₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,474 members, 8,517,724 topics. Date: Thursday, 12 November 2026 at 10:11 PM

Toggle theme

MuttleyLaff's Posts

Nairaland Forum › MuttleyLaff's Profile › MuttleyLaff's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 (of 441 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff:
petra1:
There are different kinds of givings in the Bible. To parents ,to the poor, to strangers ,to man of God , to brethren , to God etc. One does not supplant the other. You can't say because you gave to your parents you have given to God and you can't say because you gave yo your parents you are excused from giving to God
In their greed they will make up clever lies to get hold of your money.
But God condemned them long ago, and their destruction will not be delayed.

- 2 Peter 2:3

You must each decide in your heart how much to give.
And don't give reluctantly or in response to pressure. "For God loves a person who gives cheerfully."

- 2 Corinthians 9:7

There is no distinction in all the different kinds of givings anymore,
because, now, all the different kinds of givings falls under one umbrella,
and that is an umbrella called cheerful giving done under no compulsion as can be seen in 2 Corinthians 9:7 above

There is no special, designated or stipulated giving anymore
because you're now expected to give as you're led in the spirit,
expected to give any amount that you have decided in your heart done under no forcing, coercion or manipulation

petra1:
Mark 7:11
11 But you say it is all right for people to say to their parents,
‘Sorry, I can’t help you. For I have vowed to give to God what I would have given to you.’


See , we don't try to cut corners in giving. We do all.
7Their worship is a farce,
for they teach man-made ideas as commands from God.
8For you ignore God’s law and substitute your own tradition.”
9Then he said, “You skillfully sidestep God’s law in order to hold on to your own tradition.
10For instance, Moses gave you this law from God: ‘Honor your father and mother,’e and ‘Anyone who speaks disrespectfully of father or mother must be put to death.
11But you say it is all right for people to say to their parents,
‘Sorry, I can’t help you. For I have vowed to give to God what I would have given to you.
(i.e. it is Corban, that is, devoted to God, so I cant give it out)
12In this way, you let them disregard their needy parents.
13And so you cancel the word of God in order to hand down your own tradition.
And this is only one example among many others

- Mark 7:7-13

Sorry brother, you are not expected to try to cut corners in giving
but you're meant to turn the corner in giving


and you do all, by just doing one giving,
which is
: Give any amount that you have decided in your heart, has to be done under no forcing, coercion or manipulation

It doesnt look good at all, reading a whole you brother, twisting and misusing Mark 7:11 like this
because it is glaring that, Jesus, in Mark 7:11, was in effect saying to the Pharisees that:
You say, Sorry, I can’t help you, as I have vowed to give this tithe money to God that I would have given to you.’

There is nothing like corban for believers.
Tithe is not corban, especially not to a believer


It is not a matter of opinion but it is an objective fact that, tithing and/or tithe money is no longer sacrosanct
Tithe money, now can, ought to be and should be given to whomsoever or whatsoever is in need of it
(e.g. parents, the poor, neighbour in need, good causes etcetera)
Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff: 8:05am On Feb 15, 2017
petra1:
Not at all except you just refuse to see or acknowledge it.
Types and shadow of Christ is seen from genesis to malachi. Christ fulfill those. He fulfilled offering for sin, he fulfilled circumvision
Unless there is more to it, why anyone will cling for existence to a shadow baffles me
If there is shadow, then there more be a real thing
Tithe is a shadow, and not the real thing
Tithe is shadow of thing(s) to come...

Tithing is an area of darkness, caused by light being blocked by sincere ignorance, by willful ignorance, by the allure of filthy lucre, by being ill-informed etcetera

petra1:
But he didn't fulfilled personal commitment in worshiping of God
Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God--this is your true and proper worship
- Romans 12:1

petra1:
He didn't fulfil tithing nor offering unto God.
Neither did he fulfill personal prayer, so the fact that such things are mentioned in the law makes no difference. They are principles
He DID fulfil BOTH, tithing or offering unto God
Jesus is our perpetual tithe OR offering to God

petra1:
Sharing among one another Philadelphia is different from giving to God.
There's difference between giving to brethren and giving to God
"The king will answer them, 'I can guarantee this truth:
Whatever you did for one of my brothers or sisters, no matter how unimportant [they seemed], you did for me.'

- Matthew 25:40

There's NO difference between giving to brethren and giving to God
because whatever you did for one of the least of the brethren, you did for Me, says Matthew 25:40 above

petra1:
Then there's no point anybody keep bringing up the issue of circumcision.
Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing.
Keeping God's commandments is what matters.

- 1 Corinthians 7:19

Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation.
- Galatians 6:15

Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all
- Galatians 5:2

Exactly the point.
If there's no point for anybody to keep bringing up the issue of circumcision
then there's no point either for anyone to keep bringing up the issue of tithing too
because just like circumcision has no value,
so as well ''tithing'' or ''not tithing'' have no value.

''tithing'' or ''not tithing'' is nothing, dont mean anything, what counts is the new creation you've become in Christ Jesus
Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff: 9:08am On Feb 14, 2017
UNIQUEISRAEL:
2Cor.9:7 Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver.

Will somebody please show me where in the New Testament we can find any of the believers paying tithes, or any of the Apostles asking for tithes?

The epistles are full of discussions about giving for the support of preachers, teachers, and the poor: but no where do any of the Apostles ask for tithes or remind anyone to pay tithes. And, how can it be said that a man is not giving of necessity if he is obeying a LAW of tithing?

How can it be said that a man is not giving of necessity, if he is convinced that he will be cursed with poverty if he fails to pay those tithes?

Certainly, if the Apostle Paul thought he was authorized and obliged to demand tithes, he would have brought it up in 1 Corinthians chapter nine,
where he asserts that he has a right to receive financial support from those he preaches to!
Why doesn't Paul remind them that they are obliged to pay those tithes, and that he has a right to receive those tithes
?
plainbibletruth:
Like the OP wrote above:

None of you is able to answer because you've decided to blind your eyes to the plain truth.
Petra1 couldnt answer,
so out of desperation
, he tried claiming the apostles endorsed tithing and made a pitiable attempt of using 1 Corinthians 9:13-14 as evidence
But we all know that 1 Corinthians 9:13-14, is credited to only Paul and no other apostle(s)

And that Paul used 1 Corinthians 9:13-14 as a syncrisis, also known as synkrisis,
written as a figure of speech, in where opposite things were compared
(i.e. ''the altar & temple'' and ''the gospel'')

The former (i.e. who work in the the altar & serve in the temple) live off tithe and stipulated offering,
whilst the latter (i.e. who preach the gospel) live off financial/material support, collections & donations from benefactors according to how each have decided in their hearts to give
Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff: 10:12am On Feb 13, 2017
damagepbuh:
Ok
https://i.imgsafe.org/b63f9caf13.gif
Don’t forget to send a thank you letter
Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff:
damagepbuh:
As i said before most monikers behind these posts are Muslims and atheists and their mission is to set christians up against themselves.
If u want to win over Muslims and unbelievers preach d love of christ and not criticism. Dats wat d apostles did. People has been discouraged from going to church all because of all these criticism. And d best way d devil can get u to backslide is to isolate u from d gathering of d saints
FCOL Muslims and atheists setting christians up against themselves is unfounding
and are the least of the concerns of any believer standing on a strong foundation
but Ooookay ooo, I sure have stumbled into one abundantly funny side of Nairaland

damagepbuh:
People who pay tithe pay tithe because they believe it secures their finance and if it doesnt work for dem they wont continue.
Doesn't get more WTF than this.
What a very serious error in thinking that giving tithe secures anyones finance. SMH
There is a sucker born every minute, and that is what ridiculous and beautiful lies such as this rely on

damagepbuh:
No pastor and i repeat no pastor will ever preach pay ur tithe or go to hell
They in effect say, go to hell, when they preach, if you dont tithe, you cant marry in church, cant be ordained pastor or deacon(ness), and cant qualify for God's blessing

damagepbuh:
Since tithe or no tithe is not a pre requisite to enter God's kingdom, its best to drop d matter and channel our strength to winning souls for Christ. I wont want to argue on tithe or no tithe i only tell people to develop a very close relationship with God, they will find answers to the questions that bother their mind
If you arent worried over Matthew 7:21-23, I take it then, that you arent bothered of Matthew 8:12 either, which is about some sons of the kingdom being cast out into outer darkness: where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Such sons of the kingdom are the religious oligarchy and the tithe-marketeers promoting and selling tithe-money like a product to the gullible
Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff:
petra1:
TITHES AND OFFERINGS ARE ETERNAL PRINCIPLES
The church doesn't need a command to tithe it was already a principle in the kingdom of God.
Just as other biblical principles such as prayer, fasting, worship, honoring your father and mother, alms to the poor etc.
These principle existed before the law came .
TITHING EXISTED BEFORE THE LAW

Hebrews 7:6
But he whose descent is not counted from them received tithes of Abraham, and blessed him that had the promises
https://i57.tinypic.com/34sp9j4.gif
But the hour cometh, and now is,
when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth:
for the Father seeketh such to worship him

- John 4:23 KJV

Yes, accepted they are all eternal principles
but as you know and will accept, eternal principle pass eternal principle
different, different eternal principles nahin dey, eternal principles get categories
and just as the law of gravity is annihilated & rendered useless,
with no effect by the another eternal principle in the name of the the law of aerodynamics, which is better, stronger and superior
so are tithes & offering
and alms, replaced with cheerful giving done under no cajoling, done with no manipulation or twisting of scriptures
and God's true worshipers, importantly, dont just worship BUT must worship God in spirit and in truth.

petra1:
JESUS ENDORSED TITHING
Matthew 23:23 (NLT)
. . . . You should tithe, yes, but do not neglect the more important things
You're using a ''tail wagging the dog'' technique here
Meaning Matthew 23:23 was not about endorsing tithing but strongly is about a damning criticism of the Pharisees
and besides you have no witness scripture elsewhere that corroborates Jesus endorsing tithing

petra1:
Matthew 22:21
. . . , Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.
Matthew 22:21 is talking of Caesar's tax and believers giving tithe
God is not interested in worthless tithe-money
God is content with whatever you decide without grudges or coercion to give

petra1:
THE APOSTLES ENDORSED
It's through tithes and offerings the workers of the terbernacle and temple get their welfare . And the apostles used it as illustration here.

1 Corinthians 9:13-14
13 Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar?
14 Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.
Paul, is the only person, credited for 1 Corinthians 9:13-14 and not apostles. SMH.

It needs made known that, 1 Corinthians 9:13-14 is a syncrisis, which incidentally is also known as synkrisis,
written as a figure of speech in which opposite things (i.e. ''the altar & temple'' and ''the gospel'') were compared

The former (i.e. who work in the the altar & serve in the temple) live off tithe and offering,
whilst the latter (i.e. who preach the gospel) live off financial/material collections & donations benefactors' have decided in their hearts to give
Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff:
damagepbuh:
Just for d sake of killing d argument i told u i drop d word tithe
but in truth i am ardent believer of tithing but no argument will either change me or you
Some people will never change partly because they are die-hards, and you just have to respect or accept that
but isnt it funny, how day by day, change is sometimes needed to better yourself
and that small changes can make a HUGE or BIG difference

One reason people resist change is either because they focus on filthy lucre
or because they focus on an illusion they have to give up,
instead of focusing on what they have to gain from submitting to the change

damagepbuh:
I will want to drop the argument
Never mind argument(s), because the remit, isn't to force or make you drink
but was just to show, point out the stream and as it were, lead to it's water.

damagepbuh:
but read my last post.
Your last post?
It was interesting reading how you use terms & conditions and psychological manipulation as bargaining chips when negotiating with God

damagepbuh:
And stop helping muslims and atheist achieve their aims of bringing up these posts.
Instead of criticizing what you dont believe about Christianity, why dont you preach wat u believe and win souls
Muslims and atheists are won over by bringing up posts such as these showing that tithing had stopped
but unfortunately continues to exist in the form of tithe money
because of the religious oligarchy and the tithe-marketeers promoting and selling tithe-money like a product to the gullible

damagepbuh:
How will condenming tithing help win souls for God
Which of the following represents the best way a person might react to an illusion like tithing money, created out of a false narrative or doctrine?
#1 criticise the person who perpetuates the illusion, the false narrative and doctrine on money tithe?
#2 repeat the illusion, the false narrative and doctrine on money tithe to someone else?
#3 get upset at the person exposing the illusion and making all aware of the false narrative and doctrine on money tithe?
#4 reinforce or cement the illusion, the false narrative and doctrine on money tithe with another false narrative or another twisted scripture?

You need to read and take a proper close note of Matthew 7:21-23, if you really are worried about soul winning
Christianity Etc › Re: Clairvoyance by MuttleyLaff: 4:02am On Feb 13, 2017
Sarassin:
I'm in the sunnier climes of the west coast although the time zones are doing my head in
Time zones doing your head in ought to be the least of your worries, why not splash on sunscreen and rub it in on the head

Sarassin:
Hehehe....if you say so
It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to wipe it off.

Sarassin:
I appreciate that you are more than savvy enough to pull me up on that verse, but I did not quote that verse in error
No?
What does Exodus 34:29-30, the precursor to Exodus 34:34 reveal?
I know you arent that self conceited not to admit that Moses put on a physical veil and only started doing so after realising people were afraid of him because his face was shiny
and if so, then aware of the implication of Moses walking about the Israelite camp without the veil on

Sarassin:
and there is nothing humorous about the last stages of achieving clairvoyance by piercing the Veil
It is humorous reading you mixing up literal with metaphor
when using an Exodus 34:34 literal veil, as a means to validate your construct that the last stages of achieving clairvoyance is by piercing the Veil (i.e. metaphor)

Sarassin:
I believe that you know fully that the depiction of the veil in the Hebrew Bible is rooted in Jewish esoterica, particularly Qabalah.
Note below concerning Qabalah.

Sarassin:
Therefore its use in the Pentateuch can only be highly allegorical. The true meanings of the allegories of the Hebrew Bible are lost to Christians because they define these by events in the New Testament (in my view)
Dont know how you arrived at this presumption on how they define events
but hey there you go again muddling up literal with metaphor and whatnot

Fact is, in the Pentateuch, and that's talking of Exodus 34:34, Moses wore and had a physical veil on

In OT 2 Kings 6:17, Elisha prayed ''Open his eyes, LORD'', so his servant may pierce the metaphoric veil and see that the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha.

In NT Matthew 17:2, Peter, James, and John the brother of James, eyes were opened and pierced the metaphoric veil enough to suddenly see Moses and Elijah standing before them, talking with Jesus.

NT 2 Corinthians 3:16, states that whenever a person comes to self and turns to the Lord, the metaphoric veil is taken away.

Sarassin:
On the Tree of Life, the crown of which is a direct emanation of the Divine, the Veil is placed on the Sephira that is Yesod, which is more to do with sexual proclivities. The allegory here is deep and profound and I haven't even scratched the surface
15He asked me, "son of man, do you see this? You will see even more disgusting things than these."
16Then he brought me into the inner courtyard of the LORD's temple. There at the entrance to the LORD's temple, between the entrance and the altar, were about 25 men who had their backs turned to the LORD's temple. They were facing east and worshiping the rising sun

- Ezekiel 8:15-16

Ezekiel 8:15-16 above is proof positive, Qabalah or Kabballah, to a certain degree and depending on intent or motive is not halal
Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff:
damagepbuh:
I appreciate ur criticism.
Please dont get me wrong, criticisms, if any, are not levelled at you per se
rather it is levelled at those who should or ought to know better

damagepbuh:
Ok let me stop calling it tithe let me say I give 10% of my income to d work of God
When you stop calling it tithe, it is a good step in the right direction
and it's a good step in the right direction, especially because you've turned away from something everyone actually has been released from

damagepbuh:
I hope dat is not a new wine in an old bottle
Never mind that, you've done very well with this one small step, which happens to be a commendable one giant leap of no more seeing your giving as tithe
Slow and steady wins the race...
so one step at a time at unlearning to relearn
and learn about the law of the spirit, what it's all about and the implication of what this means to us or how it affects us


damagepbuh:
I negotiate with my God. Hannah negotiated with God, Jabez did it, Jehoshephat did it, Hezekiah did it
Hannah, Jabez, Jehoshephat and Hezekiah did not have the unique privilege you have and enjoy having today
Besides if negotiation failed, you dont need to resort to striking deals or bargaining with God like Hannah did

damagepbuh:
God told the Israelites "come let us reason together".
and what did God say BEFORE ''come let us reason together'' and AFTER ''come let us reason together''?
Was it not about worthless offerings and corruption?

damagepbuh:
The Syrophoenician woman negotiated with Jesus she didnt just take Jesus' answer when Jesus told her dat u cant give d food for the children to the dogs
She did not negotiate terms and conditions like your ''if u want me to give u more'' condition, and then ''bless me more'' terms
or your ''since i sponsor ur works with ten percent of my earnings i know u wont allow anything bad happen to my source of income'' psychological manipulation

damagepbuh:
Yes I negotiate with my God wen i render argumentative prayers
Now to the One being able to do exceedingly above all things that we ask or think, according to the power working in us
- Ephesians 3:20

I respect and understand that it is down to the present level of power working in you and of the amount of grace you've received

damagepbuh:
On whether to respect d annointed or not.
I go by the words of the high priest Ceiphas he said "leave the apostles alone, if their works be not of God, it will surely fail, but if it is of God then we might be fighting God. They said they are annointed and as long as their works has not failed, they still preach d gospel, heal d sick, give and support d poor, lead people to christ i will always respect the annointing in dem. Until their works fail
21It is not everyone that says to me, 'My Lord, my Lord'',
who enters the Kingdom of Heaven, but whoever does the will of my Father who is in Heaven.
22Many will say to me in that day,
'My Lord, my Lord, have we not prophesied in your name,
and in your name have cast out demons, and have done many mighty works in your name?'
23And then I will confess to them,
'I have never known you, remove yourselves far from me, you workers of evil.'

- Matthew 7:21-23

Beware of what it is being respected
Not all that glitters is gold.
and sometimes the grass appears green on the opposite side
because of the soak-away beneath it & because it's been fertilised with manure and not by anointing
Christianity Etc › Re: Clairvoyance by MuttleyLaff:
Sarassin:
Thanks for your comments
No probs, it aint being that much cold lately so why the hibernation
Anyway forecast says, it’s heating up for Valentine’s Day!
and we're set for warmer weather this week

Sarassin:
I quite like the meme of old Idi Amin Dada, a nice touch, he was many things but nobody ever accused him of great intelligence....
His infamy cast a shadow over his great intelligence

Sarassin:
You take issue with the biblical comparisons I made
29It came about when Moses was coming down from Mount Sinai
(and the two tablets of the testimony were in Moses’ hand as he was coming down from the mountain),
that Moses did not know that the skin of his face shone because of his speaking with Him.
30So when Aaron and all the sons of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone,
and they were afraid to come near him

- Exodus 34:29-30

C'mon.
I took issue with you improperly handling the word of truth when using Exodus 34:34

Exodus 34:29-30 above, says different to you plucking out Exodus 34:34 to back up your complicated and humorous ''last stage before true clairvoyance occurs is the removal of the veil'' etcetera remark

Sarassin:
I am always amazed that biblical scholars never cease to impress on we heathens the allegorical nature of biblical writings (straight from the school of Origen) yet when it suits them, the writings are of course....literal
Though this remark deserves using Idi Amin again here, I'll refrain

No, my friend, c'mon now, quit trying to play the ''when convenient or acceptable to them'' card
Suck it up, and since we both and know agree that the biblical writings are partly literal, partly obvious & unmysterious, partly allegorical, partly symbolic, partly metaphorical, partly esoteric, partly subtle, partly vague, partly hyperbolic
then all that is required is to correctly and accurately handle it
Christianity Etc › Re: See Why Tithing Is Never A Command To Be Observed In Churches (Proofs) by MuttleyLaff: 1:37pm On Feb 12, 2017
damagepbuh:
I believe in tithing not because its a sin not to tithe nor will u go to hell if u dont tithe.
It is a personal thing to me
People don't pour new wine into old wineskins.
If they do, the wine will make the skins burst, and both the wine and the skins will be ruined.
Rather, new wine is to be poured into fresh skins.

- Mark 2:22

Apart from departing from the obsolete command of tithing and the proper way of tithing, you're actually putting new wine into an old wineskin

damagepbuh:
I tell God watever u give in a month i will give u one tenth of it, so if u want me to give u more, bless me more. Also since i sponsor ur works with ten percent of my earnings i know u wont allow anything bad happen to my source of income
There is no need to bargain with God like this
Negotiating terms and conditions with God, in this manner, is of a Jacob spirit
God is content with whatever you decide in your heart, as & when you yield to a prompt in the spirit or move of the spirit to give

damagepbuh:
Its a personal decision if u believe in it do it but if u dnt believe in it dont do it.
Its not a pre requisite to make heaven every pastor will tell u dat.
If u dnt believe in tithing pls stop criticizing it d way u do, as a Christian its very wrong to criticize some pastors d way u do no matter wat
The scribes and pharisee were criticised
People were not only given warnings about the scribes but were told of antics the scribes get up to

damagepbuh:
IF they claim they have d anointing pls respect d anointing even if they dnt actually have it.
It will make d annointing work for u
Respect is something earned and not something just like that, given.
Respect is for those who deserve and not for those who demand it or on whose behalf it is demanded
Irony? How can an anointing that is non-existent on someone, work for you or anyone
They can be given courtsey but they can't gain respect by requesting it.

Respect, honesty, trust and truth is good and important
but betrayal of any one of them is to lose all
and that, after betrayal of truth, is the position most ''pastors'' find themselves in (i.e. lose respect)

damagepbuh:
Pls dnt qoute me if u believe u came from a big bang or if u slap ur head on d ground 5 times because am not referring to u
Big bang or slap head on ground 5 times dont apply to moi
Christianity Etc › Re: Clairvoyance by MuttleyLaff: 12:35pm On Feb 12, 2017
HenryDion:
Yes...thinking about resuming cause ever since I stop, my life feels incomplete. I became vulnerable to attacks cause I'm no more ignorant of the other side
One day as we were going to the place of prayer,
we were met by a slave girl with a spirit of clairvoyance,
who earned a large income
for her masters by fortune-telling

- Acts 16:16

9When you enter the land the Lord your God is giving you, be very careful not to imitate the detestable customs of the nations living there.
10For example, never sacrifice your son or daughter as a burnt offering.
And do not let your people practice fortune-telling, or use sorcery, or interpret omens, or engage in witchcraft,
11or cast spells, or function as mediums or psychics, or call forth the spirits of the dead.
12Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord.
It is because the other nations have done these detestable things that the Lord your God will drive them out ahead of you.
13But you must be blameless before the Lord your God.
14The nations you are about to displace consult sorcerers and fortune-tellers, but the Lord your God forbids you to do such things.

- Deuteronomy 18:9-14

HenryDion:
This time around, i pray i won't be over obsessed.
I wonder if my guide will be able to accept me back. I really said bad words to her in other to make her leave.
She was my friend but i turned my back on her. She usually come in form of a cat because i love cats a lot, and that time, i saw so much sadness in her eyes.
Praying into a slippery slope, you don join gang
Christianity Etc › Re: Clairvoyance by MuttleyLaff:
Sarassin:
The last stage before true clairvoyance occurs is the removal of the veil which is not in the public domain.
The veil is a mystical term denoting that at death or in meditation the consciousness expands and recalls what the soul knows.


Traversing the veil means penetrating the fabric between the living and the deceased in order to see them with open eyed clairvoyance.
The deceased walking around us far outnumber the living.
This veil is the etheric force that blocks the view of the astral planes around us.

Therefore, as the mystic opens the eye to clairvoyance it can be said the veil is being removed. It could feel as strongly as something being pulled off the eye, it can feel subtle like an eyelid touching the eyeball ever so slightly or it can be felt like a ripping sensation.

Clearly, comparisons abound in the Christian Bible;
Exodus 34:34
But whenever Moses went in before the LORD to speak with Him, he would take off the veil until he came out; and whenever he came out and spoke to the sons of Israel what he had been commanded.

Job 22:14
Thick clouds veil him, so he does not see us as he goes about in the vaulted heavens.
https://i57.tinypic.com/34sp9j4.gif
Moses in Exodus 34:34, only puts the veil on to stop people staring at him
because after leaving God's presence, the people of Israel where seeing a radiant glow on his face
(i.e. as in, they noticed that the skin of Moses’ face was shining after meeting with God)
Christianity Etc › Re: Grace Is Our Teacher, Not The Ten Commandments - Olamide Obire by MuttleyLaff: 11:26am On Feb 12, 2017
malvisguy212:
longest time bro.
Hey bro, longest time ke?
but I keep sighting your brakelights now and then nau
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff: 11:20am On Feb 12, 2017
brocab:
MuttleyLaff looking at the old woman's story, I never really seen it the way you had pointed it out to me, to be honest it was quite interesting
Her faith was their-than 'so was the tithers greed..
The scribe and poor widow's Mark 12:38-44 was about:
Warning, Criticism and then Proof Positive of the warning & criticism

brocab:
This is why I love the Lord bro, He speaks to us all, so we all understand Him the way He wants us to understand His word.

Interesting
God is Good and there is liberty in His presence, that why sometimes, I laugh along with the Lord, over amusing things

brocab:
Thanks brother
[As] iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens the wits of another
- Proverbs 27:17
No brother, you're a honourable man, thank you.
Christianity Etc › Re: Grace Is Our Teacher, Not The Ten Commandments - Olamide Obire by MuttleyLaff: 10:45am On Feb 12, 2017
TPAND:
False teaching. Ten commandments is our guide not grace. Mods please take this topic of the frontpage. It is completely false
You're right the ''Ten commandments'' is our guide,
as a matter of fact the ''Ten commandments'' was a guardian guarding and looking after men until Christ came (i.e. Galatians 3:24 below)

Let me put it another way.
The law was our guardian until Christ came;
it protected us until we could be made right with God through faith.

- Galatians 3:24


11For the grace of God has appeared that offers salvation to all people.
12It teaches us to say "No" to ungodliness and worldly passions,
and to live self-controlled, upright and godly lives in this present age

- Titus 2:11-12 KJV

How do birds fly effortlessly, isnt it by grace?
How do dolphins swim beautiifully, isnt it by grace?

Grace is instruction
Grace has detailed information about how something should be done
and that exactly, is what Titus 2:11-12 is saying about grace
Grace is a guide, grace is a teacher,
It is with and/or by the grace of God, that you'll know how and what to do etcetera
Christianity Etc › Re: Does The New Covenant Abolish The Ten Commandments? by MuttleyLaff:
petra1:
Tithes and offering and alms and worship will always be principles in Gods kingdom
https://i57.tinypic.com/34sp9j4.gif
But the hour cometh, and now is,
when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth:
for the Father seeketh such to worship him

- John 4:23 KJV

Yes, accepted they are all eternal principles
but as you know and will accept, eternal principle pass eternal principle
different different eternal principles nahin dey, eternal principles get categories
and just as the law of gravity is annihilated & rendered useless,
with no effect by the another eternal principle in the name of the the law of aerodynamics, which is better, stronger and superior
so are tithes & offering
and alms, replaced with cheerful giving done under no cajoling, done with no manipulation or twisting of scriptures
and God's true worshipers, importantly, dont just worship BUT must worship God in spirit and in truth.
Christianity Etc › Re: Does The New Covenant Abolish The Ten Commandments? by MuttleyLaff:
analice107:
Thank you.
And the Part which was fulfilled has to do with the sacrificial laws, which concerns atonement for sins by shedding the blood of an animal in the place of Man's sins.

Jesus became that lamb. But what about the moral laws, do they also needs be fulfilled?

The only part of the law fulfilled, is the part that concerns sins
Jesus came not to abolish the law or the prophets
but came to fulfill them
Jesus fulfilled everything the law required of Him (i.e. Mosaic law, ceremonial laws, moral laws etcetera)
and Jesus fulfilled everything the prophets said about and/or of Him (i.e. redemption, salvation, atonement etcetera)
Jesus in effect did everything right, He did all that is necessary.
He once insisted on water baptism just for the sake to fulfill all righteousness
Jesus did everything deemed right in the eyes of God

These are all things, we, omo Adamo, couldnt achieve, realise or succeed in doing by ourselves BUT He did
He did things we would never be able to manage to do ourselves, for us

He brought an end to the commandments and demands found in Moses' Teachings
so that he could take Jewish and non-Jewish people and create one new humanity in himself. So he made peace.

- Ephesians 2:15

He rendered the Law inoperative, along with its commandments and regulations, thus creating in himself one new humanity from the two, thereby making peace
- Ephesians 2:15 ISV

It was after Jesus fulfilling the law (i.e. the law of sin and death), that it became abolished (i.e. inoperative) because of the law of the Spirit

Moral law or no moral law, with grace and truth given by the Spirit you are equipped to do what is right in the eyes of God

petra1:
Beautiful
The real and true beauty is in, that tithe, is included in what at the right moment or time became abolished or done away with

Goshen360:
Lol....you people are throwing too many questions at me at the same time but lemme give short and straight forward answers to your questions:

You don't need the 10 commandments to tell you to love your God before you love. Under the new covenant, you can't love God because the 10 commandments told you to, you love because the the of God is put in you and you express it out to God and to your neighbors.

2. You love not because you as human is capable of loving but because he, God FIRST LOVED YOU.

3. You don't need 10 commandments to know that killing is bad. You don't need the 10 commandments to tell you fornication, adultery, lying, bearing false witness etc is bad, where was 10 commandments before Joseph ran away from Potipher wife and didn't commit fornication? How? The Spirit of God teach you and tells you it's not good NOT the 10 commandments.

Under the new covenant and AFTER BEFORE the law, it is the REIGN OF THE SPIRIT OF GOD
Its easy to spot travel classes in posts
and know who's in first class travel (e.g. those who regularly brush or clean their bible so not to fall victim of truth decay)
who's in business class travel (e.g. mostly tithe-marketeers, literalists and/or tithers)
who's in preminum economy class travel (e.g. sheepified)
who's in economy class travel (e.g. sheeple)
but as for you Sire, you're in the first class travel

You slayed it with all of the above
- Joseph did the right thing, as he knew it is great wickedness and sin against God even before there was any written law against such act

PS: I love that: The Purpose Of The Law by ayoku777(m): 8:37am On Dec 02, 2015
Brilliant post if you see one, that is
Christianity Etc › Re: Does The New Covenant Abolish The Ten Commandments? by MuttleyLaff: 11:05am On Feb 11, 2017
blueAgent:
I don't understand you are you saying the law has been abolished?
Goshen360:
The simple answer to the OP is YES! The new covenant abolished 10 commandments
For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death
- Romans 8:2

Goshen360 baba, it cant get said any simpler than what you've posted

The things legalism cause in the body of Christ isnt a small thing

The old exists, you know of its existence, you are aware of it, but dont go near it or talkless go to activate it
Dont legalists know that if one is operating the new, one renders the old inoperative or impotent?
As one, essentially overrides the 10 commandments with something that's higher, stronger and superior

Goshen360:
Delusion? U being STUDYING or READING your bible or JUST LISTENING TO YOUR PASTOR? Lord help us!
Splinz:
Why don't we study it together? Where are your proofs that the Ten Commandment is no longer binding
Goshen360:
@ Splinz,
Do you agree to the above ^ ^ ^ or disagree to the above that the 10 commandments are part of the old covenant? Let's take it step by step
Splinz:
Very poor attempt as usual. That the Ten Commandment was given in the Old Testament does not in anyway nullify its validity in the New Testament.

Have you not seen how Jesus even went further in strenthening the Ten Commandment in the New Testament? What about the apostles? I keep on asking you why a Law described as "holy, righteous and good" should be abolished. Of course, you're turning a blind eye to it!

When I say you do not know what was abolished in the Old Testament, it is indeed a true saying. When you say the Ten Commandment was part of the Old Covenant and the old is done away, do you also mean the whole of Old Testament writings are abolished too

I do not agree with you not just because I want to disagree, but because the Scriptures itself disagrees as well!
For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death
- Romans 8:2

But when you are directed by the Spirit, you are not under obligation to the law of Moses
- Galatians 5:18

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ
- John 1:17

The above are proofs that the Ten Commandment is no longer binding
The Ten Commandment is no longer binding to anyone operating something that's higher, stronger and superior due to being led by the Spirit
Christianity Etc › Re: Does The New Covenant Abolish The Ten Commandments? by MuttleyLaff:
blueAgent:
The Old Testament always informs us through
the prophets as to what changes are coming in
the future. Note the following scripture. Amos 3:7“Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the
prophets.” So what did the Old Testament say about the New Covenant? Jeremiah 31:33 “But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.”
Does this verse say God will put a “new” law in
their hearts? Or does it say His law “except” His Sabbath being the fourth Commandment? No! The law that God said He is going to write into the hearts of His people is “His law” as it exists in the Old Testament! Hence God is saying that there is going to be NO change to His law with the New Covenant.
Now here are the questions for you
#1 What is God? What's your response going to be? Spirit? No or Yes?
#2 What then will His law be? What's your response going to be? The law of the Spirit? No or Yes?
#3 What has the ''The law of the Spirit'' set us free from ? What's your response going to be? The law of sin and death? No or Yes?
#4 What are some examples of the ''The law of sin and death''? What's your response going to be? The Ten commandments? No or Yes?

Now, lets go up a gear a bit or step a bit in deeper waters
# 5 What is the law of gravity, what does it do and/or what is it all about?
#6 What is the law of aerodynamics, what does it do and/or what is it all about?
#7 Does the law of gravity produce any effect whilst the law of aerodynamics is being made use of?
What's your response going to be? No or Yes?

blueAgent:
Some trying to avoid God's law have said that
the Old Covenant was made with Israel and so the Ten Commandments were only for Israel. But note that the New Covenant was also made ONLY with the “House of Israel.” This is covered in detail in is the Sabbath for Israel only but in the meanwhile know that the Bible tells us that if we are Christ's then we are Abraham's seed and “children of Israel” or the “House of Israel.” Honestly, how could any sane person think that God would expect one group to obey His law and allow everyone else to sin? (1 John 3:4) Paul elaborates further on the purpose of the law, “What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, You shall not covet.” Romans 7:7

Below is the New Testament fulfilment of Jeremiah 31:33 in regards to the New Covenant. Hebrews 8:6-10
“6But now has he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:”

God made a covenant with His children when He lead them by the hand out of the land of Egypt. (verse 9).
The Bible tells us that Christ came as the Mediator of a New Covenant (verse 6) The belief that the New Covenant abolishes the Ten Commandments reflects a misunderstanding of both covenants. God tells us that He altered the original covenant and made “a better covenant, which was established upon better promises” (verse 6).
But now we are delivered from the law,
that being dead wherein we were held;
that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter

- Romans 7:6 KJV

But now we have been exempted from The Written Law,
and we are dead to that which had controlled us,
so that we shall serve from now on in the newness of The Spirit and not in the Old Order Scriptures

- Romans 7:6 Aramaic Bible in Plain English

We dont want a long post,
so wont bother going into the implication of the House of Israel in this matter
except than say: think for a moment, why wasnt a mention of the House of Judah in all of that too

We being released from the law, doesnt mean, The law of the Spirit has given us a licence to sin

Most can see that the gist of Romans 7 was talking about ''release from the law''
but you have cherry plucked Romans 7:7 out of from it
and turned the gist in Romans 7 to mean the opposite. Chai, there is God ooo
Brother, please think deeply about the reproduced Romans 7:6 above

blueAgent:
But as we have already seen, it was not established on different laws. The law stayed the same.
There was however a weakness or fault in the original covenant. That fault was with the people, NOT with the law.
“For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:” (verse 8.)
It was “because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.” (verse 9).
In the Old Covenant God wrote His Ten Commandments on tablets of stone. It was external and not part of the thinking and motives of the people. It was in their literature but NOT in their hearts. In the New Covenant God writes His law “into their minds, and writes them in their hearts.” (verse 10).

To enable people to internalise His law, to love it and obey it eagerly and willingly, God makes this promise,

Ezekiel 36:26-27
26“A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and you shall keep my judgments, and do them.”
See also the two Covenants
But when you are directed by the Spirit, you are not under obligation to the law of Moses
- Galatians 5:18

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ
- John 1:17

The Spirit will ALWAYS and ONLY direct you, to do the right thing
and there, at your disposal are GRACE and TRUTH to help you with doing just that (i.e. the right thing)
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff: 6:51am On Feb 10, 2017
plainbibletruth:
Be Wrong Or Give Wrong And Your Tithing Is Still Zero!
God has his system of doing things under each dispensation he sets up. Before Israel God had a way he wanted believers to relate with him. When Israel was created God set up a system through which his people were to relate with him and live their lives.

If anyone in Israel, for example, chooses not to follow God’s established system for his time but chose to run his life by the system of the previous dispensation, the fact that it was a God-established system will not make it right. As long as he is not following the prescribed protocol for his time God will consider it wrong. Many examples abound in Scripture on this.

In 1 Corinthians 13 we are told that a GOOD thing done in a WRONG way becomes zero. We are told here that one can give everything including one's body to be burned but if it is not done in love, such acts profit NOTHING.

The motivation for doing a thing MUST be right for it to be acceptable to God. The story Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5 readily comes to mind. They gave money, perhaps a large amount, but their motivation for giving was false and wrong. As a result God’s disapproval was shown in their being struck dead. God does not accept any offering or giving that is not given with the right spirit or from anyone whose lifestyle is not right with God. (Malachi 1:10, Amos 5:22, 1 Cor. 13).

Today’s TITHING is improperly motivated because people are TAUGHT to GIVE TO GET. The motivation for Christian giving should be a grace response to the marvellous grace of God. God has done so much for us that we can really do NOTHING to reciprocate what he has done for us. What God calls for us to do is live a life of gratitude for all he has done for us.

The self-righteous TITHER will do well to look again at Luke 18: 9-14 where Jesus taught against wanting to be JUSTIFIED by what we do. If you tithe because you want to go back to a system instituted under a previous dispensation, you are doing it wrongly and that would be unacceptable to God. If you tithe because you want to ESCAPE some repercussion you have been threatened with you are doing it with a wrong motive. If you tithe because you hope to get from God your intention is equally wrong and before God such giving is zero – wood, hay and straw.

“It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.”
Galatians 5:1
7Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of tithe-money rams, or with endless rivers of oil?
Am I to give my tithe firstborn to pay for my rebellion, the fruit of my body in exchange for my soul?
8He has made it clear to you, mortal man, what is good and what the LORD is requiring from you
— to act with justice, to treasure the LORD's gracious love, and to walk humbly in the company of your God.

- Micah 6:7-8

As you enter the house of God, keep your ears open and your mouth shut.
It is evil to give tithe make mindless offerings to God

- Ecclesiastes 5:1
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff: 9:06am On Feb 06, 2017
brocab:
It's not that I would like you to repeat your beliefs to me again, I was only trying to be nice.
I appreciate you being nice. Thanks for your civility towards me

brocab:
Well I do see it-but not in a way you expect me to see it, we all know the story about Jesus preaching to the scribes and the Pharisees going into house holds devouring the widow's taking everything they had. We just need to read {Matthew 23} to receive the in's and out's about the Pharisees and the scribes
It is true that Jesus is ALWAYS on the scribes & Pharisees' case, critising them at every available opportunity
but hey bro, we arent talking of those other occasion nor talking about what transpired in Matthew 23
We are talking of and what I am interested specifically ONLY in, is ALL, that transpired in Mark 12:38-44
Let's stick to Mark 12:38-44 alone,
(i.e. being in the temple courts, opposite the treasury box,
the teaching of the crowd,
the warning about the scribes,
Left alone but now watching events at the treasury box
Calling over the disciples after spotting a strange thing happening
and commenting on the strange event)

brocab:
To be truthful {God see's what man don't see} and Jesus happen to be there after He spoke to the Crowd wasn't a accident, He knew what He wanted to see, but the scribes, didn't need to prove it to Jesus, the problem is, is Jesus seeing what you see-or did Jesus see something completely different?
You understood the message, depending on what you're paying attention to in that Scribe-Widow narrative. Okay? so now, please answer the following 4 questions below for me

#1 Did you not see the lack of fairness to the widow in the narrative?
#2 Did you not see the exploitation of a poor widow in the narrative?
#3 Was your attention not drawn to the fact that a poor widow was taken advantage of in the narrative?
#4 Did you not see an example sucking dry, an exact of what Jesus mentioned just a few verses, earlier in Mark 12:40, about widows' houses being devoured by scribes, happen in Mark 12:42 & Mark 12:44 in the narrative?

brocab:
Am I reading this right
-you believe The scribes made it a point to set up Jesus to watch a little old lady put in all she had. "Interesting"
No, I am not saying the scribes made it a point to set up Jesus to watch a little old lady put in all she had

brocab:
If this is the case
-and you believed the scribes set this up
-then it's pointless to believe she put in all she had by faith?
No, no no, scribes set nothing up
She put ''all'' in faith,
just like tithers give tithe by faith believing God will rebuke the devourer for them,
so that it will not destroy the fruits of their soil, and their vine in the field
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff: 3:28am On Feb 06, 2017
brocab:
Lets try and start again
- we have started off on the wrong foot.
It is not neccesary to try and start all over again

because I see the scripture, the way you see that scripture
but you dont seem to see what the scripture narrative really is all about

The way you see the scripture is plausible but what you see is not really what the scripture narrative is all about
Like I've previously said, the scripture narrative was about Jesus being in the temple courts, opposite where the treasury box is, teaching the crowd and warning them of the scribes
Telling the crowd about the scribes fake lifestyles and excesses of life
The scripture narrative also singled out the widows as examples of victims the scribes devour
It was after finishing the teaching and the crowd have dispersed,
that Jesus now by Himself was watching people go about dropping money into the treasury box
that He saw an injustice He just awhile earlier was criticising the scribes over, get being played out before His eyes
- shocking, a poor widow was allowed to drop all she had to live on into the treasury box

True, she dropped her all and rightly so her action was commended
but the truth of the matter, is that she was exploited by the system laid down by the scribes and was taking advantage off.
Not just an average or ordinary widow but a poor one for matter indoctrinated into emptying her all into the treasury box
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff:
brocab:
This is right, there isn't any % on giving, but I didn't give a % in the first place-this was your own opinion, you attack me on.
But I will try in future to explain my pages more clearly. No problem.
But for the tithers greed, there is a %-and I have already told you I am not a tither.
Abraham gave everything that didn't belong to him, which really isn't giving, Abraham is returning.
But does anyone see this scripture, the way I see this scripture?.
I agree with you, God loves a cheerful giver, the old lady's story I see her heart bro in faith more then I see, her just giving two mites-the rich I see everyday.
We have all read the percentage story, and certain farmers and ranchers believed God to tithe their shocks and crops they supplied the needs to the levites, and in return God supplied the farmers and ranchers needs with rain and keeping the insects away.
This story had never changed..
Didnt I say it's okay and meaning letting go
besides I didnt ''attack'' you, but like I previously said, I was weeding out different parts in your remark that do not agree together

The below in green italic, is your oxymoron remark, where you misused tithe with the lady
and at which I responded that the lady didnt in the first instance tithe
If we were to tithe like Abraham, then we need to tithe like that little old lady, Jesus talks about given two copper coins. "All"

Again, what happened to that widow, is exactly what has happened to believers that tithe
The widow was indoctrinated into giving ''all'' by the scribes,
just as believers that tithe have been indoctrinated by religious leaders and tithe-marketeers into giving money-tithe
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff: 12:28am On Feb 06, 2017
brocab:
Firstly This story of the widow's mite can actually teach us something, God see's what man over looks, the big gifts in the temple were surely notice by the people, that is probably what the disciples were watching.
But Jesus saw what no-one else did, He saw the humble gift of a poor widow, that was a gift Jesus thought worthy to comment, this was the gift the disciples needed to be aware of.
The other gifts in the treasury that day made a lot of noise as they jingled into the receptacles, but the widows mites was heard in heaven.

Second God's evaluation is different from mans, the widow's two mites added up to a penny, according to man's tabulation.
But Jesus said that she had given more then anyone else that day {Mark 12;43} One must ask how can this be, when many rich people through in large amounts {Mark 12:41}?
The differences is one of proportion. The rich were giving large sums, but they still retrained their fortunes, the widow put in everything-all she had to live on {Mark 12:42} Hers was a true sacrifice, the rich had not began to give to the level of her sacrifice.

Thirdly God commends giving in faith" here was a woman of receiving charity, yet she had a heart to give. Even though the amount was negligible-what could a widow's mite buy? She gave it in Faith that God could use it. The widow's faith is also evident in the fact that she gave the last of her money.
Like the widow of Zarephath who gave her last meal to Elijah {1 kings 17:7-16} the widow in the temple gave away her last means of self support. {Does that mean the widow left the temple completely destitute, went home and died for starvation?} "No" The bible teachers us that God provides for our needs {Matthew 6:25-34}
God provides for the widow in Elijah's day and also in Jesus's day.
Yes and just before Jesus commented on the widow's mite, he commented on the scribes who devour widow's houses {Mark 12:40} The religious official's of the day, instead of helping the widows in need, were perfectly content to rob them of their livelihood and of their inheritance. {This is the same today with the tithers greed} And again God loves a cheerful giver {2 Corinthians 9:7} And God is faithful to take care of His own..

Well if you aren't trying to teach me than why the long pages of report? How you see things-and how I see things-your corrections is teaching. I am not looking for another teacher-I have a teacher man couldn't buy.
If you don't see the story's about faith-then we aren't reading the same bible, the bible is all about faith. We live by faith. [/color]
It doesn't matter how small or how large either you give all you don't, God loves a cheerful giver, and this story of the Old lady, isn't about the money-this is about her faith, she gave, because she believed..God see's our faith, Jesus pray's for our faith now, like He did back then..
And without faith we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Okay, I tried but hey I give up
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff:
brocab:
Again you aren't understanding me,
if a tither is to tithe
-I said give "all" how Abraham and the old lady gave
-meaning their is no % on their given
Thank you for editing your post to make it clearer
but if you say: Give "all" like how Abraham and the old lady gave
then that would mean Abraham and the old lady gave 100%
and not mean they didnt put a percentage on their giving

Besides, Abraham's 100% giving was done on spoils he forcibly took from other people
The poor widow's 100% giving, though commended in relation to the other people watched giving, actually wasnt fair because she was taken advantage of

Now re-echoing your last message, you are right there is no percentage on giving for believers
All God requires, is a cheerful giving that you decide in your heart without being forced or coerced to give
As a matter of fact, it is any amount that you're comfortable with
and in accordance to the level of grace you've received,
only that there is a caveat that whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly,
and whoever sows generously will also reap generously.
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff:
brocab:
If you didn't understand my last page
Kindly make your ''last page'' clearer for me then
whilst at it, follow the norm and standards for posting every like every other poster adheres to

brocab:
-Listen bro you aren't teaching me nothing - the hole bible is all about Faith
-but if you trying to call it something else I am not following you. Teacher...
For the umpteenth time, I am not teaching and I aint your teacher
Christianity Etc › Re: Pastor Chris' Smoke-Filled Healing Pavilion Of 1989 by MuttleyLaff: 9:48pm On Feb 05, 2017
Seun:
If it happened, then surely there are people on Nairaland who possibly would have attended that amazing meeting.
People like Donnie, Gombs, and Petra1 ...
https://i.imgsafe.org/b63f9caf13.gif
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff:
brocab:
Thanks for your teaching for today's message?
''Weeding out'' is not teaching brother

I am not teaching and I was not teaching
What I did was to separate out or remove the ''unrequired'' in that your post
and/or pointed out that you're copying the tithe-marketeers' style of building a doctrine on tithing by quoting scriptures out of context.
This is by you unnecessarily trying to build a doctrine on ''all'' based on the Scribe-Widow narrative

Please indulge me, as I have a question for you below, at the "second-to-last'' section of this post, that requires a honest response from you

If you're about to blindly cross a traffic moving busy road and you stopped after your attention was drawn to see that the traffic light green is on
Would you say you've just been taught something or you will say something was pointed out to you?

brocab:
But I already understood the message about the old ladies story, it isn't about money, its about our faith-and how much faith are we giving to God-she gave all she had-and the rich gave as they walked past the treasury, Jesus pointed this out-are we to follow the lady's league, or do we give less of our time to seek after God's treasury, which is the word of God.
You understood the message, depending on what you're paying attention to in that Scribe-Widow narrative.
Did you not see the lack of fairness to the widow in the narrative?
Did you not see the exploitation of a poor widow in the narrative?
Was your attention not drawn to the fact that a poor widow was taken advantage of in the narrative?
Did you not see an example sucking dry, an exact of what Jesus mentioned just a few verses, earlier in Mark 12:40, about widows' houses being devoured by scribes, happen in Mark 12:42 & Mark 12:44 in the narrative?

You're right, it isnt about money
but you're not right that: ''it's about our faith-and how much faith are we giving to God...''
You also are not right about: ''Jesus pointed this out-are we to follow the lady's league or do we give less of our time to seek after God's treasury, which is the word of God.''

The truth of the matter is that, the Scribe- Widow narrative had nothing to do with faith, nothing to do with money
Nothing to do with following the lady's league
Nothing to do with giving less of our time to seek after God's treasury
It REALLY was about the scribes or teachers of the law and injustice

It is a scathing attack on the scribes or teachers of the law, about their lifestyles and their disregard for justice and the love of God

Think about it,
if the scribes or teachers of the law loved God or cared, do you think the poor widow, who is living on the breadline, would have been allowed to drop her ''all'' into the treasury box?

And one of the Scribes answered and he said to him,
“Teacher, when you say these things, you insult us also.”

- Luke 11:45

but then like on this thread, do tithe-marketeers the scribes care
No, just like in Luke 11:45 above, and especially on tithe threads such as this, all they care about, is whining over not to be insulted. SMH

Notice in the Scribe-Widow narrative that , Jesus in that teaching, started with:
''Beware of the scribes (i.e. one learned in the Jewish Law, a religious teacher) ....''

The reason behind the Scribe-Widow narrative was about the scribes
(i.e. Jesus was critising the scribes or teachers of the law and warning the people of them)

Jesus in the Scribe-Widow narrative was in the temple courts, sitting opposite the treasury-box, teaching
In His teaching, He warned the listeners about the tithe-marketeers scribes,

He went on further, to tell the listeners how the tithe-marketeers scribes operate
He listed a few of their excesses and mentioned the scribes lack of compassion

Later on, whilst watching people dropping money off, into the treasury-box, lo and behold, He spotted a tithe-marketeer scribe victim
He promptly, not to the earlier listeners but ONLY to His disciples, brought this discovery to their attention, saying:
43Jesus called His disciples to Him and said,
“Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put more than all the others into the treasury.
44For they all contributed out of their surplus, but she out of her poverty has put in all she had to live on.”

- Mark 12:43-44

Modern day scribes are today's tithe givers, who go about congratulating self over tithing
Modern day Pharisees, are today's religious leaders who weigh people down with heavy financial burdens,
but themselves will not lift a finger to lighten people's load, especially in cases when people cant pay bills from losing their jobs
when their kids cant afford to attend the universities built out of their parents tithe giving etcetera

The Scribe-Widow narrative is reminiscent of today's religious leaders with tithe-marketeer hats on and the sheepified
Everything in that narrative continues on, in today's and present day religious gatherings
where you'll find poor widows and others giving their ''all'', living in abject poverty,
whilst the religious leaders are heavily body-guarded, live ostentatious & flamboyant lifestyles in palatial houses etcetera

All these religious leaders with or and their tithe marketeers, according to Mark 12:40, will receive harsher punishment
(i.e. they will be punished most severely)

brocab:
And if you understood my tithing comment in the first place, "all" does not mean tithe
I did understand, that is why I weeded out tithe in that comment you made
Besides, the ''all'' in Mark 12:44 was not meant to be taken as a command, not as a recommendation nor used as a doctrine to base any kind of giving on, whether ''all' or not
Mark 12:44 is an observational statement made based after something Jesus saw happen

brocab:
And of course I was only having a crack at the tithers, and if you had read my comment from top to bottom you would have seen that
I read it and know you were having a crack at the tither and tithe marketeers

brocab:
But of course you didn't.
Trust me, of course I did.
brocab, listen up, because here is the question I earlier said I have for:
Do you realise, agree and accept that ''all'', just like tithing, is of the law of death and sin?

brocab:
So thank you teacher and may God bless you with His abundance in word and in truth
Am I sensing a veiled or tinged sarcasm here in your closing remark

You cant expose the truth in the Religion forum without being ridiculed to be a teacher
You must have been wearing some serious blinders here, if you, for a second, thought that I am teaching or was teaching
besides you ought to know by now, that I am not that self conceited to come out saying, I schooled anyone, was schooling anyone or I am schooling anyone
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff: 8:30pm On Feb 05, 2017
petra1:
If I need likes. I can get over 50 likes for every post. Truth is not by the number of people cheering you on
At the least it was the joagbaje ID, if it wasnt you personally who registered a ''like'' to that post
Make sure you select ''Logout (All)'', next time, any of your internet devices are not being attended to by you

Gombs:
Abi o... More than 50 likes sef....
Who ''likes'' epp sef. Nobaga
Which means, no one is bothered about ''likes'' on posts
The ''like'' on the particular post is a non-issue.

The issue was about the manner and how the ''like'' was registered on the post,
it was ''liked'' to give that particular post an unfair advantage
and done out of the need for acceptance and validation to Petra1's post saying:
''Tithe on your business. I have a multimedia outfit. The company tithes.
And when get my pay still I personally give my own tithe apart from the company tithe
''

petra1:
I'm sure the admin can verify that. Pls let it be investigated
Gombs:
I support your claims of him asking the admin to verify.
One can't just lie against someone and still put up a defense
The weight of the evidence is overwhemingly stacked against the joagbaje ID
It would have gone unnoticed if I wasnt present on the thread, reading posts
The joagbaje ID is culpable because if the only other logged in muttleylaff ID didnt register the ''like'', then the joagbaje ID must have

The fact and truth is that this particular post had the, so far one and only ''like'' registered on it using the joagbaje ID

Anyway, reiterating, next time, sign out of any Nairaland account using ''Logout (All)'' feature
this will prevent people from using the ID to perform unauthorised actions on all unattended internet devices
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff:
plainbibletruth:
You seem to look for ways to belittle others and divert attention from main issues at hand.
Yet you'd be the one to be quick at calling others 'carnal', blame them for slander, wonder if they are sane, even when you do the very same things
When things aren't going their way on this thread, there have been quite a few "throwing one's toys out of the pram" and threats to ''spit out dummies''

Gombs:
Not every one is like you na
Why should anyone be like me? What are you like

Gombs:
Quit such petty slander on people
plainbibletruth, see it here, he is just done it again (i.e. used the slander word)

Two logged-in users A and B, with no Guests, were on a thread, reading posts
Logged in user B had a particular post with no ''likes'' registered on it
Still with no Guests viewing the thread, user B logged out
User C, now logged in to the thread, and joined logged in user A still reading without any Guests
Soon after without any Guests reading the thread, a ''like'' pops registered on this User's B particular post
Now if, without anyone else logged in but only User A and User C logged in
and there is a ''like'' registered on this particular post with only User A and User C viewing the thread
If using process of elimination, and User A didnt register the ''like'' on this particular post, then who else is left to have registered the ''like'' on the particular post?

Dont people have scruples anymore, someone is caught with the hand in the cookie jar
and here you are blindly jumping to their defence and calling it petty. SMH.
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Do Pastors Prefer Malachi To Deuteronomy When Preaching About Tithe? by MuttleyLaff: 9:42am On Feb 04, 2017
petra1:
If I need likes . I can get over 50 likes for every post. Truth is not by the number of people cheering you on.
If your conscience hasnt been seared, I'll leave it to gnaw on you. SMH
Only you and I were logged in when the like was registered, if I didnt like the post
Who did it, who ''liked'' it then?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 (of 441 pages)