₦airaland Forum

B U M P

lol


B U M P

B U M P

B U M P

B U M P

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

he he he

classic old age palava

he he he

B U M P

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

Dis section is dry 2day . . . so in that case

BUMP

HA HA HA

No wonder, i been nearly wan take fuel clean my screen b4

dani1luv: If you were adam! I swear you'ld have eaten the whole tree!

na lie. Eve no been even fine like dat self.

wetin been happen dat time b say as she chop her own share of d apple finish, she come dey see as adam dey naked, dey ring him bells everywhere dey pursue grasshopper up and down d whole garden of eden . . . CAN YOU IMAGINE . . . A WHOLE ADAM HIMSELF, what did u expect the poor woman to do

dat view was enuf for Eve to tell adam (in sign language) and decieve him dat if he ate d apple d grasshoppers would all come to him instead

WTF am i reading?

Dis one na fairy tale abi home video abi advice?

Lagusta: pls ask am again ooo, d guy dress lyk person whey dey find job 4 mortuary.....

ha ha ha

marvis5077: Men, why don't you show some respect for women! Pls stop the insults, stop discriminating or raising the male gender above the female. God created all for a purpose...

what purpose?

to have an affair with the serpent and then feed Adam dat apple abi?

im glad im a guy cos i knw i cant 'leak blood' every month

i knw dat some unfortunate ladies actually bleed 2 death because of this

^^

yeah, i agree that change is inevitable and google is already fighting a losing battle. They brought google+ (which does not have a mobile app) and people have already forgotten about it not more than a yr that it was introduced.

Facebook on the other hand generates revenue via adverts on their website. As all the current fb mobile apps dnt support advertisements they are on a long thing

The failed history
of Web 1.0
companies
adapting to the
world of social
suggests that
Facebook will be
as woeful at
adapting to social
mobile as Google
has been with its
“ghost town”
Google+ initiative
last year.
The organizational
ecologists talked
about the “liability
of obsolescence”
which is a growing
mismatch between
an organization’s
inherent product
strategy and its
operating
environment over
time. This probably
is a good
explanation for
what we’re seeing
in the tech world
today.
Are companies like
Google, Amazon,
and Yahoo!
obsolete? They’re
still growing. They
still have
enormous
audiences. They
also have very
talented
managers.
But with each new
paradigm shift
(first to social, now
to mobile, and
next to whatever
else), the older
generations get
increasingly out of
touch and likely
closer to their
significant decline.
What’s more, the
tech world in which
we live in seems to
be speeding up.
Tim Cook had an
interesting line
about the velocity
of change in his
earnings call last
week:
“through the
last quarter, I
should say,
which is just 2
years after
we shipped
the initial
iPad, we’ve
sold 67
million. And to
put that in
some
context, it
took us 24
years to sell
that many
Macs and 5
years for
that many
iPods and
over 3 years
for that many
iPhones. And
we were
extremely
happy with
the
trajectory on
all of those
products. And
so I think
iPad, it’s a
profound
product.
Yahoo is already a
shell of its 2000
self. There is
increasing chatter
(including from me)
about how
Google’s facing a
painful multiple
contraction, once
its desktop search
business (still
accounting for the
vast majority of
its revenues and
profits) starts to
fall off a cliff as
users dramatically
drop traditional
search for new
ways of getting
information they
want in a mobile
world. Is Amazon
destined to
decline? There
seem to be no
signs of it today
and people will still
need to buy stuff
in a mobile world,
but the new
mobile platform
will certainly open
the possibilities
for new entrants
that Amazon can’t
even imagine
today.
Facebook is also
probably facing a
tough road ahead
as this shift to
mobile happens. As
Hamish McKenzie
said last week
, “I suspect that
Facebook will try
to address that
issue [of the shift
to mobile] by
breaking up its
various features
into separate apps
or HTML5 sites:
one for messaging,
one for the news
feed, one for
photos, and,
perhaps, one for
an address book.
But that
fragments the
core product,
probably to its
detriment.”
Considering how
long Facebook
dragged its feet to
get into mobile in
the first place
, the data
suggests they will
be exactly as slow
to change as
Google was to
social. Does the
Instagram
acquisition change
that? Not really, in
my view. It shows
they’re really
fearful of being
displaced by a
mobile upstart.
However, why
would bolting on a
mobile app to a
Web 2.0 platform
(and a very good
one at that)
change any of the
underlying
dynamics we’re
discussing here? I
doubt it.
What about Apple?
Where does it fit in
to this
classification
scheme?
Apple is really a
hardware
company, so it’s
difficult to put it
into a bucket
related to web
apps. It certainly
seemed very Web
1.0 with its Ping
social application.
Yet it’s succeeded
in mobile from
making the best
hardware and
software
ecosystem for
apps to proliferate
on. In some ways,
as long as it has a
successful iOS
platform, it
doesn’t care which
Web 1.0, 2.0 and
mobile companies
fail or succeed on
top of it. Maybe
that’s why so
many non-mobile
companies seem
to want to
emulate Apple.
Google bought
Motorola Mobility
(MMI) to get into
the hardware
business.
Facebook and
Baidu (BIDU) are
rumored to be
launching their
own mobile OS.
The bottom line is
that the next 5 – 8
years could be
incredibly dynamic.
It’s possible that
both Google and
Facebook could be
shells of their
current selves – or
gone entirely.
They will have all
the money in the
world to try and
adapt to the shift
to mobile but
history suggests
they won’t be able
to successfully do
it. I often hear
Google bulls point
to the market
share of Android or
Eric Schmidt’s
hypothesis that
Google could one
day charge all
Android
subscribers $10 a
month for value-
added services as
proof of future
profits. Yet, where
are all the great
social success
stories by Web 1.0
companies? I
imagine we’ll see
as many great
examples of social
companies jumping
horses mid-race to
become great
mobile companies.
It’s a lot easier to
start asking Siri
for information
instead of typing
search terms into
a box compared to
thousands of
enterprises
ceasing to
upgrade to the
next version of
Windows. Google’s
76% market share.
Facebook’s 900
million monthly
users. They just
aren’t as sticky as
they seem.
And does anyone
think the pace of
change is going to
increase in the
next 5 years
versus the last?
That we’re going
to see fewer
innovations, fewer
start-ups trying
more stuff on
cheaper and more
powerful
processing power?
In all likelihood, we
could have an
entirely new way
of gathering
information and
interacting with
ads in a new
mobile world than
what we’re
currently used to
today.
The Googles and
Facebooks of
tomorrow might
not even exist
today. And several
Web 1.0 and 2.0
companies might
be completely
wiped off the map
by then.
Fortunes will be
made by those
who adapt to and
invest in this
complete
greenfield.
Those who own
the future are
going to be the
ones who create it.
It’s all up for
grabs. Web
monopolies are
not as sticky as
the monopolies of
old.

forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2012/04/30/heres-why-google-and-facebook-might-completely-disappear-in-the-next-5-years/2/

Mobile companies
born since 2010
have a very
different view of
the world. These
companies – and
Instagram is the
most topical
example at the
moment – view
the mobile
smartphone as the
primary (and
oftentimes
exclusive)
platform for their
application. They
don’t even think
of launching via a
web site. They
assume, over time,
people will use
their mobile
applications
almost entirely
instead of
websites.
We will never have
Web 3.0, because
the Web’s dead.
Web 1.0 and 2.0
companies still
seem unsure how
to adapt to this
new paradigm.
Facebook is the
triumphant winner
of social
companies. It will
go public in a few
weeks and
probably hit $140
billion in market
capitalization. Yet,
it loses money in
mobile and has
rather simple
iPhone and iPad
versions of its
desktop
experience. It is
just trying to
figure out how to
make money on
the web – as it
only had $3.7
billion in revenues
in 2011 and its
revenues actually
decelerated in Q1
of this year
relative to Q4 of
last year. It has no
idea how it will
make money in
mobile.

Mobile companies
born since 2010
have a very
different view of
the world. These
companies – and
Instagram is the
most topical
example at the
moment – view
the mobile
smartphone as the
primary (and
oftentimes
exclusive)
platform for their
application. They
don’t even think
of launching via a
web site. They
assume, over time,
people will use
their mobile
applications
almost entirely
instead of
websites.
We will never have
Web 3.0, because
the Web’s dead.
Web 1.0 and 2.0
companies still
seem unsure how
to adapt to this
new paradigm.
Facebook is the
triumphant winner
of social
companies. It will
go public in a few
weeks and
probably hit $140
billion in market
capitalization. Yet,
it loses money in
mobile and has
rather simple
iPhone and iPad
versions of its
desktop
experience. It is
just trying to
figure out how to
make money on
the web – as it
only had $3.7
billion in revenues
in 2011 and its
revenues actually
decelerated in Q1
of this year
relative to Q4 of
last year. It has no
idea how it will
make money in
mobile.

cindyrella: Choi u talk am well.. U too sabi book joor

some babes na d 'TAMBOLO' for inside their bobo boxers

'HOOKWORM' for inside their bobo belle

I tot d mad man was still watching premiership on d tv while they ran

it should also have an 'auto refresh' function