ochallo: please the correct question should be , would you marry a lady that proposes marriage to you?. i can't believe this is on front page and is grammatically wrong.

gen2briz: Even if the EARTHQUAKE will cover all part of Nigeria....... sebi na all of us dey there including the dreamer abi

azimibraun: With due respect, I am nt quite an expert on hw nairaland works so pls excuse my bringing an unconnected issue here.. Pls hw do I get this to be discussed? Just read dailytrust and in a colunm " the Savagery of Aluu" the writer said this." Uniformed personnel and at least one in police uniform" were bystanders in the crowd when thos luvly kids wia bin gruesomely murderd.. U guys check it out.. Police in that crowd? Wish it wasn't true.

Imoy: i tink its high time we match in d street and protest for this students. The judge is so in human, if it were a case of a politician stealing billions of naira, i'm too sure she wunt pass that kind of judgement base on what she myt have recievd as bribe.

greall1: Not for us in south west,it for you pple in North.
Nothing like boko boys here man....

sino:

Islam is a set of beliefs that is meant to emancipate man from the shackles of self-destruction, a path towards felicity.

As it is true for all ideologies to want to dominate, we muslims believe that, Islam, will eventually rule the world before the end time.
I hope i have elaborated enough?

lakesider: Notin is wrong with resit exam as long as i m writing it from my brain.in advanced country U can walk out of exam hall Nd. Av your paper resheduled if U feel U ll fail d paper.outdated pple @ work

SEEMESEEMEO: If trully nigeria is one,i think igbo's should be given a chance too

Idokojimmy: Only a listening Govt can reverse its position or policy to impact meaningfully on the people. The people Cried and Gej has listened, I feel he should be commended. [/color][color=#006600]

searchcorp: @op, that's a very stupid question.


And Yes!!! You are under-using your
blackberry.

pro01:

Not so fast bros. Not anything can be criminalised, especially not in a democracy. The exercise of fundamental rights, within prescribed boundaries, for instance, cannot be criminalised - moreso as it is guaranteed by the constitution.

In any case, the constituion, as I'm very sure you know, is the grundnorm, which is superior to all other laws in the land. Since the constitution guarantees my personal liberty and freedom, I can argue that any law by a state government criminalising my refusal to 'decorate' my private residence is a negation of the constitution and is therefore null to the extent of it's inconsistency with the latter.

I think it's incorrect to suggest that anything is 'legal' simply because it has been passed into law. There is such a thing as an illegal law, and precedents/examples abound. If anyone has the time and resources to challenge this 'beautification' aspect of the new law, I reckon it would be easy to convince the courts that it violates constitutional provisions and is therefore unconstitutional. Fashola ought to know this. . .which I why I had to wonder how 'learned' he really is.

pro01:

Not so fast bros. Not anything can be criminalised, especially not in a democracy. The exercise of fundamental rights, within prescribed boundaries, for instance, cannot be criminalised - moreso as it is guaranteed by the constitution.

In any case, the constituion, as I'm very sure you know, is the grundnorm, which is superior to all other laws in the land. Since the constitution guarantees my personal liberty and freedom, I can argue that any law by a state government criminalising my refusal to 'decorate' my private residence is a negation of the constitution and is therefore null to the extent of it's inconsistency with the latter.

I think it's incorrect to suggest that anything is 'legal' simply because it has been passed into law. There is such a thing as an illegal law, and precedents/examples abound. If anyone has the time and resources to challenge this 'beautification' aspect of the new law, I reckon it would be easy to convince the courts that it violates constitutional provisions and is therefore unconstitutional. Fashola ought to know this. . .which I why I had to wonder how 'learned' he really is.

Richfella: In no particular order:

- Carriage and high sense of self (confidence).
- Zest - I love girls that are full of life.
- Intelligence.
- Sense of humour.
- Compassion.
- Drive
- Nurturing.
- Very S-e-x-u-a-l.
- Beautiful.
- Mental Development.
- Fashion: Good sense of style.
- Non-needy, non-clingy.
- Independence.
- Non-materialistic.
- Humility

Shollypopz:
Lmao @ dis yahoo yahoo boy vexing unnecessarily.

I'm sure he wears all d crap ppl hv been listing......ehya, pele ehn!