₦airaland Forum

Teeboy2300:
Security is not the only thing important. It's very important but not the most important thing. I didn't say that 2d tech is better. I said that iris scanner beats face id and that is true. Too bad you couldn't see that because your eyes are prolly blurry due to tears
I didn't make any turn. Your brain made the turn which made you believe i did. Keep crying loser

How can iris scanner beat 3D facial technology?

If the iris scanner is reliable, they wouldn’t add Touch ID on the screen as back up. Everything about Samsung is a health risk.

If the iris scanner is reliable Samsung won’t put a scary Iris Scanner disclaimer warning epileptics, children, and people that experience fainting should avoid using the Iris Scanner.

No such disclaimer exists with Face ID.

Teeboy2300:
Come back and quote me when you're done crying

The beat down is epic.

If this was a boxing match, your coach would thrown the towel several days ago. However, you have no shame and I am relentless - so the beat down continues.

By the time I am through with you, you would go back to all the schools that trained you poorly for a refund. I am dishing out this education for free and you must assimilate it by force.

Run along now, you tech illiterate.

Oasis007:


Some of you just like Arguments for perhaps Cruise sakes. Una matter tire Person. Simple Question is; why is he not replicating his present Form at International Level?!

Who isn’t replicating his present form at international level?

Almajirihunter:
The way una Dey complain sometimes ehnn, na same United I Dey watch so .....

They have conceded 32 league goals already this season. Smalling & Jones conceded 28 league goals in total in 17/18.

£150m was spent on the defence and they are performing worse. If that doesn’t make you worried then I don’t know what else to say.

CrystalTiger:
Fun question, between our two first choice CB (Maguire and Lindelof), who is worse in 1v1 situation?..

My mind skips any time either of them get isolated with an attacker..

This is like arranging a deck of chairs on the Titanic. No matter which position you put the two, it won’t stop a disaster.

The two of them shouldn’t be playing for United. I keep wondering how we went from Rio/Vidic to these two clowns. I used to think we wouldn’t get any worse than Smalling & Jones but Maguire and the Swedish lesbīan proved me wrong one time too many.

They are both slow, lethargic, ponderous with zero football intelligence.

Teeboy2300:
Many smartphone manufacturers have surpassed apple.
Samsung generally have higher sales than apple.
A "shit" operating system had about 4x the number of users. And please don't come with "many brand uses android" shit. There are many operating systems asides android yet android is the most preferred.

It’s not the most preferred, it is easily affordable. It’s mass produced. Only a lunatic would expect Lamborghini and Toyota to sell the same number of units per annum. The focus should be on their respective revenue.

You are such a dumbass if I have to spell this out.

Teeboy2300:
I see you have little knowledge about smartphone pricing. High end Huawei, Samsung s, note and fold series are either on par with apple on pricing or are more expensive.
The most expensive iPhones are not the best selling.
Check stats the iPhone xr sold better than the xs max. Same with the iPhone 11 selling better than the 11 pro max. And who's arguing with emotions? Lmao chill.

You're the one having little to no clue how the industry works.

The most expensive iPhones are the best sellers. IPhone X beat every mobile phone sold in the world when it came out & this was in the era when pricing a phone at $1000 was almost a taboo.

It didn’t take long for Samsung to copy the strategy with their cheap brands that are either exploding on people’s faces or ridden with bugs that it’s unusable.

Despite copying the strategy, Samsung’s entire mobile business is half the size of Apple’s in revenue generated.

https://cdn-statcdn-com.cdn.ampproject.org/i/s/cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/8319.jpeg

Year after year, Apple sells fewer units and they make more money than Samsung. It’s not difficult to figure out that most of Samsung phone sales are low end products in the 3rd world countries.

Teeboy2300:
"No app developer wants to work on android" yet the stats states states otherwise

Calling mr an illiterate, a 'fandroid' even though i said I like both apps and indirectly saying I got low IQ is only proving the fact that you're the one arguing with emotions but I'll let you continue grin grin grin

What stat states otherwise? Developers will rather work on iOS apps than Androids. You are an illiterate - you don’t even understand optimization. I showed you a stat of how much developers make on coding for iOS & you are still here disgracing your family name to save face.

Teeboy2300:
About the revenue generated from the app store, why wouldn't that be possible when half of the apps on the app store are paid for so apple could go on with their evil business. You said Samsung robs people more but guess who's robbing people more now?
iPhone users would spend more because they are tied to the ecosystem and have no other way to get their daily apps so they get forced to pay.

When did I say Samsung rob people? Who cares what Samsung does to its fans? Are you having the same conversation with another stark illiterate like yourself who does not understand how the world works?

Anyone comfortable in paying $1000+ on a mobile phone won’t have issues paying $1-$20 per month on paid apps. If you want premium quality, you pay for it. Yet, when I said only poor people use Samsung phones, it got you in your emotions.

iPhone users spend more because they can. Nobody is robbing anyone - otherwise they would drop the brand and go for a cheaper brand that is not secure and have their devices ridden with bugs. Only poor people(coughs coughs) like yourself think paying $1/month for an app is being robbed.

You have proved my point that you are poverty stricken.

Teeboy2300:
On android, you can bypass paid apps through many means. You're more like an admin unlike ios who makes their users slaves.

Poverty mentality on full display.

This is the equivalent of saying you can use electricity without paying NEPA/PHCN. Mr Bypasser, just confess you are poor and you are incapable of affording paid apps. Those who do aren’t stupid, they get premium value for their money.

Teeboy2300:
My facts are here. Also i love how you keep changing sub-topic under this thread. First you said android were laggy, i proved you wrong, next you said thet were insecure, i proved you wrong, you said android doesn't get updates, i proved you wrong, now you're comparing number of apps which android have more and you're talking about revenue recieved which is due to the lack of versatility that the users face....

You are significantly stupid.

Who have you proven wrong? Androids are laggy, insecure, late to updates, etc. You didn’t prove any of those wrong. Whats the adoption rate of Android 11 in comparison to iOS 14. 80% of iOS users are on the current iOS update, only 20% of android users have the latest update. Both operating systems were released in the same month. What did you prove wrong?

Look at this illiterate

Teeboy2300:
you also talked about iPhones being for the "rich" which isn't true because the galaxy fold 2 is twice the price of the latest iPhone and the fold 3 is months away from release.

Any lunatic can put any price on a product. The key is the number of people willing to buy it for that price. Galaxy fold 2 could be 20 times the price of an iPhone but it won’t sell cos no one thinks the price is worth the brand.

There are plenty of studies that have revealed Apple users are wealthier, make more income and happier. I didn’t make it up. Several studies have proven this.

https://www.businessinsider.com/rich-people-prefer-iphones-over-samsung-phones-study-2016-9

https://www.businessinsider.com/android-is-for-poor-people-maps-2014-4

The second link even went further to show where people who use Androids are mostly populated in the US. most of them are in the ghetto while iOS users live in opulent parts of the state.

Facts will always beat opinions. You have proven yourself wrong time and time again that you have no clue on how technology works.

Teeboy2300:
I think you should take your own advice and learn to handle your emotions in a public forum so you don't make yourself look childish

I love when people become philosophical and then a moralist after getting a beat down. You are the one being emotional here. I wasn’t even conversing with you when you jumped into the conversation.

You couldn’t handle the heat - you became emotional cos i passively called fandroids poor folks based on a recent study. Your emotions couldn’t handle such a slur. You risked your neck and jumped into a conversation that wasn’t directed at you.

Now that you have broken your neck, sell your fake Samsung galaxy and get your neck fixed.

Teeboy2300:
Someone's pained
You couldn't debate because what i said is true. They are relevant. Let me ask you a question
If a phone is only only yet lacking in every thing a good phone should have (display, performance, camera etc) would you buy the phone?
I guess your answer is NO.
Security while been very important, is not the only requirement in a phone. Also android phones are top notch in security.
Take your L in peace. Loser

Security is the only thing that is important in a mobile phone. Mobile phones have transcended - it has emails, data, text messages, bank accounts, cryptocurrency and what not. It’s no longer your Nokia 3210.

Which L? You are the one chopping this L after stupidly opining that a 2D facial technology is better than the 3D version. You made a U-turn and your best shot was that security isn’t the only important factor in a mobile phone.

That tells me you have shamelessly admired Apple’s facial recognition technology is more secure than the best android phone ever made.

Stop crying, you have lost.

KingAlabi:

And he told you this ?

Bombblacks:
Can you provide two matches where Ole played Lukaku as a winger?

Facts will always beat emotions.

KingAlabi:
Lukaku asked for a transfer, which one is waited again na?

He asked for a transfer when Ole started disrespecting him. Ole wanted to play him as a winger to accommodate Martial or Rashford as the centre forward.

I kid you not, Ole is a lunatic.

handelex:
Reading all these biased takes here is mind-numbing, every day same issue.... Ole this Ole that.

CapitalCee and co you guys should just get ready to stop supporting United if the reports about Ole signing a new contract is true.

Why should they stop supporting United?

They were supporting United before Ole brought his bad luck to the club. Woodward, Ole, Murtough and the other zombies at the club would come and go but the supporters and the real fans shall remain.

KingAlabi:
You didn't read the performing well part?
Even under mourinho before he was sacked, did you know at a point lukaku was chopping bench?

Lukaku had health issues. He had a digestive issue that made him overweight immediately after 2018 World Cup.

Ole could have waited but the PE teacher is a morōn. He’s the most brainless manager in Europe. The only manager that would rest his key players in a KO match in the weekend before an international break.

Teeboy2300:
Poor comprehension is a big issue in the society. Did i say 2 years update isn't a big difference? With the way android and ios is becoming perfect, there are little to no difference from ios 12 and 14. Also there are little differences between android 9 and 11.

The truth is no os is totally "private ". Apple is painred as a siant in security but they're not. While the ecosystem is an advantage, almost everything can be done with other os.
Even without their own OS, Samsung is already on par with apple and beats them on many things. People who care about their security also use android.
Notice i didn't bash ios.I still like ios but calling android shit when it has many features and blows ios away is just bs.

Stop telling yourself this nonsense about being at par with Apple. No phone manufacturer is Apple’s equal. It cannot be achieved because of optimization. A different hardware & a different software just cannot work together.

Teeboy2300:
You said only tech illiterates compare the 2 but you've been doing that. Only tech illiterates think either os is shit.

Android is a shit operating system.

Teeboy2300:
There are more apps on android than ios. App developers are also working on android. Stop being a silly person just because of your love for a brand. Imagine thinking people android are poor when there are many android phones more expensive than iPhones.

Which many android phones are more expensive than iPhones and how many of those expensive android phones are sold in comparison to iPhones. The difference between Apple & Samsung is that the most expensive Apple phones are the best sellers - that’s the difference.

It’s not just about putting a price tag on a device. It’s the number of quantities sold on the most expensive mobile device. It’s clear you have no clue about how the tech industry works. You cannot use emotions to argue, these are facts.

How are there more android apps than iOS apps when no developer is interested in writing codes for android. As a matter of fact, Nanigans reports that iOS users generate an absolutely gob-smacking 1,790% more return on investment (ROI) for retail advertisers compared to Android users.

Are you an illiterate?

https://cdn57-androidauthority-net.cdn.ampproject.org/i/s/cdn57.androidauthority.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Top-App-Developers-Q1-2019-840x535.jpg

Teeboy2300:
I thought you were a tech intellectual but your beating around the bush reply with no points except bashing android just made me think i wasted my time. Go educate yourself a little about tech and stop being a fanboy

Fandroids possess room temperature IQs. You are here lying to yourself that Samsungs are at par with Apple in mobile technology when the reverse is the case.

Let’s see some stats, shall we?

- Advertising on iOS brings retailers 162% more cash than they spend on the ads, advertising on Android returns 10% less than the cost of the ads.

- Sensor Tower reports Apple’s App Store generated 188% greater revenue between 2018-2020 than the Google Play Store.

- Apple utterly dominates the Business Mobile and Tablet sectors with Egnyte reporting that in the Enterprise, an extraordinary 82% of work done on mobile takes place on iOS, while 25% of work done on a desktop was via macOS.

These are not opinions that you have been pulling out of your aśs, these are basic facts but I doubt you even know who Egnyte, Sensor Tower or Nanigans are cos you aren’t a techie.

And this is a survey that says iPhone users spend considerably more, with a higher income than Android users. I did not make them up, they are basic facts that you might never have come across before.

So the next time you open your mouth in public devoid of common sense or expose or any intellectual prowess in the tech industry, have your facts on ground.

Emotions will get you killed.

Have a nice day!

Teeboy2300:
Also the fact that you skipped other things i said to only talk about the os shows your agreement with my other points and make you a loser in this argument

You are the loser here.

I don’t need to debate the other points because they are irrelevant. Security is the key in this era of hacking and cyber warfare on gadgets.

Androids are open source, iOS is closed.

End of story!

Teeboy2300:
It seems you're in 2014
If anything, I'm more impressed that android who don't control their hardware and software at the same time is in the same league with apple products. It's a shame that despite having all the app/system optimization, apple isn't clear. It is still struggling with high end android devices.

Speaking about lag? I guess you used a budget android phone or a 2015 android phone because many high android phones don't experience any form of lag. Try using a oneplus or Google device then come back here to modify your comment.

Updates? Few things to note:
1. Galaxy s8 launched with android 7 and officially stopped update at android 9 so there were 2 major update. It'll keep recieving security update.
2. Also there are lots of custom roms for it so it may keep getting major update till next decade. This is not the case with apple. iPhone 6s will not receive ios updates anymore whereas it's competitor the galaxy s7 will keep recieving updates.
3. Apple claims to be generous by giving 5 years updates but in return, they slow down their phones and degrade battery life so users can purchase the new iPhone. Whose doing evil business now?
4. One android update will give features that 4 ios update will give you.
5. Samsung doesn't control how they release updates. Qualcomm does that. They have to come to an agreement on how many updates are released 3 and im sure no android manufacturer gives more than 3 updates. Samsung also gives 3 years update now.

You know what's funny? Even without official updates, my s8+ with android 9(yet to get custom rom) is faster than it's apple competitor the iPhone 7. The iPhone only has better ram management because of it's optimization.

If you think 2 years short of updates makes the difference between iPhone and android, you're clearly mistaken. The general features of the operating system makes the difference not just updates.

No one would laugh if i said that except apple die-hards like you. Seriously android has caught up.
Years ago the iPhone would trash any other phone in anything but today they have been beat in many areas.
The only place they hold the crown is their app optimization, video recording, 2 years+ updates and hype (especially in Nigeria and majorly due to most Nigerians being tech illiterates)

When it comes to best display
Best design
Most premium
Best camera for computational photography
High refresh rate
Faster charging
Speed
Audio
Battery
They are not the best anymore

One must be a tech illiterate to say 2 years isn’t a big difference in software updates. What if there’s a security breach or a bug in the existing software, you mean you would wait 2 years before your operating system does something about it?

Do you know how laughable your assertion is? Consumers who value security and data privacy would certainly prefer iOS ecosystem than any android shit. If Samsung really wants to compete with Apple, they need their own operating system. They can never ever even be mentioned in the same breath as Apple while using Android to power their devices.

Only illiterates compare the two. They are not peers.

Android have low adoption rates - its a shit system. No developer even wants to develop apps for Androids cos Android users are too poor to spend on in-app purchases.

Clubhouse app has been on iOS for like a year and there’s none yet on Androids. No serious developer gives a shit about Androids. Android fragmentation is such a big problem that no developer writing codes for sensible apps wants to dive into.

Teeboy2300:
Nope.
The one on my s8+ is very fast.
How can it be shit when it's more secure than face id?
It works with sunglasses so long as you registered your iris with them. It can't be fooled by a twin or someone who looks like you like face id can. It works very well in low light and can't work if your eyes are closed

Also Samsung used iris scanner and 2D face recognition before apple brought face id and sammy has dumped it to go for indisplay fingerprints. Wait until apple drops face id and goes for indisplay fingerprint and calls it "INNOVATION " lmao. Apple is mostly living in past glory. It's now slow in the smartphone game

Bringing 5G almost 2 years after others
Still on 60hz
Low res camera and poor optical zoom capabilities
Face id/notch from 2017
They started using oled panels in 2017. Samsung started it about a decade ago
Lightning port

When the first iPhone was launched, it was said to be 5 years ahead of it's time. Today snapdragon chips/kirin chips have caught up the competition. Android OS that used to be shitty have caught up and IMO surpassed iOS.
They have been dethroned in computational photography by Samsung and later Google.

TL;DR I'm not a fanboy of any brand because I can do this same thing to android but you been biased made me say this

This is laughable.

Apple controls its software & hardware making their products seamlessly gel together without issues.

Samsung phones are Samsung hardware but the software isn’t theirs & this is why other phones lag seriously behind Apple phones.

You said you use S8+. I can bet the software that came with your phone when you bought is still the same software you are using on it. There hasn’t been any update yet because if Samsung provides the latest update, you would be unwilling to buy the latest version of their phone(evil business strategy).

Apple phones don’t have such issues. Your phone came with Android 7.0 operating system when it was released. The latest operating system on Androids right now is Android 11.0 that was released in September last year. The adoption rate is still about 20%.

Meanwhile, iOS 14 that was released around the same time last year had about 81% adoption rate as at December last year. There are no restrictions on old iPhones to adopt latest operating system in the Apple world. That’s the major difference between iOS & Android.

So when you say stuff like Android has caught up or surpassed iOS, the whole world laughs at you.

raumdeuter:
Everyone had their duties only Rio was sleeping and lost his man in a crucial final

10yrs later no one has blamed Vidic nor Oshea for the goal. It all fell on Rio

O’Shea had no duty in that passage of play.

If his man wasn’t a threat, he should be covering for his centre half, otherwise fullbacks wouldn’t be in the box at all making last ditch tackles that were meant to be made by centre halves.

Henry was not interested in that passage of play. Only Messi was in the box and O’Shea stood there waiting for Henry to join the play before doing any defensive duty.

Horrendous decision.

raumdeuter:
O shea was the Defender in the extreme right watching the attacker on the extreme left, what was Rio doing? Wouldnt it be better if Rio stayed at home

The attacker on the extreme left was 30 yards away from the action so who was O’Shea marking as danger was imminent in his box?

raumdeuter:
So how will Rio look at Oshea without seeing Messi

Why was Messi in front of O’Shea in that frame and by the time the goal was scored, O’Shea was nowhere near Messi?

raumdeuter:
This frame. Can you see that Rio was looking at Messi

Or Rio was looking at O’Shea to keep the defensive line in a straight line in case the offside trap becomes an option.

DownChelsea:
Maybe because apple hasn't been able to escape from the shackles of retrogression.

Hahahaha or perhaps Samsung and the other crappy Android phones have no access to TruDepth cameras.

They have no access to the cutting edge dot projector that throws over 30,000 dots onto the user's face, which are then captured by an infrared camera.

They have no answer to ensure the system operates properly in the dark with a flood illuminator that adds more infrared light when needed.

This is cutting edge technology that is well above what Samsung and co can even muster. Security is why Apple phones are best sellers, not fanciful 120 fps or exploding batteries.

It’s not too late for you to jump ship.

raumdeuter:
Simply moving back 2 steps by Rio will be enough but he slept off

Look at the trajectory of the ball and where Rio was.

Rio wasn’t getting to the ball no matter what he did. It was a well placed, laser-guided cross.

CapitalCee:
Not true. Hummels was better in the world cup run, infact he scored the winner in the quater finals against France and was glorious and visible through out the tournament. The only match Boateng did visibly well (according to you, which is even debatable), was in the final.

For the UCL win in 2013 Dante was the better partner in my books

Boateng was monstrous in the final - but because of the occasion, he got all the accolades. The way Boateng marshaled Messi for 120 mins should be a subject in football schools across the world.

However, Hummels outperformed him in the group stage and nearly all the KO games but the final. Messi later got his revenge in the CL few years later when he massacred Boateng with leg work.

raumdeuter:
And what should Rio have done?

Stayed at home?

Rio was in position but the ball was played over his head. O’Shea should be tucking in and covering that side of the area.

Had Xavi played a ground pass to find Messi, Rio would have cut the pass off. The aerial was over Rio so the man behind him(O’Shea) should be covering that zone.

CapitalCee:
Man United team 2007-2011 is better than that Madrid team that won fluke UCLs. Remember they won just 1 league title in those runs and i think finished 3rd at one point. They were just lucky like that 2012 chelsea. Bayern would have easily knocked them out in 2 occasions if not for atrocious officiating.

That VDS/Vidic/Rio/Ronaldo/Rooney inspired team was better than that madrid team. They won 3 consecutive EPL titles and was in 3 UCLs finals getting to the semis in the other 2 seasons.

That Arrigo Sachi Milan team was heavenly, they are way way better than the madrid team

The team was better in from 2007-8 but was badly coached beaten 2009-2011.

People forget it was the input of Carlos Quieroz that got United over the line in 2008 Semis when he completely told Fergie to park the bus.

Carlos left after that victory and SAF went back to his old ways of attempting to go toe to toe with a team that was significantly better than his team in Europe.

Mourinho would have done a much better job of winning at least one of the finals in 2009 & 2011 by being smart. SAF’s tactics in both finals were laughable.

Giggs, Anderson, Carrick in 2009 final.
Giggs, Carrick, Park in 2011 final.

Was SAF high on crack? The same Barca midfield trio that battered every team at the World Cup the previous year was the same one SAF lined up Park & Giggs against in a final?

CapitalCee:
As in eeh. Very gluke wins. Nobody ever mentions that team among the best. They are not even exciting

It’s weird anyone has anything bad to say about that Barcelona side.

Bombblacks is probably just hating.

raumdeuter:
Oshea should do this, VDS should do that, Vdic should do this and that
Abeg wetin come be Rios job

Oshea doubking up on a 5ft7 player when a giant as beside him

Football is team work.

Defending as a unit is key.

Vidic was stupidly out of position, Evra shouldn’t have given the ball away and O’Shea should have tucked in.

raumdeuter:
O'Shea was watching Henry, while Messi was clearly Rio's man. All Rio had to do was pay attention to his man. Rio standing close to Messi probably beats Messi to the ball without even jumping but he snoozed at a crucial time

O’Shea was watching Henry that was 20 yards away from the action and ignored the imminent danger?

Where did you learn your football defending from?

O’Shea should be tucking in as soon as he saw Xavi looking up to make that cross.

[quote author=raumdeuter post=100210990][/quote]You are talking general label, I am talking about how Pep used them.

They were completely free of any defensive duties. Busquets dovetailed and Xaviesta floated behind the 3 forwards.

DownChelsea:
3D facial technology remains a farce.

If it’s a farce, why are they still on Apple phones till now.

It’s been almost 4 years since it was put on iPhones and it’s still going strong. Every tech geek has said iPhones are the most secure phones on the planet.

Isn’t it about time you admit you are clueless about how tech works?

raumdeuter:
Barcelona played 4-3-3 with 1 DM and 2 CMs

1 DM & 2 CAMs

DownChelsea:
Google pixel 3 had a notch? What did google pixel 4 and pixel 5 (products that were massive improvements from the pixel 3) have?

You look funny when you're joking

Are you asking me?

Phone companies without 3D facial technology copied the notch cos they thought it was just there for aesthetics.

They realized a year later that if they weren’t providing 3D facial technology, there was no reason to put a notch there - so they stuck to the old & archaic Touch ID that Motorola first put on Atrix in 2011.

DownChelsea:
a notch in a 1st Gen product.


So you are even aware that they improved on that "notchy" error subsequently.


It's good, the way you shoot yourself.

What kind of idiocy has seized your brain?

iPhone X released in 2017
Galaxy Fold released in 2019

How’s 2019 Samsung phone a 1st Generation product?

There’s no evidence you graduated from a functional school.