Iman3's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Iman3's Profile › Iman3's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 (of 104 pages)
Muki na fine girl,the problem be say she be midget ![]() |
degoat:If he is qualified to run ,why not |
How come "moderate" Abbas couldn't deliver? Was it not because he couldn't deliver that made the Palestinian people vote for Hamas?There were other political parties the Palestinian people could have voted that do not share Hamas' absolutist opposition to the existence of Isreal.Abbas(holocaust denier in his PHD thesis) belongs to Fatah,which though relatively moderate compared to Hamas,shares some of Hamas' irredentist views-Read Articles 12 &13 of Fatah's constituition.-[url]http://www.fateh.net/e_public/constitution.htm#Introduction%20to%20the[/url] Their was no Hezbollah in Lebanon until Israel invaded it, hence creating Hezbollah.When Isreal left Lebanon,the justification for the existence of the military wing of Hezbollah was vitiated.No other sect-Sunni,Christian,Druid,-retains arms in Lebanon |
initiator:They will tell you its doctored,that he is an agent of the West.Meanwhile the Zimbabwean people are starving.Many of these same people will not tolerate OBJ staying more than 8 years in power but they see no reason to object to Mugabe's continued hold on power |
I believe in freedom of labour.If a company wants to hire only Indians in senior management positions,let them do so.A company is an entirely private enterprise,the Govt has no business regulating the nationality of its staff.The company does not owe its existence to the Govt |
I don't know what version of the good book you're reading, but this is in the version of the bible I have. Try this link for bible http://www.onlinebible.org/.If the priest was right by your reckoning,then some of your anti-semitism,nay,your view of the Isreali/Palestinian conflict stems from that interpretation of your religious faith.Next time you hypocritically condemn Chidichris,Davidylan,TayoD,e.tc for being influenced by their religious philosophy,please note that you are similarly influenced,albeit from a different angle. Did you say demography?Right of return expresses a right to return to Isreal proper as opposed to the West Bank and Gaza.This was a major stumbling block in the negotiations between Arafat and Barak.The Palestinians not only want to return to the occupied territories,they also want to return to Isreal itself. What do they want?Never said I wanted them hand picked or selected.Just noting that the moderate demands made by Arab Govts,that Isreal merely return to pre-1967 borders,is not what the average Arab wants The stumbling block has always been who leads Israel. Expect negotiations to start when their's a change in leadership in Israel. The delay tactics explained by G Levy would cease if their was a Labour govt.There was more violence per day,from Palestinians, during the last Labor Govt of Barak than since Likud came into power |
sisimose:Case closed. |
babyosisi:Hey,at least we don't kiss in public.We are a moral society! I saw a survey done in a hospital in Zaria,16% of females treated for STDs where under the age of 5! |
[quote author=Adura_ngba link=topic=57457.msg1170210#msg1170210 date=1180997314]ok - wait there - until that happens - then he keeps stalking you - one lay, one roll in the hay, thats all that will silent the guy - until then he keeps coming after u.[/quote]Ferlie is back with his hocus pocus |
If we were as dynamic,smart and hardworking as Indians,we would be the ones taking their jobs.Leechy types indeed. |
sisimose:You don't,because you are racist.What else can you say about someone who describes an entire people as leeches? Describing an entire people as leeches does not merely sound racist.It is blatantly racist.If an Indian described black people as leeches,you would be outraged and rightly so. tell me it is a lie please. tell me Blacks are not taking the jobs back home. Because they do this anywhere they go, very leechy types. |
edit ![]() |
dietolive:He is NL's resident pervert. |
@TayoD Resolution 242,lays down the guiding principle.It requires Isreal to withdraw from "territories occupied in the recent conflict".Whether this should be interpreted to mean "all the territories" or otherwise depends on your interpretation.I lean in favor of the latter. The Resolution however is subject to the important caveat,that this must be as part of a comprehensive peace agreement.This is where I differ with the anti-Isreal crowd.They,and this is reflected in Afam's post,give the impression that Isreal bears a unilateral obligation to withdraw.This is far from the case.Withdrawal must be part of a comprehensive peace agreement with the Arabs.This requires a willing peace partner on the other side. History and current events illustrate vividly that many,if not most, Palestinians still harbour the fantasy that Isreal will cease to exist.That fantasy is expressed in demands for a "right of return" in order to use demographics as a weapon. It is also manifest in the election of Hamas,a group implacably opposed to the existence of Isreal. Most Arabs do no wish to have a 2 state solution.If the Arab Govts were elected,like in "Palestine",they will chose Govts that call for Isreal to be wiped off a la Ahmedinejad It is this attitude,not Isreal,that constitutes the biggest stumbling block to the search for peace in the Middle East |
Tornadoz:Its that very reason,your Catholicism,which can make you an anti-Semite.I too,I'm a Catholic. I remember,innumerable times,priests during mass claiming that the constant enimity the Jews face and the atrocities they have suffered over 2 millenia is connected to their rejection of Christ. Don't forget that the Catholic Church has been pro-Palestine and campaigned at the UN,back in the 40s, to ensure that the State of Isreal was not admitted.It was reluctant to recognise Isreal.To suggest that being Catholic makes you impervious to anti-semitism is risible . A Christian can be pro-Isreal due to religion but he can also be anti-Isreal due to religion.Besides,it was you who used the term "Jew" in a perjorative manner.I wonder what was your motive. PS:I do not support Isreal come what may.I too think they should return to most of the pre-1967 borders but I don't believe anymore that the Palestinians are willing peace partners |
Tornadoz:I guess you too see issues from an anti-Semitic perpective.I can recall quite clearly,your very self using the term "Jew" in a perjorative manner,when you refered to Condoleeza Rice as a "black Jew". Prove me wrong |
Tornadoz:So? Don't Nigerians do the same? Last week,it was Jews.This week Indians |
Its disgraceful racism,what do you think? Or do you support it? I forgot I was talking to a rabid anti-semite ![]() |
sisimose:Disgraceful racism |
What an appropriate thread to discuss issues like this Carry on guys ![]() |
Up there,at Merseyside,Scousers are known for deviant behaviour.Incest is rife and anti-social behaviour is the norm. This is the natural consequence of inbreeding which is accepted by Liverpudians-those on the red side of River Mersey.I am not surprised by this report. Don't forget,Liverpool fans have a history.They have a lot of blood on their hands. In any other field,appropriate disciplinary action would have been taken against them.UEFA however,will prefer to bury their heads in the sand when faced with the shameful behaviour of rascally Liverpool fans.Its a shame ![]() |
And I-man, if you cannot use google to carry out a simple search, it stuns me just trying to think how you became so informed. So you want me to spoonfeed you with links?Yes Denex,spoonfeed me with links.The burden of proof lies solely with the person making a claim.That concept might be alien to you but that is how civilised debates are conducted.Otherwise anyone can claim anything.If these claims you make can be verified by simply using google,why don't you put up links here.I have done that several times myself. You still haven't produced links for the following lies: -that the latest US unemployment rate is not really 4.5%. -that Bush is falsifying the numbers - that Cheney shot his hunting partner deliberately - that US growth rate is not 3.3% in real terms. - that Bush ordered the doctoring of satelitte photos -That most of the US casualties in Iraq are South American immigrants -That some of the casualties have not reached the legal age of watching porn(18 years) - I just chose a few for you to prove.Your shameless mendacity is mind numbing.Prove us wrong by providing evidence of the claims you make |
docokwy:I thought you said that the Yorubas don't do self criticism? ![]() |
Davidylan turned a "productive argument into a name-calling game"? You must have missed this from Denex@I-manAnd this from me: If you think that this is the first time America is holding foreigners captured during military conflict in a foreign location,y[b]ou must be one ignorant oaf[/b]@Denex Still awaiting your links with bated breath,hope I don't suffocate ![]() |
And I-man, if you cannot use google to carry out a simple search, it stuns me just trying to think how you became so informed. So you want me to spoonfeed you with links?Yes Denex,spoonfeed me with links.The burden of proof lies solely with the person making a claim.That concept might be alien to you but that is how civilised debates are conducted.Otherwise anyone can claim anything.If these claims you make can be verified by simply using google,why don't you put up links here.I have done that several times myself. You still haven't produced links for the following lies: -that the latest US unemployment rate is not really 4.5%. -that Bush is falsifying the numbers - that Cheney shot his hunting partner deliberately - that US growth rate is not 3.3% in real terms. - that Bush ordered the doctoring of satelitte photos -That most of the US casualties in Iraq are South American immigrants -That some of the casualties have not reached the legal age of watching porn(18 years) - I just chose a few for you to prove.Your shameless mendacity is mind numbing.Prove us wrong by providing evidence of the claims you make |
I don't know whether you guys saw this one. Abeg George Bush has ruined the Image of the US.What can I say when someone implys that the US at the present time has lesser human rights protection than Nigeria |
The other time he was arguing about the unemployment rate in the US.He insists that Bush is making false claims when it is stated that the rate is 4.5% .When I saw this,I didn't know where to start. The unemployment rate has never been disputed,untill Denex came along, and you can simply google it.Bush does not have any control over the publication of the rate anymore than he has control over the publication of playboy magazine. Another one was his claim that Cheney shot his hunting partner deliberately after an argument How do you know that for a fact?The family of the victim has never said that was the case.The friends and acquaintances have never said so.The victim himself never said so.Where the hell did you get that from?Can you put up links that show this?Its incredible how you make claims without links to support them Put up links showing that the latest US unemployment rate is not 4.5%,or that Cheney shot his friend deliberately after an argument,or that the war in South Sudan has not ended,or that the US economy has not grown 3.3%(in real terms),e.t.c.Do you think were oafs here? Are we supposed to believe something just because you said it? |
There is a reason why my interest in this thread waned.You can't have a reasonable debate with someone who argues about well known facts.Our opinions about a fact may differ but you can't have a reasonable debate,when the known facts are disputed. Take for example,I mentioned that Bush helped bring peace to the long running war in South Sudan.Note,its South Sudan not West Sudan(Darfur).The war in South Sudan had been going on for decades and had claimed a million lives. Bush coerced the Sudanese Govt into ending that war.When I mentioned it,Denex responded by claiming that Bush says there has been no progress in Sudan.Yes Bush said something to that effect but he was talking of the war in West Sudan which started in 2003.A totally different conflict from the war in South Sudan which Bush helped stop When people dispute fundamental facts,how can you engage in reasonable dialogue? This is just one example of many |
debosky:He sees tribalism everywhere.If he says there is no tribalism here against Igbos ,then there is none ![]() |
debosky:Abeg,Fabregas.Keep quiet ![]() debosky:She dey alrite |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 (of 104 pages)

