₦airaland Forum

Kay 17: Also everyone assumes the human sight/mind is perfect to capture the message from the pictures. Why shouldn't we believe our perception could be impaired, by bias for example.

Joshthefirst: you don't believe you're special? You're no different from the animal? Its a wonder your life is in direct difference to your thoughts.

Ishilove: Leave grama.

Ajibam: the very one that created you and still have mercy for your perishing soul

Deep Sight: I really don't know what you think I mean by intuition. However you must know very well that I base my discussions not on intuition alone, but cardinally on Logic.

striktlymi: Complaint




Whenever a member gets a ban on nairaland, it is usually the practice for a reason to be given in his 'profile' page for any such ban, and I am of the view that when the reason given is not clear enough to him/her, the member has every right to seek an explanation in order to understand why the ban was placed in the first place.

Placing a ban of one year is very uncommon in these paths of nairaland and whenever such rare occasion props up, it is usually backed by a very sound reason. The fact that LB had sought an explanation for his ban shows that he is yet to understand the rationale behind it and it will boil down to a miscarriage of justice if his request is snubbed, hence my complaint.

Logicboy03 deserves to know the following:

1) Why he was banned.
2) The justification for his ban.
3) Why the ban had to be for one year.

If the appropriate justification cannot be provided for the above, satisfactorily, then I am left with no option than to ask that my account be banned for one year also, and this I ask with the utmost of respect for you, HBG.

Uyi Iredia: It isn't in fact. It dares to question the puzzle of existence without any lazy resort to divine power.

texanomaly: awww...you know I love ya

Alfa Seltzer: You are in the wrong country.

rationalmind: Lol, has it gotten to this? Can't you understand english any longer? I never said belief in evolution is silly. I said "let's say". Is that difficult to understand?

Lol. So, God can make a donkey talk. Clap for yourself. Your reasoning is sublime. Ure in the same league with betrand russel and the likes.

Logicboy03: Sharrap.


Keep hating cos you aint got evangelist swagg

Logicboy03: Dont let the guy decieve you.....he owes his atheism to me.

He's ma boy...


Uyi Iredia, WHO'S YOUR DADDY?

COME TO PAPA

texanomaly:

texanomaly: The band, or the act of?

Joshthefirst: I think its near impossible
But don't listen to mr troll. He's even trolling his own home country. Smh
Edit: @ troll, who told you we'd be lynched for talking about gods existence?
Stop making a bad impression.

texanomaly: Hadn't thought of that. Hmmm. Guess we will actually have to have a civilized conversation. Do you think the group we are putting together can pull that off?

Logicboy03: had you spent time in the real world rather than waste your life in the church, you would have known that weed is bad for the belly, it makes you hungry and on an empty stomach, you could vomit

Divepen: shey u don d link

texanomaly: Of course I do.

The death and reserection of Jesus Christ fulfilled the law. Because of this, a higher law was given.

And no I don't now want to now have a debate about it.

We will have plenty of that when we all get together. Lord help us on that day.

Joshthefirst: smh. I did not bring you here to rate the thread. I invited you so you'd see truth.

plaetton: You are the one who is being comical.
Your comprehension skills show a marked decline.

I have said something 3 times and yet you deliberately( for cheap cheers from Joshthfirst perhaps) pretend not to know what I am pointing at.

You invited thoughts(in fact, you specifically asked readers to think deeply) on a couple of visual images, did you not?
You were inviting the reader's subjective inferences, were you not?
So where was the objectivity therein?

What any one sees objectively and what they infer subjectively from any visual image will differ from person to person.
Therefore, subjective truth should be seen as an oxymoron, unreliable, most especially regarding the existence or non-existence of god..
That was and is still my point.
C'mon man, how long will it take you to understand that?

Of course , you are free to discuss subjective or objective realities.
There is no crime in that, and I have made that point too.

I cannot challenge you about what is inside your head.

The error, which you are particularly fond of, is the attempt to forcefully superimpose your subjective reality into objective reality of others.
They hardly fit.
This is the problem with other thing called faith, and religion(and we can see how well that has served humankind.)
That is where you will be challenged.

Deep Sight: This statement is a trick, and an old tired one at that.

Feign shock and surprise over the fact that someone else is supposedly ignorant of an issue in order to avoid having to address it.

Please find a better trick.

Secret_Dreams: If only you knew...smh