₦airaland Forum

Lateefadewale:
Anecdotal evidence is the worst form of evidence.

… especially when given by illiterate or cretards

LordReed:
No way José. I've made it clear I am not doing more than attending church on Sunday. Do your 21day prayer and fasting and your all night and your special programs but leave me out of that shit.

You try, bro. Im not even attending church. Got better things to do, like watch fresh paint dry on the wall

Dtruthspeaker:
Say what you want but it won't change the Truth I speak for all I say are observable by anyone. People have confessed offline seeing this is how evil people die even and that they pay the mortuary guys to arrange the face and body so that it does not show during the open casket rite.
What are you on about?

What are you talking about

KnownUnknown:
Lol, what would you say if or when she drags her pastor and his silly opinions into your marriage?

Lol. I warned her before the marriage about pastors. Good thing she's just a nominal christian

Jackanda1:
The fake confidence you have now, is the same i had some years ago when i turned against God.

When your eyes finally open, i Pray it won't be too late for you.

Ok, bro. Whatever rocks your boat. Good luck in your new found love

MaxInDHouse:
Such definitions is the work of humans like you and i so we can update it, that's what i'm telling you.
This is not rocket science it's common sense anyone found close to you is your neighbour that's why you can't walk away easily when you see your fellow human in pains! Luke 10:29-37

Are my assailants my neighbors?

jesmond3945:
i have seen plenty climbing high tension

Videos please. In these days of ubiquitous phone cameras, you dont have a video clip

Ken4Christ:
Witchcraft activity is real. What about couple of times witches have been seen on top of high tension wire that is impossible to climb in real life? Not once.

The witches themselves confess that their fuel got finished.

Of what benefits will someone edit a video to scare people of witchcraft activities?

They are very real. Marine spirits are even worse.

Lol. This guy youre a waste. Which witch did you see on high tension?

Workch:
If there is evidence for or against it, then I will think that you are probably drunk or you need to visit the psychiatrist.

However if there no evidence for or against, I will remain skeptical about it.

What if there's no evidence for it, would you remain skeptic?

Workch:
law court is not science.

Even in the law court, you are always required to provide evidence for or against else the case will be struck out based on lack of evidence

There you go. Struck out based on lack of evidence
Same way I'm striking off deism based on lack of evidence

Workch:
you see why I will not accept it again.


So is there evidence against a deistic god?

As a follow-up to my question, what if I insist I flew to work. And proceed to write a book how I grew wings and flew…

Jackanda1:
I wasn't attacked when i was an Atheist, rather it was when my eyes opened to the deceit of atheism.

If you're an Atheist, i don't think the devil would bother attacking you. Turning you into an atheist is enough punishment.

Same argument my theist wife gives me. She posits since I'm atheist the devil doesn't bother me, I can't see ghosts and I don't have misfortunes.
I asked her this. You have nightmares, you're afraid of going out by 3am and you see demons. So why isn't your god protecting you but my devil is protecting me?

MaxInDHouse:
This aren't supremacists they're the ones who taught me that anyone living, working or having anything to do close to me is my neighbour. So i treat everyone as neighbours but your white supremacists taught you that it's only those living next to you that are your neighbours that's why they created class in our society so as to continue enslaving our people till today. But the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses that you're seeing made me and all my fellow believers see one another as brothers while anyone around me is my neighbour.
Now use your God's given brain to discern who are the supremacists? Is it those that made life simple for their followers or those that created class so that your own people now see you as slaves!

So why are dictionary definitions giving you sleepless nights

Workch:
is there evidence against a flying human?

Yes. Gravity!

Workch:
So there's evidence against it right?

Yes

Workch:
Are there evidence against a human ability to live on Mars?

Yes. Carbon dioxide is 96% of the air! Meanwhile, Mars has almost no oxygen; it's only one-tenth of one percent of the air, not nearly enough for humans to survive. If you tried to breathe on the surface of Mars without a spacesuit supplying your oxygen – bad idea – you would die in an instant.

Workch:
I am not talking about yahweh, I know there are evidence against yahweh.

There's no evidence against deistic god

Strawman fallacy

Neither is there evidence for it.
In the law court, they would have struck out your argument ages ago, because no evidence for it. They don't look out for 'evidence against'

Workch:
I don't know, tell me the evidence against them before you rejected it.

To start with, the book seemingly inspired by yahweh has been found to be a big fraud, and never happened

Workch:
do you believe that I am typing from Mars now, without a spacesuit?

No I dont.
There you go
Why? Because it has been found out you can't survive without one out there

Workch:
is there evidence for or against it?

Im asking you bro. Why throw question back to me

Workch:
is there evidence for or against unicorns?

Good.
Do you believe I flew to work in my wings this morning?

Workch:
We are talking about God and not unicorn.

Strawman fallacy

Just oblige me. You would understand my point
Yes or no

Workch:
Ok, it means that you are unscientific about your approach.

Because science doesn't reject until an evidence against is available.

Science is agnostic

Lol. Does science believe blue unicorns exist?

Workch:
I didn't make the word god, I don't know if it's god.

I am using the deistic term for it for you to understand what I am talking about.

It's not my word, it's the word of deists, atheists and theists. How else can I communicate with you if I don't use it.


How else do I communicate with you about aliens that we aren't sure of their existence if I don't use the word "alien".

How am I suppose to discuss dragons with you if I won't use the word dragons, even when there no evidence that they existed

Okay, I understand your view point. Clearer now. Agnostism seems a 'softer' view than atheism

Workch:
do you have sufficient knowledge to reject it?

I don't have knowledge of their existence so it stays rejected til knowledge about its properties can be ascertained

Workch:
no I don't, it's why I neither accept nor reject it.

Then you shouldn't put the word god, cos you have already qualified that being. That is what I said initially. The agnostics here have qualified and crystallized the being into a 'god'. The truth is, it may be rjhft or kahtev, but instead you chose the word 'god'
I see sometimes why y'all have run-ins with Maynmann

Workch:
yes, I don't know it there's god or not.
I think does who reject or accept the claim are wrong because we do not have sufficient knowledge to either accept or reject God.

Do you have sufficient knowledge to either accept or reject rlifht?

Workch:
Seem like you still do not understand what Agnosticism is?

Kindly read about it

I know. The issue is the ones I see here tend to qualify the 'I don't know if there's a god'

Workch:
I am telling you deistic claims. Like what they claim, not mine.

You don't understand?

I am saying that that specific kind of diestic claim can never be disproven by anybody, not even the smartest atheist on earth.

It's why agnostics hold their position

Do you understand me now?

Which of them is a deistic claim? First or second

Workch:
That's why I am agnostic in the first place, I don't know if it's a god that caused it or not.

Deist say that it's a god, atheist say it's not.

Me: we can never know, we don't know.

Some minutes ago you said

A specific kind of God that caused the singularity to form before big bang. That one

Then precisely 5 minutes later, you deposited this

That's why I am agnostic in the first place, I don't know if it's a god that caused it or not

How do you reconcile the two statements?

Workch:
A specific kind of God that caused the singularity to form before big bang. That one

How can you prove or disprove that god?

How do you know it was a god that caused the singularity? How do you know it wasn't fghtjn or akruz

1Sharon:
Yes and what did God do about it?

He basically sat back and started munching his favorite cookies