₦airaland Forum

Image123:
Lol, I won't even engage you on the meaning of the verse, the spiritual man himself.

WinsomeX:
1 Corinthians 2:15

KJV:But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.

ESV:The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one.

NIV:The person with the Spirit makes judgments about all things, but such a person is not subject to merely human judgments,

AMP:But the spiritual man tries all things [he examines, investigates, inquires into, questions, and discerns all things], yet is himself to be put on trial and judged by no one [he can read the meaning of everything, but no one can properly discern or appraise or get an insight into him].

shdemidemi:
What is this one saying!

Who told you I was unhealthy,unsound or unprosperous before I came to Christ?

Keep teaching false hopes to the unsuspecting, unhealthy, unprosperous folks. God will sure meet with you one day with the way you adulterate His word for reasons best known to you.

vooks:
Thank you for your response. Have a Blessed Lord's Day my brother

I recommend these

trustman:
[size=18pt]Hero worship!![/size]

vooks:
Gombs,
What's the last non-Oyaks/CE Christian book that you read? When was that? How often ( if at all) do you study non-Oyaks literature?

vooks:
is this your thread negro?
This is a public toilet, all you did was to start a thread. Start your blog/forum with your fellow hooligans, an echo chamber

goDs don't divorce, it must be Satan behind these rumors

trustman:
[size=18pt]RELIGION!!

Pharisaism![/size]

vooks:
You already have a thread for Rhapsodies and that is not enough, you had to soil this thread further by reminding us that the best your brains can do is regurgitate Oyaks whose marriage Satan is spreading rumors about. But then again, what do I know about worshipping men!

vooks:
A fetish for eating puke

nora544:
Read the devil who could heal and than you know that Lake was a fake and a liar this is from the University in south africa.

and he could heal nobody all is a fake like all this pentecost you have on your list no one is a real christian all are fake also Kuhlman was a big fake and a big liar but I know for brainwashed followers it is okay.

Lage died 1935 and at that time the world didnot know about ebola.

PraiseDLord:
Thanks for the link. But only the first one is available for download. How about other? Which link?

Image123:
As is becoming his custom, he shoots himself severally in the feet until he is lame. These fellows are just anywhere belle face except the right angle. We say the sky is blue, they come shouting no no no the sky is actually colorless. Someone else says the sky is red, they say yes yes yes, it is. Another says the sky is black, they say that is the most concise description ever. Another comes and talks about the light spectrum, and they say yaaaay the most profound statement of the year. Bunch of palongo artistes.

WinsomeX:
The most consise article on tithing I ever read. From John MacArthur ministry website.

Does God require me to give a tithe of all I
earn?

Two kinds of giving are taught consistently throughout Scripture: giving to the government (always compulsory), and giving to God (always voluntary).

The issue has been greatly confused, however, by some who misunderstand the nature of the Old Testament tithes. Tithes were not primarily gifts to God, but taxes for funding the national budget in Israel.

Because Israel was a theocracy, the Levitical priests acted as the civil government. So the Levite's tithe ( Leviticus 27:30-33 ) was a precursor to today's income tax, as was a second annual tithe required by God to fund a national festival ( Deuteronomy 14:22-29 ).

Smaller taxes were also imposed on the people by the law ( Leviticus 19:9-10 ; Exodus 23:10-11 ). So the total giving required of the Israelites was not 10 percent, but well over 20 percent. All that money was used to operate the nation.

All giving apart from that required to run the government was purely voluntary (cf. Exodus 25:2 ; 1 Chronicles 29:9 ). Each person gave whatever was in his heart to give; no percentage or amount was specified.

New Testament believers are never commanded to tithe. Matthew 22:15-22 and Romans 13:1-7 tell us about the only required giving in the church age, which is the paying of taxes to the government. Interestingly enough, we in America presently pay between 20 and 30 percent of our income to the government--a figure very similar to the requirement under the theocracy of Israel.

The guideline for our giving to God and His work is found in 2 Corinthians 9:6-7 : "Now this I say, he who sows sparingly shall also reap sparingly; and he who sows bountifully shall also reap bountifully. Let each one do just as he has purposed in his heart; not grudgingly or under compulsion; for God loves a cheerful giver."

www.gty.org/resources/questions/QA144/does-god-require-me-to-give-a-tithe-of-all-i-earn?Term=Tithe

trustman:
In your bid to be deceitful you refused to show the entire trend of the discussion.
The posts DID NOT START from where you posted.

You are continuing your dishonesty.

Bidam:
What's the correlation between tithes and a miracle

trustman:
This: The recording of an event in scripture does not NECESSARILY make it a command to be followed or even a thing to be emulated by believers.
Where there are clear directives on an issue, it is better to go with such instructions rather than make a 'command' or 'doctrine' out of a recorded event.

Bidam:
Epic response!

Image123:
The association of palongo dancers, NL chapter. Yuck, that's pretty nauseating.

shdemidemi:
And what is the moral behind the long sermon?

you are an emotional, proud and egoistic man. All I see here is 'I, I, I', You just can't stand being challenged or chastised, yet you see yourself as the pinnacle of spirituality and an embodiment of God's knowledge. If the Word of God does not subdue the spirit of 'me, myself and I' in you there is problem.

Winsomex can't be entirely right and he can't be entirely wrong either, and the same applies to you so stop painting a picture of a perfect Man here.

trustman:
Stalking you? Why?

Unlike those obsessed by the viewing of 'likes', trying to search out IP addresses and so on we are relaxed over these issues.
Just enjoying myself.

Note this: There is more to come.

vooks:
Why do these fools obsess and hallucinate over imagined obsession with likes? They are the ones hopelessly infatuated with 'likes'. They can't stomach an opposing post being liked, nor can they understand why nobody 'likes' Oyaks vomit. They get fits and heartburns.
I can bet they arrest and bind the spirit of 'likes' every time they pray
We have many kids here who sad enough have families, kids and wives! Let's love them because love covers a multitude of sins

mbaemeka:
Brothers, you need to understand the crux of the whole issue that is, if you are unaware. They created a thread to exchange prevarications and conjectures with themselves and nobody gave a hoot. Ihedi (purposely truncating his moniker so he doesn't see the unnecessary mention) tried to give opposing views but they didn't even let him have a say so he took the gentlemanly route and bowed out. In between I would see brother Image's moniker on the end of a page and I'd peep in and see he was trying to redirect their focus but they didn't entertain his "dissentious" views. One time he was pushed to the extent that he rubbished all their ideas on tithes so much so that they asked him to remove his post from their thread which he eventually did. The guy who suffered the most 'wounjuries' is here to testify. He is the same one that makes spurious claims and refuses to retract them even when cornered.

I only decided to make a post on that thread as I was led to and this was when I saw Nanny's post's. Initially they were not receptive of her as they felt she was there to disrupt their flow because she posed tough questions that they could not answer. I remember mentioning Nl and Brother Gombs to come and view the fiasco but you both disobliged . In retrospect, I am happy I posted when I did as until a few weeks back I didn't even know she worshiped where she worships.

The Bipolar disordered cum failed blogger cum multiple moniker owner kept making the same idiotic post's trying to give WOF a bad name and then hang them for it. He could say things like "WOF worship angels", "Paul warned us about worshiping angels. He said it is demonic" therefore "WOF is demonic, bro confused and bro dishonest will add more to this, I rest my case on F35" and then the troop will rush in to click likes. That thread would give BasketMouth comic ammunition for 2 centuries and a half.

With the last drop of commonsense that the failed blogger had, he avoided engaging me and I was happy because he didn't discuss with any ounce of spiritual or natural intellectualism of any sort. One time he developed enough clout and made one of those balderdash-laden posts at me, explaining how Jesus was a pauper who had nowhere to lay his head. Of course, I had him for breakfast and it is because of the whooping he suffered that he redirected his anger to brother Hagin when he saw from the 1st chapter of this book how he explained that Jesus was not a homeless Pauper as they had claimed. Interestingly, Brother Hagin's explanations where from a different perspective from mine but we still arrived at the same conclusions if not they would have called me a Plagiarizer- the last resort, when all else fails.

The few of them (and really I am referring to 1 person) who had some degree of Integrity Quotient didn't bother raising old dust from the previous thread as they silently learnt lessons and made amends but the chief Ignoramus tried to cast Hagin in bad light by even attempting to question his motives for writing the book.

We saw how commonsense again made a fool of him on this thread. On one other thread he said Jesus used the word power twice and never referred to miracles while at it and I and Gombs didn't let him off so easily. He even had to claim it was a typographical error but I can assure you that he didn't misuse any tense or misspell any word. It was what it was- a ginormous goof !(pardon the portmanteau)

I warned him to steer clear off my posts which his old handle did but because he is suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder he created a new moniker to initiate threads on CEC's president.

Of course, the name changed but not the bitterness, envy and ignorance. He quoted a post of mine and responded with the same lies but I spotted him out in a heartbeat without even taking note of his IP address or the etisalat line he probably uses to post. When he was asked to disprove that he managed 2 accounts he "pleaded the 5th" but everyone could tell he was still the same vo.yeur and I am right in calling him so, if not he should explain to us how he saw Rev. Chris "caught pants down" borrowing his own words.

Most of them don't communicate to exchange truth. It is all about "likes"garnered and the overbloated self-importance. One particular day while scouting through the Religion section as a guest, I came about a thread where the new moniker made a post and there was the old one on the side "viewing" it. Seconds later, I let my curiosity get the best of me when I refreshed the page and there it was- Old had liked New's post, as Old was at that point the only viewer and New had gained 1 more like.

Imagine if such a person became a top office holder: He would rig-in his village headmaster to become the President of the Harvard Alumni.

Now imagine him and his delusions. On this thread he expressed his surprise that I responded to his posts which he directed at me, yet he is now telling me not to discuss with him again on this forum as if I enjoy dumbing myself down with his pseudo-intellectualism.

2 men exchanged words and when they were done the first one said "Let's not speak to ourselves again, no hard feelings". The other quizzed "no hard feelings?", and then he concluded insouciantly "no feelings at all". I am the second man.

trustman:
Hope you're enjoying the 'TRANSITION' of the thread from focus on the book to the 'drone' it has turned into.

BabaGnoni:
https://s27.postimg.org/7loykq87j/Dimeji.jpg

Don't tell us you didn't see WinsomeX descended upon and rugby-tackled to the ground from all angles there
- did you participate in it too, as I am not sure now. Or maybe you didn't join but just liked it.
Free am jor...

WinsomeX:
Thank you BabaGnoni for your kind defence. I actually intended asking what the spirit, talking to him, said about the "inappropriate relationship" his Pastor, Chris Oyakhilome, been having with female Pastors at the White House. But alas, is there a need?
He thought to use mesmerism on me... try again.
God pass all of una!

BabaGnoni:
Don't gang up on WinsomeX, please release and leave WinsomeX alone.
If at all WinsomeX was angry, WinsomeX was angry at the statement (i.e. how it was twisted)

WinsomeX:
This is my quote from page 1, of my thread on mysticism in full:



Questions directed at a mystic on that thread.

And your interpretation



How four simple questions became an authoritative statement complete with a QED is the eight wonder of the world. I remind you what you said I said:



Pls readers should compare the above authoritative statements by mbaemeka, which he said I said, with the four questions I asked. Could an authoritative statement be questions in any part of the world?

Incidentally that thread has an authoritative statement on tongues by me and I will quote it here and leave the readers to conclude who is lying.

This is what I said:



What in that statement is "the gift of tongues is a mystic practice"? The very first statement said: "My study of scripture reveal that tongues is a valid gift of the Spirit".

Now who is it that has comprehension troubles?



Thank God I also know this Holy Spirit you are purporting messages from. In prayers this morning I came to this conclusion in my communion with God.

1. That there are two great facts today: truth and lies.

2. Two Spirits: The Holy Spirit and other spirits.

3. Two gospels: the Gospel and Another Gospel.

4. Two ways: the narrow way and the broad way.

5. Two eternal destinations: heaven and hell.

6. Two "gods": The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ and other gods.

7. Two sons: sons of righteousness and sons of perdition.

8. Two Christians: true and false.

ETC.

You, mbaemeka, occupy the latter in all these statements. You are not a Christian, you are a liar. You are not hearing the Holy Spirit, you are hearing demons. Your eternal destination is not heaven but hell. You are a son of perdition. Those who listen to you do so at great peril to their souls.

I have nothing else to say to you on this forum until you repent; and that is if you have capacity to.

Bidam:
My bro.. You need multiple scriptures to form a doctrine, if not you are on your own o..