₦airaland Forum

OLAADEGBU:
[s]
Don't be a nescient. You should have paid attention at school. [/s]

OLAADEGBU:
It seems you are having difficulties understanding my statement. Let me put it to you this way: The moment you post the scriptures that says having a personal relationship with Jesus is dangerous and harmful will be the time I will oblige your request .

OLAADEGBU:
It seems you are having difficulties understanding my statement. Let me put it to you this way: The moment you post the scriptures that says having a personal relationship with Jesus is dangerous and harmful will be the time I will oblige your request .

OLAADEGBU:
Did I say you are a catholic or did I say that you posted scriptures? I meant was when you post scriptures that says having a personal relationship with Jesus is dangerous and harmful (only) then will I post Scriptures that says the RCC was founded by Simon. Do you now get my point?

OLAADEGBU:
When you post Scriptures that says having a personal relationship with Jesus is dangerous and harmful then I may oblige you.

OLAADEGBU:
Since when have Roman Catholics been using Scriptures as the basis for their doctrines?

OLAADEGBU:
The link contains scriptures which infers and supports my statement. If you wouldn't read or can't read then please move on.

gainkay:
There is no single contradiction. Eccl 9:10 is talking about sensual knowledge; works, devices, knowledge, wisdom etc while 1peter 4:6 is about spiritual knowledge. U need to know that ur spirit wii live forever either in hell or in heaven.

OLAADEGBU:
Read up about it in the link below only if you have the heart to take in the bitter truth.

http://www.hope-of-israel.org/magus.html

OLAADEGBU:

Read your Bible to see how Simon Peter rebuked Simon Magnus (the Sorcerer) and warned him to repent but he would rather start his own religion and hence, the Roman Catholic institution.

"You have neither part nor lot in this matter: for your heart is not right in the sight of God. Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you. For I perceive that you are in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity" (Acts 8:21-23).

gainkay:
he has provided an answer to your question. 1peter 4:6 answered u perfectly. How it will be done was not explained so, it is left for u to either accept or reject the truth. atheists are the ppl who alwaz come up wit such questions and no matter how u try to answer them wit the scriptures they just wnt take it because they already have their minds made-up, just asking to create debates and see if they could bring roproach to the name of God.

johnw74:
Joh 4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

paulGrundy:
this is the scipture you are having problems with;

Matthew 25:41 - Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels

i hope you noticed Jesus' words in the highlighted. your can now see that your logic of a burning satan spirit is unsciptural.

meanwhile you didnt answer my Question, i can now safely conclude that you lied.

philfrey08:
Hehehehe... not only would the text destroy his family, someone wud sure be found in the hospital or make headlines

Princewell2012:
Good, i will also like to ask you a question.

were Adam and Eve commanded to eat the animals for food when they were still in the garden? If no, why? and if your answer is yes, pls can you explain with reference from the bible.


Thank you.

EfemenaXY:
True that.

So maybe you should take your own advice, go back and amend the omissions and grammatical errors in your write up, starting with your thread's title.

misreal:
hell is real. since.

Jeromejnr:
I know where you stand Sire.
But to debate over such matters is a luxury I do not have.
I leave thee with a scripture for consideration.

Mark 12
24Jesus replied, “Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God? 25 When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven. 26 Now about the dead rising —have you not read in the Book of Moses, in the account of the burning bush, how God said to him, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’d ? 27He is not the God of the dead, but of the living. You are badly mistaken!”

Jeromejnr:
You Sire have helped me establish my point.

Our lady over there thinks every thing is literal.

Jeromejnr:
"The soul that sinneth shall die" Ezk 18:20
Well, do souls die?
The answers you seek is in itself.

Princewell2012:
You must be a very wicked person.
Boko haram are far better than you.
quote me anywhere.

paulGrundy:
You did raise very salient points, give me lots of time to research on this subject for I respond to you.

paulGrundy:
Because of Charism, am going to expantiate on my point.

Ezekiel 18:4

"The soul that sinneth shall die"

Mattew 10:28

"And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell"

When you sinned against God the last time did you lost your life instantly?

Note that in Mattew, Jesus implied that only God can kill the soul. If the soul were to be mortal, then man could also be capable of killing the soul. Simple logic.

NB: I have modified my earlier post.

paulGrundy:
There is no contradiction between the two quotes na , are you so bitter that you cannot understand paul Grundys quote, did you even read it at all? .





I don't know if;

1. You didn't understand my post

2. You are delibrately mis-interpreting my points

3. You are bent on trolling.

Don't worry based on my past experience with you, I can understand that when your bitterness gets to saturation point, you start mis-interpreting quotes, I'll leave you to that enjoy!

paulGrundy:
Please kindly point out a post of mine where I “attacked witnesses“ on the above.

PaulGrundy
The Watchtower says: " the soul dies ; it does not live on after death ."

PaulGrundy
Yes the soul that sinneth shall die

[s]
As much as you try so hard to render it a parable, it is not .
Abrahams bossom is a metaphor. Jesus on several occasions used metaphors to describe the kingdom of heaven, but JW's will agree with me that its a real place not a figurative utopian paradise. I can see that the watchtower now chooses at will the scripture she wants to take literally or figuratively. Why don't you just tear off Luke 16:19-31 from your bible, maybe that would be better off for you. [/s]

horlaleykan:
dats all u guys got arguing skills... bt u see d kingdom of God is not in words bt Power... u can't make ny blind see..heal infirmities ..u pple lack d power of God
BTW ...like som1 once sed if church growth was by envagelism den JW ought 2 b d largest 'church'...so if u lyk stay dere and b deceiving urself ..I no u are gonna say miracles are gimmicks .bt y not drop by @where I worship and find out for urself

paulGrundy:
http://biblehub.com/greek/4983.htm
http://biblehub.com/greek/5590.htm
Yes the soul that sinneth shall die.
http://biblehub.com/greek/4151.htm

But he definitely was a rightoeus man who sometimes depended on charity.

Abrahams bossom is the title given by our lord Jesus to a bay or gulf in the spirit world that the righteous go to , so that we can get a clearer understanding of how the place looks like, I believe he delibrately used Abraham, because of the audience whom he was addressing- Jews.

http://biblehub.com/greek/2859.htm

paulGrundy:
The bible was not mistaken when it clearly differentiated between a body, soul and spirit. Hebrews 4:12

Apostle Paul is a rightoes man, and he has been in lack before what do you think?
Philippians 4:12New International Version (NIV)
12 I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want.

Hence that alone is not enough to invalidite the reality of lazarus and the rich mans story. Besides Abraham and the prophets are real life characters mentioned in the story which you deliberatly ignored.