₦airaland Forum

Fayose, go and pay your civil servants salaries. You think FG is State Government where you will be owing 5 months salary with no problem?

His case is different

timbros:
1998 he took Real Mallorca to UEFA Cup Winners Cup final and lost to Lazio.

This was the first ever football match I attended at Villa Park. But it was 1999, not 1998. It was also the last ever Cup Winners Cup.

raumdeuter:
That's why you're a empty head dunce who knows nothing.

Cuadrado is more related to chelsea than to Bayern mumu atole

We don't know that nigga Cuadrado here.

"They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us"

Kagawa10:
He was too negative on the ball which was the same thing some folks used to flog Fellaini with. Pogba had to drop laterally deep beside him in the match.

Herrera is the only man in your midfield carrying out basic midfield duties at the moment. I think you have more pressing issues ie replacement for the ageing Carrick and teaching Dablord the basics of midfield positioning since he is too expensive to replace.

After 5 months of gap closing, Manure are finally within one game of the top 4.

I hail una persistence o. Gap Closing FC are finally within touching distance. Don't fail us now please.

Debroslink:
A dude with 200 assists, but no a single one in 5 different European final matches is a classic definition of apex unproductiveness.

It's like a student who is the best in his school, but scores F9 in WAEC, and zero in jamb.

No wonder he's a local legend.

Iniesta is only 32, we've started hearing excuses about old age for his unproductivity from the age of 30.

Lampard played all his Eurofinals bar one at 34 years old as a DM. We saw him shytting all over the Eunuch at Nou Camp even at that 34 years old. The only final Lampard played younger than 34, he scored.

Don't ever open your mouth to talk about a eunuch in goals and assists who makes less passes than Matic with Lampard.

Pedro also beasted all those finals he was carried along to. I will not open mouth to compare him with Hazard.

raumdeuter:
Have you asked the over 200 coaches and captains you want us to ask about Terry?

When it comes to Terry fat ibime says ask 200 coaches and captains
When it comes to Iniesta fat ibime is suddenly insterested in stats and performances on the field

No longer awards

We asked the coach cos there are no definitive stats to compare defenders.

I think we have clearly established that:

Iniesta is a Eunuch in goals
Iniesta is a Eunuch in assists
Iniesta does not control any possession which was the reason given for his unproductiveness.

Thats all.

raumdeuter:
Se foolishness in black and white,

We can check awards when it comes to Terry who doesnt have any on field performance to show, but when it comes to Iniesta MOTM in a CL final, EUro final world cup final we should be looking for stats and performance

Says the obese tool

See foolishness. Is MOTM not an award?

That's how Xavi made two assists in Euro final, Iniesta produced nothing and won MOTM.

If big final is determinant of anything, Pedro would be greater than Hazard. Because someone carries Pedro to final does not make him better than Hazard.

All we want to know is why the Eunuch who gave excuse of dictating possession to excuse unproductivity cannot even make as many passes as Matic.

raumdeuter:
Dont your obese self think you should ask the over 200 coaches and captains who keep making him the best midfielder of the year every time

We can ask the coaches when it comes to defenders, since there are no stats that tell us their story.

We don't need to ask coaches when we know your goal rate, assist rate and passes per game.

When we asked you fool why Iniesta cannot even score like Terry, you fool said he was too busy controlling possession.

When we asked you fool why Iniesta cannot even assist like Dani Alves, you fool said he was too busy controlling possession.

So now we are asking you fool that if he is busy controlling possession, why is he making less passes than Matic.

Xavi has always controlled possession. Carryalong Iniesta never controlled anything.

raumdeuter:
Those were the same possesion and pass number he was posting for over 200 coaches and captain to vote him

Who was the person that told us he was too busy controlling possession to score or assist like his mates are doing?

How exactly does he control possession? By touching the ball less than Matic?

raumdeuter:
Those were the same number of passes he was making when over 200 coaches and captains voted him as the best midfielder in the world obese tool

The Eunuch who can't score or assist because he is too busy dictating possession by making 53 passes per game, less than Matic.

raumdeuter:
This obese foool do you know more than the over 200 coaches and captains who voted Iniesta Bale and co over Hidden Pius Hazard

Voting was in November at which time Iniesta had only circa 5 appearances. Tell us how the fake possession king who makes less passes than Matic has been better than Hazard THIS SEASON.

raumdeuter:
Part of his play this season was why he was voted the best midfielder in the world by over 200 coaches and captains and Hazard wasnt considered good enough

Whatever Hazard did better than Iniesta didnt convince the over 200 coaches and captains

Voting is for last season mumu. At the time votes were cast in early November, Iniesta only had 5 appearances to his name.

So mumu, tell me how your fugazi possession king who makes less passes per game than Matic and Kante has been better than Hazard this season.

Chelseafan1:
LOL, he has disappeared again since he can't defend why he mentioned Modric twice

This season, we have not seen much of Bale, Robben, and some of the other guys he mentioned, most of them haven't even scored 10 goals for their respective clubs this season but they are all better than Hazard.
Apoda, alainironu agbalagba.

The fool mentioned Robben and Bale who are more familiar with physio room and Eunuch Iniesta who has been making less passes per game and less assists than Matic and Kante.

raumdeuter:
Go and ask the over 200 coaches and catains who voted him as the best midfielder i the world less than 2 months ago

We are talking of this season. How is "possession King" Iniesta that makes less passes per game than Matic better than Hazard this season?

raumdeuter:
Messi, Ronaldo, Suarez, Neymar, Bale, Griezmann Modric, Lewandoski, Robben Iniesta, Kroos, Modric, Ramos,

Quit pulling big names based out the air for no reason.

What has Eunuch Iniesta done this season to make him better than Hazard?

Someone making less passes per game than Matic and half the assists of Matic.

diggz:
Interesting choice but where do you think he will fit in contes plan or formation?

Striker

Chelsea should go for Iheanacho.

Greatihex:
oga, this issue of lukaku not playing as a striker for Chelsea has already been dealt with. During Mourinho's time, all his appearances were as a striker. You keep saying that he is only good as a striker forgetting that mou is a manager that is so much in love with the target man type of striker and yet lukaku could not make it under mou.

How many appearances did Lukaku make under Mourinho. My friend keep kwayet if you don't know what you are talking about. This is why I said you were not following Chelsea then. Lukaku played a total of 64 minutes under Mourinho.

amodu:
It is my birthday blue family, show your boy some love.

Have a good one bros

airmark:
Al mustafi wanted to spoil our pitch.

[img]http:///media/2-05-2017/ZdiByL.gif[/img]

See him giving head to ground like he is in masjid. He missed afternoon prayers because of the match but Hazard still made him do Salaah.

Greatihex:
so, after torres took 14 matches to score for us, did we call him a good striker?

No, yet he started as no9 while Lukaku and Sturridge were not given a sniff of the no9 shirt. That is to tell you Lukakus situation was political, not football. . . . . so any rascal who type nonsense like "Lukaku failed at Chelsea", Amadioha should fire his fingers.

Of course the pastors don't remit everything to Head Office. They steal something for themselves first.

airmark:
Coquelin and mustafi will never forgive hazard. He made them look like f00ls.

[img]http:///media/2-05-2017/cY1vKG.gif[/img]

BWAHAHAHAHAHA. Thanks bro

Nihilist:
I'm taping that for tommorow. My boy no wan sleep so na teletybbies galore on tv

You dey watch 6 Nations?

Your boy still dey watch Teletubbies? He suppose done graduate to Voltron and Power Rangers by now na

Havilah93:
Coquelin proved a more difficult opponent, although through tenacity rather than skill. The 25-year-old made every attempt to bring Hazard down over six or seven paces, but ended up ragdolling off the little man and looking all the world like he’d encountered a bug in the universe’s physics engine

Airmark, I still need this gif o. Coquelin was bouncing and spinning like someone in a vortex in Bermuda triangle

Greatihex:
at least lukaku played as a number nine for 23 minutes for chelsea.
http://m.bbc.com/sport/football/23877992

mark my word, lukaku will neva make it any day in plays in a club that is nt average like everton. He is a fraud.
Is it nt the same lukaku that flopped at the world cup until the manager had to bring in origi and mertens to start scoring goals for belgium. He and his rasta brothers sent belguim out of the last euros. He can't make it in a big club, cus he can't stand the pressure and the demand of playing for a big club.
He shld keep playing for everton.

Torres played 900 minutes before he scored his 1st Chelsea goal and you are telling us Lukaku played 23 minutes and you cast final judgement that he failed to shine. My friend, go and sit down somewhere.

The same Lukaku that dribbled and bullied 5 Chelsea defenders last season to score against us.

Greatihex:
yet, sturridge was scoring and playing reasonably whenever he was brought in.
Let us take the case of Gabriel Jesus. We all saw his performance against tottenham. That was all he needed to make the manager bench a proven striker for him to play. Look at iheanacho.
Chelsea is a big club, and first impression matters in a big club.
Also, there is no second chance for first impression.
If lukaku is as good as u guys say, he shld be able make something out of the few chances he got. Even if it is nt to score or assist, he shld at least make movements, passes etc that will show that he is capable to play 4 a big team.

Sturridge is also a winger and was only played on the wing not as no9 which was being politically reserved for Torres no matter what.

Lukaku is a no9 and can only play that position which was being politically reserved for Torres no matter what.

So I don't see the comparison. Please receive sense.

If say someone failed to shine, that indicates another person was shining and took the position from him. Was Torres shining or stinking up the place?

Greatihex:
Batshuayi keeps scoring.
Lukaku can only shine in a club like westbrom and Everton not Chelsea.
Lukaku had ba, torres and eto to contend with. I remember lukaku being the first choice sub before he was loaned out by mou.
Debruyne didn't have the mentality then. This why he went to Wolfsburg where he will be given the chance to play regularly even when he is not doing well.

My friend you better stop typing nonsense if you don't know what you're typing.

Do you know the politics that kept Lukaku and Sturridge out of the first team? Do you know the politics that restricted KDBs chances?

Have you heard of managers losing their job for refusing to play Torres and given their main brief being Torres must play every game, and you must make Torres successful. Not only were strikers permanently benched for Torres but systems of play and formations were dictated from the very top to suit Torres. To the point a Technical Director opened his stinking mouth to imply Lampard cannot give first time passes that Torres' likes (when he is one of the best at it) and Torres is missing those passes from Gerrard.

diggz:
U mean every 5 or 10mins cameo playing as a winger right? You try well well.... I even assumed for a minute u meant straight 45mins in a Match sef bf I saw Ur response....

Aspa kdb e wasn't managed properly and fvck all those ''he started telling blah blah blah issssh u typed''.... We mismanaged him shikena!!!!

That boy has never watched Lukaku play for Chelsea. Probably wasn't a Chelsea fan in 2011. It's better to leave him to his ignorance than engage him in conversation about events he knows nothing about.

Lukaku has not played 1 minute for Chelsea as a no 9.

Greatihex:
why couldn't he produce the numbers at Chelsea?

Was he ever given the chance to play at Chelsea? Even his handful of appearances were on the wing.

This question should be posed to the "shekpe keeper must succeed by force" brigade.