₦airaland Forum

makewetalk2:
what else did you think? no one wants a better nigeria when he is in office. those universities prefer things to go this way so they can keep looting and exploiting the students.

but the main point is that some muslims need eye-opening.

when mohammed asked his soldiers to practice moota(fornicate with foreign women) was he encouraging prostitution? wasn't he a love-vendor? isnt that supposed to mean prostitution?

islam claims that satan is a jin. but when God said that ALL THE ANGELS should assemble and bow to Adam, Satan refused. So, how was satan, a jin found in ALL THE ANGELS?

how can something supposedly holy be trashed around like some useless thing? if the koran was truly from God, why does it need to be gathered like some trashy littered to make a whole in such little amount of time? the bible took 1600 years to compile but it was intact.
how can you gather verses to make the koran. we gather books to make the bible. gathering verses is an indication that mohammed did not consider those words relevant or holy. if he truly considered them holy, they would have been assembled and kept in one of his belongings or chests.

before penning down the koran, was it recited? if it was why did uthman need littered verses to make up his koran?
the above alone shows you that the lie is so wide. it is either the recitation is totally wrong or the written verses are wrong.

why were the copies other versions of the koran burned?

the current koran is called the Uthman's VERSION. It means there were other VERSIONS. uthman burned the other versions. so then what are the muslims point about the bible having different versions?

how can something(the supposed koran) that was revealed by a supposed angel have its authenticating evidence in the existing Bible?

is this not the same bible that muslims claim is altered?

which means that islam is an altered religion.

why does the koran not contain the torah since islam also believe in the torah?

why did uthman not keep a copy of the torah since it is the evidence of the koran.

islam claims the bible has been altered. okay, copies or fragments of the Bible has been found. these are fragments dating almost a thousand years before mohammed was born. and those copies corroborate with the current bible verses. so using scientific or archaeological evidence alone, islam itself can be proved wrong.

how can muslims trust uthman when they claim that he was not a prophet.

right from the wilderness with Moses, God wrote down his laws by himself ona tablet. all the prophets read the writings of the earlier prophets before them and kept them. the books of the prophets were added up. how come the koran came and did not come with copies or attachment(quotes) of the preceding prophets?

when the koran came, the Septuagint/Pentateuch containing the torah had already been combined and canonized. this was long before mohammed was born. hundreds of years. is it possible for books that are older than mohammed to be wrong while mohammed is right?

why does the koran need a hadith if it were a holy book? no other prophet's book needed a hadith but the koran. as in, why does someone who is not a prophet explain the koran if the book is from jubril(Buhari)?

the majority of online rodents are muslims. they come on to cause controversy and they insult christians. but they have not actually been met with the truth about their religion. that is why they act that way. do your research and ask questions.

chiefobdk:
U can recover ur hair quite easily and not even expensive

Abuheekmat:
You can't..
Even though you see it, you won't understand.


Discussion of deen Is way beyond you.


Go and play

Abuheekmat:
I have answered this question earlier ... Read the earlier posts