MuttleyLaff's Posts
Nairaland Forum › MuttleyLaff's Profile › MuttleyLaff's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 (of 441 pages)
orisa37:Adam remained being a man after eating but no longer a son of God |
budaatum:budaatum, this was easy to do, but when it comes to certain other subject matter(s) shrouded in elaborate lies, then it becomes a case of elaborate explanation is required. The case of angels banging female human beings or confusing Nephilims for something else is a classic example. Smh. Dont worry budaatum, I understand the challenges, your occasional low temperance and patience thresholds, but just that sometimes you need having a kick up the jacksy whenever you go on your bad-tempered, irritable and dishing out insults spree episodes. I, today checked, and couldnt believe my eyes, seeing how far back you started doing it |
budaatum:"And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work." - Revelation 22:12 "For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with His angels; and then He shall reward every man according to his works." - Matthew 16:27 You get rewarded for your good works budaatum:"If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward." - 1 Corinthians 3:14 Well, no works, then no reward |
Image123:Tell me something I dont already know sir Image123:Dont judge if you havent put foot in the person's shoe and walked a mile in it. Image123, "feel like dying" is the stuff, temporary madness, gone too far, is made of. Image123:You sidestepped my asking about what is to make of Samson's carried out suicidal thought and granted prayer? Was Samson foolish? Did Samson end his life cheaply? |
budaatum:[img]https://s3/images/ObamaMuttley.gif[/img] "Go on. I dare you!" what? Smh |
Image123:Some believers too, think heaven and so dont mind wanting to die |
Image123: Edybleketara:Will one be less of a christian if one harboured suicidal thoughts, hmm Image123? Didnt Paul want to die? Didnt he say he's having a desire to depart and be with Christ? What is to make of Samson's carried out suicidal thought and prayer? Image123, I am sure, you aware that, anyone who actually goes through and commits plain straight and undiluted suicide, had at that moment of doing the act, gone wacko, as in, had a temporary madness, gone too far, hmm? So from that point and especially from what, I've got to learned about the subject, I am not one to judge persons who have died by committing plain straight and undiluted suicide. Of course, one's life is the property of God and it is a gift. Though, death is a universal truth that can never be defied, still life is to be perpetuated for as long as it possibly can be. You keep alive, stay alive, keep on going, keep in existence, preserve yourself. Life is for enjoying the moment, not hating life. In spite of whatever and whether one likes life or not, you don't , if it can be helped, just like that, destroy it. |
[img]https://s1/images/stirringMuttleylaff.gif[/img] Smh. |
mabea:"Do not judge according to appearance, but judge the righteous judgment." - John 7:24 Dont you know that, as believers, we are called to judge, hmm? There is nothing wrong in being judgemental, especially when its concerning the use of righteous judgement to judge or even about being too judgemental to an uncouth person like jesusjnr. Just because I love jesusjnr like the next person, doesnt mean I have to co-sign his disorderly, disruptive and behaving badly behaviour unconditionally. I lean heavy on jesusjnr because from the day one onset, when he started all this with first showing his contempt for Apostle Paul, I warned him. From Apostle Paul, he slowly and gradually graduated from one heretic, idolatory and blasphemy thing to another. I make no apologies for doggedly passing judgement on that self-proclaimed prophet "His Eminence" jesusjnr. |
lightblazingnow:[img]https://s3/images/3xsmhp.gif[/img] Common guys win this trip kẹ? Smh. From the best answers wins a scholarship to study the course of your choice, its now turned into "common guys win this trip" PS: CaveAdullam, I see you reading thread, say something now |
EMILO2STAY:Ah, EMILO2STAY has suddenly found his voice. EMILO2STAY, I know you understand and/or realise I've set an envelopment for you, when I originally, a long long time ago, asked you to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses proving the sons of God to be angels, but you refused to bite the bait and get snared, so you woefully failed to say and show where or how you made out that sons of God are and/or equates to angels. You prevaricated and ducked the request, before developing the gall and cheek to be contesting with me, that Cain's descendants are not the sons of men and/or daughters of men. I have said this before that, unless you respond, you arent ever going to live this down. EMILO2STAY, why dont you just provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses proving the sons of God to be angels, to see whether or not I wouldn't educate you with proof that those "sons of God" mentioned in Genesis and Job were not angels but were mere mortal humble men. As a matter of fact, the "sons of God" in the Book of Job are humbler than the "sons of God" in the book of Genesis. EMILO2STAY, you MUST to allow me to minister to you on this matter, in a brief and clearly expressed manner, provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses proving the sons of God to be angels, then I will set about let you know the truth, the truth that shall set you free, give you healing and deliverance from that lie from the pit of hell that the "sons of God" are angels. EMILO2STAY, try provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses proving the sons of God to be angels here, to see if I wouldnt play ball with you. |
[img]https://s2/images/MuttleyDriveLaff.gif[/img] I laugh in "Book of Enoch" Smh. |
Facts are the enemy of opinionated minds, it simply is, an unwillingness to face the fact(s), undying loyalty to defy truth and hard-core dedication to blind deniability. The part of the bible that said we shouldn't add or remove from the word, is not talking about the canon of scripture. It is not talking about the collection or list of sacred books accepted as genuine, but is saying do not make the Bible more interesting by adding extra details that are often untrue. This is exactly why I am an ever advocate, of questioning because enquiring minds want to know. No believer worth his/her salt will harbour fear about the scripture not being infallibility. Permit me to let you on to what makes the scripture capable of making mistakes or being wrong. It is greed, false sense of entitlement(s), filthy lucre, political and differing theology(ies), heresies, idolatry, schisms, deliberate theological errors, intolerance, persecution etcetera that are catalysts for making Bible translation versions that have mistakes, that are wrong, that are lies, that have original word contents changed from their real and genuine meanings etcetera. Bible translation versions made where cast iron facts, are viewed as irrelevant or less important than indoctrinations, deliberate and calculated lies, personal beliefs and opinions, so have made people cast aspersions on scripture and doubt the Bible. Interesting times we sure are living in now, where the dog has gone back to its vomit, in the sense of now romanticising with accursed first century books, like the laughable the Book of Enoch and enjoying greatly reading its many catalogued lopsided fantansies |
paxonel:Are you going to say, Job loved his wife any lesser than Adam loved Eve, hmm? Remember Job rebuffed, in no uncertain terms, his wife's plea to curse God I dont know whose original idea it was, between Ananias and Sapphira, to lie to the Holy Spirit, but I suspect that Ananias didnt love his wife, Sapphira, any lesser or greater than Adam or Job loved their wives, so I give you that, about most people will not be able to avoid being emotionally attached to their missuses paxonel:You accept that Adam wasn't deceived, but wouldnt agree he was thinking straight in terms of what he did because of Eve. Adam knew he had woefully failed at his responsibility, so like a man, he took the poisoned chalice from Eve, to do the honorable kamikaze act. Eve practically dropped Adam in it, by saying, hey, you didnt teach me well enough. I am doomed, with this unfortunate and inescapable death outcome, here you are, have it, eat, lets both go down for this. |
When the woodwork creaks and out comes the guilty conscience freaks, lol. What am I saying? If things didnt start getting hot and heavy with jesusjnr, his conscience wouldnt have suddenly come into play, and to begin singing like a canary with a little finger stuck up its arse. jesusjnr, just dont forget this other one, how you led God’s people right into idolatry, leading others into idolatory, as in, meaning you breaking the first and second commandment of God, as it is only a delusional person, like yourself, and a bunch of gullible others, who dont know they are delusional, to the extent of believing they have seen the face of Jesus Christ, to the further extent of even, putting an image, physical feature and/or picture to Jesus' face |
paxonel:That declaration was a statement of fact paxonel:"... the LORD God asked. “Have you eaten from the tree whose fruit I commanded you not to eat?" - Genesis 3:11 paxonel, please dont make excuses that has no legs that Adam can stand on with paxonel:C'mon now paxonel, Eve died spiritually the instant she took a bite of that fruit. paxonel:The Bible states that Adam was not deceived, so this means he was thinking straight when he took the fruit off Eve and ate. paxonel let me be straight with you. Adam because of misplaced priority of not putting God first and not considering God to be more important than Eve, became a victim of blind loyalty. I also think, Adam was a victim of an already terribly wrong chivalry gone further pear-shaped. He should have sat the remaining last hour out jesusjnr:Werent everything already "perfect" even before not eating, hmm? |
Argh, yeurgh, eurgh, the sight of this, is so wrong and yuck, WORMS coming out of the woodwork, LEECHEES crawling out of the DARK, RATS coming out of their holes they call home, all because of the LURKING GREEN SNAKE IN THE GREEN GRASS, the confirmed and bonafide, the like of jesusjnr, who comes out in the open, beginning to sing like a canary with a little finger stuck up its arse. You cant claim to soar like an eagle and then turn round to crap like a canary jesusjnr. Smh. What's the point or use of crying over spilled coffee. I dont give a sip. |
MuttleyLaff: MuttleyLaff: |
jesusjnr:You have no iota Spirit of God in you jesusjnr, dont deceive yourself. You've proven, time after time, that you have a dustbin in your chest and not a heart for the Spirit of God to dwell in. You've just had one demon killed in you jesusjnr, and you have to worry about the plenty other demons more still frolicking inside you. As I on previous occasions have said, when the devil, hopefully by some stroke of fate, has finally had enough of you or when the devil's gone on tea break, I hope and pray you this poor tormented false prophet jesusjnr aka Apostle EnthronedbyGod MIA, gets a break and get lucky because the only way you can and will escape the journey enroute to the lake of fire, last bus stop, hell, is only, if you continue to repent, continue to recant, as in, say you no longer hold contrary opinion(s) or belief(s), especially one known to be heretical, like this Koran one and/or continue to change for the good and better. Imagine that all that would have been needed for the jesusjnr forces of evil to have succeeded, is for enough sensible people to have remained silent and turn off the heat on him |
lightblazingnow:The original answer to what would have happened to Adam if he had rejected Eve's offer of the fruit, when she disobeyed, is that the angels would have immediately after Adam's refusal to eat, come to Adam's aid and begin to minister unto him |
paxonel:[img]https://s3/images/ObamaMuttley.gif[/img] How remotely possibly were they one in mind? |
MuttleyLaff: |
jesusjnr: CodeTemplar:"And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven." - Matthew 12:31 "28 29but anyone who blasphemes the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven. This is a sin with eternal consequences." - Mark 3:28 jesusjnr did you hear CodeTemplar, hmm? jesusjnr, you have slandered, you on record, have made false spoken statements to damage the reputation of Apostle Paul. jesusjnr, you have offended the Holy Spirit. jesusjnr, you have have rubbished the work of the Holy Spirit. jesusjnr you have blasphemed against the Holy Spirit and have recently being read, speaking sacrilegiously about God. There is light at the end of your tunnel, but what kind of light is this light jesusjnr? Is it a light from a TGV, as in, a high-speed fast moving train or is it, a light beacon, a ray of hope for you? |
"The LORD said, "I did not send these prophets, but even so they I did not give them any but still they - Jeremiah 23:21 [img]https://s0/images/MuttleyLaffsipsTea.gif[/img] The sipping tea moment look, when you want to say: "Lukeastew, wasnt I warning you" |
lightblazingnow:He would have fully passed the test, but unfortunately he didnt and rest is history. What would have happened to Adam, is that, he would have gone again, under the knife and give up another rib, from where he'll be given another woman There however is a twist, as in other unexpected/expected development, to what would have happened to Adam if he had rejected Eve when she disobeyed Interlocutors' comments are 24/7 being monitored Blakjewelry:Had it been that Adam survived the last hour, what would have happened, was that he would have thereafter been allowed to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (i.e. ToKG&E) and men will not be näked but men will still be clothed in righteousness |
Shepherd00:Shepherd00, I've being meaning a long time ago to comment on this thread, when I read your comments, to say, you're on to something with this your post above here, but wasnt readily opportuned. If I can squeeze in the time, I want to asap make some contribution with some surprising fact(s) that arent generally known about the Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil and Tree of life (i.e. TokG&E and ToL). They for some, will be very surprising, astonishing, remarkable, overwhelming and/or startling facts. PS: Go easy with my bud buddy please. |
nijabazaar:The book of Enoch and other variants of it, are best flushed down the toilet, where they belong. If you start, you won't last five minutes into reading the book, before you'll shove it away, from finding the content, being ludicrous and a waste of even idle time. The book of Enoch was written by the person self styling himself as Enoch. It is not different to the Otum series, done by our own resident "Enoch" version guy here, on Nairaland nijabazaar:Except from the Book of Enoch, where in the Bible, where else, have you read that God revealed stuff to Enoch nijabazaar? MuttleyLaff:nijabazaar, you'll be absolutely spot on and right to acknowledge that Jude, in his letter, (i.e. Jude 1:3-4) was warning about individuals whose condemnation was written about long ago that have secretly slipped in among the believers, and that these are ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord, but most importantly, the missing part of the whole Book of Enoch jigsaw puzzle nijabazaar and that great missing jigsaw puzzle piece most people usually ignore and/or leave out, is about the issue of circulating myths, which are combinations of old wives' tales, fables, made-up stories, fiction from creative and imaginative writing, fake news, alternative fact, fairy tale, exagerrated made-up stories, like that of the fictional prose first century bestseller literature, that the Book of Enoch is. Continuing from Jude 1:4, nijabazaar are you aware or better still, did you notice that Jude in Jude 1:4 (i.e. with saying, For certain men have crept in among you unnoticed—ungodly ones who were designated long ago for condemnation. They turn the grace of our God into a license for immorality, and they deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ) was actually quoting Apostle Peter, hmm? By this, I mean, Jude was with Jude 1:4, quoting Apostle Peter's 2 Peter 2:1-2, yeah? nijabazaar, do you see the slight variation and/or edit to 2 Peter 2:1-2, that Jude made when he referenced 2 Peter 2:1-2, with his Jude 1:4 version of event, hmm? "1Now there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies that even deny the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction on themselves. 2Many will follow in their depravity, and because of them the way of truth will be defamed." - 2 Peter 2:1-2 "3Beloved, although I made every effort to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt it necessary to write and urge you to contend earnestly for the faith entrusted once for all to the saints. 4For certain men have crept in among you unnoticed—ungodly ones who were designated long ago for condemnation. They turn the grace of our God into a license for immorality, and they deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ." - Jude 1:3-4 nijabazaar, did you notice how Jude, in Jude 1:4 switched from Peter's 2 Peter 2:1 writing, that the false teachers were coming, to him Jude now writing that the false teachers etcetera had arrived. nijabazaar, also did you importantly notice in Jude 1:8, how Jude mentioned how these false teachers with their fabled stories were slandering angels and/or heaping abuse on celestial beings, hmm? Compare with 2 Peter 2:10 too. 2 Peter 2:11, was saying, angels, although much greater (i.e. than these false teachers), do not dare bring an accusation against each other celestial beings, and Jude 1:9 corroborates this even with saying, Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, only saying to the devil, “The Lord punish you!,” meanwhile, these false teachers have the gall to falsely accuse angels of sexually sleeping with female human beings. Peter and Jude said, these charges made, are human slander against heavenly beings, and that real angels would never make any such accusations to each other or otherwise. In short, angels themselves do not get involved in making false spoken statement(s) damaging to each other's reputation. This is aside from the fact that angels dont do sex and Jesus emphatically saying that angels dont get married. 1And then Michael, Uriel, Raphael, and Gabriel looked down from heaven and saw much blood being shed upon the earth, and all lawlessness being wrought upon the earth.From the above, at least Book of Enoch 9:1-11 quote for starters, and according to Enoch, the star fictitious character from this "the Book of Enoch", apparently Michael and three other archangels, accused Semjaza and Azazel of going into the daughters of men upon the earth, and sleeping with the women, but on the flip side and according to Peter's testimony, angels (i.e. Michael, Uriel, Raphael and Gabriel etcetera) do not dare bring accusations as ludicrous as this against each other celestial beings, and even Jude added that, Michael would not dare accuse the devil himself. So, in short, and on the strength of the assertions of Peter and Jude, the story, in the Book of Enoch 9:1-11, of Michael, making an accusation against those two angels is false. Now, if the story of the accusation is false then equally false so, is the story of the angels' sexual sin. The evidence is piling up against the Book of Enoch to be a best-selling work of fiction of a first century "Dan Brown" The Book of Enoch is littered with so many Book of Enoch 69:2-10 mumbo-jumbo that are readily and easily observed, noticed and/or seen. Too many to much mention nijabazaar. nijabazaar, did you further notice, what Jude said about these men, in Jude 1:10 that, "Whatever these people do not understand, they slander. " and that "Like animals, which are creatures of instinct, they use whatever they know to destroy themselves, they do whatever their instincts tell them, and so they bring about their own destruction." Fyi, they circulate stories that nephilims being angels, celestial beings, had sexual intercourse with female human beings and ended up married to them? Compare with 2 Peter 2:12 nijabazaar, did you notice how Jude or Peter, never quoted anywhere in the Bible, like Genesis, for instance, of any example of any angel(s) sleeping with women? Listen nijabazaar, let me put my cards on the table, straight faced up open for you with these comments to see: 1/ Angels are not what are called the sons of God. 2/ Angels did not have sexual intercourse with female human beings. 3/ Angels did not marry the daughters of men. 4/ The Enoch featured in the Book of Enoch, is not either of the Enochs nor is he the same Enoch, the patriarch mentioned in Genesis, Exodus, 1 Chronicles, Luke or Hebrews |
kkins25:No man is an island of knowledge kkins25. Your money, on this one, is not valid. kkins25:Are you wining me kkins25, because I for one and personally know, I hold no all understanding. As a matter of fact, knowledge is learning something new every day and I am yet to meet anyone so ignorant that I couldn't learn something new from kkins25:The miracle, is a once and for all, not to be replicated miracle. I am sure you know about "monogenes" having two primary definitions, as in, "pertaining to being the only one of its kind within a specific relationship" and "pertaining to being the only one of its kind or class, unique in kind". Something close to it, is the miracle birth of Isaac, who was born in spite of menopause and impotence setting in kkins25:The difference is Jesus Christ was birthed without any earthly father. This way, the sin gene, inherited from earthly fathers, was not passed down to Jesus Christ. kkins25:Affirmative kkins25, yes I do proclaim that Jesus' genetic material and/or genetic make up, even His blood type sef, would differ, as it does do differ, scientifically from those of common man's. kkins25:Affirmative kkins25, yes, if you carried out a PCR analysis on Jesus Christ and compare His DNA with that of his mother using BLAST, you would find considerable, mind boggling DNA about Jesus that His Blood type is AB+ve, which of course, you know, is considered a universal recipient, meaning He can receive from all blood types (i.e. namely O+ve, O-ve, A+ve, A-ve, B+ve, B-ve, AB+ve & AB-ve) kkins25:kkins25, how then did this 'foreign' DNA get attached to Jesus is the stuff that miracles are made of. Isnt it amazing that the percentage of the population that has AB blood type, is in the single digits, hmm? kkins25:kkins25, every day we are engaged in miracles which we don't even recognize, so please, fyi, miracles arent at all simply a novel idea. Now, another fyi, is that, even miracles have their own rules they abide to too, miracles have their limits, time and place kkins25. Miracles are bound by rules kkins25 and will only occur within the confines or boundaries of these rules. Of course, only God, is an exception to whatever the rule is. kkins25:If the situation and/or a condition that causes a miracle to occur are strictly met, of course, why not, humanity can carry out whatever the miracle is, inasmuchas with respect to what the definition of miracle is. |
budaatum:budaatum, in answering your question in the short way, you want it done, it is true, you said what Jude was saying, but you ironically stopped short. You didn't continue on with what Jude furthermore was saying about false teachers that have crept in and crept in with made up stories, accusing celestial beings with slanders, like sleeping with female human beings. |
budaatum:You don't disappoint. There after all is only one budaatum. Only one and one 9 out 10 always true to nature. budaatum, in answering your question the short way, you want it, you said what Jude was saying, but ironically stopped short. You didn't continue on with what Jude was saying about false teachers have crept in and crept in with made up stories, accusing celestial beings with slanders, like sleeping with female human beings. |
budaatum:"From the above, at least Book of Enoch 9:1-11 quote for starters, and according to Enoch, Michael and three other archangels, accused Semjaza and Azazel of going into the daughters of men upon the earth, and sleeping with the women, but on the flip side and according to Peter's testimony, angels (i.e. Michael, Uriel, Raphael and Gabriel etcetera) do not dare bring accusations as ludicrous as this against each other celestial beings, and even Jude added that, Michael would not dare accuse the devil himself. So, in short, and on the strength of the assertions of Peter and Jude, the story, in the Book of Enoch 9:1-11, of Michael, making an accusation against those two angels is false. Now, if the story of the accusation is false then equally false so, is the story of the angels' sexual sin. The evidence is piling up against the Book of Enoch to be a best-selling work of fiction of a first century "Dan Brown" The Book of Enoch is littered with so many Book of Enoch 69:2-10 mumbo-jumbo that are readily and easily observed, noticed and/or seen Did you further notice, what Jude said about these men, in Jude 1:10 that, "Whatever these people do not understand, they slander. " and that "Like animals, which are creatures of instinct, they use whatever they know to destroy themselves, they do whatever their instincts tell them, and so they bring about their own destruction." Fyi, circulating stories that nephilims being angels, celestial beings, had sexual intercourse with female human beings? Compare with 2 Peter 2:12 budaatum, did you notice how Jude or Peter, never quoted anywhere in the Bible, like Genesis, for instance, of any example of any angel(s) sleeping with women? budaatum, you asked me the question "What was Jude saying, and is it what I said below or not?" so, let me put my cards on the table, straight open face up with these, as in what you did not say. You didnt say, like I've said that: 1/ Angels are not what are called the sons of God 2/ Angels did not have sexual intercourse with female human beings 3/ Angels did not marry the daughters of men" - Re: Book Of Enoch Reveals So Much. It's So Unbelievable! by MuttleyLaff: 4:42am On Oct 05 2019 https://www.nairaland.com/5448144/book-enoch-reveals-much-unbelievable#82849084 |
budaatum:budaatum you are a grown arse man/woman, so please act that way and stop all this your typical puerile and jejune behavior, seeing me as doing "blah, yada, blah, yada, blah, yada," saying I have mouth diarrhoea and that I am not using my brain. No, you want free and fast food, but I dont operate that way, because anyone that gives you free fast food, stops you from thinking. Curiosity has its own reason for existing, dont be afraid to ask me questions. Dont be afraid, when I in return, ask you hard or seemingly difficult questions. Don't be suspicious or afraid of the answers you might get, but be afraid of not asking the questions and/or answering the questions. Why all about this? It is because its the only way you'll know which direction your truth lays budaatum:It isnt a matter of accepting, my position and informed knowledge has always been that Jude was referencing Peter, who first was referencing this first century fairy tale best seller book known as the Book of Enoch. budaatum, please tell me, if Jude, Peter, Paul or any other disciple or apostle of Jesus, anywhere in the Bible, quoted this "The words of the blessing of Enoch, wherewith he blessed the elect ⌈⌈and⌉⌉ righteous, who will be living in the day of tribulation, when all the wicked ⌈⌈and godless⌉⌉ are to be removed" text, that you lifted up from the The Book of Enoch's The Book of Parables of Enoch section. budaatum:Smh, back to your ad hominems now, are we, erhn? budaatum: MuttleyLaff:Lol, aah, only women fish for compliments. As you can see, I earlier and have already complimented you. Me that try to have things cut up in pieces, give information in piecemeals, piece by piece so whoever dished out to doesnt choke on it, you think I dont know what I am doing, huh? You think I am not using or engaging my brain, right? You think if not for labour of love, I would be giving up my precious time suffering and enduring your incessant abuse and insults, erhn? OK, Madam Big Shot, have a try for size with this. You are absolutely spot on and right to acknowledge that Jude was warning about individuals whose condemnation was written about long ago who have secretly slipped in among you, and that they are ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord, but you left an important missing part of the whole Book of Enoch jigsaw puzzle budaatum and that great missing jigsaw puzzle piece you left out, is about the issue of circulating myths, combinations of old wives' tales, fables, made-up stories, fiction from creative and imaginative writing, fake news, alternative fact, fairy tale, exagerrated made-up stories, like that of the fictional prose first century bestseller literature, that the Book of Enoch is. Continuing from where you, at Jude 1:4 stopped budaatum, are you aware or better still, did you notice that Jude in Jude 1:4 (i.e. with saying, For certain men have crept in among you unnoticed—ungodly ones who were designated long ago for condemnation. They turn the grace of our God into a license for immorality, and they deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ) was actually quoting Apostle Peter, hmm? By this, I mean, was quoting 2 Peter 2:1-2, huh? budaatum, do you see the slight variation and/or edit to 2 Peter 2:1-2, that Jude made when he referenced 2 Peter 2:1-2, with his Jude 1:4 version of event, hmm? I dont know why I bother doing this, knowing you havent the patience nor temperance to see to the end. You'll soon be complaining about having headache and hurl insults about not using brain when it is you, having the strong unwillingness to face measured emerging gradual facts. "1Now there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies that even deny the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction on themselves. 2Many will follow in their depravity, and because of them the way of truth will be defamed." - 2 Peter 2:1-2 "3Beloved, although I made every effort to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt it necessary to write and urge you to contend earnestly for the faith entrusted once for all to the saints. 4For certain men have crept in among you unnoticed—ungodly ones who were designated long ago for condemnation. They turn the grace of our God into a license for immorality, and they deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ." - Jude 1:3-4 budaatum, did you notice how Jude, in Jude 1:4 switched from Peter's 2 Peter 2:1 writing, that the false teachers were coming, to him Jude now writing that the false teachers etcetera had arrived. budaatum, also did you importantly notice in Jude 1:8, how Jude mentioned how these false teachers with their fabled stories were slandering angels and/or heaping abuse on celestial beings, hmm? Compare with 2 Peter 2:10 too. 2 Peter 2:11, was saying, angels, although much greater (i.e. than these false teachers), do not dare bring an accusation against each other celestial beings, and Jude 1:9 corroborates this even with saying, Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, only saying to the devil, “The Lord punish you!,” meanwhile, these false teachers have the gall to falsely accuse angels of sexually sleeping with female human beings. Peter and Jude said, these charges are human slander against heavenly beings, and that real angels would never make any such accusations to each other or otherwise. In short, angels themselves do not get involved in making false spoken statement(s) damaging to each other's reputation. 1And then Michael, Uriel, Raphael, and Gabriel looked down from heaven and saw much blood being shed upon the earth, and all lawlessness being wrought upon the earth.From the above, at least Book of Enoch 9:1-11 quote for starters, and according to Enoch, Michael and three other archangels, accused Semjaza and Azazel of going into the daughters of men upon the earth, and sleeping with the women, but on the flip side and according to Peter's testimony, angels (i.e. Michael, Uriel, Raphael and Gabriel etcetera) do not dare bring accusations as ludicrous as this against each other celestial beings, and even Jude added that, Michael would not dare accuse the devil himself. So, in short, and on the strength of the assertions of Peter and Jude, the story, in the Book of Enoch 9:1-11, of Michael, making an accusation against those two angels is false. Now, if the story of the accusation is false then equally false so, is the story of the angels' sexual sin. The evidence is piling up against the Book of Enoch to be a best-selling work of fiction of a first century "Dan Brown" The Book of Enoch is littered with so many Book of Enoch 69:2-10 mumbo-jumbo that are readily and easily observed, noticed and/or seen Did you further notice, what Jude said about these men, in Jude 1:10 that, "Whatever these people do not understand, they slander. " and that "Like animals, which are creatures of instinct, they use whatever they know to destroy themselves, they do whatever their instincts tell them, and so they bring about their own destruction." Fyi, circulating stories that nephilims being angels, celestial beings, had sexual intercourse with female human beings? Compare with 2 Peter 2:12 budaatum, did you notice how Jude or Peter, never quoted anywhere in the Bible, like Genesis, for instance, of any example of any angel(s) sleeping with women? budaatum, you asked me the question "What was Jude saying, and is it what I said below or not?" so, let me put my cards on the table, straight open face up with these, as in what you did not say. You didnt say, like I've said that: 1/ Angels are not what are called the sons of God 2/ Angels did not have sexual intercourse with female human beings 3/ Angels did not marry the daughters of men |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 (of 441 pages)
