₦airaland Forum

Aemmyjah:
There is no ancient jewish word for geiod or sphere but check internet for commentary on that verse. Blind atheist!

2. Lala

3. Storybook for all mankind that is changing lives for the better. The most influential book of all time. Easily accessible and widely distributed and translated

4. You have not read that Job words. Scientists who read that verse ask 'Hiw did Job know, we can't say?' Jaephoenix who lies he's a doctor but holding grudge against God denies all

5. You expected the timeline of world powers and how they got rulership and down to our day to be written in just one verse?! You need a thinking cap

6. Then it is not accurate like my own 'storybook'

7. Ape calling one cretard

8. He did not say earthquakes will occur but powerful earthquakes in one place after another and his disciples in that time period will see and know. He also mentioned ruining of the Earth environment, increase in crimes leading to a growth in lack of love, false Christ's, and a global preaching of the kingdom. Which other time did these occur SIMULTANEOUSLY?

9. you expected the wooden ark built over 4000 years ago to still be safe today right? Even if it were, you won't still believe. Besides, I thought you said Bible was myth. Is Ararat a mythical place too?

10. Read them carefully again. Show me or us where all these have been happening simultaneously

Lol. No ancient Jewish word for sphere? Who r u deceiving?
Please quote the Bible verse of the prophecies? Stop wasting your time
Other religion claim their storybook changes lives too. Not new
Which scientists? I need links
Obviously you have a reading deficiency so bad you didn't see where I wrote that the Arafat story was a lie

Aemmyjah:
Hahahaha
You know and could quote Nostradamus
I told you about prophecies that existed long before him and described the world powers fromm babylon down to anglo-american of today as well as the future of angloamerica

Many archaeology have found fossil's, lots of them in usual location and how they were buried and given idea of a global catastrophic event
If there was no Great Flood that covered the Earth, why are there many sea shells in many high mountains? Someone kept it there for an experiment?

There are legit bible prophecies too marvelous for an ape to accept. I told you the Bible described the rise and fall of the King of Greece long before his grandparents were even born (Alexander the great). What he did to become world ruler, who he defeated to become world ruler, that he'll die prematurely and none of his sons will rule after him and that the Grecian empire will be divided into four parts ruled by his general and Rome will be the successive empire. You're not happy with such prophecy or you think I'll make this all up
I wouldn't have known the life of Alexander the great if I had not try to find how of those prophecies were fulfilled. Neither will I have known the Babylon, medopersia, Greece, Rome, Angloamerica are successive world powers. I wouldn't have known that Great Britain was actually a small nation that defeated three other nations more mightier than itself to become world empire and having dominance over the largest part of the Earth unlike other world powers but not for long. If all these could be fulfilled down to the smallest details, it will be foolish to think that what the Bible predicted about the destiny of Anglo america will not happen. One stupid atheist like you said that Daniel wrote his prophecy after Anglo america was established in the world war so it will cover all the world powers before

So sea shells in mountains translates to your great flood? Ok. No problem. By the way which sea shells are you talking about?
Oga quote the Bible verse

Aemmyjah:
Lol
Did I not use verses to prove what I said concerning health and dead bodies
Did I not use verses to describe the shape of the Earth
Did I not use verses to describe the water cycle
Did I not use verses to describe the position of the Earth in space

You are not happy to hear the Bible give CONCRETE details about the run of government world powers down to our day. You're so sad and you don't like to accept it just as your fellow blind atheists

Quote the verse

Aemmyjah:
See this one thinking I'm a fool
We humans all have the same makeup
We all have head, legs and we know where each organ of the body are located. I can't expect such app to give me something else of a human walking like a monkey (Lucy)
How could they have use a half skull to reconstruct an organism they have never seen or known or have nothing to prove the existence.
Remember what happened to Fossil Ida

I can't believe I'm having this convo with a literate, never mind a 'biologist'. There are certified forensic experts that with a whole field dedicated to it
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606364/#:~:text=In%20manual%20methods%2C%20facial%20reconstruction,which%20has%20to%20be%20identified.

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/education/teaching-resources/written-bone/forensic-anthropology/forensic-facial-reconstruction

Are you sure you completed kindergarten?

Aemmyjah:
I did not ask you to speculate any thing but give facts
See his head

Philology does not even agree with what science says about the origin of language. Stupid scientists say man's complex language began from grunts and other sounds.
I wonder how a sane person like you will believe such nonsense

Selbo Gomero is not a speculation. Use your phone data for something sensible for once

Guontey:
This is really nicely said, though lacking in some detail. The probability isn't exactly 1%. It's a little higher, but it's no more than 2-3%. And as you have rightly pointed out, the consequence is a significant shift in people's experiences which often leads them into thinking a miracle is at work. Quite the contrary!

Say the prevalence of HIV in Nigeria is probably no more than 1.5%. This is the probability of having HIV and it significantly affects the probability of testing positive given that you have the disease. Let's call that P(D). Therefore, P(not D)=0.985.

If the sensitivity of the test, like you've pointed out is, 99%, then it means the test is wrong 1% of the time. Let's say the specificity of the test is 97%, which means if someone is not HIV positive, then the HIV test gets that right 97% of the time. You can go from this to obtaining P(D | HIV+) which is the probability that you have HIV given that you test positive. That's (0.99 x 0.015)/(0.99 x 0.015 + 0.97 x 0.985) = 0.0153.

That equals just about 1.53% probability that you have HIV given that you test positive. This is the posterior probability in Bayes theorem. So, the chance is not even great at all and the person may actually not have HIV at all.

So your observation is correct. Many go from here into panick mode. Only by taking the test a second time and using this as your new prior probability does the posterior increase. This is why a second test is recommended after doing a first.

Before extensive use of Bayes theorem, many people didn't understand this. Not even doctors who conducted the test, so it's not totally unreasonable to have many still ignorant about it.

Probability of having HIV in a region is different from prevalence of a the disease. 2 different entities. You need to get your epidemiology right

Workch:
The base rate fallacy.

Say that we have a city with 1 million people, and that 100 of them are terrorists.

Say that we have a terrorist detection machine, that will identify a terrorist with 99% certainty—that is, it will correctly identify a terrorist 99 times out of 100.

The machine will also give “false positives”. It will incorrectly identify a “normal” person as a terrorist 1% of the time; that is, if you use it on 100 people who are not terrorists, it will still flag one of them.

A person is tested by the machine, and it goes “Bing! Terrorist!”

What is the chance that the person actually is a terrorist?

Correct answer: about 1%.

Sadly, the same mathematics apply to medical tests, and most doctors are completely ignorant of this. If you have the same city, and 100 people in it are HIV positive, and your test similarly identifies 99% of those who are, but incorrectly flags 1% of those who aren’t—then this means that if you get your test back and it’s positive, it’s way more likely that you are not HIV positive. But most doctors will say it’s 99% likely. A fairly large proportion will say it’s 50%. Some will even say it’s completely certain.

People have committed suicide over this. When the second test came back and proved they were healthy, it was too late.
And when some of these people go to church and get prayers, they claim that they got cured from HIV. HIV test is not 100% in the first place

I don't know how you came up with that probability score, but yes, we rate based on margin of error. HIV test is a test that has come under scrutiny because of its medicolegal and psychological connotations. Now there are many types. The commonest is the HIV screening which basically tests the titer of the human antibody to the HIV antigen. It can give a false-positive or -negative result. And it may give a negative result even though the individual is positive, that is why rescreening is encouraged after about 3 months because the titer may not be high enough to be detected at the initial screen. The other broad (and costlier test) is the DNA detection which is more reliable.
So back to your topic. You did not indicate which of the tests youre alluding to.
By the way, we always go for confirmation tests in a government hospital before one is declared HIV positive(because of the medicolegal ish). So no doctor would declare a patient seropositive on just one test.
Also there may be factors that can give false negatives , like anergies, where a patient is so sick that the antibody levels are too low to be detected by the antibody test. In this case, we go for the DNA test because the patient may not be alive in 3 months for a repeat
I hope I cleared you

Steep:
No God didn't create people to be these things but rather.

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.


These things are a product of rejecting God's truth.

This is a very clear description of this post modern world.

They are unthankful, rejects the truth of God to embrace lies such as evolution, and other strange ideologies, rejecting God's order for families and society because they think they are wise or civilized or evolved better.

In stead to worshipping and glorifying God they glorify human being, human institutions, ideologies of men, science and technology, governments,etc


The result is ,God also would abandon them to do foolish things.

So the foolish things that are pooping up every day is a sign of God giving up people to do it.

Take note morality does not originate from humans but from God.

Proverbs 1:24 Because I have called, and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded;

1:25 But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof:

1:26 I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh;

1:27 When your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction cometh as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you.

1:28 Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me:

1:29 For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD:

Have you heard about genital ambiguity?

Dtruthspeaker:
And the screenshot shows I answered it Mr. the-evil.

Lol. Is that the answer to that question?
Someone asked you 'Is Nairaland religious section for Christians alone? ' and you answered 'Religious section is for gods people'
Does that sound like you have answered the question?
Remind me, what did u get in O level English? What may be a pointer to all our problems here

Leiylau:
they said you are empty and totally mad .I won't ask u such question . U aren't made to be with humans .

Told yah

Dtruthspeaker:
Which was the same time I told you that you did not ask this question, so as usual, you are a liar and everything evil.

Lol. I asked you this the very first time. Look at the screenshot, Mr. Artful Dodger

Aemmyjah:
Lol
Your brain needs testing with iron cos it's too cold
Drugs and medicines have been tested from approved organization before they enter the market
A physician will prescribe a drug based on knowledge that it will work and from the tests and experience

A teacher or principal can recommend his school to a parent who seeks admission for his child cos he has faith in his school

If you as a fake lying doctor sees someone looking for a hospital to diagnose and heal his child, you'll recommend him to your hospital cos you have faith in it based on experience and how you have dealt with such sickness before and you trust yourself to do so. If you have no such faith, you won't do so

Even if you prescribe a drug to your friend for his child, you have hope that it will help him. Your friend trusts you but also has hope on what you have him to help his child. If not,he won't accept it.. to illustrate, if you give your best friend a drug like tramadol for his child, he will likely not accept not because he does not trust you but cos he has no faith on such drug for his child

See, cos you be fake doctor no mean say u get sense

<sigh> the sadness of explaining basic shit to grown ass niggas
Bro, please scroll to the first page, reread op Workch statement. This time 3x or more. Or better still, get your 3 yr old to read it and explain to you.
The point we are talking about is the faith of a patient(not his physician, nurse, parents, pharmaceutical company etc) when ingesting a drug. If the patient takes the drug prescribed by a physician, it would work irrespective of availability of faith or trust by the patient. It doesn't matter if the patient hates the doctor. The drug acts properly as it should and the patient gets well.
Is this statement too complicated for 3 grown ass niggas to comprehend? Are you guys this daft in real life?

MaxInDHouse:
I don't need to prove to you that there's fake of anything so it's your duty to find the original but you can't convince me that there is no original when you and i have seen the fake!

Lol. The predicted song and dance has already started. MadMax going round in circles
Just ask him to prove his religion is legit and others fake, and he begins his rigmarole

NNTR:
I know I did.
I congratulate you for an abysmal attempt.
You may frame the congratulation, if the desire comes

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

So once again, where's that body of Christ?

NNTR:
Out of the abundance of a rubbish landfill decayed heart, the mouth speaketh and finger types

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

You asked me to take a wild guess, and I did just that

NNTR:
Take a wild guess

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Ummmm. Lemme see…
LAWMA main landfill?

NNTR:


Happens when its flesh typing

Abi ooo
There are no male nor female, neither do any marry in ....



Depends on what flavour of Christianity it is

What is she reincarnate as?
As a Sisterfire soul or as whose spirit?

YHWH is not Satan (i.e. Adversary, which is what the name means)
YHWH is Self Existent, while Satan is an extraterrestrial being created by YHWH
God is not Satan and vice versa

God is Love and vice versa (i.e. Agape love)

God’s judgment is not like man’s judgment. God’s judgment is not a suspension of His Love but is an extension of His Love. His holy killings, holy anger, justice et cetera are always righteous, so His judgment is always Love.

There is only one ekklesia (i.e. the called out pka church). There is only one body of Christ, and Jesus is the Head and only Pastor of her.

I am not holding brief for paistors, must need to be pointed out that the act was a scene from a Hollywood video

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Where is that body of Christ?

Leiylau:
Are you for real? Such a fool he is.

You think I'm joking? Go through his posts and topics, you'll see for yourself. Dude is a totally certified fruitcake. His only rival at that game is Maximus

Leiylau:
Tell him I said he is doomed as a man .

He'll tell you the same, then proceed to quote a totally unconnected vague Bible passage to back him up

LordReed:
What a low down dirty shame. And this story is happening to females all over the world, someone somewhere is using religious veneer to subjugate a woman.

Like I always say, religion fvcks up a human mind. Just do any crime and label it 'Thus sayeth the Lord' and you're good
No one would touch you. If Oyedepo and Adeboye carry guns and rob CBN vault, and are caught red handed, some followers would still exonerate them, and worship the same Sunday in their churches. So chill

MaxInDHouse:
Give not administer so let the baby drink it as he likes!

What has this post got to do with our topic?
Anyway, its MadMax, my people.

Aemmyjah:
You had 'faith' in whatever you have him right? You believe in whatever you have him to help him
It's sad that at this point, you have not yet come to see the point Max was trying to make about medicines. And you call yourself a doctor. Doctor that knows nothing about prescription and medicine

Ummm
Whose body is processing the drug? Mine or the baby's? We're talking about a patient having faith in a drug, and not the physician having faith in his own prescriptions.
It looks like both of you need to have your brains checked

Leiylau:
Then he is a stupid freak so deluded to be with humans .

Youre welcome

Leiylau:
Like seriously? when did the bible say so? !!
You know what? You made this up outta hate for female folks you blamed African problems upon . And we respected you for ur Spirituality in here not knowing you hate us your female admirers.
You blame your Africa negroid society decays on women ,wot for ? . Just use Evil creatures as synonym to women already to justify the hate christians like you has for women. I'm disappointed in you smh.
Is good for you to know why Afrikaan ladies behaves so ,
Black africans lacks discipline though suffering emanating from their society humbles them, in this scenario black females arent involved in the sufferings of a decayed black society due to prostitution ideology rocking decaying nations .Britain , France , china , USA so on has past this scenarium.
That's naive from a grown man like u saying lack of discipline is same as been possessed are you this low in Africa

Stop lying you think u gonna be man forever?
Do you know me dtruthspeaker ?
Is Christianity a cult which shudnt be questioned?

Looks like this is the first time you've interfaced with the legendary DTruthSpeaker. Lemme put it mildly: forget logicality, eschew facts and hide reasoning, then you can relate comfortably with my nigga. If you do otherwise, you'll lose it. Don't say I didn’t warn you

Dtruthspeaker:
And you made it sound like you had asked me this question before.

As you can see, I have actually asked the question before but you dodged it as usual

Dtruthspeaker:
Maybe you have a tail, I don't have a tail which is a clear difference between a human and animal.

So you are an ape and a human with a tail. No problem, God has a right to create anything He pleases exactly as Mr Toyoda has a right to create ugly Tundra with a tail and beautiful Prado with no tail.

I have no tail and I am not an ape.

Once again your ignorance shines forth like the stars those 3 Wise Men followed
Humans have tails. A little google search of Coccyx would straighten you out, but this is Dtruthspeaker, the most ignorant theist that walketh the earth. He's not interested in knowledge or truth

MaxInDHouse:
There is FAKE as well as ORIGINAL in anything you can think of!

Of course if I tell you to prove yours is original and theirs is fake, we'll restart our same old dance. But hey, that's how theists roll. They always believe theirs is the correct and others fake, even though they're the same thing

Dtruthspeaker:
It's not a Yes and no question Mr the-evil, this was what you asked



So you are the serpent who is changing post to ask another stupid question "Is Nairaland religious section for Christians alone?"

But you said the religious section is for God's people. And I asked a question if other religions are not supposed to use the religious section. And you started going gaga

[quote author=Dtruthspeaker post=119421957][/quote]I don't have any genetic composition similar to a mannequin, and I never said a mannequin is my own image
But y'all are theists. You aint big on logic, so no need taking this far

MaxInDHouse:
Archeology, historical or not people exist when the Bible was written and names of writers were attached to each books.
So who documented your 7,000,000 years story?

So were names of writers attached to other books of other religions
Still doesn't make them less fake

MaxInDHouse:
OK you don't have any yet you're talking as if someone documented what you're saying 7,000,000 years ago, shey?

Ọmọ you will hate me more but i don't give a damn just know that there was nobody then to document what you're saying which means it's all FABRICATIONS not FACTS!

But you believe the Bible 100% even though you weren't there and it has lots of loopholes and contradictions. Not only that, there's no historical and archaeological evidence backing it
But what the hell. You're a theist. Logic don't mean nothing to y'all

MaxInDHouse:
Is this FACTS or FABRICATIONS?
Which one can we VERIFY if there was nobody to record events 7,000,000 years ago?

Lol. A theist is asking about verification.
Interesting