Makewetalkmypip: Now is becoming obvious! those who don't believe will believe.. the Brazilian people has done another Carnival, but this time, they put Jesus Christ on the throne and matching around,
While others are matching on the streets and praising God after what happened to them after they did that demonic Carnival that claims lives and properties..
They carry tags boldly written "Come back to Jesus" "Jesus is King" etc.
Lol. I was laughing so hard during this video and laughed harder reading comments here. Religion truly breeds in ignorance. 1. First things first, that initial video of flood in Brazil was mostly stolen from floods in Asia(I never said Brazil wasn't flooded) 2. That carnival about Jesus getting flogged happened 4 years ago, and not this year. 3. Now to the clincher. This video is a collection of parades all over the world. The first is in the US( reason why the placards were in English. Brazil speaks a brand of Portuguese, since its a former Portuguese colony, so obviously they can't be carrying English placards) and Spanish celebration of Mary, from cities in Spain. One of them was in El Rocio, Spain, which was even boldly written in the video. Got this from a site… The celebration combines religion and fiesta, and is held 50 days after Easter. Hundreds of thousands of people come from all over Spain, and even abroad, to make this annual pilgrimage to the shrine of La Blanca Paloma in the village of El Rocío, 17 kilometres from the town of Almonte (Huelva province). El Camino del Rocío is one of the most famous pilgrimages in Spain, attracting almost a million Christians to the southern region of Andalusia to mark the holy day of Pentecost. The procession, which can take up to a week, is organised into dozens of brotherhoods, travelling along the roads of the village of Rocío Also Pollinica(also written in the video) is a ceremony for brotherhoods, also in Spain The Pollinica Brotherhood , whose official and full name is the Royal Brotherhood of Our Father Jesus at His Entry into Jerusalem and Holy Mary of Amparo , is a brotherhood from Malaga , a member of the Association of Brotherhoods , which participates in Holy Week in Malaga . 4. Even my reverse search of screen shots and video snippets, all pointed to Spanish ceremonies. 5. Then she now talked about people that mocked Yahweh and died. Those are old lies that have been circulating on the internet for years. Lies so funny, that its only kids or mentally debased simpletons that believe it. A simple Google search of each of them, from Marilyn Monroe to John Lennon, were well known fibs. It didn't stop christians from believing them. See, Christians why try so hard to propagate lies? I thought lying is a sin?
OLAADEGBU: Top Zimbabwe ambassador involved in gold smuggling scheme Uebert Angel, appointed by President Mnangagwa, offered undercover reporters diplomatic cover to launder over $1bn cash.
NO meaning that: If I get you right, you WON'T unequivocally dismiss the experiences of people who claimed they saw/interacted with UFOs or experienced NDE with/without OBE!
If you had said YES!
YES meaning that: You WOULD unequivocally dismiss the experiences of people who claimed they saw/interacted with UFOs or experienced NDE with/without OBE!
Since your answer was a NO, then your response to WHY ..? Should give us REASONS why you WON'T unequivocally dismiss the experiences of people who claimed they saw/interacted with UFOs or experienced NDE with/without OBE! AND Explain Why you took such a position when But you don't have ANY compelling EVIDENCES?
1. Did you give me REASONS why you WON'T unequivocally dismiss the experiences of people who claimed they saw/interacted with UFOs or experienced NDE with/without OBE!?
2. Did you explain WHY you took the position THAT you WON'T unequivocally dismiss the experiences of people who claimed they saw/interacted with UFOs or experienced NDE with/without OBE when you don't have ANY compelling EVIDENCES?
Ken4Christ: There are overwhelming evidences of its reality.
And most of the information contained were divinely revealed. Without the Bible, we would have all been lost as to how the world began.
There was no way Moses who was not present during creation could have known how the earth was created. And how man fell from grace.
The fulfillment of most of the prophecies contained therein are proofs of its divine origin.
For example, Daniel interpreted the image that Nebuchadnezzar saw in his dream. And all the successive kingdoms happened just the way he foretold it.
And there is one last kingdom of the world that is about to be unfold; The revived Roman Empire which will be a confederation of ten European countries.
Daniel saw it and the book of Revelation gave more details about the kingdom.
But it will only be unveiled after the rapture of the church.
The anti Christ will only rule for 7 years.
Out of the seven years reign, the last three and a half years will be used to persecute the Jews.
His number is also revealed which is 666.
Explaining all these will take a whole book.
You are in the dark without the Bible.
Besides, it has made my life supernatural.
Being a true believer is a higher life. It's a better life and it's glorious life. Come and taste and see how good God is.
Even sex that is driving people crazy was created by God. Can't you see that God wants us to enjoy life to the full.
Under the old testament, honeymoon for new couples was for one year. And all the entitlement of the man must be paid for that one year. In other words, it is one year leave with full payment. Can't you see how good God is?
Embrace this gospel and upgrade your life.
Without Christ, you are lost and you are in the low level of life.
Whoa. What a life of jollification you must be living But sorry to burst your bubble 1. The creation story is filled with loopholes 2. There is no evidence Moses ever existed outside the Bible. He's a mythical figure 3. Which prophesies have been fulfilled specifically? 4. The rest of the posts are delusions of grandeur
TenQ: 1. If your answer was An UNEQUIVOCAL NO, Then a. Why did you choose this position b. Why take such position when But you don't have ANY compelling EVIDENCES?
2. If your answer was An UNEQUIVOCAL YES, Then a. Why did you choose this position b. Why take such position when you don't have ANY compelling EVIDENCES?
It seem that Your response after the initial statement NO was not to strongly affirm it but to dilute or mabe even oppose your initial NO position!
No. There are no evidences. If you go to court and was accused of murder, does the judge wait til any evidence of your guilt appear before striking off the suit? No. He examines existing data and makes judgment on that. Simples
Rosemaiden: Those patients you mentioned have dissimilar experiences.
Spiritual experiences are general and universal among spiritual people. Dead people can't experience what living people experience.
You must be spiritually alive to have a spiritual experience. That's the first step.
Can you tell me the specific spiritual experience that is universal among spiritual people? Enumerate them. Thank you. We'll talk about spiritual living, but answer this one first
I didn’t ask. I compared his definition to that of many Christians. Ask 10 christians the definition of 'soul' and you'll have 11 definitions… That’s what you get when you try to define a nebulous concept
Dtruthspeaker: When you have a debate do you say the same thing your opponent says? No! You make and present your own case.
And Laws of debate controls the rest. You obviously think that debates run arbitrarily. They do not!/ought not! There are Laws of reasonable debate and these Laws control everything about a debate.
And there are hundreds of Laws and procedures that control it.
Thus, everyone must make their own cases on their own in accordance with Law and cases/arguments are not made arbitrarily. Invalid arguments are crushed Law and all it takes is for an opponent to validly raise it.
So there is no issue here The Law has settled all these things and people even know them naturally so, this is not an issue at all. Every interested party can make their case but The Law would take its course and will treat the case.
And The Law approves the Bible as good evidence in this case. When a Muslim comes and "pleads" his Koran or Hindu book we would see if they are valiid under Law!
So as I said, there is no issue here. Each party will plead it's case and we shall see if it satisfies the requirements of Law!
Well, they all pled their cases and it was found valid
MaxInDHouse: (1) If strangers from different races throughout the earth can become like a family that Jesus foretold will serve as sign that his followers will are practicing what he taught them then those religions you mentioned supposed to be Christians too but i know you can lie a lot even stubbornly saying what is not so just to console yourself in athiesm. Ọmọ there's no religion on this planet earth that can do that except Jehovah's Witnesses. You prove me wrong by presenting Brahma or what did you call it that are in all the countries of the world like Jehovah's Witnesses! Act 1:8
(2) My God has representatives assigned to gather His worshipers under one umbrella {John 17:20-23} but those who aren't ready to acknowledge them will never agree on the same line of thought {Luke 11:23} so just as you refused to agree with those governing my group since you don't want to subject yourself to any form of doctrine thinking you can figure things out yourself many like you are doing the same yet claiming they're believers. That's why there's contradictions here and there but we that are ready to learn have subjected ourselves to the same line of thought. 1Corinthians 1:10
(3) Of course that is impossible otherwise the company making billions of dollars through Michael Jackson's showbiz would have paid for that!
1. It takes only a few minutes of research to educate yourself on monks and their way of life, but no, Max won't do it. He prefers to stick to the lies he's been fed. So I'll leave you alone 2. Monster have this characteristics too, especially Buddhists. Some other organizations too, who are too humble to jump all over the place and harass people in the name of evangelism 3. Ever heard of Neuralink and other establishments doing research on human consciousness transfer? I guess not. You're too stuck in your Watchtower garbage to enrich your brain
TenQ: Your case is like an "intelligent" carpenter who want to justify the "absence of atoms" with set square, measuring tape while screaming on top of his lungs, "bring an atom here if it exists so that we can measure it!?"
Have a nice day!
Lol. Your ignorance of science and logic is pathetic. Stick to religious mumbo jumbo. It suits you better
budaatum: As I said, many many times till it fell apart.
And I think it describes hypocrisy, and the gullibility of people and their desire to believe rubbish, as opposed to "represents religion", but I guess people see different things in stories so one shouldn't necessarily expect to see what you see.
It does represent religion. The Emperor's New Clothes" meaning or moral is that it is best to trust oneself and be honest; Speak up for the truth and what is right. Without honesty, people often end up looking very foolish. In today's world, many people feel the need to pretend they know what they are doing like worshipping the right god, without actually knowing or understanding what they are doing. It is best to do one's own thinking and research with empirical data rather than trusting hearsay or unreliable information, from ancient books and respectable clergies. The story is about a situation where "no one believes, but everyone believes that everyone else believes. Or alternatively, everyone is ignorant to whether the emperor has clothes on or not, but believes that everyone else is not ignorant. People ask me, "Why are you an atheist? Are you saying millions of people are wrong, and a few of you are right?" They don't know why they have to believe a particular god, only that their parents, neighbors etc believe, and they are told he's the right god, and thus, they must be right. And of course, they are scared of the everlasting torment for doubters, which is an interesting detriment thst exists in almost all religions.
TenQ: Remember I asked you a question: I said: First, prove to me that: Everything that exist must have physical evidence?
Your response:
Me hoping that you have taken correction with your flawed definition of "physical properties"
According to YOU: "somethings" (by your definition) which does NOT have physical properties can exist!
Can you please respond: What kind of properties do you hope to measure as evidence when such "something" doesn't have physical properties, can it be measured?
Or Are you biting your tongue now?
Let me go one better than you, since you keep on dodging my question. Are wind, gravity etc physical? No! Can you feel them? Hell yeah! Can you measure their force, speed, pressure etc? Course! Are you now seeing youre such a perfect science turd? Your parents need a refund. Once again leave science alone. You know nothing about it or logic. You keep on throwing around Special Pleading fallacies and still insist you are logical. Are you okay?
OLAADEGBU: Until the supreme court interprets the constitution appropriately just as they did with Roe vs Wade.
You're talking from both sides of your mouth. From one mouth, you're saying Yahweh hands out laws, and from the other youre saying theyre interpreting it inappropriately. You're confusing yourself
Image123: "Wait, I say wait on the Lord." Don't perish for lack of knowledge, you can't be violent against what and who you don't believe, stop embarrassing Reed.
I don't care. You said he stole my wallet with money. So let him return it. I am giving him an ultimatum. Relate it to him
Image123: Check the meaning of "until", add it to your new words learned this year list.
Well, I need the money to feed. I can't wait for Yahweh to get up off his fat ass to return my wallet. I'm taking it by violence. The kingdom of Yahweh suffered violence and only the violent taketh it by force
TenQ: 1. Of course, you started it by saying I don't know science and logic when it is you who fail miserably on both counts. Do you want me to show you examples of your goofs?
2. You don't know the meaning of "strawman arguments" and instead of finding out, you insist it's the tool of your trade. It would have been okay for you to learn to understand. A question you should have asked yourself is: a. What is a strawman? b. How was my question a strawman? c. Would you appreciate a conversation where strawman arguments are routinely used for you?
3. The only tool I can use to debate Atheists is Logic and Science, it would be impossible to be below average in both and yet expect a meaningful conversation. Even if you don't know science, you should at least exhibit Truth with Logic and it would have been sufficient.
Please let's call it a day from here till another time. Thanks
jesusjnr2020: I'm ashamed that you're even arguing this despite using Google search, except you don't know the difference between numbers and percentage of a group.
The % of gays in the US is 2, in other words, out of every 100 Americans just 2 are gays, the rest are heterosexuals, so it's expected that the number of HIV-positive heterosexuals should be far more than that of gays, yet for the first time according to the screenshot you posted, the numbers of HIV-positive heterosexuals just exceeded that of gays.
You might need to learn to use Google search properly as shown below.
No. We're talking percentage of HIV in gays and straights.
Heterosexuals were also far more likely to be diagnosed late, meaning damage to the immune system has already begun. More than half (51%) of women, 55% of heterosexual men and 66% of those aged 65 and over diagnosed with HIV in 2020 were diagnosed at a late stage. This compares to just 29% of gay and bisexual men. This is likely driven by a belief that they are not at risk of HIV, which is often reinforced by healthcare professionals. https://www.tht.org.uk/news/heterosexual-hiv-diagnoses-overtake-those-gay-men-first-time-decade
Image123: LoLz, you should have spoken against the "prosperity" gospel instead of playing to the gallery na. Obviously, you are now in more chains of sin. Now you drink and get drunk, lie without conscience, and live in sin like you wished that there's no God.
No Jesus, no life.
Its interesting the most immoral and criminal societies in the world are the religious ones. From Africa to South America. Crime pile up, yet they accuse the Western countries of sin. Why?