₦airaland Forum

binarymachine:
There are a number of obvious and remote reasons for the negative distant attitude of many kids towards their parents who are no longer together. It is true that not every one is happy about the homes being shattered. Still, there are some who take it more to heart than others and this is mostly the case with the children.

A major reason for this attitude is the feeling of deprivation the kids have. Very easily, kids feel they have been deprived by their parents of the privileges of the home. They find it hard to accept that their parents are not longer together and the once united family they had is no more.
Along with this sad state of mind comes the thought that their parents did not care and love them. Kids will likely think that if their parents cared so much about them, they would have stayed together to look after them.

At times, kids may feel less important to the parents and thus, unwanted. Factually or erroneously, they can nurse the thought of parents being selfish and insensitive. By feeling left alone, they get detached from these parents or parent who they feel does not have them in mind and thus become distant.

It is also common to have kids feeling a parent or both were being immature and careless about the family and in handling the issues in the home. Hence, towards such parent, kids may express gross disrespectful and disregard as well as strong dislike for.

Kids love to feel relevant and cherished, if for one reason or the other they are lacking this attention as a result of their parents pulling apart, this deficiency leads them to build these characters.

Whenever parents are not living up to their expectations and are not living up to the standards expected of them, they are bound to invite negative reviews to themselves from their kids. With this bad reviews also come bad response and reaction in terms of attitude.

Thus, we see as one prominent one, the recoil into shell and closing up of kids. They build the defensive mechanism or physically and emotionally resisting the parent. The walls created in such kids can grow so tall that it becomes impossible to scale.

Consequently, it is wise for parents to explore all available avenues to resolve their issues and disputes before settling for the final decision of splitting. Therefore, separation should only become an option as the last resort when all other means fail.
Source:
https://flipmemes.com/2021/08/30/why-do-kids-become-bitter-towards-separated-parents/

freshboi88:
NWT
13 And I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and underneath the earth+ and on the sea, and all the things in them, saying: “To the One sitting on the throne+ and to the Lamb+ be the blessing and the honor+ and the glory and the might forever and ever.”+ 14 The four living creatures were saying: “Amen!” and the elders fell down and worshipped.

Come and answer

1. Y is Jesus not part of every creature. Is he not a creature again.

2. Y is Jesus receiving the same honor, praise, glory, worship, blessing given to Jehovah ?

MaxInDHouse:
When you say things like the underlined you don't know that it's an insult but it's when i bash on you that you'll say someone is insulting you. From now on watch how you address me if you don't want me to insult you!

JEHOVAH said:

“This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved. Listen to him.” Matthew 17:5
Jesus speaks as one having authority {Matthew 7:29} so when we subject ourselves to his command what do you think that means?
Your problem is the TRINITY which has nothing to do with the scriptures. Jesus is God's Son Chosen to rule so we are serving him by going out to do as he COMMANDED! Matthew 28:19-20

It is the worship that's your problem and i keep telling you that Jesus never said we must WORSHIP him rather we are serving our Master Lord and King Jesus Christ!

Bishopkingsley:
Did you not see where I told you it is an attack on the identity lord by JW organization

achorladey:
The reality is [b]you and your likes never follow Jehovah's viewpoint on any of una teachings from times past till date.
[/b]
They know Jehovah’s viewpoint was that Jesus was to be worshipped but they won't follow it. No wonder Mr Jan was saying they are ARCHAIC IDEAS and are no longer relevant

Jehovah's viewpoint are ARCHAIC IDEAS, to be MOCKED and recent discoveries of biblical evidences have made Jehovah’s viewpoint irrelevant.


You think this is from Bishop and the post of others. My post is related to the publications of the organization you belong Like I told you last night. Na web! but not Howard Webb.

The moment you use popular, widespread, archaic ideas, recent biblical evidence should tell you the full story.

But you know you always have the sense but easily GET LOST within your own discussion.

freshboi88:
If we lied then give us answer nahhhhh. Y r u dodging the answer. You cannot escape it. I will disgrace u from this forum.

NWT
13 And I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and underneath the earth+ and on the sea, and all the things in them, saying: “To the One sitting on the throne+ and to the Lamb+ be the blessing and the honor+ and the glory and the might forever and ever.”+ 14 The four living creatures were saying: “Amen!” and the elders fell down and worshipped.

Come and answer

1. Y is Jesus not part of every creature. Is he not a creature again.

2. Y is Jesus receiving the same honor, praise, glory, worship, blessing given to Jehovah ?

achorladey:
Una no dey follow Jehovah’s viewpoint on any of una teachings not to talk of teachings of other Christian denominations.

If you like call me SHAMELESS LIARS my LIES are your TRUTH on this platform. You can attest to that again and again

freshboi88:
Nah confused people

Shame on you LIAR.
Bishop Kingsley and your Trinitarian mentors proven that @ Revelation 5:13-14 worship is NOT for Jesus Christ.
I will screenshot your DUBIOUS post of Revelation 5:13-14 you have been using to defend your Trinity GIBBERISH.
Freshboi88 LIENUS

achorladey:
The reality is they never follow Jehovah's viewpoint on any of their teachings from times past till date.

They know Jehovah’s viewpoint was that Jesus was to be worshipped but they won't follow it. No wonder Mr Jan was saying they are ARCHAIC IDEAS and are no longer relevant

Jehovah's viewpoint are ARCHAIC IDEAS, to be MOCKED and recent discoveries of biblical evidences have made Jehovah’s viewpoint irrelevant.

Achorladey shame on you, your LYING, deceptive spirit will always be exposed.
Bishop Kingsley made the post copied from your Trinitarian mentors proven @ Revelation 5:13-14 worship is NOT for Jesus Christ.

Emusan, Achorladey, KNOWMORE56 and Freshboi88 lied against Jehovah's Witnesses regarding Revelation 5:13-14 & their own Trinitarian mentors proven Jehovah's Witnesses are very correct @ Revelation 5 :13-14

achorladey:
Here it is again una no dey follow Jehovah’s viewpoint on any of una teachings printed in numerous pages of the publications.

DappaD:
Daniel 7:27

Good News Translation

“The power and greatness of all the kingdoms on earth will be given to the people of the Supreme God. Their royal power will never end, and all rulers on earth will serve and obey them.”


God’s Word Translation

“The kingdom, along with the power and greatness of all the kingdoms under heaven, will be given to the holy people of the Most High. Their kingdom is eternal. All other powers will serve and obey them.”


JPS Tanakh

“And the kingdom and the dominion, and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High; their kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey them.”


What makes you think the above translations are faulty and the King James is trustworthy? For your information, in that verse there is no third person pronoun “him” in Hebrew.
The above translations used “them” because the context is not referring to a person, but a group of people.

Heck it’s even in harmony with the rest of the Bible. Jesus promised his disciples that God would give them a Kingdom and they would rule as kings and judges alongside him. Matthew 19:28, Luke 12:32, 22:28-30, Revelation 3:21, 20:4,6 see also 2Timothy 2:12


The question remains, are we to worship these people who also receive a Kingdom like the son of man did in verse 14?

achorladey:
Nawa! OP quoted Daniel 7:13,14 hoping to make it stick to the belief that one should worship Jesus....... Dappad

Jehovah’s viewpoint was that Jesus too should be worshipped una no dey follow Jehovah’s viewpoint. Go figure.


Somehow somehow, “serve” suddenly changed to “worship” in his dictionary.... Dappad

It is not somehow somehow, trying to colour the matter further. What you know is what one of your brother posted already is that SERVE = REVERENCE = REVER = WORSHIP.

This is not somehow somehow

all dominions shall serve and obey them.”

Achorladey is a LIAR tayy tayy

johnw47:
ecc 7:6 For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool:

fraud jw janosky

u love to continually call the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit:
"the three dogheads"

truly you will have your reward:

rev 20:15 And whoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

johnw47:
ecc 7:6 For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool:
oh duh most dum false jw janosky

truly know nothing fraud jw janosky, verse 17 is not about chopping up the Holy Spirit and giving bits of Him to 70 others
it's about taking some of the gifts of the Spirit from moses and giving them to the 70

1 cor 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.

A question for you:
what is the Hebrew lexicon for "gifts of the spirit" @ Numbers 11:17?

John W fraud no get conscience LYING like kilode

johnw47:
[s]false jw dappa d dope

you have searched for a faulty translation to suit your false belief.
the one to be served/worshipped in verse 27 is the most High:[/s]

27 And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.

Strongs: 06399
6399 plach pel-akh' (Aramaic) corresponding to 6398; to serve or worship:--minister, serve. see HEBREW for 06398

Daniel 7:27 complete Jewish bible, NWT
"Obey them"

SERVE, Minister is NOT worship.
Matthew 20:28.
John W fraud

johnw47:
[s]ecc 7:6 For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool:


oh duh duh duh fraud jw janosky[/s]

[s]talk about no understanding and confusion,[/s] you don't understand God's word at all.
truly verse 17 is not about chopping up the Holy Spirit and giving bits of Him to 70 others
it's about taking some of the gifts of the Spirit from moses and giving them to the 70

[s]of course u confused fraud jw could never understand:

1 cor 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.[/s]

John W fraud who understands God's word by adding his own "gifts" ,

A question for you:
what is the Hebrew lexicon for "gifts of the spirit" @ Numbers 11:17?

achorladey:
Your worship of Jesus is in your head NOT in your Bible...... Janosky

Repeat that to those giving you God's viewpoint on any matter as published in the numerous publications of theirs

whose doctrine did Jesus teach Achorladey....... Janosky

The one I know is Jehovah’s viewpoint and that Jehovah’s viewpoint is that Jesus Christ too must be worshipped

The Bros is desperate to discredit Jesus Christ...... Janosky

Like the case of you saying Jesus support Idolatry and by extension paapaa Jehovah support Idolatry since Jehovah's viewpoint is that Jesus too should be worshipped

This viewpoint was popular and widespread more recent discoveries (in screenshot) came to light....... Janosky

My worry is not about popularity and widespread. My worry is that they are Jehovah’s viewpoints and you and your religious organisation hardly follow Jehovah’s viewpoint as taught by you and your religious organisation. Get to understand that.


Stop making a mockery of yourself clinging to archaic ideas disproven by recent discoveries of biblical evidences in several manuscripts...... Janosky


God is not to be mocked indeed but Jehovah’s viewpoint are what you make mockery of and you call ARCHAIC IDEAS . Had your Jehovah come in 1874 you won't have anything called ARCHAIC IDEAS OR MOCKERY or RECENT DISCOVERIES of BIBLICAL EVIDENCE and nothing would have been disproved. You see the Web?


Bros, continue DECEIVING yourself and Continue WAILING, the adjective in Luke 24:25 befits you.....Janosky


Out of the abundant of his hearts, mouth and fingers comes DECEIVING and WAILING

Here is Luke 24:25
So he said to them: “O senseless ones and slow of heart to believe all the things the prophets have spoken! 26 Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and to enter into his glory?” 27 And starting with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them things pertaining to himself in all the Scriptures.

Another confirmation that you hardly follow Jehovah’s viewpoint all the prophets and Moses bear witness about JESUS but what do you bear witness about?

Bishopkingsley:
Janosky why are you shaking
I did not even mention worship
I want to use your Bible to actually see if you people follow your own bible

That why I will follow your own Bible and use serve I only want to see who you obey if it is your Bible or the JW organization

Bishop, you know you can't find any evidence for your DUBIOUS claim

johnw47:
[s]ecc 7:6 For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool:
oh duh most dum false jw janosky[/s]

num 11:17 is talking of the gifts of God/the gifts of the Holy Spirit
moses was given more than enough grace for some to be taken from him and be given
to 70 men to help

[s]talk about being deceived, u deceive yourself all the time, oh heap big fraud[/s]

Bishopkingsley:
[s]Any questions that you fail to answer I will move on to the next question

If you continue to say abusive words I will leave you

I told you you don't know Bible and you don't know Jesus and Jehovah because if you know this things you will not abuse when we are just discussing about Bible [/s]

Next question

They brought him to Ancient of Days
Ancient of Days is Jehovah

Now tell me who are the people that Jehovah said is going to serve that chosen king called the son of man ....

NAME the type of person or people who will serve him who will serve that chosen king called the son of man

Bishop, your question is based on a DUBIOUS claim & therefore NOT valid.
Coman be going, your Trinity mentors done fall your hand & throw away your FALSE claims

Hebrew lexicon 6399 "SERVE" is NOT worship , na your Trinity mentors,biblehub' talk am.
Dem say Bishop LIENUS Is LYING.

Emusan:
Even within their perverted Translation, the personhood of the Holy Spirit can still be traced out.

Notice the transition from various version of NWT in Gen 1:2 just to conceal the truth about the Holy Spirit.

1961 Edition:
"Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the surface of the
surging waters , and God’s active force was moving to and fro over the surface of the waters."

1984 Edition:
"Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the surface of [the]watery deep; and God’s active force was moving to and fro over the surface of the waters."

2013 Edition:
"Now the earth was formless and desolate, and there was darkness upon the surface of the watery deep, and God’s active force was moving
about over the surface of the waters."

1961 says Holy Spirit is moving "TO and FRO" this is what a person with absolute mind does which shows someone moving with directions as force or wind don't move TO & FRO (like when the scripture says the Devil is moving TO and FRO seeking whom he may devour) but in 1984 it's like this was discovered within the text so the phrase "TO and FRO" was completely removed. Yet they don't know how to eliminate the word MOVING/HOVERING, in 2013 the word "ABOUT" was added which even compounded the problem because only living thing "MOVE ABOUT" which is still similar to that TO and FRO

Mumu LIENUS
Continue WAILING & proof texting

How many spirits was shared to Moses & 70 valiant leaders of Israel ?

Trinitarians too dey DECEIVE themselves

achorladey:
[s]Last last you na agree you agree that you and your religious organisation and leaders don't follow God's viewpoint on any of your own teachings [/s]

1. Now you jump enter Jesus viewpoint. Jesus viewpoint was absent when God's viewpoint said you should worship Jesus too

John 7:16 whose doctrine did Jesus teach Achorladey @ Matthew 4:10 & John 4:24?
Achorladey Polytheist, you no see "MUST" @ John 4:24?
Wear goggles find am

achorladey:
how did Jehovah's servants know God's name in the new testament......Janosky

achorladey:
How will they know when God's viewpoint deliberately removed and omitted it from the new testaments?

achorladey:
How will they know when God's viewpoint states Jesus and his apostles never utter it from their lips not to talk of mouth paapaa?

achorladey:
This part na serious laughter so you know times and seasons ARE not under your Jurisdiction but under God Jurisdiction but that same God and God's viewpoint states the preaching work will end in the twentieth century

[/s]

achorladey:
[s]Na horse wey dey front others they use waka.
[/s]
Have you and the religious organisation you belong ever accepted God's viewpoint that

5. That God does not need organisation that all bear one name from heaven called CHRISTIAN

6. Did you accept God's viewpoint when you decided to put FAITH in an organization when your Jehovah outrightly said it is faith in the only begotten son that leads to everlasting life.

#6
Achorladey,Acts 11:18,26 & 2 Chronicles 7:14 explained @Acts15:14,17, which gained divine recognition first?
Achorladey did Jehovah recognize Acts 15:14,17 in your Bible?

But Achorladey the hypocrite has faith his 3 deities are using his Pastorpreneurs to minister to him
Bros, you are a hypocrite.
Get outta here

achorladey:
Na horse wey dey front others they use waka.

Have you and the religious organisation you belong ever accepted God's viewpoint that

1.Jehovah said Jesus should be worshipped too.

2. That God deliberately remove and omitted his name from the new testaments

3. That the good news is expected to end in the twentieth century?

Hismasterpiece:
MaxInDHouse

Just answer this one question and let this argument die.

Who was God referring to when He said, 'Let Us mae man in Our Image, according to Our Likeness'? Gen 1:26

Please answer this question in all honesty and let this argument about the trinity die.

freshboi88:
But u r the one who claims oh u JWs are united n Christians are segregated by doctrinal issues. Our segregation is rooted in scripture.

But your unity is demonic not scriptural

sagenaija:
Janosky,
You quoted Job 38:
Then Jehovah answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said, Who is this that darkeneth counsel By words without knowledge? Gird up now thy loins like a man; For I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me. Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding. Who determined the measures thereof, if thou knowest? Or who stretched the line upon it? Whereupon were the foundations thereof fastened? Or who laid the corner-stone thereof, When the morning stars sang together, And all the sons of God shouted for joy?
Job 38:1‭-‬7 ASV

See Hebrews 1:10
but of the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever; And the sceptre of uprightness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee With the oil of gladness above thy fellows. And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning didst lay the foundation of the earth, And the heavens are the works of thy hands:
Hebrews 1:8‭-‬10 ASV

Did you see that according to verse 10 the Son laid the foundation of the earth?
Can you link it to Job 38?
I know that you are good at linking verses.

freshboi88:
You are too dull to see your own contradiction.
Your brother just said YHWH was referring to the angels when he said let us make man. Thereby making them co-creators.

Since u have disproved that using Job, so who is the us he was referring to ?

LIAR
1 Corinthians 8:6 & Job 38:1-7, Jehovah God NEVER at anytime reference any co-creator.

"The US" are those @ Job 38:1-7 & Hebrews 1:2, who saw the Creation of man happen before their eyes.

freshboi88:
U said only Jehovah is ho theos...so take a snap shot of your own NWT Greek interlinear MuMu

livingchrist:
you are deluded, A drowning man holding on to straw.

Jesus is yaweh so not among the Holy ones spoken of in that verse, Just as Yaweh is not among the no one spoken of in revelation. Next

livingchrist:
firstborn does not mean first to exist but in position.

KNOWMORE56:
Check the records in the book of Daniel... not me or anyone else. The writer said he saw one like the son of man...
Weather the son of man had blood in his flesh o, he did not say...
"

KNOWMORE56:
weather the son of man was in Heaven at the time of the visions o, I don't know...
KNOWMORE56:
Jesus was seen as the son of man (i.e human being) in that vision...

He has at this time off loaded His divinity...He was seen in His office as Servant ( not in His office as God Almighty)
."

Honesty is very far from KNOWMORE56
Did Almighty God Jehovah at any time offloaded His divinity in heaven?

KNOWMORE56:
#1
But I know from the Word that God looks like human in appearance... that's one of the application that He created us in His image...

The Bible reveals God has a human shape!

[s]It's your organization that is putting you in this confusion about "flesh and blood"[/s]

Now, flesh and blood is a phrase describing human being just as son of man refers to human being...

#2
yet when we say son of God means God, you begin to find fault!."

#1
Trinitarian DELUSION of KNOWMORE56.
John 4:24, "God is a spirit".
Is Jehovah God a human being ?

#2
Adam is son of God.
Is Adam God Almighty?

KNOWMORE56:
Ok, your organization have held on to the phrase FLESH AND BLOOD CANNOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD...
"

KNOWMORE56:
their interpretation of this statement is very wrong!
They take this to mean HUMAN BEING CANNOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD, wrong. Very wrong!
"

KNOWMORE56:
*. Daniel 7 :13 "KJV: I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him."

Singlenhappy:
bro don't worry yourself the good thing about it all is that we shall all leave the face of this Earth one day so whether they will sleep foreveror in the (sheol,gehenar) or not they, they shall know better. But it important you preached the real Christ to them, it's only for a witness not for anyone to believe forcefully Mathew 24:14. At least that will stand against any of them that read it! Keep it up you are doing a great job.