₦airaland Forum

SIRTee15:
1. U were definitely overwhelmed. I remember I took on 3 of u atheists on that thread and didn't misquote anyone. So don't blame it on multitasking, u are not the only one doing that
U were definitely punched so bad on that thread u didn't know who was who anymore.
2. Your questions were all answered. You were just too coward and obstinate to see it. I remember one of your atheist colleague was humiliated on that thread so bad he almost cried.
Funny enough u didn't even offer to help him with counter evidence. U abandoned him to continue wallowing in his dose of disgrace. That shows how coward u are.
3. U are simply a liar. U came up with evidence of immune response in cancer therapy. I asked u if u have heard of immunotherapy, u admitted u don't know much about it.
Go back and read immunotherapy, that explain the evidence u brought up.
FYI BCG is used in the treatment of bladder cancer.
Compare above with your last evidence and see the similarity.
Your are not in any position to determine who is a medical personnel. Your own credentials are in doubt. Are u not they guy who didn't know the essence of biopsy in cancer management.
4. It obvious u had a terrible upbringing. Constant use of vulgar words as an adult is as a result of childhood abuse. What u suffering from now is what's called ACE.
5. Not surprise with your warp definition of destiny.
Since u believe a child who will become a prostitute is already determined at birth.
Such a depraved soul cannot come up with something better.

1. Lol. It was my thread and I'm obligated to be more active. The other atheist was Maynmann and he showed you pepper. There were only 2 of us. I know u can't count. And you don't even know what I was doing while chatting with you, so you have no point. For all you know, I was driving and distracted. But to your illiterate mind, any misquote means submission.
2. No you didn't answer my questions. I asked you why spontaneous remission occurs in anyone and not just christians. But you kept on dodging that question. Lol, which atheist was at the point of crying? Please name him or her, Mr. Lienus. If you were talking of Maynmann, then you're wrong. He kicked your ass. You kept on dodging questions. You need to stop lying.
3. Lol. Please explain how I didn’t know the essence of biopsy in a lump
4. You call my convo vulgar? No p
5. I know u are very empty. And your knowledge of science is derived from your pastor. Below is the definition of destiny derived from 2 world known dictionaries, Merriam Webster(American) and Cambridge(British)
As you can see they all denote events beyond control, which cannot be changed or predetermined
Olodo

clinician2x:
One head of department don use the intestine run juju to get promotion. Nothing the wasteside no fit do. Very fetish region.

Come to think of it. How and why is the hospital denying the allegations? Stuffs like this no de hard na. Before a patient is admitted a comprehensive (SOAP) assessment is carried out on all systems together with history taking.

If at a later time, such a development was discovered then it must be from the hospital and nowhere else.

That hospital have harvested the child's intestines for ritual. E no be skull again, or bress and prick, na intestine brown roof babalawo de collect.

Are you sure you're a clinician?

Freksy:
Can you quote where I said the creation and creator are the same?

Every factory is owned by someone.

The earth as a giant factory belongs to someone too.

Who is this someone?

Dtruthspeaker:
Fallacy of asking the impossible.

Everything here is concerned about discoveriing the truth of the begining of our life and world.

AND NOT ABOUT DISCOVERING THE WORLD OF OUR WORLD. THIS PART IS OUT OF SCOPE AND A FORAY INTO MADNESS!

Lol. Stay away from philosophical discourses. You need to think first

Freksy:
If you work into a production facility that is fully automated, observe as raw materials are processed and transformed to finished products, I am sure you would not walk away with the conclusion that the products are selfmade simply because no human facility operator is in sight.

Consider the earth, with all the energy and materials in it, as being on auto mode for procreation and reproduction.

Take a deeper look at various reproduction processes and the things involved.

Whats your time

Emusan:
Are you part of that 'WE'?

Just say you're waiting for your atheist gods to tell you what to believe on that

Who are the 'atheist gods'?

Dtruthspeaker:
Yeah! And matter and so called "energy" are things which create themselves right?

There's still debates about their origins. But if u say its your favorite god that created them, u have to provide proof

gisevak:
Which evidence are you looking for while we see natural creations such as trees and many more? You are a creation!

Trees aren't created!
You lack simple scientific knowledge judging by your posts

Wilgrea7:
I don't usually shy away from the title "atheist", but for a lot of people, the word doesn't mean the same thing it means for me.

To me, an atheist is someone who lacks the belief in a god/gods. A stunning number of other people see atheism as the claim that god/gods do not, and cannot exist.

Because of that, I tend to identify as agnostic, to avoid the headache of people misrepresenting my position.

Does lack of belief equate to denial of facts?
Lemme break it down. If you say I as an atheist 'lack' belief in hsgdjc, are you saying there is actually evidence that hsgdjc exists but I simply lack such evidence?

Dtruthspeaker:
Simple.
Because every reasonable person knows that Laws don't make themselves and they are made by A Creator who has set how He wants His creation to be.

Everyone knows that!

Lollest DTruthSpeaker!
Are you saying 'the creator' postulated the laws of thermodynamics?
Are you also aware some of these laws are flawed. Are you saying 'the creator' made flawed laws?
Like I always tell you, stay away from scientific or philosophical discourses. You simply don't have the resources to engage in them

gisevak:
A simple analogy is this: I saw a mansion at a place. And I couldn't see the builder. Does it just make sense to say there is no builder? Is it logical to conclude that the builder of such a mansion doesn't exist? What cause the natural process?

We know how buildings come into place. Matter of fact, we have seen buildings being built and what's more, the building process is well documented.
Do you know the process in creating a human? Have you seen a human created and what are the process of creating 'the first human'?

gisevak:
"Natural creation" typically refers to the process by which entities, or others come into existence through natural means.

Explain 'natural means'
Thus by this definition there is artificial creation

gisevak:
Please explain to me the existence of humans. Do not deviate from the op position.

We probably evolved from unicellular organisms. About the origin of this unicellular, I don't know
There are abounding evidence about evolution
If you say stuff was created, u need to give evidence

gisevak:
Natural creations that include mountains, ecosystems, and even living organisms; Are this not evidence of creation to you? Or Are these not natural creations?

You said creation didn't exist! Are you kidding yourself or someone else?

A tree was once a seed. So in effects it wasn't created, it grew!
Mountains too are results of volcanic activities, waves etc. They weren't created.
So I don't know what you're yammering about

gisevak:
Maybe you have any in the process of being created. We can all see the trees, humans and many more are creations. So what are you saying?

Who created the big baobab tree in my village? And how was it created

iamwhat:
Anybody that accepts evolution theory is not a Christian.
It's a paradox to be a Christian and also evolutionist.

Meaning the pope is an atheist. Right

gisevak:
Example of nature is Human. Do you agree nature exists? YES [/b]OR [b]NO

Please what is 'nature'? I need definitions

KnownUnknown:
What first human?
What evidence of creations?
Point out any natural thing that’s in the process of being “created”.

Dude is a regular theist with the cloak of agnosticism

LordReed:
LoLz. Nice attempt to shift the burden of proof to me. You are the one making the claim that they are evidence of a creation so it is up to you to supply the proof that they are.

Exactly

gisevak:
do you have any proof that nature and its laws are not creations?

You made the allegations. The onus to provide proof lies with you

gisevak:
The first human is an example of a creation

Huh! What is evident about creation in a human? Try to be specific

Maynman:
That's why I call agnostics, theists sympathizers, when they are done sympathizing they will come around.
When the question of gods come in, it's either yes or no which is theism or atheism, any other thing is just extra.

And the funny thing is theists don't give a fvck about the label. U dont believe in god, u r a doomed atheist. End of story. In fact, amongst christians here, if you don't belong to their sect or denom, you're an atheist. We see this especially between DTruthSpeaker and Maxindhouse

gisevak:
The evidence of a creator is in the creation, except you would tell me creation can exist without a creator. Nature and its laws are its evidence we cannot just reject. Can you address the subject of discussion?

You carefully ignored the question

gisevak:
Consciousness is a state of awareness of one's surroundings and inner thoughts, but goes beyond just be awake.

Ok so we weren't born with consciousness then. We 'grew' into it

Wilgrea7:
Affirmative

So you completed the spectrum. Interesting…
Like I said in that thread, agnosticism is a spectrum with you on the atheist end of it while AOO1, Triplechoice, Workch and that op scattered on it. That op in that thread is at the theist end. And also this op: A step away from theism

SIRTee15:
Show me where I said Yahweh said nothing in the bible.
I've always known English language comprehension is a big problem for u.
A primary school pupil should decipher my first post on the matter.

This is what you said, Mr. Liar

I already defined to u what exactly is the word of God.
So I don't understand your point above.

THE WORD OF GOD IS THE MESSAGE not the letter.
U should learn the classification of exegesis in the bible. Words are men in the bible are not expressive and not inspired.

The biblical writer never thought or said they were writing God’s words verbatim . Instead, they were writing what they knew, what they heard, what they experienced about God.

The hard copy bible is a collection of words about God, not a collection of God’s words to us.

The message in the hard copy bible is the word of God and this is what is inspired by the holy spirit. That is what should not be added or removed.

Show me where a bible author said he was writing from God verbatim.
So where Paul said this are his own words and not the Lord....is that word of God too?
Go and learn about word of God, rhema and logos.
Then u can come back here to discuss what is the scripture.
From The above highlighted words, you infer there are no verbatim words from Yahweh, Mr. Lie Lie.
In case you are so illiterate u don't know what verbatim means, it means word for word. And the verses I quoted showed the words in quote, meaning they were verbatim.
Take your illiteracy outside here please

MaxInDHouse:
There can't be FRAUD without AUTHENTIC that's what made both of you fools.

If i am fraud in Christianity let him present the authentic nah!

A fraud in this means you're a liar

MaxInDHouse:
Come on shut up there!
The guy quoted me several times that's why i mentioned him too so face front!

Who quoted u?

LordReed:
I had to show one Catholic colleague that indeed the BBT was accepted by the Catholic Church, he initial denied it vehemently until I showed it to him.

The Nigerian Catholics don't even know that the pope(a picture of catholic authority) accepts evolution. I had to show some of the ignoramuses here

jmoore:
Nigerian atheists will make it seem that only atheists are scientists.

Nigerian atheists keep painting the picture of theists as those who are against science.

The head of the team that achieved India moon project is S Somanat. He is a Hindu.

The only thing Nigerian atheists can produce is noise.

Many scientific research has been undertaken by theists. They remove their theistic illogical brain and put on their logical reasoning while at work. No atheists said theists don't do science

TenQ:
Well, that’s pastors who do despicable and horrible things in the name of God in their churches can not claim to have their backing from the Bible or even church traditions.

Unlike this sir!

They would say otherwise for you: your view isn't biblical. And they would quote the same bible to back their actions

gisevak:
Why should I reject the existence of a creator since there is more evidence to accept its existence than not? No scientist has claimed he or she created any natural laws or nature. They can always deceive themselves. Let's hear from atheists about the existence of human consciousness. They may have scientific explanations.

Any evidence of this creator? His or their names? How did it/they pop up? Who was his/their creator? etc