₦airaland Forum

Imani:
What of your future husband? Will you love him less than your ex?

You haven't heard the cliche,"love never changes",a vacuous claim  but some believe it

@imani

He said one step at a time.Do you meet people and decide immediately on starting a relationship?

Totally irrelevant but funny nonetheless I present-The Faking Mullah.Click on the YouTube link

http://www.pajamasmedia.com/2007/06/the_faking_mullah.php

degoat:
@denex
Do you know what it feels like to have masters degree, but had to relocate to other countries to sweep floor and kiss ass?

degoat:
@denex
Do you know what it feels like to have a PHD in Nigeria and can't even afford to eat a meal a day?

degoat:
@denex
Do you know what it feels like to have masters degree for the past 7 years and never made 10 kobo with your degree?

What's all this got to do with Indians? Mass unemployment in Nigeria is an entirely separate issue from whether the Govt should intervene to compel Indian owned coys in Nigeria to employ more Nigerians.

Afam:
This dog called chidichris never ceases to amaze me.
Can't someone take it upon himself to brush this man up? He is the most narrow minded pig on this forum.
Funny enough the same animal that freely insult others will be the first to complain when his insults are responded to in kind.
Unlike the[b] unrepentant liar[/b], I make bold to state that I have never insulted anyone while making my point on this forum but I have always (and will continue to do so) responded to insults in kind, no apologies.
So, chidichris the dog, stop lying or take otapiapia to cool off, you are just a complete slowpoke.

How Tornadoz go explain away this one?

This is not a football related story but I just heard that that wastepipe-Kieran Richardson is dating Kelly Rowland of Destiny Child.More reason for us to get rid of the donkey

Kelly Rowland may be the latest person to join the prestigious WAG club – she’s being dating Manchester United star Kieran Richardson.

The Destiny’s Child singer has reportedly been seeing the footballer for the past couple of months, according to The Sun.

The pair struck up their romance after meeting backstage at one of her gigs, and since then he’s been following her around while the bootylicious Rowland promotes her new album ‘Ms Kelly’.

A source said: “Things are starting to heat up.”

We wonder what Kieran’s Big Brother cousin Charley will have to say about his new lady…
http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news?id=32678

They don release am

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070607/D8PK26R00.html

mukina2:
he did

calling Arsenal fans stupid

Is he wrong?  

He hasn't been contributing much to Chelsea anyway,so its probably a good thing that he is leaving.

R.Madrid in talks with Chelsea over signing Robben-SkySportsNews

Why is this guy womanising all the time?    I don't understand a word of what has been written but I am sure he is womanising 

@Ika

Bawo ni?

Is this I-man an idiot?. . .Does he think discrimination is a "RIGHT" or what?

If you weren't so immersed in idiocy,you would have realised by now that I don't view such practices as discrimination.You think it is,I don't.

Donzman:
@Davidylan
I said "This is stupid", that isn't an insult and for that you're a slowpoke.

This is what is left of the intellectual resources of the anti-Isreal camp-personal insults/attacks on personalities

The Lebanese army is busy destroying TWO palestinian refugee camps (who by the way are only defending themselves with stones!) and we are yet to hear of sanctions from the UN, The EU is yet to "express their displeasure", Iran is yet to "demand immediate withdrawal", european wide boycotts of Lebanese media and academia is yet to occur and our fellow appologetics here are yet to devote 20 threads to the Lebanese display of "disproportionate force"!

There was an interesting link discussing the rather deafening silence sorrounding civilian casualties in the current conflict in Lebanon-http://www.pajamasmedia.com/2007/06/sanity_squad_unsung_casualties.php

It all goes to show that much of the hoopla sorrounding civilian casualties in last year's conflict involving Isreal had more to do with anti-Isreal sentiments than sympathy for suffering Lebanese civilians

Was it not his intention to annoy or why else would he make  a comment knowing some of his audience will be disgusted when using such pejorative language.
It may be fun to you but this is how the Moslem's viewed it

I acknowledge your attempts to divert discussions on this thread from issues to personalities.You seem to view the world through that prism.Look, C.Moore asked a rhetorical question and even defended Mohammed by claiming that it would be anachronistic to describe him as a pedophile in view of the context in which Arabs lived then.

There is nothing in that article which shows that he intended to annoy Muslims.He asked a rhetorical question in an article about new legislation.That does not make him a "known racist".

Google  Charles Moore and see how much Google coughs up.
See his  disdain about Moslem's and Islam
Is the prophet Muhammad a pedophile by Charles Moore

This is arrant nonsense.That article was written with regards to a proposed Law that will prohibit remarks viewed as offensive to religion.If asking rhetorically "Is Muhammad a pedophile"? makes you a "known racist"(wondering whether Islam is a race),what about all those who raise questions about one religion or the other.Is Bill Maher a "known racist" because he makes fun of Christianity?Is Chris Ofili a "known racist" because he made fun of Catholicism?   

You claimed earlier that he is a racist because he works for the Daily Mail,when I pointed out your error,you immediately googled his name and came up with this red herring-he is a known racist because he asked whether Muhammad was a pedophile.This from someone who uses Jew in a perjorative manner. You are just clutching at straws.

Your litany of excuses is exactly what made Gideon write the article.  Israel refused the American road map to peace (which calls for a 2 state solution) the Saudi and European initiatives, and countless  UN resolutions. There won't be peace as long as Israel with its almighty army remains a pariah state. Anyway the balance of power will soon change when Iran becomes nuclear.

Seriously,your comments here are laughable.What I pointed out was the implication of Resolution 242.If you understand that Resolution better than me,please explain what you think it means

Even when the OBJ adminstration asked for arms to quell the insurgency in the Niger-Delta,the US refused.They are definitely not going to send troops.So you folks should calm down your anti-American hysteria.

GNature:
I disagree with you here my friend. Why do you think there are labor laws against job discrimination in place ?

Let me reiterate for the umpteenth time,I am against such laws for the reason I provided.I know for a fact that in Nigerian companies,nepotism is the order of the day.Complaints here are directed against a particular group of enterpreneurs who are doing what is common practice in the Nigerian corporate world.There is no need to single Indians out.

If you believe in freedom of labour (whatever that is),

Though agreeably a nebulous concept,it refers to the discretion which the owners of companies should have to hire whosoever they wish.

If a company decides to hire only Indians, that is discrimination and it goes against your "freedom of labour". You contradict yourself and have no clue what you're talking about i.e., you're an idiot. Another dumbass that has no clue what freedom means!

You presume here,that I view such employment practices as discrimination.That presumption marks you out as the idiot.I don't believe that the concept of freedom from discrimination encompasses a duty on the part of employers to refrain,in their hiring,  from "discrimination" on the grounds of nationality,race,sex,religion,e.t.c.

To that extent,there is no contradiction,for while I support  the principle that employers should hire whoever they wish.I do not support the principle that freedom from discrimination applys to the aforementioned employer's right.That is blatantly implicit in my post to any rational person apart from the irredeemably  idiotic.

To reiterate,the thread asks ,why Indians are taking "our jobs" .To the extent,that  a company is owned by an Indian,it is fair to say that such jobs won't exist in the first place but for that particular Indian owned company's investment.So the idea that they are taking "our jobs" is risible.Those jobs exist by virtue of the enterpreneur's efforts,he and only he alone should decide who gets it

Why else would you paste articles by known racist? You can visit them in their  racist hangout, but spare us the pain of regurgitating  their vile views here.
Is it not a joke that Charles Moore was accusing the BBC of bias, while writing for the (British) daily mail, a known racist propagandist machine.
Did he forget (unlike the Mail) the editorial independence of the BBC  is etched solid in its charter. One of the true media outlet you can actually trust. Are we to rely on Fox News that pass opinion as facts?

When you asserted that Charles Moore was a "known racist",I was taken aback.Naturally,one would expect you to produce evidence of this evil man's "known racist" views.No where did you do that.Instead you went on to inform us that he writes for the Daily Mail.Presumably,we are expected to deduce from the fact that he works for the Daily Mail,that he is a "known racist". Is Baz Bamigboye-a Yoruba man- who works for the Daily Mail,also a racist?He must be,for he works for them.

There was one other little problem with your post.Charles doesn't work for the Daily Mail,the article that Davidylan produced was written  in the Daily Telegraph,the newspaper for which he is Editor-http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/06/02/do0201.xml.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Moore_(journalist)

I suppose the Daily Telegraph must also be racist for having as an Editor,someone who does not share your views about the conflict. You may be disinclined towards producing accurate information but you do have a knack for humor.

Donzman:
Some guys are funny, "I believe Israel should pul out and go back to its pre-1967 borders but I do not think Palestine are peace partners". This is stupid, Justice before Peace, when you serve Justice and peace does not reign, then you can make statements like the one above.

I agree, some guys are funny. . . .including the ones who wrote Resolution 242,which demands Isreal withdraw to pre-1967 borders in the context of a comprehensive peace agreement where all the parties renounce claims of belligerency and recognise each other's right of existence.In other words,what I just outlined earlier which requires a peace partner on the other side.

You may prefer a unilateral withdrawal by Isreal but what you prefer is not what is required of Isreal by 242.As Davidylan pointed out,there was no peace prior to the 6 day war.The occupation of the West Bank and Gaza came about because of the belligerence of the neighbouring Arab states.As a result,the Security Council a.k.a funny guys, resolved that for Isreal to withdraw,there must be a comprehensive peace agreement where all the states renounce their belligerence and recognise each other's right of existence.

Here are the 2 main principles as enshrined in the text:    

Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;

Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;

PS:This was the Arab position after the 6 day war-http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_1967to1991_khartoum.php

The presumption is that the appropriate procedures have been complied with.Otherwise the Finance Minister won't be "begging" for a non-closure.The story is too sparse anyway to tell

If that is true,then Akunyili tenure as NAFDAC boss is coming to an end unless she backs down.

The poor boy is stuck in the "friend zone" . No man wants to be in that zone.I doubt the friendship will survive.It will collapse although they can rebuild later in the future if she "lets him down gently"

@topic
Just follow Luxoire's advice

The best posts I have seen come from Nferyn.I don't agree with most of his views-atheism,pro-abortion,e.t.c but they are well articulated and incredibly lucid

@Larvi a.k.a leech

Send my regards to Aboki