Enigma's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Enigma's Profile › Enigma's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 (of 198 pages)
ogajim:The US in particular is where you find probably the highest number of and certainly the most high profile (deliberate) teachers of the false doctrine of "tithing". Unfortunately, the disease has spread to the UK and parts of the EU particularly in the Pentecostal/Charismatic arm of Christianity --- with the sad growth of the so-called "prosperity gospel". |
Pastor AIO:Exactly!!! We (myself, Kunle and many others) have said here repeatedly that we have nothing against people who "tithe" per se. We want them to know that it is not a Christian requirement; we do not want them to be enslaved; we do not want them to be deceived or blackmailed into "tithing". We want them to have the facts and the correct understanding of the bible on the subject. If after all these they then choose to "tithe" knowing the truth, then that is "perfectly okay" (to borrow words for which Kunle has been unjustly villified!). We make no apologies for calling some so-called "pastors" or others who, deliberately with misleading intent, preach a false doctrine of compulsory "tithing" frauds and criminals. Personally, I am happy to be tolerant and understanding of a person or "pastor" who teaches the false doctrine of compulsory "tithing" simply because s/he him/herself is ignorant or misconceived. We will however challenge them vigorously too. |
[quote author=F_Marshal link=topic=242036.msg3973562#msg3973562 date=1244064440]@ Enigma Have you heard of a Linux FTA Box called "AZBox" already in Europe and capable of HD, DVB-S2 4:2:2, MPEG-4, Internet youtube connection among other features? See AZBox webpage here. Any comment or insight will be appreciated. [/quote]Yeah, the AZ Box is one of the receivers exciting hobbyists currently (others include the Cube Revo and the DM 800). I haven't had a play with any of the three yet but there is a good thread (link below) on one of the UK forums on the AZBox.http://www.satellites.co.uk/satellite/azbox-english-language-section/ |
I will check the g+ magic when he gets back at the weekend.Heard it has been on since 2007 without any break or need for update.If you need details,please holla my ogas mentioned.All you need with the g+ is a 1.8m dish and C-band lnb.Get the details from the group please.It is very confidential.tox, I first hinted about this in This Post from September last year. In particular note the line " , is not hacked (though some say the 68e c Band might be open on some cards)." Enigma,I honestly don't know, try lyngsat etc; most people here don't bother with C band. |
OYIBN:If you say so, no problem. I know that the general principle is the same. |
OYIBN:George_D has already addressed this and I only want to buttress what he said. CNN and many many other channels are completely free to air (i.e. FTA) on many many satellites world-wide and can be received totally free and completely legally if you have the right size dish and know where to point it. A comparable example: BBC World Service radio is not receivable on an FM radio but if you have a LW/SW radio you can receive it free ---- is that illegal because you use the right equipment? FTA satellite reception is even a hobby for many people worldwide and many people enjoy the buzz of being able to receive TV stations from different parts of the world. In most of sub-Saharan Africa, it is more difficult because the satellite beams were/are not that generous for us; this is why we need the large dishes to make the best of FTA satellite television. However, even with a 90cm dish you can enjoy a reasonable number of FTA channels legally and without subscribing. As George_D also said, many channels that are packaged as part of pay-TV are free elsewhere if you have the interest, acumen and patience to find them. The pay-TV people are providing a service the main benefit of which is the convenience of small dishes. If you don't mind the "inconvenience" of big dishes, then you don't necessarily need pay-TV at all. ETA It is true that as part of the FTA hobby it is possible to get some stations that are encrypted, by various other means, without paying for them. That is, however, secondary and is not "true" FTA. |
naijafinestgal:The best way of maximising your 90 cm dish is to stick a diseqc/USALS motor on it --- done by someone who knows what s/he is doing. ![]() |
Oxone:It is a good idea to set aside something you can afford in order to give biblically. It could be ten percent of what you have/earn which is probably why you call it "tithes". Indeed, giving to beggars (and similar poor and needy e.g. orphans, widows etc) is very much at the heart of what Jesus Christ and the apostles taught as our Christian duty. I'll give you a couple of examples: 1. Jesus Christ clearly made clear that to love Him, to give to Him, to clothe Him, to feed Him --- is done when you love/give to/clothe/feed the poor and needy. Read e.g. Matthew 25:35ff 2. The apostle James, one of the highest earliest leaders in Christianity after the death of Jesus Christ (who was his blood brother), said this: Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.See James 1:27 (Edited: I have changed the version to NIV) Very interestingly neither Christ nor James nor any of the other apostles is recorded in the Bible as teaching anyone to "tithe" or especially as teaching anyone to pay or give "tithes" to any "church" or leader or "pastor". Let me clarify one more thing in relation to the word "tithe". The bible uses the word "tithe" to refer specifically to a tenth especially a tenth of produce (and in the case of Abraham, a tenth of the spoils of war). Also the bible uses the word "tithe" to refer specifically to the tenth animal of livestock holding. If you had 9 animals, you did not need to give a "tithe" as you had no tenth animal to give. If you have 20 animals, you could not choose number 11 or number 1 or number 20 or any animal other than the tenth under the rod when counting your animals. The result is that anyone supposedly living by the "tithe" rule today will need to make sure, legalistically, that what they are giving/paying is a tenth. Do not be confused by false claims that some people believe that the tithe was more than ten percent. That statement is very simple to understand. Firstly, there are different instances when the "tithe" i.e. a tenth was referred to in the Bible; it is by aggregating different "tithes" or "tenths" that someone can claim that paying "tithes" (i.e. different types of tithes/tenths) can amount to more than 10 per cent. Secondly, in one instance God said that the "tithe" must be produce --- but that if people wanted to redeem the "tithe" in money, then they must add an extra 2.5 per cent to the value of the tenth ---- interestingly, this was to discourage the people from paying/giving "tithes" in monetary form!. This last bit further shows that the "tithe" really never was money nor about money! |
Image123:Sorry, I'm not sure I follow! What queries? If I know, I'll try to answer. |
The fact is that there are "pastors" that are fraudulent and criminal --- and who use the "tithe" as part of their fraudulent activities i.e. "fleecing the flock". The fact that such "pastors" "spiritualise" the so-called "tithe" does not deter from the fact that they are being fraudulent. |
sleekdot: sleekdot:The two quotes above represent the two enquiries that have been made on this thread. As far as I can see these two posters are, so far, the only "enquirers" on the thread. It is perfectly legitimate to answer each enquiry/enquirer with the answer that "tithing" is not, in the first place, necessary, compulsory or even a Christian doctrine. In fact, the question of "how" to "tithe" indicates the legalism that is associated with the false doctrine of "tithing". If we believe in true New Testament freedom of "giving" then the question of "how" to "tithe" could be answered simply with "as you purpose in your own heart". |
pitodenz:Read This Link for USALS/Diseqc Motors |
BUTONEDAY:It was temporarily FTA for 2 or 3 days but re-encrypted yesterday. |
darqly:Hi darqly Out of curiosity, what is your location? |
@F-Marshal How bodi now? Some chap came to present that funnel/plastic idea at the satellites.co.uk forum last week; however, he wasn't able to convince the folk there that it boosts signal. It might be worth trying out for oneself though. Edited: @George_D; yep, they would have indeed been testing for a while before launch. ![]() |
@baba_egun Thanks for confirmation; I had actually read that news item; here is the link: http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/05/14/africa-24-launched-in-paris/ The new channel is very promising apart from the language being in French. By the way, what are the latest developments at Sirius 5e? |
Now, while I haven't actually done a statistical test to determine what percentage of churches preach compulsory tithes, it seems to me that at least 90% of the churches that I am familiar with, probably 98% of nigerian pentecostal churches make a big deal of tithes as a compulsory matter. And even those that do not say it is compulsory teach that there are special benefits to be accrued by the person tithing.Ah ha! Herein lies one of the reasons why the false doctrine of "tithing" must be continually challenged. I think it would be rather churlish to deny that (a) the teaching of "tithing" as a compulsory obligation of the Christian is rather widespread; or (b) that many, almost certainly the overwhelming majority, of Christians who "tithe" today do so because they believe it to be an obligation; or (c) that a large proportion of "tithing" Christians believe that not to "tithe" today is robbing God; or (d) that a large proportion of "tithing" Christians believe that not to "tithe" today will result in missing out on God's blessing; or (e) that a large proportion of "tithing" Christians believe that by "tithing" you are guaranteeing some blessing which might not be available if you didn't "tithe; (edited) in other words "tithers" are guaranteed blessings that 'non-tithers' (even generous givers) are not. These are all false and each one of them in its own right is enough reason to keep challenging the false doctrine of "tithes" before even (or at the same time as) moving on to the issues of fraud or 'fleecing the flock' or spiritual abuse - whether through "tithing" or other false doctrines. |
Happy birthday to Mr Gem (and Ifende i think - from one post I saw?) For those who can get NSS 7 @ 22w please scan 11551 V 30000 3/4 and report back. This is the background: http://www.mediainzimbabwe.com/?p=1787 |
abose:In fact from what I have seen most of those who have supported tithing on this thread and the overwhelming majority of those who support tithing do so on the premise or assumption that it is compulsory ---- and that it must be paid into "church" and some even add the more insidious "it must be from your gross not your net". You only have to look at the very first post on this very thread here: What the tithe really means Thus I will keep repeating those questions on whether they believe they have the freedom not to "pay" "tithes" into a/their "church". |
kantoma:kantoma I do not think you are a Zombie and neither have I said so. I have also never said a person will be rejected by God or for that matter be sent to hell(!) simply because they "tithe". If you've been reading carefully, fairly and objectively, you will see that I posted the following earlier on: We who argue against the modern teaching of "tithing" acknowledge and accept that a Christian can voluntarily choose to "tithe" (including giving it in the form of money to a church) - preferably when s/he knows that it is not compulsory and s/he is not coerced or manipulated into doing it.So I have no problem with it if you choose to "tithe". I have the following questions for you though: 1. Do you believe that you have a duty as a Christian to "tithe"? 2. Do you agree that you have the freedom not to "pay" your "tithes" into your church or into any "church"? 3. Do you agree that you have the freedom to give/pay your "tithes" instead to widows or poor people or similar charity? 4. Do you agree that you can decide say one month to spend your "tithes" on whatsoever your heart please? |
Considering the topic title, here are some basic questions (deliberately kept to a minimum for now) for anyone who teaches "tithing" today: 1. Can a "tither" of today choose not to give the monetary "tithe" to his/her "church" or to any "church" at all? 2. Can a "tither" choose to give the "tithes" to charity e.g. to the poor, the orphan the widow? 3. Can a "tither" of today choose not to "pay" the "tithes" every month? 4. Can a "tither" of today choose to spend the "tithes" of one month on whatsoever his own heart desires? |
abose:Actually I posed these questions (though I don't know if Kunle did at some point as well); it is really a matter of basic comprehension and simple context. |
@pilgrim.1 Just for the records only: I'm afraid I still have no time to waste answering your questions; or even to deal with slights/insults ('letting go of letter and seeing the 'spirit' nonsense) from you. I will post what I want to post exactly I how I want to post it. Edited |
It is true that when Hebrews 7 speaks of the "law" in general it is talking about the "law of Moses" which means not only "tithing" but the whole corpus of that law. Verse 5 of Hebrews 7 mentions two things: (a) the commandment to receive "tithes" as part of (b) the law of Moses. The rest, indeed the whole, of chapter 7 makes clear that the law of Moses including the commandment to receive "tithes" has been done away with ("annulled" NKJV) with the advent of the new priesthood of Christ. Question: where then is the source of teaching people to "tithe" today? Is it the "tithing" mentioned in Malachi, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Nehemiah? Has that not been done away with and disannulled with the law? Is it the "tithing" done by Abraham? If it is the "tithing" done by Abraham: how many times did Abraham give "tithes"? From which "possessions" or "increase" did Abraham give the "tithes"? Did Abraham ever pay "tithes" as an obligation? To whom and when else did Abraham give/pay "tithes"? Did Abraham ever give/pay "tithes" more than once? Is it the "tithes" promised by Jacob? When and how did Jacob pay the "tithes"? How many times did Jacob ever pay any or any other "tithes"? |
![]() I knew I should have put the word 'church' in quotes! So, here goes "church"! ![]() |
chukwudi44:Very good post. Indeed the bone of contention is that those who support "tithing" today are essentially saying, either directly or indirectly, that it is compulsory or that it is a Christian obligation. A lot of the debate would be unnecessary IF certain simple acknowledgments are made. 1. We who argue against the modern teaching of "tithing" acknowledge and accept that a Christian can voluntarily choose to "tithe" (including giving it in the form of money to a church) - preferably when s/he knows that it is not compulsory and s/he is not coerced or manipulated into doing it. 2. Those who support "tithing" today acknowledge that it is not a Christian obligation. 3. Those who support "tithing" would agree that a "tither" can choose not to give the monetary "tithe" to his/her church or to any church at all; thus 4. Those who support "tithing" would agree that every month, a "tither" can choose to give the "tithes" to charity e.g. to the poor, the orphan the widow. 5. Those who support "tithing" would acknowledge that the "tither" does not have to give/pay the "tithe" in money but that it can be in other forms including giving of food to the hungry (to take a less controversial example). These are just some basics to keep things simple; proper scholarship can distill things into such simplicity than obfuscate issues with irrelevance. |
The issue of whether some Levites owned property is one of those irrelevances that are raised to cloud issues ---- instead of dealing with the real issues. It is not even worth dwelling on. Similarly, people raise Matthew 23:23 to say that Christ taught tithing (particularly for Christians) when the passage does no such thing. It is conveniently forgotten that even in the Matthew 23:23 the "tithe" spoken of was very tiny (almost insignificant) agricultural products like mint, rue and other garden herbs --- just like saying you give/pay tithes with your ewedu, mushrooms, spinach etc. Where did Christ say anyone should tithe money? Moreover, the context of that passage reveals clearly that Christ was telling even non-Christians that tithing was not that significant when compared with weightier issues like justice etc. Focusing on whether Levites owned property, or whether some modern Jews "tithe" to charity is simply digressionary and diversionary - not addressing the key issues. Similarly, pointing to passages where Paul enjoined raising money to support specific Christians or addressing New Testament giving, which had nothing to do with "tithes" or "tithing" is simply disingenuous. Like Jesus Christ before him, Paul never taught anyone to tithe and neither did any of the apostles! You will not find anyone in the New Testament teaching, instructing or telling anyone (especially Christians) to "tithe" or for that matter to "tithe" money --- and the Hebrews passage that will probably be brought up did not instruct anyone to tithe or to tithe money. Of course if a Christian voluntarily, especially with knowledge of the biblical truth that it is not a requirement, chooses to tithe we do not castigate them for that. The critical points are that: "tithing" is not a Christian doctrine; it should not be taught as a Christian doctrine; more importantly, it should not be used as a means to fleece the flock and defraud people; it should not be used as a means to enslave people by fear into an "if I don't tithe, I will not be blessed" mentality; it should not be used to deceive people by saying "they are robbing God"! |
My dear pilgrim.1 I see you've engaged my posts on two occasions asking me questions: I'm afraid I have no intention whatsoever of wasting my time on any of such questions. I will post what I want to post when I want to post and how I want to post. All the best. |
Pastor AIO:Yep, I am familiar too with huxley's tactics and have an idea of his intentions. |
Pastor AIO:This is interesting; it is also one of the reasons that long winded and tortuous attempts to justify tithing do not merit any real effort to debunk them; in fact most can be easily dismissed contemptuously. As we keep referring to Deuteronomy 14: yes, the tithe, in the form of produce and livestock, was meant to be consumed by the tither himself --- sharing with widows, orphans etc. The only reference concerning money was that if it was too difficult to carry the tithe (produce and livestock) to the designated place, the tither could convert it to money. Now here (repeated again!) is another conundrum for those who teach tithes today: if the tither converts the tithe to money, he was supposed to spend the money on whatsoever his heart desires, that is, whatsoever his heart desires ---- not necessarily anything spiritual but things for jolly jolly jollification (or "frivolity" including strong drink and then share those things with widows, orphans etc etc. What is the equivalent of that in today's tithing teaching and practise? |
Well summarised Abose; "tithing", especially as taught today, is simply false doctrine and irrelevant for Christians. You will find that most if not all attempts to justify the continuation of the practice today are circular or tortuous interpretations of the Bible; some being deliberately dishonest (those whose gods are their belly); some being intellectually dishonest (the dogmatists who do not look at the relevant biblical passages, biblical history etc objectively). I still find that modern tithing preachers fail to address Deuteronomy 14 either at all, properly or honestly as the passage clearly states that the tither (who converts it to money) should spend the money on whatsoever his own heart desires - including strong drink! How do modern tithe teachers reconcile that with what they teach? |
Orilee9ice We are truly neighbours as I am very local to you (DA8). Ola Nathan Marsh was the guy with the 'oyinbo accent' who used to announce programmes on NTA 2 channel 5; he was also a friend of JAJ's and used to do voice overs for JAJ's radio programmes. Yeah, I remember Christ Chapel; I think by the late 80s they moved to VI? The memories from that era just tend to bring a smile to one's lips. Other memories include Gbenga Adeboye's programme; another was the pidgin "I go die ooo"; the Lagos Weekend paper (i forget the name now!); then the early naija "funky music" music - Alex O, Alex Zitto; Orits Wiliki, Charly boy etc etc. Adverts like Planta - " . . . the rich creamy Planta with that best butter taste for you"; Schweppes bitter lemon ". . . fresh and free as a bird in the skyyyyy . , 17 kobo a bottle of the shelf, liquid contents only"! etc etc etc lol lol lol ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 (of 198 pages)
[/quote]Yeah, the AZ Box is one of the receivers exciting hobbyists currently (others include the Cube Revo and the DM 800). I haven't had a play with any of the three yet but there is a good thread (link below) on one of the UK forums on the AZBox.


including strong drink and then share those things with widows, orphans etc etc. What is the equivalent of that in today's tithing teaching and practise?