop laughing at this your defense mechanism.

Was it not Chris' wife who filed for divorce too?

Truly you people have no iota of shame.

Even the same Rutherford failed in his marriage

Trevor007007:
Mr man you know nothing about Mr Russell's court issues in his marriage, that your copy and paste is filled with errors, let me help you out.

Just imagine....

Where did I do any copy and paste here

Besides, what petra1 pasted is from Wikipedia

It'll be filled with errors since it's about your Founder but had it been it's another person it won't.