₦airaland Forum

1000Capacity:
■ You see the reason why me and you will fight ehen. Instead of you to make your second point in peace, you quickly chipping im a SNIDE remark. Why call my point silly

Concluding that because Jesus Christ attended a wedding and also performed a miracle at the wedding should only mean one thing and one thing only which is that Jesus Christ attended that particular wedding and performed a miracle at that particular wedding. The conclusion that that event should serve to nullify every proclamation regarding marriage and the Kingdom of God can only amount from a disconnect in reasoning.

Think about it carefully. What did the wedding he attended have to do with the Kingdom of God? Are miracles only available where the Kingdom of God is concerned? Why even reason that that wedding and the miracle had to be about the Kingdom of God? Does the presence or Jesus Christ at a place or event automagically mean the place or event is sanctioned as a part of the Kingdom of God? I mean there are so many questions when you really consider the reasoning behind such a conclusion as the one you posted earlier. It makes no sense if you really really consider it.

1000Capacity:
■ I don't know if you have written your own Bible. God never caused marriage, In Genesis 1:26-27 and 2:18-24, God commands man and woman to leave father and mother and become husband and wife through uniting in a one-flesh act that seals their love and which can bring forth children. The formation of family is part of humanity's call to a loving stewardship of creation and culture. God is the author of every creation.
■ Also, Jesus first miracle was At a wedding party. My favorite where he turned water to wine. So with that, marriage or union is established in the kingdom of God. As it was in the beginning is now, and ever shall be, world without end Amen

1. Right there in Genesis 3 vs 16, the same God who had earlier defined marriage as an agreement that is formed by a man and a woman placed His curse on the woman in the union. He also cursed the woman in childbearing in the same verse. Clearly, the fact that her end— post sin— was worse than her beginning— before sin—, in both cases meant cursed her. And that which is cursed passes on its cursed stated to that which it enters into agreement with or births.

2. That is a silly conclusion on your part though. Does the fact that He also ate and drank with prostitutes and taxpayers equally mean that their lifestyle was equally established as a part of the Kingdom of God then?

1000Capacity:
■ Me and you no suppose fight o. But I fit still reason your matter. I see say you wann dey follow me cap anyhow

I am the last person interested in a fight with anyone, even on here. I am simply for keeping the mention of Scripture out of these debates particularly since even the world is aware that religious people don't believe or emulate much of the ideas put forward by the God of Scripture and His Son, Jesus Christ.

AbuTwins:
■ Neither did Jesus ever wrote anything of the new testament!

God of Israel never did ask Jesus Christ to write down the New Law which He is the embodiment of. According to God of Israel— YHWH—, the new Agreement/Law/Covenant/Will/Testament was instead to be put, by Him, in the minds of His people.

31 This is what the Lord said, “The time is coming when I will make a new agreement with the family of Israel and with the family of Judah. 32 It will not be like the agreement I made with their ancestors. I made that agreement when I took them by the hand and brought them out of Egypt. I was their master, but they broke that agreement.” This message is from the Lord.
33 “In the future I will make this agreement with the people of Israel.” This message is from the Lord. “I will put my teachings in their minds, and I will write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.
34 People will not have to teach their neighbors and relatives to know the Lord, because all people, from the least important to the most important, will know me.” This message is from the Lord. “I will forgive them for the evil things they did. I will not remember their sins.” - Jeremiah 31 vs 31 -34

So, do you know better than the God of Israel — YHWH— who chose not to have His Prophet and Son, Jesus Christ, write down the Law by His own hands?

1000Capacity:
■ In everything you typed, you are just confusing yourself

Your confusion is entirely yours as all the information presented is as recorded right there in Scripture.

Kemadealadire:
■ One of the reasons a woman shouldn't say 'Yes' to a foolish head because their lives will be on standstill or go the reverse direction. The Biblical stand on marriage is ultimate. A man should love his wife the way Christ loves the Church. A man who loves his wife will not do things that will make her unhappy, from cheating to all kinds of evil vices, submission follows. Reasons ladies should pray to be found by a good head because problems go dey if you have to submit to a man who doesn't love you, who is an empty head with no sense of purpose and direction, who is addicted to all kinds of evil vices, who is constantly making bad decisions that affects you both etc. Marriage should be partnership not a master-slave relationship. The man provides, the woman supports where necessary. Each should capitalise on each other's strength areas, it should be teamwork, that way you make progress faster.

Let's please keep Scripture and God's mention out of these debates abeg! Way too many people have little to no understanding of the information contained in it. God of Scripture does not take sides in debates such as these so let's desist from trying to drag His name in the mud.

1000Capacity:
■ Biologically MALE and FEMALE were not fashioned by nature to be the same. It's funny when women push for partnership and make it seem like men are pushing "slave-master" relationship. The Bible teaches, “Husbands, love your wives” (Ephesians 5:25) and “teach the young women … to love their husbands” (Titus 2:4). When you love your husband, you will respect his authority and see him as the head. There is no master-master relationship for husband and wife in the Bible. You are bound to be subject to Man's authority.
Thats what I love specifically about Islam. A woman knows her place.Her roles and clear and expressly spelt out.
But of course, women are always in a constant battle against NATURE herself. That's why they are never contended with the way the look.
In Ephesians it states "For the husband is the HEAD of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. As the church is SUBJECT to Christ, so let wives also be SUBJECT in everything to their Husbands. The Bible did not say you the wife will run a partnership with your Husband.
THE HUSBAND IS THE HEAD OF THE HOME AND THE WOMAN IS THE SUBJECT.

1. The Bible does no such thing as you claim there. Rather, Paul and Peter, both of whom lived in the Land of Canaan, during the time that was the Last Days of God's Judgement against the Nation of Israel(and Judah) under the Law of Moses, for reasons best known to them chose to assert the stance of the Old Law of Moses where married women are concerned. Jesus Christ, God's New Law, however, made it abundantly clear that in the Kingdom of God

▶ Marriage is of the world of men and not of the Kingdom of God - Luke 20 vs 34 - 36. This is to echo the fact that God Himself cursed marriage from the beginning(Genesis 3 vs 16) and that which is cursed cannot be of the Kingdom of God.
▶ There is only one head over a man and a woman in His Kingdom, and He alone is that Head/Teacher/Authority/Master - Matthew 23 vs 8 - 10
▶ All men and women in His Kingdom are equaled (No hierarchies) exist in His Kingdom- Matthew 23 vs 8 - 10
▶ There are no blessings in the Kingdom of God on those who choose marriage; only those who chose to live as Eunuchs have God's special blessings - Matthew 19 vs 11 - 12
▶ Those among the women who would choose to have children should weep for themselves and their children for it is those of them who would live as Eunuch(and the barren among them) that are blessed by God - Luke 23 vs 27 - 23

1000Capacity:
■ I keep thinking, the things we call spirit and gods are probably some human race higher than normal humans operating on a different plane. Maybe the reason they know so much is because they have been privileged to live beyond flesh-limit. Humans live for a short number of years. But when you are out of flesh, you can live further. So the question becomes, what can I do to become a living sage after death. I want to consciously continue the journey after death and attain the position of a spirit. I know spirits can be good and some can be malevolent. I'm finding it hard to chose if I'll be a good spirit or malevolent. How can I attain the position of god after death?

▶ What gave you the idea that you could attain the position of a god after death?
▶ Where does your particular idea of an afterlife — life after death — come from?
▶ Where does your idea of spirits and gods come from?

You say you keep thinking so you should be able to answer these questions for you so we can at least have a direction to point you in.

whatisthetruth:
■ Imagine the depth of evil to cheer on wrongful incarceration, because of what, politics? You wake up and the first thing in your heart is celebrating something that causes an innocent person and his family such pain. I hope you get the rewards you seek here on earth after trading your soul to the king of darkness. Eat and drink then from the stores of your wickedness. May you guys live forever.

Are you high? What has hell(Eternal damnation) as proscribed by Jesus Christ who was sent by the God of Israel only to the Lost sheep of Israel to do with your Nigerian political squabble? I can't believe you created this thread to try to use the God of Israel and Jesus Christ to deceive others into thinking your particular opinion is justified by them.

Many of you are so deluded you cannot even reasonably defend your opinions without attempting to drag the name and things of God into the fray as if to suggest God of Israel somehow thinks or reasons on the level of your particular delusion. I suggest you find yourself something else doing if you are unable to separate the things that pertain to God of Israel and His Son, Jesus Christ, from that hogwash you there called Nigerian politics and living.

DeepSight:
■ Olodo, the Olympics originated in Greece, so it's apt.

And Paris is Greece, no be so?

kingxsamz:
How many hours to transform Nigeria?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Catapault:
■ BLIND AND STUPID NIGERIANS WHO DO NOT REALISE THEY ARE THE REAL HEBREWS, NOT THESE ARABS AND WHITES CLAIMING TO BE THEM. EVEN THE BIBLE THEY READ STATES CLEARLY THAT ABRAHAM WAS FROM THE LAND OF KUSH, MEANING BLACK AFRICA. EVEN WHEN RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN RELEASES THOUSANDS OF ANCIENT IMAGES SHOWING THE HEBREWS AND JESUS AS BLACK PEOPLE, OUR DUMB, BRAINWASHED NIGERIANS STILL POST RUBBISH NONSENSE LIKE THIS. IGNORANT, PROGRAMMED FOOLS.
YOU ARE SUCH AN EMBARRASSMENT.

▶ If you are indeed the real Hebrews, then the God of the Hebrews says you are cursed by Him because they refused to obey the details of HIs Law as Given by HIm to them.
▶ Do you equally accept this fact of the Bible that you read or do you throw these portions away all so you can beat your chest claiming all blacks are Hebrews? Do you equally accept that your children, from at least the last 1900 years ago will remain cursed so long as they remain without redemption from the curse?

nlfpmod:
“Apollo, God of sun, and the idea of light, send your rays and light the sacred torch for the hospitable city of Paris. And you, Zeus, give peace to all peoples on earth and wreath the winners of the Sacred Race."
The Olympic Games

This is weird! Did the French ever in fact worship the Greek gods? This is annoyingly fake abeg! I would have preferred it if the French dug deep into their ancestry to local and showcase their local gods in this. The games are about inclusion and this ain't my idea of inclusion

Imagine if China or Tokyo had done something like this... I would have 😨 This is definitely a miss abeg!

Lamasta:
Wrong move at this time, they should've waited till investigation is complete before suing for rights violation....

Who is currently carrying out the investigation? The same organization that can destroy all evidence against itself or which? Abegi make we all dey reason these things properly.

AbuTwins:
■ I can talk about Moses, Jesus and others based on what Allah says in the Qur'an! It is proven that Moses never wrote a dot from what is now called the Old testament!
■ Neither did Jesus ever wrote anything of the new testament!
■ But the Qur'an existed during the time of the Prophet of Islam!
■ Yes, Going to Mosques and bowing to the Black stone in Mecca is what makes us outwardly appear as Muslims, the second pillar of Islam!
Of David. I give You thanks with all my heart; before the gods I sing Your praises. I bow down toward Your holy temple and give thanks to Your name for Your loving devotion and Your faithfulness; You have exalted Your name and Your word above all else. Psalm 138:1-2
1 Kings 8:29
May Your eyes be open toward this temple night and day, toward the place of which You said, 'My Name shall be there,' so that You may hear the prayer that Your servant prays toward this place.
Psalm 5:7
But I will enter Your house by the abundance of Your loving devotion; in reverence I will bow down toward Your holy temple.
Psalm 28:2
Hear my cry for mercy when I call to You for help, when I lift up my hands toward Your holy sanctuary.
■ Having said that, we worship Allah who is not physically present on earth!

1. Interesting claim you make regarding Moses. So, what you are saying is that Moses did not do as God of Israel commanded Him to do?

14 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write about this battle. Write these things in a book so that people will remember what happened here. And be sure to tell Joshua that I will completely destroy the Amalekites from the earth.”
15 Then Moses built an altar and named it, “The Lord is My Flag.”
16 Moses said, “I lifted my hands toward the Lord’s throne. So the Lord fought against the Amalekites, as he always has.” - Exodus 17 vs 14 - 17

...

27 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write everything that I have told you. This is the agreement that I made with you and the Israelites.” - Exodus 34 vs 27

...

9 Then Moses wrote this Book of Teachings and gave it to the priests, who are from the tribe of Levi. They have the work of carrying the Lord’s Box of the Agreement. Moses also gave it to all the elders of Israel.
10 Then Moses spoke to the leaders. He said, “At the end of every seven years, in the Year of Freedom,[a] read these teachings at the Festival of Shelters. - Deuteronomy 31 vs 9 - 10

You claim you believe and follow Moses with your mouth yet your every word denies this fact. How is that any different from what the other religionists say and do as well?

2. Jesus Christ was not commanded to write the Law with His own hands. So why do you have some sort of stick up your arse that it is only if He wrote it down that it should matter?

3. Mohammed compiled his religion during his time so of course his book had to exist.

4. Regarding the acts of David, He was able to give praises to God for the wonderful things God did in His life, particularly where it concerns sparing him from a lot of the consequences of his acts, because he, David, was previously approved holy and righteous by God through His obedience to God's Law. Had David not been previously approved Righteous by God, ALL(not some) of his prayers and praises to God would have amounted to nothing but an abomination to God.

Regarding the bowing down of one's bother, No commandment in the Law of Moses requires an individual to do so - bow down.(Ceremonial laws did but not commandments to individuals.) So, all mentions of bowing down to be done are based on individual choice and do not please or glorify God of Israel. David mentioned his bowing rather to suggest the actual submission of his own will as an individual as King of Israel to the Will of the God of Israel.

What David did is nothing like your Muslim ritual.

BeigJawnson:
■ Diversion or no diversion... I want to ask, the god you serve, have you for one day hear from him or him passing a message to you through dreams?

You have yourself never received a message passed you through dreams by Jesus Christ either. The passing of messages through dreams and visions were of YHWH and His Old Law of Moses.

6 God said, “Listen to me! You will have prophets. I, the Lord, will let them learn about me through visions. I will speak to them in dreams.
7 But Moses is not like that. He is my faithful servant—I trust him with everyone in my house.
8 When I speak to him, I talk face-to-face with him. I don’t use stories with hidden meanings—I show him clearly what I want him to know. And Moses can look at the very image of the Lord. So why were you brave enough to speak against my servant Moses?” - Numbers 12 vs 6 - 8.

And that regime came to a close in the Last days/Endtime when the God of Israel Himself put a seal on Visions and Prophets according to His declaration in Daniel 9 vs 24.

Jesus Christ, God's New Law/Will/Covenant did not make a similar promise as that made by YHWH in the Old Law of dreams and Visions to those who are of the Kingdom of God. So, those dreams which you pretend are from Jesus Christ, are not from Him. And recall the God of Israel would never violate His own Eternal Law, Jesus Christ either.

AbuTwins:
■ Good question!
Simply defined, a Muslim is one who submits to Allah through His Prophet.
So by this definition, those who submits to Allah through Prophet Noah are Muslims!
So by this definition, those who submits to Allah through Prophet Moses are Muslims!
So by this definition, those who submits to Allah through Prophet Jesus are Muslims!
So by this definition, those who submits to Allah through Prophet Muhammad are Muslims!

However, absolutely none of the named men submitted to the Allah of the Muslims. Rather, they all instead submitted themselves to YHWH aka the God of Abraham AND Isaac AND Jacob aka God of Israel. Additionally, every single one of those men listed lived their lives in continuous truth(submission) and obedience to the teachings and commandments of YHWH's Law, what it means to follow YHWH. See now, how what you claim cannot be true at all!

AbuTwins:
■ David had already been married to at least seven known-named wives. (1 Samuel 18:27, 25:42-43, 2 Samuel 3:2-5.)
Then God gave him Saul's wives after Saul
"And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things."
2 Samuel 12:8.
So how many wives did David have in total?
Is God for or against Polygamy?
If Polygamy is right for David how is it bad for others?
"Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite. "1 Kings 15:5.

Ignorance is not bliss!

14 “You will enter the land that the Lord your God is giving you. You will take that land and live in it. Then you will say, ‘We will put a king over us, like all the nations around us.’
15 When that happens, you must be sure to choose the king that the Lord your God chooses. The king over you must be one of your own people. You must not make a foreigner your king.
16 The king must not get more and more horses for himself. And he must not send people to Egypt to get more horses, because the Lord has told you, ‘You must never go back that way.’
17 Also, the king must not have too many wives, because that will make him turn away from the Lord. And he must not make himself rich with silver and gold. - Deuteronomy 17 vs 14 - 17

Right there in the Law of Moses, the Constitutional Law in the Nation of Israel(and Judah) that existed until almost 1900 years ago, it is stated that the King of Israel was allowed to have many wives but not too many of them.

olaJako:
After Killing Nigerian Army Officers and Soldiers shege.. Okuama idiots don't have the rights to sue Army. If their sons were killed what will dey do?

Here's another angle I question. No investigation done into the killings of both civilians and soldiers but you are certain that all the killings were done by the civilians, all this in 2024? Are you people for real?

Asmmi:
■ That's why I called those asking for billions jokers

Jokers? Could this have happened in America or any of the civilized world and gone uninvestigated and unprocessed? Something that should never have been allowed to happen to them and here you are insisting that they should not by right demand as much compensation for the violation as is possible. Why are you people so wicked abeg?

AbuTwins:
■ So Jesus did not ceremonially accept any female disciples among the 12? Just a Yes or No with full stop!
■ Where was Deborah and Anna appointed as Prophetess?
■ I quoted the Law of Paul to you earlier which supports the laws in the old testaments!
■ Are those laws of Paul scriptures or not? Same Paul said in 2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,
■ If those are his ideas then the New Testament is entirely false since Paul's book is almost half of it and you call them his idea!

1. LOL... NO
(there are no ceremonial appointments or acceptances in the ETERNAL Kingdom of God.)

2. Where in the Law of Moses did you get this notion that those appointed as Prophets by God had to endure some sort of appointment ceremony though? There is no indication in the Old Law of Moses that a special ceremony was required so where do you get this idea of yours from?

3. There is no Law of Paul. There is just Paul stating his own opinions in his letters based on his ideas and experience of the issues of the times in which he lived. You elevating him to law status is all you and nothing.

4. Yes, Scripture is inspired since it contains records of God's own Prophets. At the time Paul wrote those words you quote to Timothy, he knew his own words do not even constitute scripture at all. And it still does not. Only that his letters are in our day and time contained in a collection that includes that which is Scripture.

5. This conclusion of yours is reached from a point of ignorance. The section of the book called the Bible that is labeled The New Testament is simply a section in the book labeled The New Testament. Paul's letters which are contained in that section of the book are letters that chronicle his experiences and opinions as he maneuvered God's New Law while living in the Land of Canaan during the Last days of God's final judgment against the Nation of Israel(and Judah), by way of His Old Law of Moses. The letters of Paul including those of James, John, Peter, and Jude, are merely commentaries of some of those who were a part of the New Testament/Law and lived in the Land of Canaan at the time of the end. They are not the New Testament/Law/Will/Covenant of the God of Israel. The New Law/Covenant/Testament/Will of God is Jesus Christ, the Last Prophet sent by God of Israel.

StillDtruth:
■ And the bible shows that God Spoke a lot in the bible, therefore the bible is the Word of God

This is a silly conclusion.

AbuTwins:
■ Show us where Jesus appointed them?
■ What makes them Prophets? Show us verses?
■ So what laws do you have today? ...
Which of these is outdated today?

1. Are you insinuating that Jesus Christ, not only received their contribution from their selling all of their belongings to follow Him(a command which all disciples are meant to carry out to prove themselves worthy of Him) but also sent them out to obey a command given by Him only to His disciples without actually appointing them His disciples?

2. The God of Israel appointed men and women from among the Israelites as Prophets to His people in the Old according to the Law of Moses, for instance, written in Deuteronomy 18 and Numbers 12. Even Miriam, the sister of Moses, was a prophet.

6 God said, “Listen to me! You will have prophets. I, the Lord, will let them learn about me through visions. I will speak to them in dreams.
7 But Moses is not like that. He is my faithful servant—I trust him with everyone in my house.
8 When I speak to him, I talk face to face with him. I don’t use stories with hidden meanings—I show him clearly what I want him to know. And Moses can look at the very image of the Lord. So why were you brave enough to speak against my servant Moses?” - Numbers 12 vs 6 - 8.

Men had no power or say as far as those whom God appointed His prophets. He did it according to His terms as laid down in His Law to them.

3. Jesus Christ is the Law which exists to this day. And His Kingdom is the nation where all those cursed by the Old Law can receive redemption.

Paul's ideas are not Law but ideas which he put forth given he lived in the nation of Israel(and Judah) in the Land of Canaan where the Old Law of Moses held until the end time came about 1900 years ago. The harvest of the Kingdom of God began at the end time and as such the Old Law of Moses became of no worth to all given God Himself had destroyed the physical nation of people by His Judgement.

Here's the kicker! When the nation of Israel is eventually restored by God at the time of the resurrection. The Law of Moses will equally kick back into effect as a result and Jesus Christ will rule again over the Nation by it. At that time, the laws that pertain to marriage will all be null. Why? Because there will exist no marriages at that time. Everyone in the land will be equal under that very Law.

Chucks13:
■ Ok go pay the community the N200billion then as you are now the one to sign the cheque. So killing 17 army in an unprovocative situation is not barbaric baa? Then the community should be forced to pay N500Billion on each army and the police they massacred so multiply N500Billion x17 I guess you know the answer? You get head at all? I guess No.

Please stop rambling!

Again, Who is currently paying as we speak for the barbaric actions of the military rank in civilian communities across the country? Make una dey ask a question like people wey dey get head abeg!

Fighttillvictory:
■ i told you no similarity. In biafra law and code of conduct will be enforced and culture will clear alot of vices.

You mean the same set of indigenes who do not care to themselves do what is necessary to have the laws enforced in their current situation will suddenly receive a magical upgrade to transform them all into law-abiding citizens who not only know their rights and demand it at every turn? Keep deceiving yourself!

AbuTwins:
You Sabi tell lies o?
■ How many women did Jesus appoint as deciples?
■ How many Prophets women exist in the Bible?
■ Even with all the verses above that gives clear distinct submission to men you're still denying?

Again, I am not here to hold brief for any religionist here, so don't mistake my response for support for anyone's views as I instead believe in the facts as stated in Scripture.

1. There were at least 7 women recorded as disciples of Jesus Christ while He lived. Women were also sent out with the 72 disciples into areas around the land by Jesus Christ.

2. There were female prophets in the Old Covenant times. Two of them were named - Deborah and Anna.

3. If you paid close attention to Scripture, you would find that God's laws of submission pertained to women in marriage. Zelophadad's daughters - Numbers 27 - were not restricted to the same. And these laws that pertain to submission in marriage had to do with the Nation of Israel in the land of Canaan. That nation was destroyed by the God of Israel about 1900 years ago rendering that Constitutional Law of no real worth to anyone in this day and age.

Fighttillvictory:
■ biafra will in no way have a similarity with nig.

No be the same set of wicked folks wey full the place today go still populate this Biafra delusion of yours? Abeg make we hear word o'jare!

tobenuel:
∆ this will be the second time that I'm tagging you, if you still don't get my point then I will leave you to your fate. no law allows the military to disturb the peace, property and lives of a people. an individual or a group can sue the army, but, but it is very hard.
∆ Based on decades of claims, civilians are unlikely to gain any relief when service members violate their constitutional rights. are you telling me the Nigerian Army will compensate the Okuama community? this was and still the question I asked you first, before you start using question to answer question.
I will leave you here

1. So there is no law meaning that invading civilian space as they did is not right by law.

2. So, because something didn't work yesterday, we should all together abandon the hopes of trying to get it to work today?

Because these people's rights have been trampled upon by their government for many decades, they should altogether abandon the idea of fighting for it?

Nigerians, you people wicked no be small. If your family , blood relatives and properties had been in the line of this destruction, I can bet my last dollar that you wouldn't be here condemning this action.

Timmi:
∆ Unfortunately, that's your one black man's opinion and everyone including a dog is entitled to. End of discussion.

Argh! So investigations are unnecessary into the facts because it didn't happen to your own family and relations ,abi,? OK.

Timmi:
∆ So the innocent military men are not humans and hence deserved to die in the most horrible way, or is it because that they are military and hence have no soul, body and spirit, and don't have family that depends on them. I don't understand your sense of reasoning.

So, innocent military men kill innocent lives and destroy properties of innocent lives all in the name of protecting the innocent? The kids and even old folks destroyed were evil criminals? Rather, than a proper investigation in to how lives and properties were destroyed in the process of restoring security, you would rather that the soldiers who went into the community armed to destroy be painted innocent from the get go? You folks are indeed wicked.

Angelfrost:
∆ Nope... Evidence is not the issue. Corruption is the issue. Nigerian Judiciary is the most corrupt and rotten in the world.

Who will root out the corruption from where it is in the judicial system if people refuse to expose it via actions such as these. If these people get nothing and the reason given is unbalanced then we at least know the names of corrupt personal that needs to be tossed out, and they can appeal their case after those have been removed.