₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,477 members, 8,517,737 topics. Date: Thursday, 12 November 2026 at 10:55 PM

Toggle theme

MuttleyLaff's Posts

Nairaland Forum › MuttleyLaff's Profile › MuttleyLaff's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 (of 441 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: Invitation by MuttleyLaff: 12:57am On Jul 22, 2016
holahmihdeh:
u can trace the reply to each statement as you deem fit
I always try do my best

holahmihdeh:
U always attach importance to things that are not necessary. Try to outgrow that!
SMH at this tangential remark

holahmihdeh:
Everyone makes spelling mistakes at one point or the other
Please dont be deceitful, because GoodMuyis would never accept that him typing ''M-uttley.Laff'' was a spelling mistake
Dont insult the readership's intelligence

holahmihdeh:
U can call speaking in tongues false indoctrination
I call what is practised by penterascals as false indoctrination
You are an accomplice, if you deny that what is widely and currently practised in penterascal gathering as speaking in tongues is not false

holahmihdeh:
That is ur belief which u have no right whatsoever to impose on anyone
If God doesnt impose, and if the Holy Spirit is too much of a gentle person to impose
so from whom would I have learnt imposing from?
No not imposing, it is called exposing to the truth(s)

holahmihdeh:
The bible is a personal conviction of each person as the Holy spirit teaches the person.
1 John 2:27 "but the anointing which you have received from Him abides in you and you do not need that anyone teaches you concerning ALL THINGS and is true and is not a lie and just as it has taught you, you will abide in Him
The Holy Spirit teaches with an ever increasing measure
yet will not teach one beyond what one is not ready to handle
but it is amazing how the Holy Spirit responds to enthusiasm

However, Proverbs 27:17 As iron sharpens iron, so a friend sharpens a friend, might be the catalyst for the Holy Spirit to intervene in the ''personal conviction'' and teach

holahmihdeh:
Am already used to ur "saucy" tongue
Whatever ''saucy'' tongue means to you, definitely isnt any of my repertoire

holahmihdeh:
That means u are an ANTAGONIST of the Holy Spirit!
Meow! Did someone pee in your cornflakes?
ANTAGONIST of the Holy Spirit lorhun-lorhun
In your dreams
but if it makes you feel better, then in your figment of imagination, an ANTAGONIST of the Holy Spirit I am to you

holahmihdeh:
I will rather wallow in my ignorance than to listen to an antagonist of God's spirit
Pride.
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall

Truth is by nature self-evident. As soon as you remove the cobwebs of ignorance that surround it, it shines clear.

Ignorance is your choice, as it can be difficult to come to terms with the truth. I know and understand

The caveat, is that you've somewhat been exposed to the truth now
and can no longer plead ignorance to its knowledge

holahmihdeh:
And what is the truth u were saying about JMG1 tongues? That it is false.
Were u the one that gave him the utterance?
Yes, yes that what is currently uttered sit is false
Dont be daft, how can it be me who gave him the mumbled, incoherent and unintelligible utterance
It wasnt me and certainly wasnt God too

holahmihdeh:
No one is annoyed
You didnt read me saying anyone was annoyed
If anyone wants to be annoyed, such can be my guest and have my go ahead

holahmihdeh:
but pls dont play the role of the Holy Ghost here!
That goes without asking

Throw a rock into a marketplace, the one that cries out the loudest is usually the one that got hit.
The struggle, reluctance and protest isnt surprising
because all truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

holahmihdeh:
If u read ur bible very well Apostle Paul said he did not confer with flesh and blood after his encounter with Jesus on his Damascus while he was still persecuting the xtians. U can as well call that arrogance
When you read people posting and exposing you to things in the BIBLE, and you cant remember reading it like that, or if you dont understand what you are exposed to, then it is no use to bickering about their actions, just do the ''Philip & Ethiopian eunuch'' needful and ASK THEM TO SHOW IT, SHOW EVERYTHING & ALL TO YOU.
All truths are easy to understand once they are exposed or discovered; the point is to discover them or be exposed to them ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

holahmihdeh:
I pray the light of God illuminates ur understanding
SMH, pot calling kettle black.

holahmihdeh:
SMH
Yes, twas question asked out of curiousty
I hate making assumptions. Him answering those questions will save me a whole lot of guesswork bother
Christianity Etc › Re: What Does It Mean To Speak In Tongues? by MuttleyLaff: 11:13pm On Jul 20, 2016
blueAgent:
Nice one
The thing tire we ooo

blueAgent:
Speaking in tongue,
was a gift of the holyspirit to help spread the gospel in different languages,
The fascinating eye-openers are knowing who were originally to benefit from speaking in tongue (i.e. speak in a foreign language)
Why was it necessary to be speaking in tongue (i.e. speak in a foreign language)
Why did Cornelius' household speak in tongue that without interpretation was understood by the present audience?

What are the two common denominators in the case of tongue speaking on Pentecost and at Cornelius' household?
The exhibits and evidences are clearly there on display...

blueAgent:
not speaking or making unintelligent sounds
You havent seen unintelligent and unintelligible yet
Do you know, one time ago, a certain lady penterascal had the nerve to try typing praying in tongues on Facebook?

blueAgent:
people read the Bible literally without understanding its meaning
Also such people like coveting parts in the bible that arent theirs or necessarily is for them
The Bible is a book of division, with parts to the relevant.
and that is why the advice to:
Study to show yourself approved unto God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Christianity Etc › Re: Where Was My Spirit/soul When I Lost Consciousness? by MuttleyLaff: 2:00pm On Jul 18, 2016
HardMirror:
I must have been about 12 years old when it happened.
I was terribly ill, terribly, so my mum took me to the hospital where I got some medications.

All I remember was that I was watching TV in the morning..... Next I woke up only to see myself in the hospital. My mum was asleep beside me.

It was the morning of the next day.

I was unconscious for almost 24 hours.

Honestly where was my spirit when I lost consciousness.
Since you hadnt died, your soul wouldnt have to be anywhere or gone somewhere
so when you were inactive for those 24 hours, your soul was still in this realm

Saying it this way, your soul would have been in the same realm or vicinity where it always is whenever you sleep

Your soul in your 24 hours inactive state had its consciousness suspended
The consciousness suspension is similar to when you have a siesta, night or day sleep

Also it's similar to those few seconds of unconsciousness, one experiences during a sexual climax

HardMirror:
I strongly believe we have no spirit or soul
Your remark is neither here nor there, because the fact remains, human beings are Spirit, Soul and Body

The Soul and Body is animated by the Spirit (i.e. God's breath of life)
The Spirit and Soul is housed in the Body.
Animals have body and soul like human beings but no spirit

Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
- Genesis 2:7 NIV

You turn your face and they are disturbed; you take their spirit and they die and return to their dust.
- Psalm 104:29

“Thus says the Lord GOD to these bones, ‘Behold, I will cause breath to enter you that you may come to life
- Ezekiel 37:5

Your soul is YOU, and it is the soul that sinneth that shall die (i.e. the soul that misses the mark, shall be destroyed)

HardMirror:
but are alive based on the function of our brains. Once the brain lacks oxygen for a prolonged time, then that is the end
This is true, it will be the end, because there is

no point of return after brain death,
however this is an exception to biblical people who were raised back from the dead, such as the Shunammite woman’s son, Lazarus, Tabitha or Dorcas etcetera.
They had no recollection of any sort of consciousness, whilst they were on the other side (i.e. Sheol) to share with the living, after returning back to the land of the living.
They also were oblivious of activites happening on the land of the living, when they were on the other side (i.e. Sheol)
Delusions in the 18th,19th, 20th and 21st centuries make out they arent subjected to this rule
and as a result of that, majority of them usually have some NDE supposedly consciouness to share

HardMirror:
Interestingly your organs could still be alive. So it is enough proof for me that our brains are responsible for who we are and not any phantom ghost
The organs coud

be kept alive by using a life support machine or ventilator, the muscle however will waste away from prolonged inactivity or lack of mobility, when the body isn't periodically

turned
The function of the heart is to pump blood, moving it to supply oxygen, which has nutrients for various parts, nerve cells and organs of the body
The brain is not you, it is part of you, it is part of who you are
The brain is responsible for messaging, processing, signalling and coordinating all your sensation, intellectual, reasoning, nervous etcetera activities

HardMirror:
When my mum was narrating how she and others where frantically trying to revive me, I was shocked. To the extent that raw pepper was poured into my mouth.
It was an amazing experience anyway, glad I experienced it so no one lies to me how being unconscious feels.
It is all blank and you have no consciousness of time unlike when you sleep
No surprises here, reiterating, the blankness is normal as your consciousness was suspended when your soul drifted into a 24 hours state of inactivity

Point of correction, there is no consciousness of time when ones sleeps.
You are conscious of time when awake, but not when sleeping

People from being manhandled and roughened up have been woken up from deep sleep,
only for the sleeping person to deny being aware they were woken up.
They at times would have opened their eyes and stared at person waking them up
but whatever the eyes is seeing and brain is registering, isnt take in at all by the sleepy person
When the now but woken up, formerly sleepy person is told, they opened their eyes, raised themselves up from the bed and even talked back to person stirring them up from sleep,

The now woken up,formerly sleeping person's usual reply is a '' I didnt know I did all that or I never knew I did all those'' answer
No memory, not even a blur recollection of events, happenings or time, but it is always a case of a big fat drawn blank oblivion whenever one sleeps
Christianity Etc › Re: Invitation by MuttleyLaff: 1:28pm On Jul 17, 2016
GoodMuyis:
MuttleyLaff:

Sir, I did mention your moniker to notify you of reply
https://i57.tinypic.com/34sp9j4.gif
Sir, ''... start replying to M-uttley.Laff'' is extraordinarily different to ''start replying to MuttleyLaff''
The dash (i.e. - ) and dot (i.e. .) you inserted changes completely MuttleyLaff and there is no way it will flag up as a mention for me to notice
Why would you have to modify my moniker with the dash and dot, if not that you want to post about MuttleyLaff under a radar without being detected

MuttleyLaff is the moniker and not your adulterated M-uttley.Laff version

GoodMuyis:
The reason for creating this thread is to avoid online contention or argument, but since you find it out, i dont have problem with that.
In the other thread if you check, i did not intrude your conversion with anyone there
You didnt have to feel you would be intruding because obviously I had already

involved you when at the very beginning, I mentioned you among others, whom I noticed had responded to JMG1's quest in wanting SERIOUS clarification about the baptism

of the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues

GoodMuyis:
and when I see thing are heading towards argument its derailing the thread so I call those i think will listen to me
Things werent derailing the thread.
Did you not read JMG1 and holahmihdeh, ungraciously declining, when I made the effort to take the discourse elsewhere, as in, off the thread, ''outside''

GoodMuyis:
In the case of Speaking in Tongue and interpretation, myself so desire the gift [in fact Chinese]
I can tell, you do crave for the gift,
but please oblige me, for what purpose exactly do you desire Speaking in Tongue and interpretation for
and/or why do you really so desire the gift?

GoodMuyis:
i would have flow with your lesson but i discovered that the way you handle it came with ambiguity
You neednt have to flow to anything because there was no class and it was no lesson.
My posts on were mere disclosures and surprising facts on Speaking in Tongue and interpretation
Technique or no technique but did you question any of your phantom ambiguity(ies)?

GoodMuyis:
MY TAKE ON YOUR METHOD
As a you teacher you should understand your student or audience and adjust your method or drilling and grilling, not everyone can take
My role on the thread was not that of a teacher, again I did not teach, but gave JMG1 a long and detailed period of questioning
JMG1 took well, he was doing well until he buckled under more lines of questioning and then switched from Dr Jekyll to Mr Hyde on me

Usually am not one to give up easily but at a particular point, I said to JMG1:
I haven't even started yet. I couldn't because we didn't get to start because questions I posed and about to pose to you were left inadequately answered, if at all any attempts were made to answer them.
It is until after you've answered the question(s) that sequential ones will be asked you.
Everything I asked you about is Bible based and will be bible backed, which is why I need honest answers or "I don't know" answers. When I counter give the answers then do

a Berean with it

GoodMuyis:
If you ask hard question any attempt should be appreciated and the wrong one properly corrected
https://www.nairaland.com/2705292/seeing-demons-angels-fallen-

angels/101#44552120
https://www.nairaland.com/2705292/seeing-demons-angels-fallen-angels/101#44582564
Revisit the above links to review how appreciations was given to the responses made

It is by questioning we arrive at the truth. Again, you fail to accept that, wrong answers to questions asked, werent intended or planned to be corrected on that threa

GoodMuyis:
Teaching is not all about telling the TRUTH, it more than that, but exposing your audience to the fact; digging the knowledge from observations 1st then experiences and

vice-versa, citing examples just to establish a point and pass the knowledge to the audience with expectation of their application
My role on the thread a
The problem on

that thread was that someone shouldnt have asked for the truth, if such wasnt ready for it
It was the truth that ended whatever relationship we had on that thread, I mentioned the bitter truth but many people didnt want to hear it
Who said I was teaching on that thread. My role wasnt teaching. I didnt teach nor did I get to a point to explain anything yet.
My role on the thread wasnt teaching, if you review the below links, you will notice that I merely was gradually exposing JMG1 to a few facts and truths using series of open,

closed, probing, leading questionings
https://www.nairaland.com/2705292/seeing-demons-angels-fallen-angels/101#44552120
https://www.nairaland.com/2705292/seeing-demons-angels-fallen-angels/101#44582564

GoodMuyis:
If your method are as you describe in your comment, than how would you deal with Youth Ministry where you find different characters?
There is an adage in yoruba "he who speak proverb at inlaw's house, will interpret it himself".
So if you ask drilling and grilling question it is expected of you to be ready to give

answers to your learner. But if you prefer to go by your method, not everyone is a slow learner, there are many who only need mark to make market, i.e. enlightenment and

they become more wiser, by the way knowledge is enlightenment
If I know you can handle the truth, I give and tell you the truth, straight up.
For most of the times, I dont spoon-feed or give outright answers on a silver platter just like that because truth wasnt handed to me on a platter
but rather via 2 Timothy 2:15 (i.e. approved unashamed workman rightly dividing the word of truth) and Acts 17:11 (i.e. Berean study)

When I go by, what you termed ''by your method'', this is done to gauge any on the other sides, understanding of a subject
and pin down where exactly they have lapses of understanding on the subject

''by your method'' is trying to stir up thinking for themselves, using the questionings, until arriving by themselves, at that face-palm golden moment of sudden realization of the truth

If not everyone can take it, then, is it that difficult to say: I dont know
That is all that is simply needed, to move on, just: I dont know

Now there is this other adage in Yoruba that says: ''Ti oogun eni ba dani loju, a ma nfi gba ori'',
so if you sincerely and truly believe in becoming wiser (i.e. making right decisions, words, comments, remarks etctera, at right time, and att God's right side)
and also believe that: ''knowledge is enlightenment'' (i.e. information that sheds light brings CHANGE)
then I give you the same offer JMG1 & holahmihdeh threw back in my face after trampling on it
My sweet darling brother you can report back here the outcome of our discussion
Trust me , it will be a John 8:32: Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.

GoodMuyis:
Lastly, the gifts from God are all gotten without ambiguity
Act 10:44 "While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word."
ROTBL, SMH, with this kind of remark and unjustly backing it up with this verse, you really expect the truth be told, straight up, just like that

I remember, before my another mention of your moniker,
asking JMG1 series of questions about why it was necessary that speaking with other tongues should occur etcetera

Permit me to reproduce some below:
1) Do you know that ''speaking in tongues'' or ''speak with other tongues'' as in the Bible IS NOT THE SAME AS what is widespread and generally accepted today to be?
2) Do you know why it was necessary that speaking with other tongues should occur when it occurred X amount times in the Bible?
3) Do you know what was the primary objective or goal for the time(s) that speaking with other tongues occurred in the Bible?
4) Do you know when speaking with other tongues occurred in the Bible who it was aimed at or meant for?
7) According to GoodMuyis, three years after her conversion, his late Aunt was firing praying tongue, now with best efforts, give a demonstration, explanation and example of ''if I pray in a tongue'' as in 1 Corinthians 14:14a above
Taken from: https://www.nairaland.com/2705292/seeing-demons-angels-fallen-angels/101#44552120

Gombs take note
Christianity Etc › Re: TB Joshua Prophecy On Saudi Arabia Comes True by MuttleyLaff: 1:28pm On Jul 17, 2016
petra1:
How do you define a false prophet.
https://s32.postimg.org/m6plb8iz9/Wolf_In_Sheeps_Clothing.jpg

SMH.
To what end will my definition of a false prophet serve you, hmm?

OK, to placate you, it is one who falsely claims the gift of prophecy or divine inspiration.
The bible believes that in the end times, they come in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves

For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine.
Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.
- 2 Timothy 4:3 NIV
Christianity Etc › Re: How We've Been Praying The Wrong Way All This Time by MuttleyLaff:
tyconcepts:
We already have an open cheque being Christians....."God said, ask ANYTHING in my name".
The ANYTHING in that sentence, is a hyperbole
because in the real sense, you're to ask for anything within reason, ask for anything within your remit
If you ask the wrong thing, ask the wrong way, ask the wrong side of God, ask the wrong time, ask the whatever left not mentioned and you'll be a long time waiting for request to be grant

Sukkot is not an attention seeker but a bohemian

tyconcepts:
Faith is our key as Christians....Its the hope/evidence for things not seen.
Prayer is the key, not faith
Faith is part of all the ingredients
Faith is part of a whole lot of other dynamics of getting prayers answered

tyconcepts:
A lot has to do with faith.
tyconcepts:
That's what we think....But doubt within kills faith.
Praying hard, having the biggest faith and zero doubts, wont stop you obeying the law of gravity, jumping of a tall storey building without a parachute

Click on a wrong part of any Nairaland page, hoping for a page load, is pointless
Such action of clicking or typing on a wrong section, of any Nairaland page is incapable of producing any useful result
because Seun (i.e. the god of Nairaland) hadnt coded anything to that section of the page to respond, obey or react to

STFUareyouG0d says below: Not all prayers are answered
Luke 18:1, Jesus teaches that men always ought to pray and not lose heart
This within reason, ask within your remit
Pray not the wrong thing, pray not the wrong way, pray not the wrong side of God, pray not at the wrong time,
in short, be 24/7 in communication with God without wavering
Christianity Etc › Re: Invitation by MuttleyLaff:
GoodMuyis:
@holahmihdeh @JMG1

Sorry for mentioning you here, I was tempted to start replying to M-uttley.Laff on the other thread, but thay same day was the day I commence studying the Book of timothy and I Got some lesson form 1Tim 1:3-4
I am just aware of this posting,
and I missed noticing the thread earlier than now because GoodMuyis bastardised my ID by adding - and . punctuations to it

Wonders never cease!
If GoodMuyis didn't sneakily bastardise the other holahmihdeh and JMG1 IDs mentioned in his post,
why I wonder did he had the need to sneakily bastardise my ID?

GoodMuyis:
Although I suppose the thread was to enlighten, strengthen and edify us,
but the it turns out that the Brother makes the topic of Holy Ghost a drilling exercise; when he suppose to guide those he feel were still lacking
Point of correction, it was the topic of speaking in tongues (i.e. the gift of speaking in a foreign human language) that was made into a drilling exercise by the Brother and not the topic of Holy Ghost
Nothing worth it's worth is found picked from the surface. Diamonds, gold, oil etcetera come about from drilling exercises

My mention of the Holy Ghost was about the ever-increasing measure and you-never-can-get-enough-of-it nature of the Holy Ghost.

This then spilled into JMG1's self-interest about speaking in tongues (i.e. the gift of speaking in a foreign human language)

The drilling questions were asked, so as to slowly and steadily chip away, piece by piece, the layers of misunderstanding and years of this particular false indoctrination
Afterall, Gandhi at one time about truth, said that:
Truth is by nature self-evident. As soon as you remove the cobwebs of ignorance that surround it, it shines clear.

At times, I dont spoon-feed or give outright answers on a platter, as my aim to whomsover is being grilled/drilled is to think for themselves
You can't solve a speaking-in-tongue problems with the same thinking you used when you created them
The lead on from one question(s) to another is to steer towards re-thinking to a point of having an I-get-it-light-bulb moment
JMG1 did an Agrippa-to-Paul- Almost-thou-persuadest-me version on me and baulked when he wrote:
Thank God am a born again Christian filled with the Holy Spirit,
if not I'll have started thinking you were right about me speaking nonsense.
Infact I almost believed you...


Some facts I shared in another recent thread shown below, has some of the answers I was expecting to hear, as responses to the posed drilling questions given to JMG1 & holahmihdeh on that thread
https://www.nairaland.com/3203214/what-does-it-mean-speak#47182013

Presenting and exposing some people to the truth almost never changes their minds, in fact, it can do just the opposite.
This was proven right on that thread as we had the two major protagonists on the speaking in tongues matter showing defiance
by responding defensively to this widely held and false belief of speaking in tongue
(i.e. their wrong idea and thinking of speaking in a foreign human language)

MuttleyLaff:
Write what you like in abuse of me but I know you're smart enough to know it has nothing to do with finally summoning spine to write

I am never at loss for a response. I had 99% of all those already written up but never got to allocating time to publish them
My confidence is silent, it's your insecurities that are loud
Goshen360 earlier told you he doesnt have your time,
I too, am very protective of my time, and prefer to prioritise what I used my time for
Sorry, posting rebuts on this thread obviously is at the bottom of the pecking order
https://www.nairaland.com/1456343/tithes-offerings-eternal-principles/33#46942264
Gombs:
like the time you protectively used in this thread "Seeing Demons, Angels, Fallen Angels, Spirits"? Yeah, right
https://www.nairaland.com/1456343/tithes-offerings-eternal-principles/33#46953599
Notice Gombs above goading me on another thread over my time given on the "Seeing Demons, Angels, Fallen Angels, Spirits" thread
but because wisdom prevailed, I didnt in a retaliatory manner gung ho respond to his veiled provocation

ROTBL, holahmihdeh, on the "Seeing Demons, Angels, Fallen Angels, Spirits" thread, even had the audacity of making a shameless throw away comment that I had copied and pasted. SMH, possibly accusing one of something she frequently does

Sometimes silence is more powerful than having the last word and that is what happened on the "Seeing Demons, Angels, Fallen Angels, Spirits" thread
Allowed the two protagonists to have the last word over the issue of speaking in tongue and wallow in their ignorance

GoodMuyis:
Dont get annoyed, lets love one another
Colossian 3:9 telling us not to lie to each other
and the instructive in Ephesian 4:15 telling us to speak the truth in love, is what encouraged me to comment on the OP saying believers recharge
etcetera and to counter the ''recharging'' misconception, so GoodMuyis none and/or no one should be annoyed.

Tough love is part and parcel of loving one another especially when people mistake confidence for ''trait of arrogance'' as my sweet darling brother JMG1 once put it
and are obstinate in misinterpreting a simple bible phenomenon or being very wrong for a long time in still misunderstanding it

The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.
- Winston Churchill
cc blueAgent
Christianity Etc › Re: TB Joshua Prophecy On Saudi Arabia Comes True by MuttleyLaff: 7:36am On Jul 10, 2016
petra1:
90% of Bible prophecies sounded bad . Prophets give warnings , they sound alarm from the place of watch
And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many
- Matthew 24:11 KJV

For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect
- Matthew 24:24 KJV
Christianity Etc › Re: Churches In China Forced To Surrender Tithes And Offerings To Government by MuttleyLaff: 11:04pm On Jul 09, 2016
petra1:
Not when the so called government is contrary to God .

Acts 4:18-20
And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus. But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye.
For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard
Do you accept that, it is not right, in the sight of God, to frighten with a curse, to force, to scare etcetera believers in Jesus Christ and the Gospel to pay tithe and offering?
Christianity Etc › Re: Bible Scholars Lets Discuss Eternal Security by MuttleyLaff: 10:50pm On Jul 05, 2016
Gombs:
Thanks for your time. I never thought you'd want to face your theological blunder head on.

Have a great day sir!
You simply just caught Image123 going through one of his indifference moments, that's all
and so shouldnt have had to form humble on him with this post nor waste away the ''Have a great day sir'' nicety on him
Christianity Etc › Re: Bible Scholars Lets Discuss Eternal Security by MuttleyLaff:
Image123:
Thinking hardly helps progress in spiritual matters. thinking makes many an atheist. When your understanding of God is based MORE on thinking, you will not get it. fact
I cannot believe reading you too making another generalised remark in this manner and especially an unguarded one in regards to thinking
What were you thinking or werent thinking, pun not intended
Maybe you meant doing thinking a wrong way or going about thinking the wrong way, hardly helps progress in spiritual matters

An unthinking person believes everything, but the prudent one thinks before acting
- Proverbs 14:15 ISV

Apart from Proverbs 14:15 above, God in Joshua 1:8, advises Joshua to mediate (i.e. think deeply) on ''spiritual matters''
King David in Psalm 119:15, said he mediates (i.e. reflects or thinks) on God's guiding principles and studies His ways
In Psalm 119:97, King David says, he so much love God's instructions he thinks about them all day long.

Does anyone discuss, argue or reason without thinking?
Thinking is acceptable, allowable, permitted or tolerable.
God in Isaiah 1:18, throws down the gauntlet with an invitation to THINK

The bible in Proverbs 4:5, says, get wisdom (i.e. get skillful at making good and right decisions), get understanding (i.e know the why, the how, the when etc)
Further on the bible persist in talking about wisdom, again, in Proverbs 4:7 that, wisdom is the principal thing (i.e. the summit); therefore get wisdom: and with all your getting get understanding

What can wisdom be if not something borne out from sensible or wise thinking
How does one make considered decisions over matters or come to sensible conclusions over issues, if not by, after or from thinking
Dead or alive, (i.e. dead in a parable or alive on earth) thinking of some or any sort is done

Now Image, if what you were on about is that, foolish thinking hardly helps progress in spiritual matters, then I am 120% gidigba-no-shaking with and behind you

If the bible in 1 Thessalonians 5:21 says, prove all things and hold fast that which is good
then how you'll going to prove things without critical thoughts about them

Am sure Image123, you arent one of those who associate enquiring minds' investigative and/or critical thinking with skepticism and criticism
Christianity Etc › Re: Bible Scholars Lets Discuss Eternal Security by MuttleyLaff:
Gombs:
Standing ovation.

Wonderful piece!

I'm thinking, what kind of father will disown his child because he stole sweets, and then reclaim him after the child has apologized, and keeps doing so, for how long?

Knowing fully well that the Bible said foolishness abounds in the heart of a child
The Bible is very clear of what sin(s) will bring forsaking about

Gombs:
The Corinthians and galatians were never said to have lost their salvation despite their shortfalls, for the ONLY WAY one can loose their salvation is the same way he got it - with his confession of mouth, denouncing the lordship of Christ.
Yep, add sin against the Holy Spirit too to this

Gombs:
Some folks here are sounding like God's waiting to catch us do wrong, then he'd keep record of it, waiting for pay back time.
Let's not be deceived, God's isnt waiting to catch us do wrong, then be keeping record of it, waiting for pay back time
God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man sows, that shall he also reap (i.e. cause and effect)

Gombs:
Brethren, God has settled the issue of sin in Jesus, since... And He has no issue with fixing it. Why He doesn't want us to sin is because we'd expose ourselves to the working of devils. He so loves us and wouldn't want the devil to have party time with us (kill, steal and destroy) , but we regardless sometimes fall off. That never means he revokes our SONSHIP, meaning we'd loose our very righteous nature given us by Jesus, pending when we ask for forgiveness. That doesn't make sense at all
You dont want to know who kill, steal and destroy is really all about?
That snippet from John 10:10 and the verse's context certainly wasnt talking about the devil?

Gombs:
The issue of sin is between the one who commits the sin, his conscience and the devil. God isn't bothered about sin, His laws and justice will however not be compromised.
ROTBL, I guess you means this in a generalised manner that ''God isn't bothered about sin''

God is big time bothered about sin. This whole sin issue existed before Adam.
Sin is a necessary evil allowed in Man's world for a greater good to come about.
God has promised that in the fullness of time, sin will be no more

https://s32.postimg.org/4eig85or9/eternal_Security.jpg

OP, petra1 asked:
Can a christian lose salvation by committing a sin

Reply to question was:
Yes according to Mark 3:28-29 and Matthew 12:31-32 particularly when it comes to missing the mark with the Holy Spirit
(i.e. sinning against the Holy Spirit)

28“Truly I say to you, all sins shall be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter;
29but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin''
- Mark 3:28-29

31Wherefore I say unto you,
All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men:
but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.
32And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him:
but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.
- Matthew 12:31-32

Lets sizzle this thread up a bit, and with one or two conundrums, make it a little bit more exciting
It is on record that Judas and Peter, both, committed a sin of betrayal or denial
Would any of both be found guilty of an eternal sin?
Would any of them not be forgiven, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.
Christianity Etc › Re: What Does It Mean To Speak In Tongues? by MuttleyLaff:
[size=3pt]Gombs - LOL ooo ybɒɘɿ ƨi booʇ ubudO ʇo idO[/size]
ministeriallist:
But am surprised the way speaking in tongues in being done today - uttering unintelligible words
You have every legitimate reason to be surprised because the way speaking in tongues is being done today - church folk, 21st century believers uttering unintelligible words is bable, confused noise made by a number of voices
This is not speaking in tongues (i.e. not speaking in a foreign language) but is mere babbling by unintelligible utterraces

It is the end time deception of the demonic spirit in Rev 16:13-14, symbolised as three unclean spirits that looked like frogs
And how do frogs catch their prey? Yes, using tongues to snare believers with their false speaking in tongues deception

ministeriallist:
Back to the question: what does it mean to speak in tongues?
To speak in tongues means audibly saying something out or make sounds with your voice to express your thoughts and feelings in a structured, conventional, intelligible and understandable way

Speak in tongues is language (i.e. tongues of man=human language)
and has the same meaning with mother tongue, native tongue, dialect, vernacular etcetera
For example, you can speak in vernacular, can speak in your local dialect, might speak in a native tongue or speak in your mother tongue

Dottore:
I am still surprised that no one since after biblical record of Acts chapter 2, has been able to achieve the feat of speaking in other tongues they didn't have prior knowledge of. Upon all the Born again and heavy radical dangerous 'anointing' being claimed everywhere.
Ordinarily there wouldn't be need for interpreters.
There is a time and a place for everything. Also there is always a reason for everything that happens or why it does not happen
Things do happen for a reason and what took place in Acts Chapter 2 happened importantly because of Acts 2:5
Place Acts 2:5 close together with Matthew 10:5-6, Matthew 15:24, Romans 1:16, especially for a comparison or contrast effect

1 Corinthians 14:22 confirms that, what took place in Acts Chapter 2, was for the benefit of any unbelieving Jews at Acts 2:5
The Jews (i.e. all adult Jewish men) thousands of them from different nations dispersed to or from where they are scattered to, would travel to Jerusalem for this pilgrim festival called Feast of Weeks or Pentecost to celebrate the giving of the Law to Moses at Mount Sinai

What took place in Acts Chapter 2, was for the benefit of the lot in Acts 2:5 and nothing to do for and/or with the lot in John 10:16

Dottore:
What you hear these days are some verbose cacophony from every quarter during prayers and all claim it's heavenly language that edifies their spirit.
ROTBL. You havent heard anything yet, you will fall off the chair if you are shown ''praying in tongues'' typed on Facebook

Dottore:
The major aim of speaking in tongues is to preach the gospel to people the way they will understand it.
Yes, absolutely, and it was apart from being a sign, was for the benefit of the unbelieving lost tribe of Israel pilgrim to the festival, who incidentally were always at the top of Jesus' list of priorities.

Dottore:
I really mean no harm, neither am I making an attempt to criticize anyone but I feel it's a challenge to anyone who claims to be born again.
How can you claim to be:
an English teacher when you don't know parts of speach
A doctor but you don't know symptoms of diseases
A mechanic but you don't know components of a vehicle. And so on
What has born again got to do with speaking in a different language
If you see the Kingdom of God, then you are born again.
Please carefully revisit John 3:1-15 (i.e. the conversation between Nichodemus and Jesus) to get the low-down on born again

Flexherbal:
It means : speaking the language the devil does not understand. For you speak not unto men but unto God.
No. Haba Chief, you've turned 1 Corinthians 14:2 on its head ooo

For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God:
for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries
- 1 Corinthians 14:2 KJV

Here is an illustration of what 1 Corinthians 14:2 is saying:
If you speak and understand only Ibo, but I, bilingual in Ibo and Hausa, start to speak, preach or pray in Hausa
Then the Hausa tongue or language would be unknown to you, you wouldnt understand what I said, preached or prayed in Hausa
I wouldnt be communicating with/to you, as it all be mysteries to you what I said, preached or prayed in Hausa
Only God will understand what I said, preached or prayed in Hausa, not you, as God understands all languages or tongues

ministeriallist:
Read Acts chapter 2
Yep if it was me I'll seriously go brush up my Bible, Acts Chapter 2 and all, to prevent truth decay

shadeyinka:
Hi
There are two kinds of tongues:

1. Glossa: When by faith you speak as it is put in your mind the syllable's put in your mind by your Spirit. Usually, no one understands this except God and whomever the Holy Spirit ministers the meaning to through Word of Knowledge, Interpretation of Tongue etc. ..my spirit prays but my mind is unfruitful
I throwe salute ooo but Glossa and Dialectos are interchangeable words because they literally mean the same thing (i.e. means language)

Anyway, one is not even meant to continue speaking in tongues if there are no interpretations or audience that understands what are being said, as the main reason for speaking in tongue or in a foreign language, is a sign, not for believers (i.e. sign not for church people) but for unbelievers (e.g. for atheists, agnostic, pagan etcetera)

shadeyinka:
2. Dialectos: When supernaturally your utterances whether in your language or in Glossa is translated:
a. You actually speak a real language to the benefit of a person or groups of persons.
b. Your words are interpreted i.e. You speak for instance in English language but your hearer(s) hear in their own language (Berom, Chinese, Malay etc). This was what took place in the book of Act2:
What took place in Acts 2, was the Apostles were actually speaking in the individual languages or dialects of the visiting Jews and each of the pilgrim Jews present, without need of interpretation, heard and understood the preaching

shadeyinka:
Dialectos is not common because it functions mainly in the mission fields where language barrier is a problem
It's so infrequent because it's original and primary purpose was for the benefit of the unbelieving lost sheep of Israel at Acts 2:5 and elsewhere before it got passed down to the church
Christianity Etc › Re: Bible Scholars Lets Discuss Eternal Security by MuttleyLaff:
petra1:
Is there such thing as eternal security
Yes, there is such thing as eternal security.
It is also known as eternal life

petra1:
What is eternal security
It a crowning moment, and happens at the end or completion of the following:
#1 saved,
#2 being saved and
#3 hope to be saved
https://s31.postimg.org/w25moseiz/eternal_Security.jpg

#1 saved as in:
For God says,
"At just the right time, I heard you. On the day of salvation, I helped you."
Indeed, the "right time" is now. Today is the day of salvation
- 2 Corinthians 6:2 NLT

We were given this hope when we were saved. (If we already have something, we don't need to hope for it.
- Romans 8:24 NLT

that even though we were dead because of our sins, he gave us life when he raised Christ from the dead. (It is only by God's grace that you have been saved!)
- Ephesians 2:5 NLT

#2 being saved as in:
Our lives are a Christ-like fragrance rising up to God. But this fragrance is perceived differently by those who are being saved and by those who are perishing.
- 2 Corinthians 2:15 NLT

and
#3 hope to be saved as in:
9Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.
10For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life
- Romans 5:9-10

11For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.
12Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble;
13Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.
14If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
15If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
- 1 Corinthians 3:11-15

Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
- Philippians 2:12 KJV

petra1:
Can a christian sin
Sin means missing the mark. Everyone, believers inclusive, now and/or then do miss the mark hence can and/or do sin

petra1:
Can a christian lose salvation
Yes, though saved, if such, without safely reaching the shore or harbor, due to sea sickness etcetera, jumps off a ship whilst being saved, then such would lose salvation, lose being saved and dash away any hope to be saved once reaching the shore or harbor

petra1:
Can a christian lose salvation by committing a sin
Yes particularly when it comes to missing the mark with the Holy Spirit
(i.e. sinning against the Holy Spirit)
28“Truly I say to you, all sins shall be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter;
29but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin''
- Mark 3:28-29

31Wherefore I say unto you,
All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men:
but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.
32And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him:
but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.
- Matthew 12:31-32

petra1:
How many times can a man be born again
This depends on how born again is used in this question.
If used, as a verb, then possibly and potentially more than one time
If it is used, as an adjective, in a similar way as Jesus did, then all it takes is one time only
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff:
openmine:
Bro u dey try ohhh....
Thats what they are...from pillar to post...
I hail you jaare.
Pillar to post indeed and their weak diversionary tactic attempts
Looks like you know Joagbaje and Gombs a whole deal more than I thought I did

openmine:
Shey he told u his "tithing" is based on a "kingdom principle" which has no backing from scripture?
Well he said Tithes And Offerings are Eternal Principles but OP never gave an explanation or responded to Goshen360 asking:When you say "eternal principles", what does that mean?

Him and his lackey Gombs wont accept that tithe and offering are eternal principles, comparable to and just as the law of gravity is an eternal principle
They dont want to see that, giving is an eternal principle too, comparable to the law of aerodynamics, another eternal principle like the law of gravity

Are not agreeing that the principle of giving and the law of aerodynamics are not just run-of-the-mill eternal principles
but they are better eternal principles than tithe, offering and the law of gravity are
and this why the principle of giving superseded tithe and offering principles
This is why there is no where in the Bible it is found Jesus or Paul calling whatever the believers give or are to give tithe or offering
Tithe and/or offering, deliberately are not words used in any of the original text when talking about the believers' giving and/or collection

One or two religiously motivated and ulterior motive bible translations (e.g. TLP etcetera) have doctored original texts by inserting offering into their translation versions, in order to falsify the original content and deceive unsuspecting congregation for unclean personal gain or filthy lucre

What Joagbaje and Gombs dont want hear and accept is that giving, another eternal kingdom principle, has taken over, has taken the place of the old and no longer useful tithe and/or offering principles

Also Joagbaje and Gombs dont want hear and dont want to accept that the action or state of forcing or being forced to give tithe or do offering has been replaced with the principle of giving
Principle of giving, as meaning, freely transfering the possession of something or anything to someone, another or anyone without compulsion, manipulation or need of using curse or scare tactics and false information

Principle of giving is an easy and simpler doctrine to teach
The principle of giving, unlike the tithe & offering principles, has no hang-ups, it doesnt give anyone nightmares nor anxiety from not giving
The principle of giving, unlike the tithe & offering principles, it doesnt give you cause to feel worried, afraid, scared, frightened or embarrassed from not giving
The principle of giving for the believer has no penalties.
If you give, dey-dey, if you no give, dey-dey, God no dey vex

The principle of giving is a narrow gate, only few ever recognise or find it's narrow gate and this mainly because the principle of giving is often misunderstood.
For some like Joagbaje and Gombs, if or when the principle of giving's narrow gate is found, indoctrination makes it impossible to approach the gate.
For another lot, even if switched into, find it difficult to stay on the principle of giving road, so they exit to return back to the tithe & offering principles highway wide gate.

Just because the principle of giving path isnt always understandable, doesnt mean it is not a better and right path than the tithe & offering principle' highway
Avoid the tithe & offering principles highway with its gate that is wide for the Joagbaje and Gombs many who choose it's way
Exercise faith, by coming off this tithe & offering principles worn and beaten track for the principle of giving narrow gate

The tithe & offering principles have a gravitational pull and the properties to weigh down anyone clinging to or embracing them
but the principle of giving cancels out all gravitational pull, lifts you on to great heights, allowing you to soar.

So like the Wright brothers, did with the law of aerodynamics, dont be afraid to take unaccustomed paths, such as one like the principle of giving path, a right path approved by God, because it's always right unaccustomed paths that takes one to the best and high places
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 10:12am On Jun 26, 2016
Gombs:
Hehehehehheh... E pain am. It's good you finally summoned the spine to write something
Write what you like in abuse of me but I know you're smart enough to know it has nothing to do with finally summoning spine to write

I am never at loss for a response. I had 99% of all those already written up but never got to allocating time to publish them
My confidence is silent, it's your insecurities that are loud
Goshen360 earlier told you he doesnt have your time,
I too, am very protective of my time, and prefer to prioritise what I used my time for
Sorry, posting rebuts on this thread obviously is at the bottom of the pecking order

Gombs:
Ehen, Joagbaje that hardmirror guy refused giving me names of folks he mentioned in his fairy tale. I wanted to do a Christine Amanpour on him, I feel he's a total scam. Abi be ko?
https://s31.postimg.org/598wew1q3/Gomb_Like_This.jpg
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 8:21am On Jun 26, 2016
Joagbaje:
^^^^^^
Hmmm finally summoned some courage to come out of hiding
SMH.
There's nothing quite like seeing a tool, behaving as expected, posting a silly remark as one like this and mistaking my silence for weakness or lack of courage

If you havent and dont understand my words, am not surprised you dont understand the intermission and silence

Next time, try ''Hmmm finally found time and/or a suitable period to publish a rebut''

Joagbaje:
That's nice
Yep will be nice and will be with great delight to have your self-conceited person for breakfast, lick, chew and crunch the bones before spitting them out
Politics › Re: Princess Aderemi Adebowale Packs Refuse In Lagos This Morning by MuttleyLaff: 11:44pm On Jun 25, 2016
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 10:08pm On Jun 25, 2016
Gombs:
smiley

you are really getting it fantastically wrong.

I hope you know collection is a form of giving? undecided

grin grin grin grin grin
Wonderful

..and a doctrine is birthed already grin grin grin

This was where i was heading to. It's shameful and a huge disgust that Christian brothers will go this lenght to refute a claim for either their selfish reasons or ignorance. Goshen360 said same (I've always thought you write and argue like his sha), and i schooled him properly, he didnt drop by afterwards. I'd just paste the link here, especially for those following this discourse.

https://www.nairaland.com/2824312/eat-tithe-before-lord/3#45001714

He made ridiculous claims as you just did, notably the following

1. Giving is giving NOT offerings.
2. Contributions can come in form of giving but not offerings .

and many others...let me ask you what I asked him...
my question is, Is GIFTS different from GIVINGS which is also different from OFFERINGS?? The greek words here are dosis (Phil 4:15), domah (Matt 7:11)and Prosphora (Rom 15:16). ALL these greek words have one thing in common... the word Gift.

So, was Paul's techings on Collections as you call it and not gifts as in gifts, giving and offerings?


there is another word "Collection", it appeared once (or twice if you count it as 1 corith 16:1 & 2) in the NT, and the greek is Logia, which means money gathered for the relief of the poor, you'd see that in 1 Corinthians 16:1, which brings me to the latter part of my question, for we know what you termed contribution or collection was not gathered for the relief of the poor... except the Pastor said it is initially to the brethren before the givings are done.

Wrong! A thousand times wrong.

Moses' law was't strictly agricultural produce, monies were involved. Let me explain

There were only two types of income that were tithable: One was from agricultural production.

"All the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land, or of the fruit of the tree, is the Lord’s" (Leviticus 27:30).

This meant that a tenth of all agricultural produce of the land of Israel, whether fruits or vegetables, had to be tithed.

The second type of tithable income was the increase of animals. "All the tithe of the herd or flock, whatsoever passeth under the rod, the tenth shall be holy unto the Lord" (verse 32). Only these two specific income producers were subject to the tithe IN THE LAW OF MOSES.

There was, however, one exception to this rule. Leviticus 27:31 reads: "If a man will redeem ought of his tithe, he shall add unto it the fifth part thereof." In other words, if a man for various reasons did not wish to pay his tithe in kind (and he wished to give money as a substitute), he was penalized a fifth part.


Y'all should drop the tithe collector brouhaha, and that monies were never involved, but just crops.

There are many instructions for sacrifice throughout the Pentateuch, but Leviticus chapters 1-7 is completely dedicated to the 5 Levitical offerings which were the main sacrifices used in the rituals. They describe 5 kinds of sacrifices: The burnt offering, the meal offering, the peace offering, the sin offering, and the trespass offering . Each of the sacrifices were uniquely fulfilled in Jesus Christ.

But Paul talked about some kind of givings (some translations used offerings), he also taught on the conditions for giving, and the benefits...My question is, is how then is giving not same as offerings, when in the greek, they both mean GIFTS? Is collections (as you lot call it) the giving Paul was talking about? What of that of Peter and Ananias? Was it collections too? (Note: I've explained the word collection according tot he greek

He doesn't do them because Jesus already did it for him, not because it was tagged offering.

note, some churches gave Paul monies to do the work of ministry, that was a gift, like Jesus received from Suzanna, Joanna and co. It was monies given for a specific reason, it was for their needs (Pocket money, shaving money, okada money, Amala ati ewedu dinner, Tax money, etc).... and it was for his personal purpose. This can be termed seed, gift, giving AND offerings. No point calling it collection, for the bible clearly defined collection in 1Corinthians 16:1

QUIZ:
Paul wrote, that his offering up of the gentiles might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost... The greek word translated offering there is Prosphora, which means,giftor ....a present! Why say then that givings (gifts) is different from offering (gifts)? Don't you see offerings, givings is different from collection as the bible states?

so, then i ask, If tithes are done away with, what about offerings?
https://s32.postimg.org/iu8v5e1et/Two_Rabbits.pnghttps://s32.postimg.org/ymw8bz2xt/Chase_Rabbit.gifhttps://s32.postimg.org/u2a1x1j8h/Chase2rabbits.jpg
Wish I could rip this post to shreds but wisdom prevails
About Goshen360, ''ẹjẹ lo nrun'', as he is my brother from another mother, that is why we say same (i.e. write and argue educate alike sha)
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff:
Joagbaje:
Dont let your words be too many
SMH. What would cause anyone to want to avoid information?
Information overload is always the main challenge for the learning fear, knowledge fear or wisdom fear anyway

Joagbaje:
I meant to write (TLB) not NLT I wonder why you make a big deal out of just that
Please be fair and honest brother, tell the truth and put the devil to shame
Did I make a big deal out of ''just that'' brother?
No, I asked that you compare and contrast your 1 Corinthians 16:2 (NLT) with my 1 Corinthians 16:2 (NLT)
adding that only God knows why
and how you managed to doctor in a non-existent offering wording, into that 1 Corinthians 16:2 New Living Translation (NLT) verse.
before SMH, saying you tried, and shifting my heinie for you

I made ''a big deal out of'' other things with you in that post, exposing you to a few incontrovertible truths, like:
#1 You better start accepting that, no where in the Bible does Jesus or Paul call whatever the believers give, offering.
Now, you saved your hide by not trying to sought solace or comfort in Acts 24:17
#2 Please reproduce all translations of 2 Corinthians 9:2 or any other translations of 2 Corinthians 9:2 with offering in the verse
#3 Recognise that the bible is a book of divisions
It is a book of divisions because it has different parts for different people, like for the Jew (i.e. Israelites) for the Gentile and to the Church ( i.e. the called out ones)
There are some parts in the bible where it speaks only to the Jew (i.e. Israelites) and it wasnt speaking to the Gentile and vice versa
there are equally some other parts in the bible, where it specifically speaks to the Gentile and it wasn't speaking to the Church etcetera and vice versa
#4 What I am trying to get across here simply is this. DON'T COVET, ''ma fẹjumọ ọrọ ọlọrọ'', especially parts of the Bible, like those part(s) belonging to another
#5 21st century believers have been indoctrinated to covet verses such as like these abandoned tithe or offering principles, like coveting passages not talking to them but was talking to others
Such bad and misled behaviours are damaging and detriment to a believer enjoying fulfilment based on better principles established in charis (i.e. grace), generosity, altruism, agape and others found in Galatian 5:22-23
# Lastly made a big deal about, wondering, if the Wright brothers were fantastically bought into the law of gravity eternal principle so much as to refuse appreciating or acknowledging the law of aerodynamics which is not only just another eternal principle but is a better one, taking anyone seizing the opportunity & who doesnt want to remain grounded to heights (no pun was intended), would Pastor Chris Oyakhilome have arrived London in a private jet, receive red carpet red suited guards of honour presidential welcome at an airport with a rolls royce to pick him up

Joagbaje:
1 Corinthians 16:2(TLB )
On every Lord's Day each of you should put aside something from what you have earned during the week, and use it for this offering.
The amount depends on how much the Lord has helped you earn. Don't wait until I get there and then try to collect it all at once
https://s31.postimg.org/cypg8llcb/1_Corinthians_16_2.jpg
This immediately above screen grab, is the Greek-English interlinear New Testament 1 Corinthians 16:2 Berean Literal Bible
The λογεῖαι (i.e. money gave) is called collection and not offering. It speaks volumes brother.

Joagbaje:
We shall get there
Waiting with baited breath, seriously though cant wait for us to get there

Joagbaje:
I'm sure by checking the reference "offering" you saw that and you realized you've made a mistake
When we have the true information about the original texts there is no need to check any reference ''offerring'' sic, and I am beatifully glad you put ''offering'' in double quotes

Joagbaje:
and since you wouldn't want retrieve your "revelation" which means concession, the best thing you probably thought as a way out is to destroy or rubbish the evidence
This is New Testament 101, it is not ''revelation''
You can't see the wood for the trees, please clear the phantoms in the head, grasp reality and stop being a drowning man grasping at straws
I do not have to destroy or rubbish your phantom evidence, because the facts speak for themselves.
If money is needed, arrange or call for a giving or collection, do not hide under the cloak of tithe and/or offering which is a pretense
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff:
Joagbaje:
Really ?

1 Corinthians 16:2 (NLT)
On every Lord's Day each of you should put aside something from what you have earned during the week, and use it for this offering
Yes really, no not just really but a 120% really
and not with your fabricated 1 Corinthians 16:2 (NLT) evidence
because this below is what Paul with a 1 Corinthians 16:2 New Living Translation (NLT) actually says:

On the first day of each week, you should each put aside a portion of the money you have earned.
Don't wait until I get there and then try to collect it all at once
- 1 Corinthians 16:2 New Living Translation (NLT)

Compare and contrast your 1 Corinthians 16:2 (NLT) with my 1 Corinthians 16:2 (NLT)

Only God knows why
and how you managed to doctor in a non-existent offering wording, into that 1 Corinthians 16:2 New Living Translation (NLT) verse.
SMH, you try, I shift my heinie for you

Joagbaje:
Really?
2 Corinthians 9:2
For I know how eager you are to do it, and I have boasted to the friends in Macedonia that you were ready to send an offering a year ago. In fact, it was this enthusiasm of yours that stirred up many of them to begin helping.
Of course really again now. Are you surprised?
You better start accepting that no where in the Bible does Jesus or Paul call whatever the believers give offering
Now, you saved your hide by not trying to sought solace or comfort in Acts 24:17

Oya, please reproduce all translations of 2 Corinthians 9:2 or any other translations of 2 Corinthians 9:2 with offering in the verse

Joagbaje:
Brother, whatever you offer to God is an offering. Either it's money, material, souls, ministry or our lives
SMH superficial and non-serious remarks like this is an indictment of biblical literacy

Joagbaje:
We should avoid redefinition of words to suit theology
This thread was opened with a misguided ''Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles'' title
and the original post kicked off with a misapprehension of Galatians 3:7 and put it to a wrong use when aligned with a teasing and poor taste ''many posters and tithers have deeper understanding of these things better now. . . To be continued in a moment'' remark

How I wish and pray you take to your own words about ''avoid redefinition of words to suit theology'' in your last sentence
You would be a wiser person, taking the right choice, at the right time and still be at God's right side, if you do

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
- 2 Timothy 2:15

2 Timothy 2:15 is referenced above because I want it to be recognised that the bible is a book of divisions
It is a book of divisions because it has different parts for different people, like for the Jew (i.e. Israelites) for the Gentile and to the Church ( i.e. the called out ones)
There are some parts in the bible where it speaks only to the Jew (i.e. Israelites) and it wasnt speaking to the Gentile and vice versa
there are equally some other parts in the bible, where it specifically speaks to the Gentile and it wasn't speaking to the Church etcetera and vice versa

What I am trying to get across here simply is this. Dont covet, ma fejumo oro oloro, especially parts of the Bible, like those something(s) belonging to another
21st century believers have been indoctrinated to covet verses such as like these abandoned tithe or offering principles, like coveting passages not talking to them but was talking to others
Such bad and misled behaviours are damaging and detriment to a believer enjoying fulfilment based on better principles established in charis (i.e. grace), generosity, altruism, agape and others found in Galatian 5:22-23

https://s33.postimg.org/c12yz2wlb/Chris_Jet.gif
I wonder if Pastor Chris Oyakhilome would have arrived London in a private jet, receive red carpet red suited guards of honour presidential welcome at an airport with a rolls royce to pick him up, if the Wright brothers were fantastically bought into the law of gravity eternal principle so much as to refuse appreciating or acknowledging the law of aerodynamics which is not only just another eternal principle but is a better one, taking anyone seizing the opportunity & who doesnt want to remain grounded to heights (no pun was intended)
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 3:15pm On Jun 05, 2016
Joagbaje:
Offering is not connected to Isreal. Offering existed before Isreal did. The name "offering" alone defines itself except of course you just don't want to accept the reality
Of course
and importantly, the word offering, from Abel to Cain, from Abraham to the Widow at Zarephath, back to back, has always being about or had to do with agricultural produce only (e.g. animals, crops, food or a son) with the exception of the Israelites' trespassing offering, where restitution is not only done but includes adding 20% of the original value in silver money to the offering for violation or trespassing done.

You've have so far been careful
but if this thread was opened up for an entitlement to money under the guise of tithe and offering
you will soon make a slip, be found out and be betrayed by it

Accept the reality that altruistic action or to give, is what Jesus preached
and cheerful giving or collection without compulsion, is what Paul preached
No where in the Bible does Jesus or Paul call whatever the believers give offering

If money is needed, simply ask people to give, teach them on the principle of giving or just arrange for a collection
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff:
Joagbaje:
What is offering
MuttleyLaff:
Offering was a habitual practice done by the Israelites, it primarily involved agricultural produce (e.g. animal and food) as money was never exchanged except for when it is a trespass offering, and that is where restitution is not only done but includes adding 20% of the ''holy thing's'' or the ''neighbor property's'' original value in silver money for violating it or trespassing against it

That historically in a sentence, is what offering is. Capisce
Joagbaje:
Wrong
Why say wrong?

Joagbaje:
Whatever you offer God is an offering
And what kind of offering is this?
What is this ''whatever-you-offer-God-is-an-offering'' called?

We know that the Israelites, where commanded to give tithe and when, where and if applicable, were explicitly asked to do offering(s)
but nothing of such compulsion is required from believers than to freely give without being under duress

Lets call a spade a spade. Whatever believers ''offer'' is not called offering but is simply called giving or collection
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff:
Joagbaje:
What is offering
Offering was a habitual practice done by the Israelites, it primarily involved agricultural produce (e.g. animal and food) as money was never exchanged except for when it is a trespass offering, and that is where restitution is not only done but includes adding 20% of the ''holy thing's'' or the ''neighbor property's'' original value in silver money for violating it or trespassing against it

That historically in a sentence, is what offering is. Capisce
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 6:55am On Jun 05, 2016
Joagbaje:
I didn't ask what kinds of offerings
It was served you as a FYI in order to show that offering is now give, giving or collection

Joagbaje:
In one sentence, what is an offering. Honestly shouldn't have any problem to answer in one sentence
Honestly I had already written about what offering is in one sentence and in more than one ocassion.

Again in God's greater grander or overall scheme of things, believers, rise above with another principle which by no accident is better, higher and worked out in conformity with the purpose of God's plan.

God has simplified things for us now and replaced all those various kinds of offerings practised by the Israelites with single plain outright giving

Jesus, Paul et al, when addressing the people, except for the Pharisees, never encouraged tithing or offering but were always harping on give, giving or collection
They chose their words right and correctly, as they were deliberate and careful not to use words like tithing or offering to the people but instead used give, giving or collection

Man does not do offering as was practised by the Israelites or have to put a name to an offering as was practised by the Israelites
because Man has come of age and so now worships God with à la no frills give, giving or collection only
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 12:28am On Jun 05, 2016
Joagbaje:
WHAT IS AN OFFERING
Now, go ahead and tell me I havent already given the low-down on offering, the various kinds etcetera.
Though you prevaricate, duck and dive when asked pointed questions, you can redeem yourself by finding out what an offering is, answer the pointed questions asked you from going back to:
https://www.nairaland.com/1456343/tithes-offerings-eternal-principles/32#46256384
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff:
Joagbaje:
We don't need any special law as Christians to add to what is already a principle in Gods kingdom
This is an obstinate, a ''refuse to think deep enough'' or an unaware remark
It is a remark stemming from an underlined suggestion that because gravity is already a principle in God's scheme of things, we don't need aerodynamics to add to gravity. SMH

In God's greater grander or overall scheme of things, believers, rise above with another principle which by no accident is better, higher and worked out in conformity with the purpose of God's plan.

Joagbaje:
Tithes and offering are principles of the kingdom. Man will always worship God with offerings
The Bible, Jesus. Paul and others teaches that believers giving is an act of worship.

God has simplified things for us now and replaced all those various kinds of offerings practised by the Israelites with single plain outright giving

Jesus, Paul et al, when addressing the people, except for the Pharisees, never encouraged tithing or offering but were always harping on give, giving or collection
They chose their words right and correctly, as they were deliberate and careful not to use words like tithing or offering to the people but instead used give, giving or collection

Man does not do offering as was practised by the Israelites or have to put a name to an offering as was practised by the Israelites
because Man has come of age and so now worships God with à la no frills give, giving or collection only

Joagbaje:
Whatever you offer God is an offering
And what kind of offering is this?
What is this whatever-you-offer-God offering called?

Lets call a spade a spade. Whatever believers ''offer'' is not called offering but is simply called giving or collection

Offering as was practised by the Israelites involved agricultural produce e.g. animal and food. Money didnt exchange hands except only and particularly with trespass offering

Do you do burnt offering/ordination (or cereal and grain) offering, the meal offering/the drink offering, the peace offering/freewill (or vow, wave and thanksgiving) offering, the sin offering or the trespass offering like the Israelites used to do?

No, you don't and/or can't do any of them, and that is because these are well defined and tagged offerings which exclusively fell within the remit of the Israelites, formerly practised by them alone, based on and because of the Levitical law(s)
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 6:53am On Jun 04, 2016
brocab:
No I was only suggesting at the time of my post. If you don't like the support It's ok.
Haba Chief, kilode, it hasnt come to ''If-you-don't-like-the-support-It's-ok'' now
There was my mention in that remark, and though I responded to it, I wasn't actually sure who it was addressed to, that is why out of curiousty and without animosity I asked who it was addressed to

Welcome aboard. The more the merrier against all these tithe and offering misconceptions that Satan particularly wants people to believe in
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 7:19am On Jun 03, 2016
brocab:
A good question to put across, Are we Israelites or are we Gentiles?
It doesnt matter now if we are Israelites or we are Gentiles

brocab:
And where in the bible does it say Christians are to tithe?
Is this last question addressed to me too?
It is very clear that in the Bible, the only group of people explicitly told to pay tithes are the Israelites
And there is a very good & valid reason for God staking a claim
and bolding asserting a right to the tenth of all agricultural produce from the Israelites

Joagbaje:
where did it say christians should give offerings?
Nowhere!.
That there, smack on, is the point
It doesnt anywhere say believers should give offerings, just as it neither anywhere says believers should should pay tithe

As is seen in 2 Corinthians 8:12 & 2 Corinthians 9:7, believers have moved on past tithe and offering, to better eternal principles

2 Corinthians 8:12 For if the willingness is there, the gift is acceptable according to what one has, not according to what one does not have
2 Corinthians 9:7 Each of you should give whatever you have decided. You shouldn't be sorry that you gave or feel forced to give, since God loves a cheerful giver
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 7:18am On Jun 02, 2016
Joagbaje:
You tried thanks for stopping by. cool
Not me, you tried, we tried. Thanks for your sportsmanship displayed cool
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff: 6:40am On Jun 02, 2016
Joagbaje:
Was wondering if your post needs replying. Seems you're out of options
I was wondering if you can handle body blows and do understand your situation, in that you're receiving too much information at one time and cannot think about them or dont have the time to properly think over them
Makes you fell like a boxer in a boxing ring being pummelled mercilessly against the ropes

Again, apart from the facts in Numbers 18:24 and/or from Deuteronomy 8:17-18 why did God demand tithing from the Israelites or why did the Israelites have to tithe?
Do you know why specifically, tithing became an established command for the Israelites?

Joagbaje:
Read Gen from chapter . Leviticus. . Mattew you will have better understanding of my communication. Aha Malachi 3. Heb 4-7.
Every single chapter in the Bible is a hit. From Genesis to Malachi, Matthew to Revelation is a hit. Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt back to back.

If tithes and offerings are eternal principles, do you accept that gravity and aerodynamics as well, are external principles too?
Well the thing is, tithing is rendered unnecessary by another principle, just as gravity is rendered inoperative and unnecessary by another principle (i.e. aerodynamics)
Tithing prohibits or prevents believers who are tithe partisans from flying. You cant rise high in the air with gravity. There is a better law, there is a better eternal principle...
That is the decisive or most important point countering the assumptions in the thread and in your postings

Read Hebrews 7:18-19, you'll have a better understanding of my communication and any psychological dependence on tithing will easily be overcomed
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithes And Offerings Are Eternal Principles by MuttleyLaff:
Joagbaje:
what does Deuteronomy 14:24-26 say pls?
Feign ignorance on what does Deuteronomy 14:24-26 say for as long as you like.
but why arent I not surprised thsat again you're not answering the question(s)

Joagbaje:
Abraham is father of faith, who's faith we follow
SMH LOL, first, you're demostrating biblical illiteracy on the subject of tithing, if you are connecting the phrase ''Abraham is father of faith'' with tithing.
The long and the short of ''Abraham is father of faith'' has nothing whatsoever to do with tithing

SMH, ''Abraham is father of faith, who's faith we follow'' you say, OK Abraham's faith in what gangan are you following?

Joagbaje:
Tithing is a principle in Gods kingdom he believes in
This is very interesting, because tithing was a practice common and prevalent in the society Abraham lived then, even as a matter of fact, tithing existed or was practised earlier than when Abraham first and only one time tithed

Even if what you say is true, it then begs the question, why didnt Abraham continue tithing? Why didnt Abraham tithe more than once?

Joagbaje:
Where did scripture say so.
Never mind if it is strange to you, because it doesnt matter as by your own admission you arent practising the Israelites
The Abraham tithing one you are doing you arent even following it to the letter

Joagbaje:
So you agreed people bought back which means they used money to pay
That is besides the point except if you accept that there is a 20% penalty or surcharge to the original value

Had to go to great lengths to tease out of you that you are practising the Abraham 10% tithing and not practising the Israelites 23 two-third% whole tithing
Now you would now appreciate the probing questions asked you, were done, in order to set boundaries, to establish what form of tithing or whose form of tithing you are practising

It is evident that what you are practising is a hotchpotch and nothing close to the Abraham style or type of tithing you declared doing

Joagbaje:
What does the scripture say in those verses? Kindly quote them out for us to read. Thanks
SMH. Why don't I just altogether drop everything I am doing to kindly quote them out for all to read!
Or maybe I can read it out at bed time
Re-read the post all over again. It's quoted in it. Done already but then pretend again as much as you like

You obviously are one with an averse to receiving too much information or data.
You cant, at a go, handle a lot of information or questioning, (e.g. apart from the facts in Numbers 18:24 and/or from Deuteronomy 8:17-18, why did the Israelites have to tithe? Did Jacob tithe? Why didnt Jacob tithe? etcetera) which is why I've had to resort to holding back
and be biding jumping moment in this Double Dutch (jump rope)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 (of 441 pages)