₦airaland Forum

Truthseeker10:
Going by your teachings here, is macro-evolution not suppose to make a single cell organism evolved over the years into all types of organisms including humans, if yes, are single cell organism from millions of years still existing today and going through macro-evolution as against your Neanderthal logic?

Arda1000:
you can believe whatever makes you feel better

MaxInDHouse:
The funny thing is many just say what they were told but at the same time they want others to accept what they were told by arguing!🙂

MONEY247:
Good morning lovelies. Yes you woke healthy and strong.its God's goodness.

Know this that your time on earth will be a testament for your life in eternity. If you have not accepted the love of god today by accepting his gifts of salvation please do...You don't have it all to figure out... just confess your sins and ask the Lord Jesus for mercy....

Remain blessed.

Arda1000:
Pls I don't want to with you. BIBLE discovered everything

Theawakensoul:
You actually raised an interesting point.
And honestly, I partially agree with you.

Yes…
the fact that a text passed through history does NOT automatically mean:
👉 it became completely false
👉 or lost all wisdom.
That would be an exaggerated conclusion.

Human beings can still preserve:
👉 ideas
👉 teachings
👉 wisdom
👉 philosophy
👉 and spiritual insight
across generations.

I acknowledge that.

But I think there’s an important distinction we must make carefully:
preserving a GENERAL MESSAGE
is not the same thing as preserving EVERY DETAIL perfectly and untouched.

Those are two different claims.

For example:
A teaching can still inspire millions…
while also having:
👉 translation variations
👉 editorial influence
👉 political shaping
👉 interpretational layers
👉 and institutional modifications across centuries.

Those realities are not mutually exclusive.


Now regarding your point about:
👉 the purpose being achieved.

That sounds reasonable at first…
but it also raises deeper questions.

Because many religions claim:
👉 transformed lives
👉 moral improvement
👉 spiritual results
👉 miracles
👉 purpose
👉 and fulfilled destinies.

Christians say it.
Muslims say it.
Hindus say it.
Buddhists say it.

Even philosophies outside religion have transformed lives.

So if “positive results” alone prove absolute preservation or ultimate truth…

then multiple contradictory systems would all become equally and fully true at the same time.

And that becomes philosophically difficult.


Also, human transformation itself does not necessarily prove:
👉 textual perfection.

People can grow through:
👉 wisdom
👉 meaning
👉 discipline
👉 meditation
👉 love
👉 purpose
👉 community
👉 psychological conviction
👉 and deep belief.

Even imperfect systems can still produce meaningful experiences.

That is part of human consciousness itself.


And honestly…

I think questioning preservation is not an attack on spirituality.

It’s simply intellectual honesty.

Because historically, we KNOW:
👉 manuscripts differ
👉 translations differ
👉 canon selections happened over time
👉 scribes made edits
👉 some verses were later additions
👉 interpretations evolved across centuries

Most serious biblical scholars openly acknowledge this today.

That does not automatically destroy all value in scripture.

But it DOES challenge the idea that every word dropped from heaven untouched by history.


And maybe that’s where wisdom is truly needed:
Not blind rejection…
and not blind acceptance either.

But mature investigation.

Because truth should not fear examination.

If something is genuinely divine…
honest questions should not destroy it.

In fact, they may deepen understanding.

I AM - THE AWAKEN SOUL (TAS)
QUESTIONING EVERYTHING 🌿

Arda1000:
of discovery

Arda1000:
science requires evidence.
Religion on other hand requires faith both are not compatible.
Why a scientist goes out to search for proof a religionist will be faithfully waiting on his or deity.

Theawakensoul:
Nobody possesses the original writings of:
👉 Moses
👉 Isaiah
👉 Paul
👉 Matthew
👉 John

brightDdon:
Good morning nairalanders

Please I need your advice,

I have about two old and torn Bibles which I don't make use of again due to it state of torn and incomplete pages

Note,I natural don't like having worn-out properties in my space, either I repair or I replace

Now, I want to get a new Bible

Here comes the main point, I want to discard the two old ones but don't know the best way to discard a Bible

As a Christian,what's the best way to discard a Bible, ( with biblical verse if available)


I'll be at the comment section

Thanks and God bless.

enemyofprogress:
I attended Cherubim and Seraphim Church for two years before I left, and my experience there taught me so many lessons about Christianity and life.

MaxInDHouse:
Why did God arrange for His message to be written?

Tboy222:
You are in an inverted matrix , a computer simulated reality, wake up, all religions are false. Your God , your sky daddy is actually the devil himself.

SmartPolician:
Pastor Paul, Nigeria is not dead. You just lack the courage to call Tinubu out because he's your good friend.

Truthseeker10:
should you be concerned about my own theory or the theory of those who developed the doctrine?

Kemetian:
He was a Jehovah's witness.

Ken4Christ:
It means that you share the same beliefs with Jehovah Witness organisation

PastorAIO:
I remember you better now. You’re a JW. The fakest of the lot, with your own twisted mistranslation of bible.
Na tat ti, means to give, not to allow. There is no context in Hebrew where it means to allow. Lying JW.

MaxInDHouse:
Why did God arrange for His message to be written?
If you don't know the purpose of God's word you can't know whether it has been well preserved. Daniel 12:10🙂

PastorAIO:
Can you imagine a so called deity that tells his devotees to sacrifice their first born children?